A Hearing Screening Protocol for Stroke Patients: An Exploratory Study.
Journal: 2019/August - Frontiers in Neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Abstract:
Background: Auditory impairment post stroke is common and may be due to both peripheral hearing loss and or central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). When auditory impairment remains untreated, it may impact on patient communication and rehabilitation after stroke. Offering a comprehensive audiological assessment to all stroke patients would be both costly and time-consuming. A brief hearing screening is thus required. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether a two-tiered hearing screening approach, with use of a handheld hearing screener and two validated hearing questionnaires could be used as a hearing screening for peripheral hearing loss and CAPD in stroke survivors. The sensitivity and specificity of the screening method was analyzed. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary neurology hospital. Forty-two consecutive stroke patients were recruited and tested within 3-12 months post-onset of their stroke. Three screening tools for the identification of hearing impairment were evaluated in this study: A handheld hearing screener for determination of peripheral audiometric hearing loss and two validated questionnaires (The Amsterdam Inventory Auditory for Disability (AIAD) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly (HHIE) questionnaires) for determination of peripheral hearing loss and/or CAPD. Results: The hearing screener had a sensitivity of 92. 59% detecting a hearing loss and specificity of 100%. The greatest test accuracy in identifying a central auditory processing type hearing impairment in stroke patients was found when the handheld hearing screener and the AIAD questionnaire were combined. Conclusion: This study is a first step toward addressing the complex auditory needs of stroke survivors in a systematic manner, with the ultimate aim to support their communication needs and long-term recovery and wellbeing. Registration: Project Identification number 11/0469 and REC ref 11/LO/1675.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(1)
References
(35)
Diseases
(1)
Conditions
(1)
Genes
(1)
Processes
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Front Neurol 10: 842

A Hearing Screening Protocol for Stroke Patients: An Exploratory Study

Click here for additional data file.(25K, docx)
Department of Neuro-audiology, The Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Neuro-otology Department, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Stroke Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, London, United Kingdom
Edited by: Paola Marangolo, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Reviewed by: Bin Jiang, Capital Medical University, China; Vinaya Manchaiah, Lamar University, United States
*Correspondence: Nehzat Koohi ku.ca.lcu@ihook.n
Doris-Eva Bamiou ku.ca.lcu@uoimab.d
This article was submitted to Stroke, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Edited by: Paola Marangolo, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Reviewed by: Bin Jiang, Capital Medical University, China; Vinaya Manchaiah, Lamar University, United States
Received 2019 Feb 10; Accepted 2019 Jul 19.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Abstract

Background: Auditory impairment post stroke is common and may be due to both peripheral hearing loss and or central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). When auditory impairment remains untreated, it may impact on patient communication and rehabilitation after stroke. Offering a comprehensive audiological assessment to all stroke patients would be both costly and time-consuming. A brief hearing screening is thus required.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether a two-tiered hearing screening approach, with use of a handheld hearing screener and two validated hearing questionnaires could be used as a hearing screening for peripheral hearing loss and CAPD in stroke survivors. The sensitivity and specificity of the screening method was analyzed.

Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary neurology hospital. Forty-two consecutive stroke patients were recruited and tested within 3–12 months post-onset of their stroke. Three screening tools for the identification of hearing impairment were evaluated in this study: A handheld hearing screener for determination of peripheral audiometric hearing loss and two validated questionnaires (The Amsterdam Inventory Auditory for Disability (AIAD) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly (HHIE) questionnaires) for determination of peripheral hearing loss and/or CAPD.

Results: The hearing screener had a sensitivity of 92. 59% detecting a hearing loss and specificity of 100%. The greatest test accuracy in identifying a central auditory processing type hearing impairment in stroke patients was found when the handheld hearing screener and the AIAD questionnaire were combined.

Conclusion: This study is a first step toward addressing the complex auditory needs of stroke survivors in a systematic manner, with the ultimate aim to support their communication needs and long-term recovery and wellbeing.

Registration: Project Identification number 11/0469 and REC ref 11/LO/1675.

Keywords: stroke, hearing loss, hearing screening, central auditory processing disorder, hearing questionnaires
Abstract

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the study participants, and our colleagues at the Neuro-otology Department, University College London Hospitals.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

Funding. This study was funded by the British Medical Association Helen Lawson grant.

Footnotes
Click here for additional data file.(25K, docx)

References

  • 1. Bamiou D-E. Hearing disorders in stroke. Handb Clin Neurol. (2015) 129:633–47. 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00035-4 [] [[PubMed]
  • 2. Bamiou DE, Werring D, Cox K, Stevens J, Musiek FE, Brown MM, et al. . Patient-reported auditory functions after stroke of the central auditory pathway. Stroke. (2012) 43:1285–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644039 [] [[PubMed]
  • 3. Koohi N, Vickers DA, Lakshmanan R, Chandrashekar H, Werring DJ, Warren JD, et al. . Hearing characteristics of stroke patients: prevalence and characteristics of hearing impairment and auditory processing disorders in stroke patients. J Am Acad Audiol. (2017) 28:491–505. 10.3766/jaaa.15139 [] [[PubMed]
  • 4. Edwards DF, Hahn MG, Baum CM, Perlmutter MS, Sheedy C, Dromerick AW. Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Neurorehab Neural Repair. (2006) 20:42–8. 10.1177/1545968305283038 [] [[PubMed]
  • 5. Landi F, Onder G, Cesari M, Zamboni V, Russo A, Barillaro C, et al. . Functional decline in frail community-dwelling stroke patients. Eur J Neurol. (2006) 13:17–23. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01116.x [] [[PubMed]
  • 6. Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, et al. . Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. (2017) 390:2673–734. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6 [] [[PubMed]
  • 7. Savva GM, Stephan BC. Alzheimer's society vascular dementia systematic review group. Epidemiological studies of the effect of stroke on incident dementia: a systematic review. Stroke. (2010) 41:e41–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.559880 [] [[PubMed]
  • 8. Zheng F, Yan L, Zhong B, Yang Z, Xie W. Progression of cognitive decline before and after incident stroke. Neurology. (2019) 93:e20–8. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007716 [] [[PubMed]
  • 9. Koohi N, Vickers D, Warren J, Werring D, Bamiou DE. Long-term use benefits of personal frequency-modulated systems for speech in noise perception in patients with stroke with auditory processing deficits: a non-randomised controlled trial study. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e013003. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013003 ] [
  • 10. Shield B. Hearing Loss – Numbers and Costs. Evaluation of the Social and Economic Costs. Brunel University London (2019). [PubMed]
  • 11. Amieva H, Ouvrard C, Giulioli C, Meillon C, Rullier L, Dartigues JF. Self-reported hearing loss, hearing aids, and cognitive decline in elderly adults: a 25-year study. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2015) 63:2099–104. 10.1111/jgs.13649 [] [[PubMed]
  • 12. Formby C, Phillips DE, Thomas RG. Hearing loss among stroke patients. Ear Hear. (1987) 8:326–32. 10.1097/00003446-198712000-00007 [] [[PubMed]
  • 13. Graves D. Is hearing screening needed for all admissions to a stroke rehabilitation unit?Perspectives. (1995) 19:9–14. [[PubMed]
  • 14. O'Halloran R, Worrall LE, Hickson L. The number of patients with communication related impairments in acute hospital stroke units. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. (2009) 11:438–49. 10.1080/17549500902741363 [] [[PubMed]
  • 15. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. (1997). Available online at: (accessed July 26, 2016).[PubMed]
  • 16. Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet. (2005) 366:1111–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67423-5 [] [[PubMed]
  • 17. Rey B, Frischknecht R, Maeder P, Clarke S. Patterns of recovery following focal hemispheric lesions: relationship between lasting deficit and damage to specialized networks. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2007) 25:285–94. [[PubMed]
  • 18. Audiology BSA. Recommended Procedure Pure-Tone Airconduction and Bone-Conduction Threshold Audiometry With and Without Masking. (2018). Available online at: [PubMed]
  • 19. Pendlebury ST, Mariz J, Bull L, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. MoCA, ACE-R, and MMSE versus the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairmentharmonization standards neuropsychological battery after TIA and stroke. Stroke. (2012) 43:464–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.633586 ] [
  • 20. Audiology BSA. Recommended Procedure Pure-Tone Airconduction and Bone-Conduction Threshold Audiometry With and Without Masking. (2011). Available online at: [PubMed]
  • 21. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Central Auditory Processing Disorders. Technical Report (2005). Available online at: (accessed July 26, 2016).[PubMed]
  • 22. Musiek FE, McCormick CA, Hurley RM. Hit and false alarm rates of selected ABR indices in differentiating cochlear disorders from acoustic tumours. Am J Audiol. (1996) 5:90–6. 10.1044/1059-0889.0501.90 [[PubMed]
  • 23. Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, Hood LJ, Berlin CI. Auditory neuropathy. Brain. (1996) 119:741–53. 10.1093/brain/119.3.741 [] [[PubMed]
  • 24. Cohen M, Prasher D. The value of combining auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflex threshold measurements in neuro-otological diagnosis. Scand Audiol. (1988) 17:153–62. 10.3109/14992028809042187 [] [[PubMed]
  • 25. Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (gaps-in-noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear. (2005) 26:608–18. 10.1097/01.aud.0000188069.80699.41 [] [[PubMed]
  • 26. Goll JC, Crutch SJ, Loo JH, Rohrer JD, Frost C, Bamiou DE, et al. . Non-verbal sound processing in the primary progressive aphasias. Brain. (2010) 133:272–85. 10.1093/brain/awp235 ] [
  • 27. Meijer AG, Wit HP, TenVergert EM, Albers FW, Muller Kobold JE. Reliability and validity of the (modified) Amsterdam inventory for auditory disability and handicap. Int J Audiol. (2003) 42:220–6. 10.3109/14992020309101317 [] [[PubMed]
  • 28. Neijenhuis K, Snik A, van den Broek P. Auditory processing disorders in adults and children: evaluation of a test battery. Int J Audiol. (2003) 42:391–400. 10.3109/14992020309080048 [] [[PubMed]
  • 29. Weinstein BE, Spitzer JB, Ventry IM. Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly. Ear Hear. (1986) 7:295–9. 10.1097/00003446-198610000-00002 [] [[PubMed]
  • 30. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. (1983) 25:37–42. [[PubMed]
  • 31. Golstein D. Hearing impairment. Hearing aids and audiology. ASHA. (1984) 23:493–500. [PubMed]
  • 32. Bamiou D-E, Iliadou VV, Zanchetta S, Spyridakou C. What can we learn about auditory processing from adult hearing questionnaires?J Am Acad Audiol. (2015) 26:824–37. 10.3766/jaaa.15009 [] [[PubMed]
  • 33. Lichtenstein MJ, Bess FH, Logan SA. Diagnostic performance of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly (screening version) against differing definitions of hearing-loss. Ear Hear. (1988) 9:208–11. 10.1097/00003446-198808000-00006 [] [[PubMed]
  • 34. Jupiter T. Screening for hearing loss in the elderly using distortion product otoacoustic emissions, pure tones, and a self-assessment tool. Am J Audiol. (2009) 18:99–107. 10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0020) [] [[PubMed]
  • 35. Yueh B, Collins MP, Souza PE, Boyko EJ, Loovis CF, Heagerty PJ, et al Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment–which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2010) 58:427–34. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02738.x [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BE. Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss. Audiology. (1998) 37:295–301. 10.3109/00206099809072983 [] [[PubMed]
  • 37. Deepthi R, Kasthuri A. Validation of the use of self-reported hearing loss and the hearing handicap inventory for elderly among rural Indian elderly population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2012) 55:762–7. 10.1016/j.archger.2012.07.006 [] [[PubMed]
  • 38. Tomioka K, Ikeda H, Hanaie K, Morikawa M, Iwamoto J, Okamoto N, et al. . The hearing handicap inventory for elderly-screening (HHIE-S) versus a single question: reliability, validity, and relations with quality of life measures in the elderly community, Japan. Qual Life Res. (2013) 22:1151–9. 10.1007/s11136-012-0235-2 [] [[PubMed]
  • 39. Gopinath B, Schneider J, Hickson L, McMahon CM, Burlutsky G, Leeder SR, et al. . Hearing handicap, rather than measured hearing impairment, predicts poorer quality of life over 10 years in older adults. Maturitas. (2012) 72:146–51. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.010 [] [[PubMed]
  • 40. Wigney D, Golding M, Newall P, Mitchell P, Hartley D. An audiological profile of elderly Australians reporting speech affecting stroke. Adv Speech Lang Pathol. (2005) 7:211–9. 10.1080/14417040500337054 [[PubMed]
  • 41. Gurgel RK, Ward PD, Schwartz S, Norton MC, Foster NL, Tschanz JT. Relationship of hearing loss and dementia: a prospective, population-based study. Otol Neurotol. (2014) 35:775–81. 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000313 ] [
  • 42. Mellon L, Brewer L, Hall P, Horgan F, Williams D, Hickey A, et al. . Cognitive impairment six months after ischaemic stroke: a profile from the ASPIRE-S study. BMC Neurol. (2015) 15:31. 10.1186/s12883-015-0288-2 ] [
  • 43. Szelag E, Lewandowska M, Wolak T, Seniow J, Poniatowska R, Pöppel E, et al. . Training in rapid auditory processing ameliorates auditory comprehension in aphasic patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neurol Sci. (2014) 338:77–86. 10.1016/j.jns.2013.12.020 [] [[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.