Homeologous plastid DNA transformation in tobacco is mediated by multiple recombination events.
Journal: 1999/September - Genetics
ISSN: 0016-6731
PUBMED: 10388829
Abstract:
Efficient plastid transformation has been achieved in Nicotiana tabacum using cloned plastid DNA of Solanum nigrum carrying mutations conferring spectinomycin and streptomycin resistance. The use of the incompletely homologous (homeologous) Solanum plastid DNA as donor resulted in a Nicotiana plastid transformation frequency comparable with that of other experiments where completely homologous plastid DNA was introduced. Physical mapping and nucleotide sequence analysis of the targeted plastid DNA region in the transformants demonstrated efficient site-specific integration of the 7.8-kb Solanum plastid DNA and the exclusion of the vector DNA. The integration of the cloned Solanum plastid DNA into the Nicotiana plastid genome involved multiple recombination events as revealed by the presence of discontinuous tracts of Solanum-specific sequences that were interspersed between Nicotiana-specific markers. Marked position effects resulted in very frequent cointegration of the nonselected peripheral donor markers located adjacent to the vector DNA. Data presented here on the efficiency and features of homeologous plastid DNA recombination are consistent with the existence of an active RecA-mediated, but a diminished mismatch, recombination/repair system in higher-plant plastids.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(19)
References
(50)
Genes
(1)
Organisms
(2)
Processes
(5)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Genetics 152(3): 1111-1122

Homeologous plastid DNA transformation in tobacco is mediated by multiple recombination events.

Abstract

Efficient plastid transformation has been achieved in Nicotiana tabacum using cloned plastid DNA of Solanum nigrum carrying mutations conferring spectinomycin and streptomycin resistance. The use of the incompletely homologous (homeologous) Solanum plastid DNA as donor resulted in a Nicotiana plastid transformation frequency comparable with that of other experiments where completely homologous plastid DNA was introduced. Physical mapping and nucleotide sequence analysis of the targeted plastid DNA region in the transformants demonstrated efficient site-specific integration of the 7.8-kb Solanum plastid DNA and the exclusion of the vector DNA. The integration of the cloned Solanum plastid DNA into the Nicotiana plastid genome involved multiple recombination events as revealed by the presence of discontinuous tracts of Solanum-specific sequences that were interspersed between Nicotiana-specific markers. Marked position effects resulted in very frequent cointegration of the nonselected peripheral donor markers located adjacent to the vector DNA. Data presented here on the efficiency and features of homeologous plastid DNA recombination are consistent with the existence of an active RecA-mediated, but a diminished mismatch, recombination/repair system in higher-plant plastids.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (203K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Alani E, Reenan RA, Kolodner RD. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):19–39.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Birky CW., Jr Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11331–11338.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bookjans G, Stummann BM, Henningsen KW. Preparation of chloroplast DNA from pea plastids isolated in a medium of high ionic strength. Anal Biochem. 1984 Aug 15;141(1):244–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boynton JE, Gillham NW. Chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas. Methods Enzymol. 1993;217:510–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goulding SE, Olmstead RG, Morden CW, Wolfe KH. Ebb and flow of the chloroplast inverted repeat. Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Aug 27;252(1-2):195–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavalier-Smith T. Electron microscopic evidence for chloroplast fusion in zygotes of Chlamydomonas reinhardii. Nature. 1970 Oct 24;228(5269):333–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hildebrand M, Hallick RB, Passavant CW, Bourque DP. Trans-splicing in chloroplasts: the rps 12 loci of Nicotiana tabacum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):372–376.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cerutti H, Osman M, Grandoni P, Jagendorf AT. A homolog of Escherichia coli RecA protein in plastids of higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8068–8072.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cerutti H, Ibrahim HZ, Jagendorf AT. Treatment of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protoplasts with DNA-damaging agents induces a 39-kilodalton chloroplast protein immunologically related to Escherichia coli RecA. Plant Physiol. 1993 May;102(1):155–163.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cerutti H, Johnson AM, Boynton JE, Gillham NW. Inhibition of chloroplast DNA recombination and repair by dominant negative mutants of Escherichia coli RecA. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;15(6):3003–3011.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Iratni R, Diederich L, Harrak H, Bligny M, Lerbs-Mache S. Organ-specific transcription of the rrn operon in spinach plastids. J Biol Chem. 1997 May 23;272(21):13676–13682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers SR, Hunter N, Louis EJ, Borts RH. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;16(11):6110–6120.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kavanagh TA, O'Driscoll KM, McCabe PF, Dix PJ. Mutations conferring lincomycin, spectinomycin, and streptomycin resistance in Solanum nigrum are located in three different chloroplast genes. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Mar;242(6):675–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Koop HU, Steinmüller K, Wagner H, Rössler C, Eibl C, Sacher L. Integration of foreign sequences into the tobacco plastome via polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation. Planta. 1996;199(2):193–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalczykowski SC, Eggleston AK. Homologous pairing and DNA strand-exchange proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:991–1043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniell H, Datta R, Varma S, Gray S, Lee SB. Containment of herbicide resistance through genetic engineering of the chloroplast genome. Nat Biotechnol. 1998 Apr;16(4):345–348.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Datta A, Adjiri A, New L, Crouse GF, Jinks Robertson S. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):1085–1093.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lemieux C, Lee RW. Nonreciprocal recombination between alleles of the chloroplast 23S rRNA gene in interspecific Chlamydomonas crosses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4166–4170.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Datta A, Hendrix M, Lipsitch M, Jinks-Robertson S. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9757–9762.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lieb M, Tsai MM, Deonier RC. Crosses between insertion and point mutations in lambda gene cI: stimulation of neighboring recombination by heterology. Genetics. 1984 Oct;108(2):277–289.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Deng C, Capecchi MR. Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;12(8):3365–3371.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • de Wind N, Dekker M, Berns A, Radman M, te Riele H. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):321–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matic I, Radman M, Rayssiguier C. Structure of recombinants from conjugational crosses between Escherichia coli donor and mismatch-repair deficient Salmonella typhimurium recipients. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):17–26.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsubayashi T, Wakasugi T, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Zaita N, Hidaka T, Meng BY, Ohto C, Tanaka M, Kato A, et al. Six chloroplast genes (ndhA-F) homologous to human mitochondrial genes encoding components of the respiratory chain NADH dehydrogenase are actively expressed: determination of the splice sites in ndhA and ndhB pre-mRNAs. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Dec;210(3):385–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dooner HK, Martínez-Férez IM. Recombination occurs uniformly within the bronze gene, a meiotic recombination hotspot in the maize genome. Plant Cell. 1997 Sep;9(9):1633–1646.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott B, Richardson C, Winderbaum J, Nickoloff JA, Jasin M. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):93–101.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McBride KE, Svab Z, Schaaf DJ, Hogan PS, Stalker DM, Maliga P. Amplification of a chimeric Bacillus gene in chloroplasts leads to an extraordinary level of an insecticidal protein in tobacco. Biotechnology (N Y) 1995 Apr;13(4):362–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rochaix JD. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as the photosynthetic yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:209–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Roeder GS. Chromosome synapsis and genetic recombination: their roles in meiotic chromosome segregation. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):385–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shen P, Huang HV. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441–457.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shen P, Huang HV. Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Aug;218(2):358–360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Medgyesy P, Fejes E, Maliga P. Interspecific chloroplast recombination in a Nicotiana somatic hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6960–6964.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, Zaita N, Chunwongse J, Obokata J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2043–2049.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Modrich P, Lahue R. Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:101–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smolik-Utlaut S, Petes TD. Recombination of plasmids into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome is reduced by small amounts of sequence heterogeneity. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;3(7):1204–1211.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morel P, Stasiak A, Ehrlich SD, Cassuto E. Effect of length and location of heterologous sequences on RecA-mediated strand exchange. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 5;269(31):19830–19835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Staub JM, Maliga P. Long regions of homologous DNA are incorporated into the tobacco plastid genome by transformation. Plant Cell. 1992 Jan;4(1):39–45.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Negritto MT, Wu X, Kuo T, Chu S, Bailis AM. Influence of DNA sequence identity on efficiency of targeted gene replacement. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):278–286.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sweetser DB, Hough H, Whelden JF, Arbuckle M, Nickoloff JA. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3863–3875.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Newman SM, Boynton JE, Gillham NW, Randolph-Anderson BL, Johnson AM, Harris EH. Transformation of chloroplast ribosomal RNA genes in Chlamydomonas: molecular and genetic characterization of integration events. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):875–888.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • te Riele H, Maandag ER, Berns A. Highly efficient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 1;89(11):5128–5132.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Newman SM, Harris EH, Johnson AM, Boynton JE, Gillham NW. Nonrandom distribution of chloroplast recombination events in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: evidence for a hotspot and an adjacent cold region. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):413–429.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill C, Horváth GV, Horváth E, Dix PJ, Medgyesy P. Chloroplast transformation in plants: polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment of protoplasts is an alternative to biolistic delivery systems. Plant J. 1993 May;3(5):729–738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watt VM, Ingles CJ, Urdea MS, Rutter WJ. Homology requirements for recombination in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4768–4772.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Petit MA, Dimpfl J, Radman M, Echols H. Control of large chromosomal duplications in Escherichia coli by the mismatch repair system. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):327–332.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Worth L, Jr, Clark S, Radman M, Modrich P. Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecA-catalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3238–3241.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang D, Waldman AS. Fine-resolution analysis of products of intrachromosomal homeologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jul;17(7):3614–3628.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Radman M, Wagner R. Mismatch recognition in chromosomal interactions and speciation. Chromosoma. 1993 Jun;102(6):369–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zahrt TC, Maloy S. Barriers to recombination between closely related bacteria: MutS and RecBCD inhibit recombination between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9786–9791.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rayssiguier C, Thaler DS, Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Department of Genetics, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Department of Genetics, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Abstract

Efficient plastid transformation has been achieved in Nicotiana tabacum using cloned plastid DNA of Solanum nigrum carrying mutations conferring spectinomycin and streptomycin resistance. The use of the incompletely homologous (homeologous) Solanum plastid DNA as donor resulted in a Nicotiana plastid transformation frequency comparable with that of other experiments where completely homologous plastid DNA was introduced. Physical mapping and nucleotide sequence analysis of the targeted plastid DNA region in the transformants demonstrated efficient site-specific integration of the 7.8-kb Solanum plastid DNA and the exclusion of the vector DNA. The integration of the cloned Solanum plastid DNA into the Nicotiana plastid genome involved multiple recombination events as revealed by the presence of discontinuous tracts of Solanum-specific sequences that were interspersed between Nicotiana-specific markers. Marked position effects resulted in very frequent cointegration of the nonselected peripheral donor markers located adjacent to the vector DNA. Data presented here on the efficiency and features of homeologous plastid DNA recombination are consistent with the existence of an active RecA-mediated, but a diminished mismatch, recombination/repair system in higher-plant plastids.

Abstract
Full Text
Selected References
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.