Background: Limited data are available regarding real-world prescribing in patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAT) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Most current guidelines recommend a period of triple therapy with OAT and dual antiplatelet (DAPT) agents over dual therapy with an OAT and DAPT but the clinical benefit is still unclear giving rise to limited evidence-based recommendations.

Aim: To analyze the appropriateness of OAT and anti-platelet strategies post PCI in a real-world cohort of patients in 2 academic teaching hospitals.

Methods and results: In total, 103 patients were retrospectively analyzed. As the initial 3 month stragey, 97 patients (94.2%) received triple therapy, 4 received Dual Therapy (3.9%) and 2 received DAPT (1.9%). Patients with predominant bleeding risk were significantly less likely to receive triple therapy (75% vs. 95.7% vs. 95.8%, p < 0.05). Apixaban was the most common OAT (65.7%) which in most cases was prescribed at an inappropriately reduced dose of 2.5 mg BD (80.4%). The MACE, bleeding and all-cause mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups.

Discussion: Our study demonstrates the widespread use of triple therapy for the first 3 months of treatment in 2 Irish academic hospitals. DOACs were prescribed in most cases at reduced doses not currently known to prevent stroke. This study highlights the need for more explicit management algorithms to improve evidence-based management in this area.

Keywords: anticoagulants; antiplatelet therapy; coronary artery disease.