Objective: To determine whether functional vision and visual function improvements after voretigene neparvovec (VN; LUXTURNA®, Spark Therapeutics, Inc.) administration in subjects with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal disease are maintained at 3-4 years, and to review safety outcomes.
Design: Open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial.
Subjects: Thirty-one individuals were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to intervention (n=21) or control (n=10). One subject from each group withdrew before, or at, randomization.
Methods: Subjects in the original intervention (OI) group received bilateral subretinal VN injections. Delayed intervention (DI) subjects served as controls for 1 year, then received VN.
Main outcome measures: Change from injection baseline in bilateral performance on the multi-luminance mobility test (MLMT), a measure of ambulatory navigation, and change from injection baseline in full-field light sensitivity threshold (FST) white light, visual field (VF), and visual acuity (VA).
Results: Mean bilateral MLMT change scores at Year 4 for OI subjects and at Year 3 for DI subjects were 1.7 and 2.4 respectively, with 71% of subjects with a Year 3 visit able to pass MLMT at the lowest light level. Mean change in FST white light, averaged over both eyes at Year 4 for OI subjects, and at Year 3 for DI subjects, was -1.90 log10(cd.s/m2) and -2.91 log10(cd.s/m2), respectively. Mean change in Goldmann kinetic VF III4e sum total degrees, averaged across both eyes, was 197.7 at Year 4 for OI subjects and 157.9 at Year 3 for DI subjects. Mean change in VA (Holladay scale), averaged across both eyes, was -0.003 logMAR at Year 4 for OI subjects and -0.06 logMAR at Year 3 for DI subjects. One OI subject had a retinal detachment around Year 4, which impacted VA for the OI group. No product-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred, and there were no deleterious immune responses.
Conclusions: Improvements in ambulatory navigation, light sensitivity, and VF were consistent in both intervention groups. Overall, improvements were maintained up to 3-4 years, with ongoing observation. The safety profile of VN was consistent with vitrectomy and the subretinal injection procedure, and was similar between intervention groups, with no product-related SAEs reported.