Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic.
Journal: 2004/July - British Medical Journal
ISSN: 1756-1833
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE
To examine the relative benefits and disadvantages of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids for the management of acute renal colic.
METHODS
Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Medline, Embase, and reference lists of retrieved articles.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials comparing any opioid with any NSAID in acute renal colic if they reported any of the following outcomes: patient rated pain, time to pain relief, need for rescue analgesia, rate of recurrence of pain, and adverse events.
RESULTS
20 trials totalling 1613 participants were identified. Both NSAIDs and opioids led to clinically important reductions in patient reported pain scores. Pooled analysis of six trials showed a greater reduction in pain scores for patients treated with NSAIDs than with opioids. Patients treated with NSAIDs were significantly less likely to require rescue analgesia (relative risk 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.93). Most trials showed a higher incidence of adverse events in patients treated with opioids. Compared with patients treated with opioids, those treated with NSAIDs had significantly less vomiting (0.35, 0.23 to 0.53). Pethidine was associated with a higher rate of vomiting.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients receiving NSAIDs achieve greater reductions in pain scores and are less likely to require further analgesia in the short term than those receiving opioids. Opioids, particularly pethidine, are associated with a higher rate of vomiting.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(32)
References
(38)
Diseases
(2)
Chemicals
(2)
Organisms
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
BMJ 328(7453): 1401

Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic

Department of Emergency Medicine, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
Correspondence to: A Holdgate ua.vog.wsn.shases@naetagdloh
Correspondence to: A Holdgate ua.vog.wsn.shases@naetagdloh
Accepted 2004 Apr 1.

Abstract

Objective To examine the relative benefits and disadvantages of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids for the management of acute renal colic.

Data sources Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Medline, Embase, and reference lists of retrieved articles.

Review methods Randomised controlled trials comparing any opioid with any NSAID in acute renal colic if they reported any of the following outcomes: patient rated pain, time to pain relief, need for rescue analgesia, rate of recurrence of pain, and adverse events.

Results 20 trials totalling 1613 participants were identified. Both NSAIDs and opioids led to clinically important reductions in patient reported pain scores. Pooled analysis of six trials showed a greater reduction in pain scores for patients treated with NSAIDs than with opioids. Patients treated with NSAIDs were significantly less likely to require rescue analgesia (relative risk 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.93). Most trials showed a higher incidence of adverse events in patients treated with opioids. Compared with patients treated with opioids, those treated with NSAIDs had significantly less vomiting (0.35, 0.23 to 0.53). Pethidine was associated with a higher rate of vomiting.

Conclusions Patients receiving NSAIDs achieve greater reductions in pain scores and are less likely to require further analgesia in the short term than those receiving opioids. Opioids, particularly pethidine, are associated with a higher rate of vomiting.

Abstract

Notes

This review was conducted with substantial support and advice from the Cochrane Renal Group, Sydney, Australia.

Contributors: AH and TP were involved in all stages of study design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. AH will act as guarantor for the paper.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: Not required.

Notes
This review was conducted with substantial support and advice from the Cochrane Renal Group, Sydney, Australia.
Contributors: AH and TP were involved in all stages of study design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. AH will act as guarantor for the paper.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not required.

References

  • 1. Stewart CNephrolithiasis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1988;6: 617-30. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Drach GW. Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis, and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Refik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED, eds. Campbell's urology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992: 2085-156.
  • 3. Holdgate A, Hardcastle JRenal colic: a diagnostic and therapeutic review. Emerg Med 1999;11: 9-16. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Curry C, Kelly AMIntravenous tenoxicam for the treatment of renal colic. NZ Med J 1995;108: 229-30. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. Smally AJAnalgesia in renal colic. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29: 296. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Reich JD, Hanno PMFactitious renal colic. Urology 1997;50: 858-62. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tramer MR, Williams JE, Carroll D, Wiffen PG, Moore RA, McQuay HJComparing analgesic efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs given by different routes in acute and chronic pain: a qualitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42: 71-9. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Labrecque M, Dostaler L-P, Rouselle R, Nguyen T, Poirier SEfficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of acute renal colic. Arch Intern Med 1994;154: 1381-7. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nicholson F. Renal colic. In: Cameron P, Jelinek G, Kelly AM, Murray L, Heyworth L, eds, Textbook of adult emergency medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 372-4.
  • 10. Moll J, Peacock WF. Urologic stone disease. In: Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS, eds. Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999: 640-5.
  • 11. Cordell WH, Wright SW, Wolfson AB, Timerding BL, Maneatis TJ, Lewis RH, et alComparison of intravenous ketorolac, meperidine, and both (balanced analgesia) for renal colic. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28: 151-8. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. al-Sahlawi KS, Tawfik OMComparative study of the efficacy of lysine acetylsalicylate, indomethacin and pethidine in acute renal colic. Eur J Emerg Med 1996;3: 183-6. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. Holdgate A, Pollock TNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus opioids for acute renal colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(1): CD004137. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Edwards JE, Meseguer F, Faura C, Moore RA, McQuay HJSingle dose dipyrone for acute renal colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(4): CD003867. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Willis NS, Mitchell R, Craig JC. Renal Group. In: Cochrane library, Issue 4. Chichester: Wiley, 2003.
  • 16. Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Scneider M, Minder CBias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. BMJ 1997;315: 629-34. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Arnau JM, Cami J, Garcia-Alonso F, Laporte JR, Palop RComparative study of the efficacy of dipyrone, diclofenac sodium and pethidine in acute renal colic. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991;40: 543-6. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cordell WH, Larson TA, Lingeman JE, Nelson DR, Woods JR, Burns LB, et alIndomethacin suppositories versus intravenously titrated morphine for the treatment of ureteral colic. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23: 262-9. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hetherington JW, Philp NHDiclofenac sodium versus pethidine in acute renal colic. BMJ 1986;292: 237-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Indudhara R, Vaidyanathan S, Sankaranarayanan A. Oral diclofenac sodium in the treatment of acute renal colic. A prospective randomized study. Clin Trials J 1990;27: 295-300. [PubMed]
  • 21. Jonsson PE, Olsson AM, Petersson BA, Johansson K. Intravenous indomethacin and oxycone-papaverine in the treatment of acute renal colic. A double-blind study. BJU Int 1987;59: 396-400. [[PubMed]
  • 22. Larkin GL, Peacock WF, Pearl SM, Blair GA, D'Amico FEfficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17: 6-10. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lehtonen T, Kellokumpu I, Permi J, Sarsila O. Intravenous indomethacin in the treatment of ureteric colic. A clinical multicentre study with pethidine and metamizol as the control preparations. Ann Clin Res 1983;15: 197-9. [[PubMed]
  • 24. Lundstam SOA, Leissner K-H, Wahlander LA, Kral JGProstaglandin-synthetase inhibition with diclofenac sodium in treatment of renal colic: comparison with use of a narcotic analgesic. Lancet 1982;i: 1096-7. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. Marthak KV, Gokarn AM, Rao AV, Sane SP, Mahanata RK, Sheth RD, et alA multi-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and a dipyrone/spasmolytic combination, and a single-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and pethidine in renal colic patients in India. Curr Med Res Opin 1991;12: 366-73. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Oosterlinck W, Philp NH, Charig C, Gillies G, Hetherington JW, Lloyd JA double-blind single dose comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and pethidine in the treatment of renal colic. J Clin Pharm 1990;30: 336-41. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. Persson NH, Bergqvist D, Melander A, Zederfelt BComparison of a narcotic (oxicone) and a non-narcotic anti-inflammatory analgesic (indoprofen) in the treatment of renal colic. Acta Chir Scand 1985;151: 105-8. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. Quilez C, Perez-Mateo M, Hernandez P, Rubio I. Usefulness of a non-steroid anti-inflammatory, sodium diclofenac, in the treatment of renal colic. Comparative study with a spasmolytic and an opiate analgesic. Med Clin (Barc) 1984;82: 754-5. [In Spanish.] [[PubMed]
  • 29. Sandhu DP, Lacovou JW, Fletcher MS, Kaisary AV, Philip NH, Arkell DGA comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in the alleviation of renal colic. BJU Int 1994;74: 690-3. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sommer P, Kromann-Andersen B, Lendorf A, Lyngdorf P, Moller PAnalgesic effect and tolerance of Voltaren and Ketogan in acute renal or ureteric colic. BJU Int 1989;63: 4-6. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 31. Thompson JF, Pike JM, Chumas PD, Rundle JSRectal diclofenac compared with pethidine injection in acute renal colic. BMJ 1989;299: 1140-1. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nicolas Torralba JA, Rigabert Montiel M, Banon Perez V, Valdelvira Nadal P, Perez Albacete MKetorolaco intramuscular frente a Tramadol subcutaneo en el tratemiento inicial de urgencia del colico renal. Arch Esp Urol 1999;52: 435-7. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 33. Uden P, Rentzhog L, Berger TA comparative study of the analgesic effects of indomethacin and hydromorphine-chloride-atropine in acute, ureteral-stone pain. Acta Chir Scand 1983;149: 497-9. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 34. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JPClinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27: 485-9. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PEProspective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38: 633-8. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 36. Smith LA, Carroll D, Edwards JE, Moore RA, McQuay HJSingle-dose ketorolac and pethidine in acute postoperative pain: systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2000;84: 48-58. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 37. McEvoy A, Livingstone JI, Cahill CJComparison of diclofenac sodium and morphine sulphate for postoperative analgesia after day case inguinal hernia surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78: 363-6. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zackova M, Taddei S, Calo P, Bellochchio A, Zanello MKetorolac vs tramadol in the treatment of postoperative pain during maxillofacial surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2001;67: 641-6. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 39. DeAndrade JR, Maslanka M, Reines HD, Howe, D, Rasmussen GL, Cardea J, et alKetorolac versus meperidine for pain relief after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 1996;1: 302-12. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 40. Shende D, Das KComparative effects of intravenous ketorolac and pethidine on peri-operative analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for paediatric strabismus surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43: 265-9. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dula DJ, Anderson R, Wood GC. A prospective study comparing i.m. ketorolac with i.m. meperidine in the treatment of acute biliary colic. J Emerg Med 2001;20: 121-4. [[PubMed]
  • 42. Henderson SO, Swadron S, Newton EComparison of intravenous ketorolac and meperidine in the treatment of biliary colic. J Emerg Med 2002;23: 237-41. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 43. Rainer TH, Jacobs P, Ng YC, Cheung NK, Tam M, Lam PK, et alCost effectiveness analysis of intravenous ketorolac and morphine for treating pain after limb injury: double blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2000;321: 1247-51. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chia YY, Liu KProspective randomized trial of intravenous tenoxicam versus fentanyl and tramadol for analgesia in outpatient extracorporeal lithotripsy. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1998;36: 17-22. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 45. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales—a practical guide to their development and use, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.