<A<em>b</em>stractText>Alliance/CALG<em>B</em> 50303 (NCT00118209), an intergroup, phase III study, compared dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxoru<em>b</em>icin, and rituxima<em>b</em> (DA-EPOCH-R) with standard rituxima<em>b</em>, cyclophosphamide, doxoru<em>b</em>icin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) as frontline therapy for diffuse large <em>B</em>-cell lymphoma.</A<em>b</em>stractText><A<em>b</em>stractText>Patients received six cycles of DA-EPOCH-R or R-CHOP. The primary o<em>b</em>jective was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary clinical o<em>b</em>jectives included response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety.</A<em>b</em>stractText><p><div>(<em>b</em>)RESULTS</<em>b</em>)</div><em>B</em>etween 2005 and 2013, 524 patients were registered; 491 eligi<em>b</em>le patients were included in the final analysis. Most patients (74%) had stage III or IV disease; International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk groups included 26% IPI 0 to 1, 37% IPI 2, 25% IPI 3, and 12% IPI 4 to 5. At a median follow-up of 5 years, PFS was not statistically different <em>b</em>etween the arms (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.27; <i>P</i> = .65), with a 2-year PFS rate of 78.9% (95% CI, 73.8% to 84.2%) for DA-EPOCH-R and 75.5% (95% CI, 70.2% to 81.1%) for R-CHOP. OS was not different (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.59; <i>P</i> = .64), with a 2-year OS rate of 86.5% (95% CI, 82.3% to 91%) for DA-EPOCH-R and 85.7% (95% CI, 81.4% to 90.2%) for R-CHOP. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more common (<i>P</i> &<em>lt</em>; .001) in the DA-EPOCH-R arm than the R-CHOP arm, including infection (16.9% <i>v</i> 10.7%, respectively), fe<em>b</em>rile neutropenia (35.0% <i>v</i> 17.7%, respectively), mucositis (8.4% <i>v</i> 2.1%, respectively), and neuropathy (18.6% <i>v</i> 3.3%, respectively). Five treatment-related deaths (2.1%) occurred in each arm.</p><A<em>b</em>stractText>In the 50303 study population, the more intensive, infusional DA-EPOCH-R was more toxic and did not improve PFS or OS compared with R-CHOP. The more favora<em>b</em>le resu<em>lt</em>s with R-CHOP compared with historical controls suggest a potential patient selection <em>b</em>ias and may preclude generaliza<em>b</em>ility of resu<em>lt</em>s to specific risk su<em>b</em>groups.</A<em>b</em>stractText>