Cannabinoid discrimination and antagonism by CB(1) neutral and inverse agonist antagonists.
Journal: 2013/June - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
ISSN: 1521-0103
Abstract:
Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)) inverse agonists (e.g., rimonabant) have been reported to produce adverse effects including nausea, emesis, and anhedonia that limit their clinical applications. Recent laboratory studies suggest that the effects of CB(1) neutral antagonists differ from those of such inverse agonists, raising the possibility of improved clinical utility. However, little is known regarding the antagonist properties of neutral antagonists. In the present studies, the CB(1) inverse agonist SR141716A (rimonabant) and the CB(1) neutral antagonist AM4113 were compared for their ability to modify CB(1) receptor-mediated discriminative stimulus effects in nonhuman primates trained to discriminate the novel CB(1) full agonist AM4054. Results indicate that AM4054 serves as an effective CB(1) discriminative stimulus, with an onset and time course of action comparable with that of the CB(1) agonist Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, and that the inverse agonist rimonabant and the neutral antagonist AM4113 produce dose-related rightward shifts in the AM4054 dose-effect curve, indicating that both drugs surmountably antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of AM4054. Schild analyses further show that rimonabant and AM4113 produce highly similar antagonist effects, as evident in comparable pA(2) values (6.9). Taken together with previous studies, the present data suggest that the improved safety profile suggested for CB(1) neutral antagonists over inverse agonists is not accompanied by a loss of antagonist action at CB(1) receptors.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(19)
References
(43)
Drugs
(1)
Chemicals
(7)
Organisms
(2)
Processes
(1)
Affiliates
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
J Pharmacol Exp Ther 344(3): 561-567

Cannabinoid Discrimination and Antagonism by CB<sub>1</sub> Neutral and Inverse Agonist Antagonists

Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (B.D.K., M.S.D., J.B.); and Center for Drug Discovery, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts (V.K.V., G.A.T., S.P.N., K.V.S., V.G.S., A.M.)
Corresponding author.
Address correspondence to: Brian D. Kangas, Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02478., E-mail: ude.dravrah.naelcm@sagnakb
Received 2012 Nov 16; Accepted 2013 Jan 2.

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) inverse agonists (e.g., rimonabant) have been reported to produce adverse effects including nausea, emesis, and anhedonia that limit their clinical applications. Recent laboratory studies suggest that the effects of CB1 neutral antagonists differ from those of such inverse agonists, raising the possibility of improved clinical utility. However, little is known regarding the antagonist properties of neutral antagonists. In the present studies, the CB1 inverse agonist SR141716A (rimonabant) and the CB1 neutral antagonist AM4113 were compared for their ability to modify CB1 receptor–mediated discriminative stimulus effects in nonhuman primates trained to discriminate the novel CB1 full agonist AM4054. Results indicate that AM4054 serves as an effective CB1 discriminative stimulus, with an onset and time course of action comparable with that of the CB1 agonist Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol, and that the inverse agonist rimonabant and the neutral antagonist AM4113 produce dose-related rightward shifts in the AM4054 dose-effect curve, indicating that both drugs surmountably antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of AM4054. Schild analyses further show that rimonabant and AM4113 produce highly similar antagonist effects, as evident in comparable pA2 values (6.9). Taken together with previous studies, the present data suggest that the improved safety profile suggested for CB1 neutral antagonists over inverse agonists is not accompanied by a loss of antagonist action at CB1 receptors.

Abstract

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ani Zakarian and Michael Z. Leonard for assistance with conducting these studies, and Carol A. Paronis and Rajeev I. Desai for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

Δ-THCΔ-tetrahydrocannabinol
AM2511-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-N-(1-piperidyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide
AM356(R)-(+)-arachidonyl-1'-hydroxy-2'-propylamide
AM23899β-Hydroxy-3-(1-hexyl-cyclobut-1-yl)-hexahydrocannabinol
AM40549β-(hydroxymethyl)-3-(1-adamantyl)-hexahydrocannabinol
AM41135-(4-alkylphenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-N-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide
AM65455-(4-[4-cyanobut-1-ynyl]phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-N-(1,1-dioxo-thiomorpholino)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide
CB1cannabinoid receptor 1
CP 55,9402-[(1R,2R,5R)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]-5-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)phenol
FRfixed ratio
SR141716A5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-N-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide
TaranabantN-[(2S,3S)-4-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3-cyanophenyl)-2-butanyl]-2-methyl-2-{[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy}propanamide
WIN 55,212-2R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate
Abbreviations

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: Kangas, Bergman.

Conducted experiments: Kangas, Delatte.

Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Vemuri, Thakur, Nikas, Makriyannis, Subramanian, Shukla.

Performed data analysis: Kangas, Delatte.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Kangas, Bergman.

Authorship Contributions

Footnotes

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse [Grants DA023142; (to J.B.) and DA26795 (to A.M.)]; and the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Service Award (to B.D.K.).

dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.201962.

Footnotes
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.