Response to letter: COVID-19 and macular edema-a necessary blindness?
Journal: 2020/July - Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Relations:
Content
Diseases
(1)
Conditions
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol undefined

Response to letter: COVID-19 and macular edema—a necessary blindness?

Service d’ophtalmologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team LEHA, Université de Bordeaux, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
Jean-François Korobelnik, Email: rf.xuaedrob-uhc@kinleborok.siocnarf-naej.
Corresponding author.
Received 2020 Jul 2; Revised 2020 Jul 2; Accepted 2020 Jul 8.
This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

Dear Editor,

We certainly agree with Navel et al. that ophthalmologists have faced difficult decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic and that a delicate balance is needed to protect both lives and vision. In order to strike this balance, it is important that all decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the local infection rate and individual risk for loss of visual acuity. We believe that strategies for managing patients with retinal disease during this uncertain time should focus on the following:

  • Minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19 for both the patient and healthcare staff

  • Simplifying anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment regimens

  • Prioritizing treatment for those at greatest risk of irreversible vision loss

By implementing stringent safety practices and triaging those who are most vulnerable, we have the opportunity to continue to provide the best possible care to patients.

With lockdown restrictions now easing in many countries, we are re-evaluating our initial guidance [1] to determine which measures can be relaxed while the infection rate remains low and which should remain in place until a suitable vaccine or treatment for COVID-19 becomes available. The updated guidance for the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and for the post-lockdown era will be available from https://www.visionacademy.org/.

Funding information

Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Hollie Robinson, PhD of Complete HealthVizion, Ltd., McCann Health Medical Communications, funded by Bayer Consumer Care AG, Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding information

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Jean-François Korobelnik is a consultant for Allergan, Bayer, Kanghong, Novartis, and Roche.

Compliance with ethical standards

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Korobelnik JF, Loewenstein A, Eldem B, Joussen AM, Koh A, Lambrou GN, Lanzetta P, Li X, Lövestam-Adrian M, Navarro R, Okada AA, Pearce I, Rodríguez FJ, Wong DT, Wu LGuidance for anti-VEGF intravitreal injections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258:1149–1156. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04703-x.] [[Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.