Cochlear Implant : Anaesthesia Challenges.
Journal: 2016/August - Medical Journal Armed Forces India
ISSN: 0377-1237
Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Cochlear implants are now an acceptable therapeutic option for those patients with irreversible hearing loss and deaf-mutism. The surgery is time consuming and complicated. Hence, the technique of anaesthesia plays a crucial role in success of cochlear implant surgery. Cochlear implant patients have various types of syndromes which are important from anaesthetic as well as surgical point of view. Pre-implant preparation requires objective assessment of hearing, plain X-rays of skull and a CT scan of the temporal bone. Anaesthesia is required for objective assessment of hearing in children under five years of age, to obtain X-rays of skull, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT scan, brain evoked response audiometry (BERA) testing and finally for cochlear implant surgery. Anaesthetic considerations include preoperative familiarisation with the patient and his family. Syndromal illnesses have specific anaesthetic significance such as presence of difficult airway or prolonged QT interval. Parental presence is highly desirable during induction of anaesthesia. Electro-surgical instruments especially monopolar ones, should not be used once the cochlear implant is in place.
METHODS
In our institution, all cases (15 children) received their cochlear implants under general anaesthesia and formed the study group. Children were administered midazolam orally and inj ketamine during CT scan. Our techniques of general anaesthesia were modified to permit use of nerve stimulators during surgery. To minimise the incidence of vertigo particularly after cochleostomy, postoperative nausea and vomiting, all patients received glycopyrrolate and fentanyl citrate intravenously prior to induction. Other agents used were, thiopentone, suxamethonium and end-tidal 1.3 MAC halothane in 1:2 mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (O2 and N2O). Electro diathermy was switched off, before the cochlear device was implanted on the patient. Patients were allowed to breathe spontaneously whenever nerve stimulator was used to locate the facial nerve. Inj Ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg was used as anti-emetic agent. Postoperative pain relief was initially provided with fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV and later with syrup ibuprofen.
RESULTS
There were no remarkable anaesthetic or surgical complication in our series except perilymph leakage in two cases.
Relations:
Content
References
(8)
Drugs
(10)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Med J Armed Forces India 60(4): 351-356

Cochlear Implant : Anaesthesia Challenges

Background

Cochlear implants are now an acceptable therapeutic option for those patients with irreversible hearing loss and deaf-mutism. The surgery is time consuming and complicated. Hence, the technique of anaesthesia plays a crucial role in success of cochlear implant surgery. Cochlear implant patients have various types of syndromes which are important from anaesthetic as well as surgical point of view. Pre-implant preparation requires objective assessment of hearing, plain X-rays of skull and a CT scan of the temporal bone. Anaesthesia is required for objective assessment of hearing in children under five years of age, to obtain X-rays of skull, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT scan, brain evoked response audiometry (BERA) testing and finally for cochlear implant surgery. Anaesthetic considerations include preoperative familiarisation with the patient and his family. Syndromal illnesses have specific anaesthetic significance such as presence of difficult airway or prolonged QT interval. Parental presence is highly desirable during induction of anaesthesia. Electro-surgical instruments especially monopolar ones, should not be used once the cochlear implant is in place.

Methods

In our institution, all cases (15 children) received their cochlear implants under general anaesthesia and formed the study group. Children were administered midazolam orally and inj ketamine during CT scan. Our techniques of general anaesthesia were modified to permit use of nerve stimulators during surgery. To minimise the incidence of vertigo particularly after cochleostomy, postoperative nausea and vomiting, all patients received glycopyrrolate and fentanyl citrate intravenously prior to induction. Other agents used were, thiopentone, suxamethonium and end-tidal 1.3 MAC halothane in 1:2 mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (O2 and N2O). Electro diathermy was switched off, before the cochlear device was implanted on the patient. Patients were allowed to breathe spontaneously whenever nerve stimulator was used to locate the facial nerve. Inj Ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg was used as anti-emetic agent. Postoperative pain relief was initially provided with fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV and later with syrup ibuprofen.

Results

There were no remarkable anaesthetic or surgical complication in our series except perilymph leakage in two cases.

Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune-411 040
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune-411 040
Ex-Professor & Head, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune -411 040
Professor & Head, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune -411 040
Director General Medical Services(Navy), Naval Head Quarters, Sena Bhavan, New Delhi-11
Commandant, 92 Base Hospital, C/o 56 APO
Received 2002 Aug 26; Accepted 2003 Jan 8.

References

  • 1. Pedersen CB, Jochumsen U, Madsen S, Koefoed-Nielsen B, Johansen LVResults and experiences with 55 cochlear implantations. Ugeskr Laeger. 2000;162(40):5346–5350.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Clark GM. The Melbourne Cochlear Implant Programme. In: Clark GM, Cowan RSC, Dowell RC, editors. Cochlear Implantation for infants and children. Singular Publishing Group; San Diego: 1997. pp. 47–70. [PubMed]
  • 3. O'Sullivan PG, Elli SM, Pyman BC, Clark GM Proceedings of the XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology. Head and Neck Surgery; Sydney, Australia: 1997. The relationship between aetiology of hearing loss and outcome following cochlear implantation in a paediatric population. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Clark GM, Pyman BC. Preoperative medical evaluation. In: Clark GM, Cowan RSC, Dowell RC, editors. Cochlear implantation for infants and children. Singular Publishing Group; San Diego: 1997. pp. 71–110. [PubMed]
  • 5. Clark GM, Cohen NLSurgical and safety considerations of multi-channel cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing. 1991;(supplement 12):15–24.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Clark GM, Pyman BC, Webb RL. Surgery. In: Clark GM, Cowan RSC, Dowell RC, editors. Cochlear implantation for infants and children. Singular Publishing Group; San Diego: 1997. pp. 111–124. [PubMed]
  • 7. Baines DB, Murrell DPreoperative hypoglycaemia, propranolol and the Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth. 1999;9(2):156–158.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Green JD, Schuh MJ, Maddern BR, Haymond J, Helffrich RACochlear implantation in Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000;185:27–28.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hannallah RS, Rosales JKExperiments with parent's presence during induction in children. Can Anaes Soc J. 1983;30:286.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gnadeberg D, Battmer RD, Lullwitz E, Laszig R, Dybus U, Lenarz TEffect of anaesthesia on the intraoperative elicited stapedius reflex. Laryngorhinootologie. 1994;73(3):132–135.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kenny GRisk factors for post operative nausea vomiting. Anaesthesia. 1994;49(supplement):6–10.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. Toner JG, John G, McNaboe EJCochlear implantation under local anaesthesia, the Belfast experience. Laryngol Otol. 1998;112(6):533–536.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.