Trial of an anti-inflammatory agent (indomethacin) in low back pain with and without radicular involvement.
Journal: 1968/September - British Medical Journal
ISSN: 0007-1447
PUBMED: 4232743
Abstract:
A short-term double-blind sequential trial of indomethacin against placebo in the treatment of low back pain, with and without nerve root pain such as sciatica, showed that indomethacin was significantly more effective than placebo in the group with nerve root pain. On the other hand, no difference was found between the treatments in the patients with uncomplicated low back pain. This difference may result from an effect of indomethacin on the inflammatory process around the nerve root which has been shown to be present when this is compressed.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(3)
References
(7)
Diseases
(1)
Conditions
(3)
Drugs
(1)
Chemicals
(1)
Organisms
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Br Med J 3(5611): 158-160

Trial of an Anti-inflammatory Agent (Indomethacin) in Low Back Pain with and without Radicular Involvement

Abstract

A short-term double-blind sequential trial of indomethacin against placebo in the treatment of low back pain, with and without nerve root pain such as sciatica, showed that indomethacin was significantly more effective than placebo in the group with nerve root pain. On the other hand, no difference was found between the treatments in the patients with uncomplicated low back pain. This difference may result from an effect of indomethacin on the inflammatory process around the nerve root which has been shown to be present when this is compressed.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (546K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hart FD, Boardman PL. Indomethacin and phenylbutazone: a comparison. Br Med J. 1965 Nov 27;2(5473):1281–1284.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • IRSIGLER FJ. Mikroskopische Befunde in den Rückenmarkswurzeln beim lumbalen und lumbosakralen (dorsolateralen) Diskusprolaps. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1951;1(4-5):478–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rothermich NO. An extended study of indomethacin. II. Clinical therapy. JAMA. 1966 Mar 28;195(13):1102–1106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SUNSHINE A, LASKA E, MEISNER M, MORGAN S. ANALGESIC STUDIES OF INDOMETHACIN AS ANALYZED BY COMPUTER TECHNIQUES. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1964 Nov-Dec;5:699–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson M, Percy JS. Further experience with indomethacin in the treatment of rheumatic disorders. Br Med J. 1966 Jan 8;1(5479):80–83.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WANKA J, JONES LI, WOOD PH, DIXON AS. INDOMETHACIN IN RHEUMATIC DISEASES. A CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL. Ann Rheum Dis. 1964 May;23:218–225.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WINTER CA, RISLEY EA, NUSS GW. ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND ANTIPYRETIC ACTIVITIES OF INDOMETHACIN, 1-(P-CHLOROBENZOYL)-5-METHOXY-2-METHYLINDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1963 Sep;141:369–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Abstract
A short-term double-blind sequential trial of indomethacin against placebo in the treatment of low back pain, with and without nerve root pain such as sciatica, showed that indomethacin was significantly more effective than placebo in the group with nerve root pain. On the other hand, no difference was found between the treatments in the patients with uncomplicated low back pain. This difference may result from an effect of indomethacin on the inflammatory process around the nerve root which has been shown to be present when this is compressed.
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.