BET inhibitors as novel therapeutic agents in breast cancer
Abstract
Role of epigenetic regulators in breast cancer
Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent tumors and a leading cause of death in women worldwide [1]. Although early detection and adjuvant treatment have improved survival in early stage breast cancer, disseminated cancer is still an incurable disease where novel therapies have shown limited efficacy [2]. In addition, the fact that most breast cancer patients progress after a given period of treatment reinforce the necessity for the identification of novel therapeutics that can contribute to improve patient outcome.
Breast cancer has been classified in several different subtypes based on molecular and genomic findings [2]. Around 20% of tumors overexpress the transmembrane protein HER2 due to gene amplification [3, 4]. These tumors benefit from therapies against this protein, including monoclonal antibodies like trastuzumab or pertuzumab, or small tyrosine kinase inhibitors like lapatinib or neratinib [5, 6]. Recently targeting tumoral cells with an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) against HER2 has also shown efficacy in the metastatic setting [7]. Expression of hormone receptors (HR), including estrogen and progesterone receptors, is observed in 80% of tumors and strategies to block these receptors or decrease the presence of activating hormones have been used with successful results for a long time [8]. Novel agents designed to block the estrogen receptor have also reached the clinical setting [8, 9]. Finally, breast cancer has been classified by gene expression analyses in several subtypes that mimic the histological classification in some aspects. The HER2 enriched, the luminal and the basal-like subtype mimic tumors overexpressing HER2, HR positive and the triple negative subtype, respectively [8, 10].
Epigenetic regulators are promising therapeutic targets in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [11]. For instance, deacetylase inhibitors have shown activity in the clinical setting in some hematological diseases [12]. Deregulation in chromatin modulators and transcription factors (TFs) are common findings in cancer [11, 13, 14]. The bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) family of proteins is involved in the recruitment of proteins of the transcription machinery to regulate gene expression [13, 15]. To do so, they recognize acetylated-lysine residues in nucleosomal histones [13, 14]. An example is the recruitment of the positive transcription elongation factor (p-TEFb) [16]. There are around 46 bromodomain-containing proteins of which the BET family in mammals is composed of four members: BRD2, BRD3, BRD4 and the testis-specific BRDT. They contain two conserved N-terminal bromodomains (BD1 and BD2), which recognize and bind acetylated lysine residues on histone tails [17] (Figure 1). Inhibition of these proteins has shown antitumoral efficacy in a wide range of solid tumors including breast cancer [11, 18]. It should be mention, that the inhibition of each individual component can have a different effect that the inhibition of all members and sometimes one member can have an opposite function [19]. On the other hand, most available BET inhibitors can inhibit all members although there are currently under development inhibitors of specific members, like MZ1 that induces selective removal of BRD4 [20].
Antitumor activity and mechanism of action of BET inhibitors in breast cancer
The efficacy of BET inhibitors was mainly explored in hematologic malignancies and pediatric cancers where well known transcription factors play a key role in the oncogenesis of the disease, as is the case of C-MYC in neuroblastomas or leukemia [18, 21]. Later on, the significant antitumor activity of these compounds in other solid tumors like prostate, non-small cell lung cancer or pancreatic cancer was evaluated and reported [22–24]. Indeed, the efficacy of these agents can be more relevant in biological situations like in cancer where chromatin is in a constitutively open situation available for gene transcription.
BET inhibitors have shown activity in different breast cancer subtypes including HER2 positive tumors, HR tumors and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). For a comprehensive review of BET inhibitors in clinical development we suggest to read the article by Andrieu G et al. [25].
BRD4 activity is necessary for the proliferation of breast and endometrial tumors expressing estrogen receptors as it regulates ERα-induced gene expression by affecting elongation-associated phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and histone H2B monoubiquitination [26]. Indeed BET inhibition with JQ1 impaired E2-induced transcriptional activation [27].
In HER2 and HR positive tumors, BET inhibitors have contributed to overcome resistance to currently approved therapies like lapatinib in HER2 positive tumors, or tamoxifen and everolimus in HR positive cancers, among other therapies [28–30]. These data will be described in detailed in the next section of this review.
Given the fact that BET inhibitors can repress the expression of several transcription factors, the mechanism of action of these compounds is heterogeneous affecting several biological functions including: control of cell cycle, proliferation, stemness, metastatic spreading or angiogenesis, among others [31–34]. Of note doses used in some of the studies were extremely high leading to conclusions that have no relation with the biological mechanism of action [29]. Therefore this data cannot be considered as a good example of how BET inhibitors suppress certain transcription factors and cause arrest of the cell cycle, unless the goal is to generate chemoresistance clones.
Several studies have described the function of Bromodomains (BRD) and particularly BRD2 and BRD4, in cell cycle regulation [35]. Indeed, experience from our group and others shows that treatment with BET inhibitors affects proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest at G1 with an increase of p27 [33, 34, 36]. Inhibition of proliferation is likely mediated by a reduction of genes involved in cell division [28] and particularly of those associated with the mitotic process like Aurora kinases A and B, Polo-like kinases (PLKs) or TTK protein kinases [33, 36].
Inhibitors of BET proteins reduce cell migration and invasion, and recent data suggests that this mechanism is mediated by inhibition of the Jagged1/Notch1 signaling pathway through modulation of BRD4 [31]. In addition, BET inhibition reduces angiogenesis in xenografted tumors by targeting the hypoxic response [32]. BET inhibition also produce morphologic changes inducing a stem cell phenotype [31, 34, 37]. Interestingly the mechanism of action of BET inhibitors in TNBC is not mainly mediated by the inhibition of MYC or by affecting known pathways linked with this disease like the JAK/STAT pathway [34, 36]. By contrast, other transcription factors affected by the compound have been described like LM04, DEPDC or FOXM1 [33].
Finally, several mechanisms have been reported in relation to resistance to BET inhibitors. The activation of casein kinase II (CK2) has been associated with resistance to BET inhibitors and agents targeting this kinase have shown to overcome such resistance [23]. Similarly, the decrease of the PP2A phosphatase that opposes the CK2 function has been linked with resistance to BET inhibitors [24]. In addition, inhibition of BCL-X and BCL-2, revert the resistance to BET inhibitors [34]. Confirming these findings, novel BET inhibitors with a more potent mechanism of action have shown to be synergistic with agents that induce apoptosis [38]. Of note this has also been observed in other tumors beyond breast cancer, like in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [39]. Figure 1 summarizes the mechanism of action of BET inhibitors.
BET inhibitors can overcome resistance to breast cancer therapies
If resistance to a given therapy is mediated by upregulation of specific transcription factors, BET inhibitors can overcome resistance to this specific therapy by reducing their expression. For instance, resistance to everolimus in estrogen receptor positive tumors was mediated by the expression of MYC, and reverted by treatment with BET inhibitors that downregulated MYC expression [29]. Other studies have shown activity of BET inhibitors in HR positive tumors that are resistant to tamoxifen or increasing the effect of the ER degrader fulvestrant [28]. In addition, JQ1 increases the efficacy of everolimus in MCF7 xenograted models [29].
Similarly BET inhibitors can overcome the resistance to PI3K inhibitors [40]. In addition, OTX015, a novel inhibitor, increases the activity of everolimus in some triple negative breast cancer cells [41].
In HER2 positive breast cancer, BET inhibitors have been shown to overcome resistance to lapatinib [30]. Resistance to the anti-HER2 small tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib was mediated by reprograming of the kinome and activation of ErbB2/ErbB3 receptors [30]. BET inhibition reduced the transcription of some of the genes involved in this pathway like ERBB3, IGF1R, DDR1 or MET, among others [30].
Potential combinations, biomarker discovery and future clinical development
Preclinical data from our group showed that BET inhibitors synergized with chemotherapies used for the treatment of breast cancer including antimitotic agents like taxanes or vinorelbine and DNA damaging compounds like cisplatin and carboplatin [33]. In addition, the combination produced a remarkable induction of apoptosis compared to treatment with each agent given alone [33]. BET inhibitors synergized with agents targeting key kinases involved in the mitotic spindle formation like polo-like kinase 1 [37]. These data opened options for the future clinical development of BET inhibitors in triple negative breast cancer in combination with chemotherapies or PLK1 inhibitors [37].
Similarly BET inhibitors have shown a synergistic interaction with inducers of apoptosis, like BCL-X and BCL-2 inhibitors or with CK2 inhibitors, through the control or relevant phosphatases [34, 38].
Combination of BET inhibitors with immunotherapies like checkpoint inhibitors is an attractive approach. Indeed some articles have suggested that PD-L1 expression is suppressed by treatment with JQ1, and this could be the bases to explore this regimen in several tumors [42].
Also a potent inhibitory effect has been observed with the combination of BET inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors in triple negative and estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cells, mainly through an induction of the ubiquitin-specific protease (USP17) [43]. And finally, the BRD family of proteins has been involved in several mechanisms associated with resistance to cell signaling inhibitors by avoiding the activation of complementary signaling pathways [44]. For instance, inhibition of BRD4 overcomes resistance to MEK inhibitors in triple negative breast cancer [45].
Although not yet explored in breast cancer, in other tumor types like in leukemia the presence of stem cells is associated with resistance to BET inhibitors through an increase of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [46]. In addition, activation of the AMPK pathway is associated with JQ1-induced autophagy in resistant cells. AMPK promoted JQ1-induced apoptosis in acute myeloide Leukemia stem cells [47].
Table 1 shows the list of BET inhibitors in clinical development. Of note two of them OTX015 and MK-8628 are under evaluation in triple negative breast cancer. Indeed OTX015 has shown a good tolerability profile, with mild side effects like hematologic toxicities, diarrhoea or fatigue, in recently published phase I studies in lymphoma and acute leukemia [48, 49].
Status | Reference | Drug | Sponsor | Phase | Condition | Combination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recruiting | NCT02543879 | FT-1101 | Forma Therapeutics, Inc. | I | Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndrome | Alone |
Recruiting | NCT01949883 NCT02157636 NCT02158858 | CPI-0610 | Constellation Pharmaceuticals | I | Lymphoma/Multiple Myeloma/Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable Myelofibrosis | Alone |
Recruiting | NCT01943851 NCT01587703 NCT02630251 | GSK525762 GSK2820151 | GlaxoSmithKline | I | Cancer/Carcinoma, Midline/Cancer | Alone |
Recruiting | NCT02711956 NCT02705469 | ZEN003694 | Zenith Epigenetics | I | Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer/Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer | Enzalutamide/alone |
Active, not recruiting | NCT02259114 | OTX015 | Oncoethix GmbH | I | NUT Midline Carcinoma, Triple Negative Breast Cancer Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Rearranged ALK Gene/Fusion Protein or KRAS Mutation, Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC), Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | OTX015/MK-8628 |
Terminated/Withdrawn | NCT02296476 NCT02303782 | OTX015 | Oncoethix GmbH | I/II | Glioblastoma Multiforme/ Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Alone/ + Vidaza (azacitidine) |
Recruiting | NCT02419417 | BMS-986158 | Bristol-Myers Squibb | I/II | Multiple Indications Cancer | Alone |
Not yet recruiting | NCT02986919 | CPI-0610 | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | II | Peripheral Nerve Tumors | Alone |
Active, not recruiting | NCT02698189 NCT02698176 | MK-8628 | Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. | I | AML Including AML de Novo and AML Secondary to MDS DLBC/ NUT Midline Carcinoma (NMC), Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) | Alone |
Recruiting | NCT02308761 NCT01987362 | TEN-010 | Hoffmann-La Roche | I | Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia/ Solid Tumors, Advanced Solid Tumors | Alone |
Terminated | NCT02369029 | BAY 1238097 | Bayer | I | Neoplasms | Alone |
Recruiting | NCT02431260 NCT02711137 | INCB054329 INCB057643 | Incyte Corporation | I/II | Advanced Cancer | Alone |
Recruiting/Not yet recruiting | NCT03068351 | RO6870810 | Hoffmann-La Roche | I | Multiple Myeloma | Alone / Daratumumab |
Recruiting | NCT03059147 | SF1126 | SignalRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | I | Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Alone |
Recruiting/Not yet recruiting | NCT02391480 | ABBV-075 | AbbVie | I | Advanced Cancer, Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Acute Myeloidm Leukemia, Multiple Myeloma, Prostate Cancer, Small Cell Lung Cance, Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma | Alone / Venetoclax |
When observing the clinical development of these compounds, it is interesting to see that there are multiple indications and not clear biological rationale for the development of BET inhibitors in some of them, what suggests that this family of compounds are developed as a tolerated but nonselective molecule.
Strategies to augment the efficacy of these compounds include the designing of more potent agents or the identification of potential biomarkers of response. To increase the efficacy an approach is the development of bivalent BET inhibitors that are 100-fold more potent than monovalent antagonist [50]. To identify biomarkers of efficacy, a recent paper suggests potential genes like HEXIM1, SERPINI1, ZCCHC24 and ZMYND8 that could predict activity in a broader range of tumors [51]. However, these data needs to be confirmed in the clinical setting.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, BET inhibitors have demonstrated preclinical activity in TNBC alone or in combination, and in some specific breast cancer scenarios mainly associated with resistance to existing therapies. Their effect goes beyond the regulation of oncogenes as they can act on a variety of cellular programs. The identification of patients whose tumors may benefit from these therapies together with studies to optimize the antitumoral properties of these compounds, represent important future challenges.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No conflicts of interest to declare.
FUNDING
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/01444), ACEPAIN; Diputación de Albacete and CRIS Cancer Foundation (to AO). BAE (Beca Ampliación de Estudios) to AO for his stay at Yale University, CT, USA. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (BFU2015-71371-R), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the Spanish Cancer Centers Network Program (RD12/0036/0003) and CIBERONC, the scientific foundation of the AECC and the CRIS Foundation (to AP). The work carried out in our laboratories receive support from the European Community through the regional development funding program (FEDER).
References
- 1. Cancer statistics, 2016CA Cancer J Clin201666730https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 2. Targeting oncogenic vulnerabilities in triple negative breast cancer: biological bases and ongoing clinical studiesOncotarget201782221834https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14731[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 3. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogeneScience198723517782https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3798106[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 4. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancerScience198924470712https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2470152[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 5. Targeting the EGF/HER Ligand-Receptor System in CancerCurr Pharm Des201622588798https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612822666160715132233[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 6. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trialLancet Oncol20161736777https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00551-3[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 7. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancerN Engl J Med2012367178391https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209124[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 8. Optimizing Endocrine Therapy for Breast CancerJ Natl Compr Canc Netw201513e5664https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0125[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 9. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trialLancet201638829973005https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32389-3[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 10. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data setsProc Natl Acad Sci USA2003100841823https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0932692100[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 11. Epigenomic regulation of oncogenesis by chromatin remodelingOncogene201635442336https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.513[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 12. Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trialLancet Oncol2014151195206https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70440-1[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 13. Targeting bromodomains: epigenetic readers of lysine acetylationNat Rev Drug Discov20141333756https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4286[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 14. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomainsNature2010468106773https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09504[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 15. The double bromodomain-containing chromatin adaptor Brd4 and transcriptional regulationJ Biol Chem20072821314145https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R700001200[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 16. Recruitment of P-TEFb for stimulation of transcriptional elongation by the bromodomain protein Brd4Mol Cell20051953545https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.029[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 17. Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomainNature199939949196https://doi.org/10.1038/20974[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 18. Targeting BET bromodomain proteins in solid tumorsOncotarget20167539974009https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9804[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 19. BET Bromodomain Proteins Brd2Brd3 and Brd4 Selectively Regulate Metabolic Pathways in the Pancreatic β-Cell. PLoS One201611e0151329https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151329[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 20. Selective Small Molecule Induced Degradation of the BET Bromodomain Protein BRD4ACS Chem Biol201510177077https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.5b00216[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 21. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemiaNature201147852428https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10334[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 22. The BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 suppresses growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patient-derived xenograft modelsOncogene20163583345https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.126[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 23. Therapeutic targeting of BET bromodomain proteins in castration-resistant prostate cancerNature201451027882https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13229[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 24. Efficacy of BET bromodomain inhibition in Kras-mutant non-small cell lung cancerClin Cancer Res201319618392https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3904[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 25. Clinical trials for BET inhibitors run ahead of the scienceDrug Discov Today Technol2016194550https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2016.06.004[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 26. Bromodomain protein BRD4 is required for estrogen receptor-dependent enhancer activation and gene transcriptionCell Reports2014846069https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.016[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 27. Inhibition of BET proteins impairs estrogen-mediated growth and transcription in breast cancers by pausing RNA polymerase advancementBreast Cancer Res Treat201515026578https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3319-1[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 28. An epigenomic approach to therapy for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancerCell Res20142480919https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.71[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 29. Resistance to everolimus driven by epigenetic regulation of MYC in ER+ breast cancersOncotarget20156240720https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2964[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 30. Inhibition of Lapatinib-Induced Kinome Reprogramming in ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer by Targeting BET Family BromodomainsCell Reports201511390404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.037[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 31. BRD4 Regulates Breast Cancer Dissemination through Jagged1/Notch1 SignalingCancer Res201676655567https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0559[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 32. The BET inhibitor JQ1 selectively impairs tumour response to hypoxia and downregulates CA9 and angiogenesis in triple negative breast cancerOncogene20173612232https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.184[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 33. Silico Analysis Guides Selection of BET Inhibitors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer TreatmentMol Cancer Ther201615182333https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0004[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 34. Response and resistance to BET bromodomain inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancerNature201652941317https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16508[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 35. A Mammalian bromodomain protein, brd4, interacts with replication factor C and inhibits progression to S phaseMol Cell Biol200222650920https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.18.6509-6520.2002[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 36. Bromodomain and Extraterminal Protein Inhibition Blocks Growth of Triple-negative Breast Cancers through the Suppression of Aurora KinasesJ Biol Chem20162912375668https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.738666[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 37. Targeting basal-like breast tumors with bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) and polo-like kinase inhibitorsOncotarget20178194789010.18632/oncotarget.14465[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 38. Targeted degradation of BET proteins in triple-negative breast cancerCancer Res201777247687https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2622[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 39. Targeting BET proteins improves the therapeutic efficacy of BCL-2 inhibition in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaLeukemia2017Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.10[Google Scholar]
- 40. Kinase and BET Inhibitors Together Clamp Inhibition of PI3K Signaling and Overcome Resistance to TherapyCancer Cell20152783751https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.05.006[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 41. The bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 (MK-8628) exerts anti-tumor activity in triple-negative breast cancer models as single agent and in combination with everolimusOncotarget20178759861310.18632/oncotarget.13814[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 42. BET Bromodomain Inhibition Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Suppressing PD-L1 ExpressionCell Reports201616282937https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.032[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 43. Induction of USP17 by combining BET and HDAC inhibitors in breast cancer cellsOncotarget201563362335https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5601[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 44. Upregulation of AKT3 Confers Resistance to the AKT Inhibitor MK2206 in Breast CancerMol Cancer Ther201615196474https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0748[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 45. Enhancer Remodeling during Adaptive Bypass to MEK Inhibition Is Attenuated by Pharmacologic Targeting of the P-TEFb ComplexCancer Discov2017730221https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0653[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 46. BET inhibitor resistance emerges from leukaemia stem cellsNature201552553842https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14888[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 47. AMPK-ULK1-mediated autophagy confers resistance to BET inhibitor JQ1 in acute myeloid leukemia stem cellsClin Cancer Res201723278194https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1903[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 48. Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma: a dose-escalation, open-label, pharmacokinetic, phase 1 studyLancet Haematol20163e196204https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(16)00021-1[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 49. Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 in patients with acute leukaemia: a dose-escalation, phase 1 studyLancet Haematol20163e18695https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00247-1[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 50. Design and characterization of bivalent BET inhibitorsNat Chem Biol201612108996https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2209[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 51. HEXIM1 as a Robust Pharmacodynamic Marker for Monitoring Target Engagement of BET Family Bromodomain Inhibitors in Tumors and Surrogate TissuesMol Cancer Ther20171638896https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0475[PubMed][Google Scholar]