OBJECTIVE

In a randomized study in primarily inextirpable rectal cancer, conventional radiotherapy to reduce the tumor mass was compared with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

METHODS

The combined treatment (CRT) was given every other week, four times, during a 7-week period. The drugs used were methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil in bolus injection followed by continuous infusion and leucovorin rescue. Radiotherapy (RT) was given simultaneously with five 2-Gy fractions in 3 days to a dose of 10 Gy to a total dose in the four courses of 40 Gy. This regimen was compared with radiotherapy in 2-Gy fractions to a total dose of 46 Gy in the radiotherapy group. Surgery was performed 3-4 weeks after finished treatment. Seventy patients were included between November 1988 and August 1996; 36 patients were allocated to RT and 34 to CRT.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (74%) of the patients in the CRT group underwent a locally radical resection with 20 (59%) patients without any known metastases. The corresponding figures in the RT group were 23 (64%) and 18 (50%), respectively. Among the patients who underwent any tumor resection, 5/29 (17%) in the CRT group and 12/27 (44%, p = 0.05) in the RT group have had a local recurrence. After a locally radical resection, the corresponding figures are 4% and 35% (p = 0.02), respectively. Local disease-free survival was significantly superior in the CRT group (66% at 5 years) compared with the RT group (38%, p = 0.03 log-rank test). Five-year survival was 29% (9 patients) in the CRT group and 18% (6 patients) in the RT group, a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.3). Five patients in the RT group did not complete planned treatment, mainly due to the appearance of metastatic disease. In this group toxicity was usually of Grade 0-1. In the experimental group, the toxicity usually was Grade 2 or higher, and 6 patients did not manage to fulfill the planned treatment due to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, with fewer included patients than intended, resectability rates were high in both groups. The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy significantly improved local control rates, but no statistically significant difference was found in survival between the groups. The acute toxicity after CRT was higher than after RT alone, but manageable.

Two oral fluoropyrimidine therapies have been introduced for metastatic colorectal cancer. One is a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug, capecitabine; the other is a combination of tegafur and uracil administered together with leucovorin. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these oral therapies against standard intravenous 5-fluorouracil regimens. A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the clinical effectiveness of the therapies and costs were calculated from the UK National Health Service perspective for drug acquisition, drug administration, and the treatment of adverse events. A cost-minimisation analysis was used; this assumes that the treatments are of equal efficacy, although direct randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparisons of the oral therapies with infusional 5-fluorouracil schedules were not available. The cost-minimisation analysis showed that treatment costs for a 12-week course of capecitabine (Pounds 2132) and tegafur with uracil (Pounds 3385) were lower than costs for the intravenous Mayo regimen (Pounds 3593) and infusional regimens on the de Gramont (Pounds 6255) and Modified de Gramont (Pounds 3485) schedules over the same treatment period. Oral therapies result in lower costs to the health service than intravenous therapies. Further research is needed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness of oral therapies vs infusional regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To assess local control after preoperative radiation and local excision and to determine an optimal radiotherapy regimen.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with G1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma <3-4 cm; unfavourable cT1N0 (23.6%), cT2N0 (62.9%) or borderline cT2/cT3N0 (13.5%) received 5 × 5 Gy plus 4 Gy boost (71.9%) or 55.8 Gy in 31 fractions with 5-FU and leucovorin (28.1%). Local excision (traditional technique 56.2%, transanal endoscopic microsurgery 41.6%, Kraske procedure 2.2%) was performed 6-8 weeks later. If patients were downstaged to ypT0-1 without unfavourable factors (good responders), this was deemed definitive treatment. Immediate conversion to radical surgery was recommended for remaining patients.

RESULTS

Good response to radiation was seen in 67.2% of patients in the short-course group and in 80.0% in the chemoradiation group, p = 0.30. Local recurrence at 2 years (median follow-up) in good responders was 11.8% in the short-course group and 6.2% in the chemoradiation group, p = 0.53. In the total group, a lower rate of local recurrence at 2 years was observed in elderly patients (>69 years, median value) when compared to the younger patients; 8.3% vs. 27.7%, Cox analysis hazard ratio 0.232, p = 0.016. A total of 18 patients initially managed with local excision required conversion to abdominal surgery but either refused it or were unfit. In this group, local recurrence at 2 years was 37.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests an acceptable local recurrence rate after preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of small, radiosensitive tumours in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze early results of a single institution experience using adjuvant intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) presacral boost in locally advanced rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation.

METHODS

In a 63 month period (March 1995-June 2000), 100 consecutive T(3-4)N(x) rectal cancer patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (45-50 Gy plus oral Tegafur or 5-Fluorouracil continuous intravenous infusion), radical surgery and IOERT presacral boost (mean dose, 12.5 Gy; range, 10-15 Gy). Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU-leucovorin: 4-6 cycles) was given to 52 patients. The median age was 63 years, and 39 patients were>>or=70 years old (65 males). Clinical staging was performed with computed tomography (94%) and/or endorectal ultrasound (71%) categorizing 90 cT(3), 10 cT(4), 20 cN(x), and 36 cN(+). Abdomino-perineal resection was performed in 41 cases.

RESULTS

The IOERT cancellation rate was 6%. With a median follow-up of 23 months in IOERT treated patients, three developed pelvic recurrence: one anastomotic and one in the posterior vaginal wall (simultaneously with distant metastatic disease); and one presacral (in-field IOERT) as the only site of initial failure. Distant metastasis has been observed in 14 patients (exceptionally in pT(0-1) downstaged patients: 1/20; 5%). Overall treatment tolerances, including neoadjuvant and surgical segments, were acceptable. The actuarial 4-year estimations of local control, disease-free and overall survival are 94, 75 and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IOERT electron boost to the presacral region is feasible to integrate systematically in the intensive combined treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, including neoadjuvant chemoradiation segment. Topography of pelvic recurrences identified 2/3 relapses located in non-IOERT boosted anatomic intrapelvic sites: posterior vaginal wall and anastomotic suture. Presacral recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer seems to be of low incidence, in a non-subspecialized academic surgical practice coordinated with a multidisciplinary oncology evaluation context, if an IOERT boost is included as a component of treatment together with preoperative chemoradiation.

OBJECTIVE

To report clinical experience with radioembolization (RE) plus systemic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Clinical outcomes were evaluated retrospectively among 19 patients with unresectable liver metastases from CRC who had a good performance status and a low burden of extrahepatic disease (EHD) and were eligible for RE. Most (74%) had disease confined to the liver. Concurrent treatment with 5-fluorourail/leucovorin (n = 7) or 5-fluorourail/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 12) was started 3-4 days before single treatment with RE.

RESULTS

Overall response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 84% (two complete responses and 14 partial responses). Median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10.4 months and median overall survival (OS) time was 29.4 months. For patients with disease confined to the liver, PFS improved (10.7 mo vs 3.6 mo; P = .09), with significant prolongation of OS (median, 37.8 mo vs 13.4 mo; P = .03) compared with those who had EHD. Nine patients, including three long-term >> 3 y) survivors, remained alive after a median follow-up of 18.6 months. Serious treatment-related toxicities included febrile neutropenia with concurrent FOLFOX treatment, a perforated duodenal ulcer, and one death from hepatic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings confirm the effectiveness of RE plus systemic chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. Patients with liver-confined disease derived the greatest benefit, with median survival times beyond 36 months. Larger datasets from ongoing phase III trials are needed to further define the safety and efficacy of RE in the first-line setting.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a pilot trial of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUDR), leucovorin, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cisplatin (FLAP) in nonresectable hepatocellular cancer (HCC) confined to the liver and assess the effects of hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viral markers on toxicity, response to treatment, and patient survival.

METHODS

Of 31 HCC patients, 13 were HBV- and HCV-nonreactive, and 18 had evidence of either current or prior HBV and/or HCV infection. Treatment was delivered through percutaneous hepatic arterial catheters, and Infusaid pumps (Shiley Infusaid, Norwood, MA) were placed in responding patients. Cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and Adriamycin (30 to 35 mg/m2) were administered on day 1, followed by a continuous 24-hour HAI of an admixture of floxuridine (60 mg/m2) and leucovorin (15 mg/m2) daily for 4 days. Treatment was repeated every 5 weeks.

RESULTS

Twelve (41%) of 29 assessable patients had a partial response (PR), with a median time to disease progression of 13 months. Six (50%) of 12 HBV-negative (HBV-)/HCV-negative (HCV-) and six of 17 (35%) HBV-positive (HCV+) and/or HCV-positive (HCV+) patients achieved a PR. Eight patients have been maintained in remission for a median duration greater than 15.5 months. The median survival duration of all 31 patients was 15 months, 7.5 months among HBV+ and/or HCV+ patients, and significantly longer among hepatitis-non-reactive patients (P = .007). (A median has not yet been reached.) Granulocylopenia (< 0.1 x 10(3)/microL), thrombocytopenia (< 25 x 10(3)/microL), and hospitalizations for infectious complications were significantly more common among HBV-HCV-reactive than -nonreactive patients: 56%, 50%, and 67% versus 15%, 15%, and 8%, respectively (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

HAI of FLAP has induced long-term PR and has palliated extensive nonresectable HCC. Positive hepatitis serology appeared to increase bone marrow susceptibility to myelotoxic drugs. Conceivably, one or both viruses may have a direct inhibitory effect on bone marrow progenitors and thereby contribute to the observed myelotoxicity.

The main objectives of this study were to assess the use of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (FA) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases and to determine the response rate and proportion of patients that could be down-staged to resectable tumors. Forty patients were treated with irinotecan (180 mg/m2 over 30 min) on d 1, FA (200 mg/m2 over 30 min) followed by 5-FU (400 mg/m2 bolus and continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 over 22 h) on d 1 and 2 every 2 wk. The overall response rate was 55% (95% CI: 39.5-70.4%). The progression-free survival was 12.1 mo (95% CI: 11.4-14.8 mo). The median overall survival was 20 mo (95% CI: 17.7-26.6 mo). Four patients (10%) have undergone liver resection after a median of eight cycles. Those patients remained alive with a median follow up period of 33 mo. The principal grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia in 20 patients (50%). We conclude that the regimen of irinotecan/5-FU/FA was highly active in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases with limited toxicity. In a subgroup of patients with initial inoperable liver metastases, this regimen was able to down-stage the disease to an operable stage.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan administered as a 5-day schedule synchronously with 5-fluorouracil (5FU), leucovorin (LV) and preoperative pelvic radiation (45 Gy) for primary borderline/unresectable, locally advanced rectal cancer. The study used escalating doses of intravenous irinotecan (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 mg m(-2)) administered on days 1-5 and 29-33 followed by low dose LV (20 mg m(-2)) and 5FU (350 mg m(-2) over 1 h) in sequential cohorts. Preoperative pelvic radiotherapy using a three- or four-field technique and megavoltage photons comprised 45 Gy given in 25 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction. Surgery in the form of mesorectal excision was performed 6-10 weeks later. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen was performed according to techniques of Quirke, and compared with clinical staging. A distance of 1 mm or less between the peripheral extent of the tumour and the radial resection margin defined an involved circumferential resection margin (CRM). The MTD was determined as the dose causing more than a third of patients to have a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as specific grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Once the MTD was reached, a further 14 patients were treated at the dose level below the MTD. In total, 57 patients received irinotecan at the eight dose levels. The final cohort reached DLT after only four patients had been enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range 26-75), 37 male and 20 female subjects. The MTD of irinotecan in this schedule was 20 mg m(-2) when three out of four patients experienced DLT. Dose limiting grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was reported in seven out of 57 patients, three at the 20 mg m(-2) dose level. Serious haematological toxicity (grade 3) was minimal and reported in only three patients; one grade 3 neutropaenia, one grade 4 neutropaenia and one grade 3 febrile neutropaenia and anaemia. Compliance was good with 93 and 89% of patients completing radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. The remaining patients had only minor deviations from protocol therapy. Eight patients did not proceed to surgery, in six cases because they remained unresectable or had developed metastatic disease, one patient was unfit for surgery and one died as a result of complications from radiotherapy. Forty-nine patients underwent a potentially curative surgical resection. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen demonstrated pCR 12 out of 49 (24%) and 12 out of 57 (21%) overall. A histologically confirmed clear circumferential resection margin (CRM) was achieved in 39 out of 49 (80%) of those resected, and 39 out of 57 (68%) overall. In conclusion, MTD with this scheduled regimen of irinotecan is 20 mg m(-2) (days 1-5 and 29-33). The acceptable toxicity and compliance at 18 mg m(-2) recommend testing this dose in future phase III studies. The tumour downstaging and complete resection rates (negative CRM) are encouragingly high for this very locally advanced group.

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of combining i.v. irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of pirarubicin in non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were included in a phase II trial with i.v. irinotecan/5-FU/LV administered every 2 weeks, combined with HAI pirarubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. In most cases HAI was administered via a percutaneous catheter.

RESULTS

The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia, encountered in 78% of the patients. When all patients were considered in the analysis, tumour response rate was 15 out of 31 [48%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 32% to 65%]. Liver resection was made possible in 11 patients (35%; 95% CI 21% to 53%). There were no toxic death. Median overall survival was 20.5 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.1 months. In patients with completely resected metastases, median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival was 20.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The multimodality approach used in the present study was well-tolerated and yielded dramatic responses. An aggressive approach combining i.v. and HAI chemotherapy deserves further investigation.

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the therapy-induced reduction of the (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) maximum standardized uptake value in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab could predict the objective response and outcome early during the treatment.

METHODS

The study was performed as a part of a phase II trial evaluating cetuximab plus the leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen. The objective response was evaluated according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) every 6 weeks. The early metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET was assessed according to our own evaluated cutoff value (<35%) after receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty of 22 patients had positive baseline 18F-FDG-PET. The best RECIST response was: complete response (CR), 3; partial response (PR), 9; stable disease (SD), 8. Twelve patients (60%) were classified as metabolic responders and 8 (40%) as nonresponders. At the median follow-up time of 11 months, median time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) for early metabolic responders versus nonresponders were 11 versus 5 months (P = 0.0016) and 16 versus 6 months (P = 0.1493), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The early metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET predicted the clinical outcome in this series of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.

BACKGROUND

Systemic chemotherapy is being used increasingly in patients with colorectal cancer. The effects of prior systemic adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy on morbidity following hepatic resection for metastases are not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the peri-operative impact of systemic chemotherapy on liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases.

METHODS

Ninety-six resections for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases performed from July 2001 to July 2003 (93%>> or =2 segments) were reviewed. Pre-operative demographics, peri-operative features, and post-operative outcomes were collected prospectively. Type of chemotherapy and the temporal relationship of chemotherapy to the liver resection were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of 96 patients (55%) received a mean of 5.7 cycles (6.1 months) of systemic chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection, with a median interval of 12 months from end of chemotherapy to liver resection (range 1-75 months). Thirty-five received 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) alone, nine had irinotecan (CPT-11) in addition to 5-FU/LV, and nine were not specified. Pre-operative age, sex, co-morbidities, ASA score, biochemical and liver enzyme profiles, tumor number, and extent and technique of hepatic resection were the same in the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts. Mean tumor size was smaller (4.5 cm vs. 5.8 cm) and synchronous metastases were half as common (25% vs. 49%) in the chemotherapy group. Liver resection operative time was equivalent (270 min) in the two groups. Higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (1,000 ml vs. 850 ml), but fewer transfusions (23% vs. 15%) were associated with the chemotherapy group. Although not statistically significant, post-operative liver enzyme peaks were higher in the chemotherapy group (AST = 402 U/L vs. 302 U/L, P = 0.09 and ALT = 433 U/L vs. 312 U/L, P = 0.1). Peak changes in INR and serum bilirubin did not differ. Complications and length of stay (LOS) did not differ between the groups. The only post-operative death was in the non-chemotherapy group. Interestingly, hepatic steatosis was present in 28% of the non-chemotherapy cases and 57% of the chemotherapy resection specimens (P = 0.005) and was marked (>30%) in 7% and 10%, respectively. Further analysis of the chemotherapy group based on the interval between completion of chemotherapy and the hepatic resection (<6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, and >2 years) revealed a trend towards worse outcomes in most categories for those in the >2 years cohort. When comparing the 5-FU/LV alone, to the CPT-11 group there were no significant differences except higher intra-operative blood loss in the group receiving 5-FU/LV alone (1,295 ml vs. 756 ml, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite variations in biochemical function and hepatic steatosis, short-term clinical outcomes are not affected by the administration of chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection. Furthermore, there is no detrimental effect of close timing of chemotherapy prior to resection, and there are no appreciable differences between irinotecan containing regimes and more traditional 5-FU-only based therapies, although the subset sample sizes were small in this study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

Irinotecan and infusional bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy (FOLFIRI [5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan]) + bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-B) is 1 of the cornerstones of first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, bevacizumab was approved for use after the AVF2107 trial that included a bolus 5-FU schedule (IFL [irinotecan + 5-FU + leucovorin]). No randomized trials have been published comparing FOLFIRI and FOLFIRI-B. The aim of this review is to pool all published data on the activity and efficacy of FOLFIRI-B as first-line therapy in treating advanced CRC in prospective and retrospective studies. We performed a systematic review, through PubMed and EMBASE, of all prospective and retrospective published studies exploring the efficacy of FOLFIRI-B as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced CRC. Pooled estimates of the response rate (RR) and weighted median of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from all FOLFIRI-B-related studies were calculated. Rates of metastasectomy and bevacizumab-related severe toxicities were reported. A total of 29 studies (8 randomized controlled trials, 1 phase IV trial, 2 phase II trials, 4 observational studies, 4 prospective nonrandomized cohort studies, and 10 retrospective case series) were retrieved for a total of 3502 patients. Overall, the pooled RR (n = 22 publications) was 51.4%. Median PFS and OS (n = 25 and 20 publications) were 10.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9-12.8) and 23.7 months (95% CI, 18.1-31.6), respectively. The pooled rate of surgical resection of metastases (any site of surgery: n = 7 publications) was 9.3% (range, 3.6%-24%), and rate of liver resections (liver surgery only: n = 7 publications) was 18% (range 8%-25%). Grade 3-4 bevacizumab-related toxicities were also comparable with larger phase III trials. FOLFIRI-B is used worldwide as upfront treatment for stage IV CRC. This indication is confirmed by robust data about RR, PFS, and survival obtained, which this pooled analysis of 29 trials also found. FOLFIRI-B remains 1 of the referent combinations when bevacizumab is considered as first-line therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose intensification and autologous stem-cell rescue (ASCR) to determine therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

Induction consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (LOMAC) in 27 patients, or fluorouracil, cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FCAP) in 32 patients. Intensification after LOMAC was cyclophosphamide and thiotepa (CyTepa) with ASCR, and after FCAP it was cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carmustine (BCNU) in all but eight patients who received CyTepa.

RESULTS

Median survival from study entry for the entire group was 13.3 months. Median time to progression from reinfusion for the 45 patients who underwent intensification was 7.5 months. After LOMAC and intensification, there were 12 complete responses (CR) (nine partial responses [PRs] after induction converted to CRs). Responses after FCAP and intensification were eight CRs (two PRs after induction converted to CRs). Median time to treatment failure from reinfusion was 5.4 months for LOMAC and intensification, and was 10.5 months for FCAP and intensification. Median survival from study entry was 15.1 months for all 27 LOMAC patients and 9.3 months for all 32 FCAP patients. Median time to treatment failure from reinfusion for 11 patients who were CRs at intensification has not been reached and is more than 13 months compared with a median of 5.5 months for the 23 patients in partial remission at intensification.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose intensification therapy has led to increased CR rates in metastatic breast cancer. The role of such therapy in the treatment of stage IV breast cancer requires further refinement.

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the most frequent gastrointestinal cancer in Mexico. Only 33% of cases are resectable. Our aim was to determine the activity and toxicity of the cisplatin, etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil combination in initially unresectable tumors and to determine its ability to permit resection.

METHODS

Sixty patients with unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m2, etoposide 80 mg/m2, leucovorin 25 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 by central intravenous catheter for 4 consecutive days. Two courses of this combination were followed by surgical resection.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 36.8% (20 partial responses and one complete response). By using logistic regression analysis, the tumor, node, and metastasis stage (risk ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.02; P = .039) was identified as the response determinant to chemotherapy. Major toxicity was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 67% of patients. Ten resections were performed (17.5%); five were curative and five palliative. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 40% and 10%, respectively. The median length of survival was 7.46 and 13.3 months for nonresponders and responders, respectively (P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

The cisplatin, etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil combination is active in advanced gastric cancer and the toxicity level is acceptable. This treatment permits a 17.5% resection rate in previously unresectable tumors. A randomized trial of surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery is warranted.

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for patients with advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

METHODS

Patients with SCCHN according to World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 2 or less and adequate organ function were enrolled. The CT regimen (PTL) was 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin (P) on Day 1, 800 mg per day oral tegafur (T), and 60 mg per day oral leucovorin (L) for 14 days. The CT was administered at outpatient clinics for 14-day cycles. PTL was initiated with the intent of organ preservation and it was continued for a maximum of six cycles before locoregional therapy. Reevaluation after three cycles led to the termination of CT when the response was less than a partial response. CT was discontinued immediately upon evidence of tumor progression or excessive toxicity.

RESULTS

From March 1996 through July 1999, 97 patients were enrolled consecutively. All participants were men with a median age of 56 years (range, 37-70 years). The primary tumor sites were the tongue base, 14, and the hypopharynx, 83. Sixteen percent of the tumors were Stage III, 84% were Stage IV, 62% were Stage T4, and 44% were Stage N2-3. The median number of CT cycles was six. On an intent-to-treat basis, 26 patients (27%) achieved complete responses and 32 patients (33%) achieved partial responses. The overall response rate was 60% (95% confidence interval, 50-70%). The most common toxicities of WHO Grade 3 or higher included (percent of patients): anemia, 8.3%; stomatitis, 6.3%; thrombocytopenia, 3.1%; and vomiting, 3.1%. With a median follow-up period of 3 years, the overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 40% and 38%, respectively. Organ preservation was achieved in 70% (29 of 37) of the surviving patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The outpatient PTL regimen was a moderately effective and minimally toxic CT for SCCHN. PTL should be studied further in combination with other active agents or radiotherapy for patients with SCCHN.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) continues to be widely used for treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. Because many tumors show primary or acquired resistance, it is important to understand the molecular basis underlying the mechanism of resistance to 5-FU. In addition to its effect on thymidylate synthase inhibition and DNA synthesis, 5-FU may also influence RNA metabolism. Our previous studies revealed that colorectal cancer cells resistant to bolus 5-FU (HCT-8/4hFU) showed significantly decreased incorporation of the drug into RNA. Resistance to bolus 5-FU was associated with lower expression of UMP kinase (UMPK), an enzyme that plays an important role in the activation of 5-FU to 5-FUTP and its incorporation into RNA. Activities of other 5-FU-metabolizing enzymes (e.g., thymidine kinase, uridine phosphorylase, thymidine phosphorylase, and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase) remained unchanged between sensitive and resistant cell lines. Herein, we show that UMPK down-regulation in 5-FU-sensitive cells (HCT-8/P) induces resistance to bolus 5-FU treatment. Moreover, HCT-8/4hFU cells are even more cross-resistant to treatment with 5-fluorouridine, consistent with the current understanding of 5-fluorouridine as a RNA-directed drug. Importantly, colorectal cancer hepatic metastases isolated from patients clinically resistant to weekly bolus 5-FU/leucovorin treatment exhibited decreased mRNA expression of UMPK but not thymidylate synthase or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase compared with tumor samples of patients not previously exposed to 5-FU. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of acquired resistance to 5-FU in colorectal cancer and implicate UMPK as an important mechanism of clinical resistance to pulse 5-FU treatment in some patients.

BACKGROUND

Thirty previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomized as part of two multicenter Phase III trials. Twenty-two patients were randomized to receive either 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/interferon alfa-2A (IFN-alpha) or 5-FU/leucovorin (11 patients in each arm). Eight patients were randomized to receive 5-FU/IFN-alpha or 5-FU alone (4 patients in each arm).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (13 patients treated with 5-FU/IFN-alpha and 10 patients treated with 5-FU/leucovorin or 5-FU alone) were evaluated regularly for response by computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen when treatment began and then every 6-8 weeks.

RESULTS

Incidentally, four patients developed hepatic steatosis during treatment with IFN-alpha and 5-FU. The diagnosis was based on a decreased CT value of the liver parenchyma by repeated CT scans of the abdomen during treatment, and this diagnosis was verified histologically by liver biopsy. There was no relationship to cumulative IFN-alpha or 5-FU dose. Based on posttreatment CT scans, the liver parenchyma changes were reversible after therapy was stopped, and there were no significant clinical sequelae. No patients treated with 5-FU/leucovorin or 5-FU alone experienced a decreased CT value of the liver parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic steatosis was been observed in approximately 30% of patients treated with IFN-alpha and 5-FU. The hepatic changes were fully reversible after the treatment was stopped. Recognition of this condition is important to prevent a patient from being labeled as having progressive hepatic metastases.

Whether gastric cancer in young adults differs from gastric cancer in older patients has been a controversial issue. It has long been suspected that young patients with gastric cancer have different biological features with a more aggressive course of disease and a poorer prognosis than older patients. This, however, has not been firmly substantiated. We report on the clinical course of four patients (three female and one male) with locally advanced (n = 1) or metastasized (n = 3) non-resectable gastric cancer diagnosed under the age of 29 years (23, 25, 27, 28 years). Prior to diagnosis, all three women had recently been pregnant (1-22 months). Diagnosis was endoscopically biopsy-proven and staging work-up was performed by primary explorative surgery (n = 1), laparoscopy and explorative surgery (n = 1) or CAT scan and ultrasound (n = 2). The delay between initial symptoms and diagnosis was 8-22 weeks (median, 10 weeks). The histology was signet-ring cell (n = 2) or undifferentiated (n = 2) gastric cancer. All patients had the diffuse type of gastric cancer according to Lauren. Patients were treated with the FLAP polychemotherapy regimen consisting of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cisplatinum, as previously reported. The best response after chemotherapy was partial in two patients. Two patients showed progressive disease. Secondary surgery was performed in three responding patients (one of them responded only locally). One patient achieved no evidence of disease after complete tumor resection (R0). In two patients surgery was palliative (R2/exploration). Three patients died 6, 4 and 8 months after diagnosis. One patient is still alive. In our series, very young adults with gastric cancer had adverse clinical and pathological features. In accordance with other reports, we observed a predominance of female patients and a possible association with recent pregnancies. Though the delay between the first symptoms and diagnosis in our patients was no different from that reported for older patients, special emphasis should be given to prompt referral and diagnostic investigations, ensuring the diagnosis of gastric cancer early in the course of disease.

BACKGROUND

The Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of TS-1 for Colon Cancer (ACTS-CC) is a phase III trial designed to validate the non-inferiority of S-1 to UFT/leucovorin (LV) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. We report the results of a planned safety analysis.

METHODS

Patients aged 20-80 years with curatively resected stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive UFT/LV (UFT, 300 mg m(-2) per day as tegafur; LV, 75 mg per day on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 courses) or S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg per day on days 1-28, every 42 days, 4 courses). Treatment status and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 1535 enrolled patients, a total of 1504 (756 allocated to S-1 and 748 to UFT/LV) were analysed. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 77% in the S-1 group and 73% in the UFT/LV group. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) were 80% in S-1 and 74% in UFT/LV. Stomatitis, anorexia, hyperpigmentation, and haematological toxicities were common in S-1, whereas increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were common in UFT/LV. The incidences of grade 3 AEs were 16% and 14%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AE profiles differed between the groups, feasibility of the protocol treatment was good. Both S-1 and UFT/LV could be safely used as adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

The authors previously reported that 30 minutes of oral cryotherapy inhibits 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced stomatitis. The current trial was designed to determine whether a longer duration of cryotherapy would provide additional protection.

METHODS

This trial involved patients who were receiving their first course of a 5-FU plus leucovorin chemotherapy regimen, for which stomatitis is a major dose-limiting toxicity. These patients were randomized to receive either 30 or 60 minutes of oral cryotherapy given at around the same time as the 5-FU therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 178 evaluable patients were studied. Both cryotherapy groups had similar degrees of mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors continue to recommend the use of 30 minutes of oral cryotherapy for patients receiving bolus intensive courses of 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of osteosarcoma includes cisplatin and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX); both agents exert significant toxicity, and HDMTX requires complex pharmacokinetic monitoring and leucovorin rescue. In the previous OS91 trial, the treatment of localized disease with carboplatin, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and HDMTX yielded outcomes comparable to those of cisplatin-based regimens and caused less toxicity. To build on this experience, the authors conducted a multi-institutional trial (OS99) that evaluated the efficacy of carboplatin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin without HDMTX in patients with newly diagnosed, localized, resectable osteosarcoma.

METHODS

Treatment was comprised of 12 cycles of chemotherapy administered over 35 weeks: 3 cycles of carboplatin (dose targeted to area under the concentration-time curve of 8 mg/mL × min on Day 1) and ifosfamide (at a dose of 2.65 g/m(2) daily ×3 days) and 1 cycle of doxorubicin (at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) daily ×3 days) before surgical resection, followed by 2 additional cycles of the combination of carboplatin and ifosfamide and 3 cycles each of doxorubicin (25 mg/m(2) daily ×2 days) combined with ifosfamide or carboplatin.

RESULTS

A total of 72 eligible patients (median age, 13.4 years) were enrolled between May 1999 and May 2006. Forty of the 66 (60.6%) evaluable patients had good histologic responses (>90% tumor necrosis) to preoperative chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year event-free survival rate was 66.7% ± 7.0% for the OS99 trial compared with 66.0% ± 6.8% for the OS91 trial (P = .98). The estimated 5-year survival rate was 78.9% ± 6.3% for the OS99 trial and 74.5% ± 6.3% for the OS91 trial (P = .40).

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen used in the OS99 trial was found to produce outcomes comparable to those of cisplatin-containing or HDMTX-containing regimens. This therapy offers a good alternative for patients, particularly those who demonstrate an intolerance of HDMTX, and for institutions that cannot provide pharmacokinetic monitoring for MTX.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the FOLFIRI regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) after the failure of gemcitabine and platinum salts.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with histologically confirmed, metastatic PAC and World Health Organization performance status (PS) ≤ 2 received FOLFIRI-1 [irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 and leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) as a 46-h infusion, biweekly] or FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and leucovorin 400 mg/m(2), then 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) as a 46-h infusion and irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) repeated on day 3, biweekly) after failure of gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapies as a systematic policy in two institutions between January 2005 and May 2010. Tumor response, time to progression (TTP), overall survival rate (OS) and grade 3-4 toxicities were retrospectively studied. Subgroup analyses were performed to search for prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (52.4% male, median age 59 years) were analyzed. Among them, 42.9% were PS 0, 38.1% were PS 1 and 19.0% were PS 2. Fifty one patients (81.0%) had liver metastases. Before the FOLFIRI regimen, patients had received 1 line (n = 19), 2 lines (n = 39) or 3 lines (n = 5) of chemotherapy. Median TTP obtained with the line before FOLFIRI was 3.9 mo (95% CI: 3.4-5.3 mo). A total of 480 cycles was completed (median: 6 cycles, range: 1-51 cycles). The main reason for discontinuing FOLFIRI was tumor progression (90.3%). Tumor control was achieved in 25 patients (39.7%) (partial response: n = 5, stable disease: n = 20) with FOLFIRI. Median TTP was 3.0 mo (95% CI: 2.1-3.9 mo) and median OS was 6.6 mo (95% CI: 5.3-8.1 mo). Dose adaptation was required in 36 patients (57.1%). Fifteen patients (23.8%) had grade 3-4 toxicities, mainly hematological (n = 11) or digestive (n = 4). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 patients. There was no toxic death. PS 2 was significantly associated with poor TTP [hazard ratio (HR): 16.036, P < 0.0001] and OS (HR: 4.003, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFIRI regimen had an acceptable toxicity and an interesting efficacy in our study, limited to patients in good condition (PS 0-1).