Comparison of coronary angiographic narrowing in stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, and in acute myocardial infarction.
Journal: 1995/August - American Journal of Cardiology
ISSN: 0002-9149
PUBMED: 7618611
Abstract:
Coronary angiographic findings were compared in patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 75), unstable angina pectoris (UAP, n = 36), or stable angina pectoris (SAP, n = 36) for>> or = 2 years without evidence of any previous acute event and with an angiogram within 2 years of the initial symptoms. Angiograms were evaluated blindly for severity, extent (depending on the percentage of each coronary segment showing atherosclerosis), and pattern (discrete, < 3 loci of narrowings involving < 50% of any segment; diffuse, anything exceeding this). Patients in the SAP group had more narrowed arteries (2.4 +/- 0.7 vs 1.3 +/- 0.6 [p < 0.02] and 1.4 +/- 0.6 [p < 0.02]), more stenoses (6.0 +/- 3.3 vs 2.1 +/- 1.5 [p < 0.01] and 2.6 +/- 1.7 [p < 0.05]) and occlusions (1.3 +/- 1.1 vs 0.7 +/- 0.6 [p = 0.05] and 0.3 +/- 0.5 [p < 0.02]), and a greater extent index (0.9 +/- 0.5 vs 0.5 +/- 0.3 [p < 0.02] and 0.5 +/- 0.3 [p < 0.02]) than those in the AMI and UAP groups. Furthermore, a discrete pattern was less prevalent in patients with UAP than in those with SAP or AMI (3% vs 40% [p < 0.02] and 25% [p < 0.05], respectively). In conclusion, patients who present with acute coronary syndromes have less extensive atherosclerosis than those who present with chronic stable angina. Therefore, in the former group, coronary atherosclerosis appears to be more susceptible to ischemic stimuli responsible for acute coronary syndromes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Relations:
Citations
(3)
Diseases
(2)
Conditions
(2)
Organisms
(1)
Anatomy
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.