A 60-year-old woman with a history of unresectable colon adenocarcinoma was treated by chemotherapy with a combination of oxaliplatin with leucovorin and fluorouracil. Progressive dyspnea and bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates developed. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage confirmed pulmonary eosinophilia. Clinical and radiologic aspects of eosinophilic lung disease cleared after cessation of this combination of chemotherapy and did not recur after reintroduction of leucovorin/fluorouracil alone, suggesting that oxaliplatin was the causative agent. Care was taken to rule out other possible causes for eosinophilic pneumonia.

BACKGROUND

Success of surgical treatment for pancreatic and periampullary cancer is often limited due to locoregional recurrence and/or the development of distant metastases.

OBJECTIVE

The survival benefit of celiac axis infusion (CAI) and radiotherapy (RT) versus observation after resection of pancreatic or periampullary cancer was investigated.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial, 120 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven pancreatic or periampullary cancer received either adjuvant treatment consisting of intra-arterial mitoxantrone, 5-FU, leucovorin, and cisplatinum in combination with 30 x 1.8 Gy radiotherapy (group A) or no adjuvant treatment (group B). Groups were stratified for tumor type (pancreatic vs. periampullary tumors).

RESULTS

After surgery, 120 patients were randomized (59 patients in the treatment group, 61 in the observation group). The median follow-up was 17 months. No significant overall survival benefit was seen (median, 19 vs. 18 months resp.). Progressive disease was seen in 86 patients: in 37 patients in the CAI/RT group, and in 49 patients in the observation group (log-rank P < 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed significantly less liver metastases after adjuvant treatment in periampullary tumors (log-rank P < 0.03) without effect on local recurrence. Nonetheless, there was no significant effect on overall survival in these patients (log-rank P = 0.15). In patients with pancreatic cancer, CAI/RT had no significant effect on local recurrence (log-rank P = 0.12) neither on the development of liver metastases (log-rank P = 0.76) and consequently, no effect on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This adjuvant treatment schedule results in a prolonged time to progression. For periampullary tumors, CAI/RT induced a significant reduction in the development of liver metastases, with a possible effect on overall survival. Especially in these tumors, CAI/RT might prove beneficial in larger groups and further research is warranted.

BACKGROUND

The primary end-point of our randomized trial was sphincter preservation. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether distal bowel clearance < or =1 cm is safe after radiation.

METHODS

The study randomized 312 patients with cT3-4 resectable low-lying and mid-rectal cancer to receive either preoperative irradiation (5 x 5 Gy) with immediate total mesorectal excision (TME) or chemoradiation (50.4 Gy, bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin) with delayed TME. After anterior resection, pathologists prospectively measured macroscopic and microscopic distal bowel clearance.

RESULTS

Macroscopic and microscopic distal bowel clearance, distal intramural spread, sphincter preservation, local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival did not differ in the two randomized groups. Pooled analysis of the two groups showed that the incidence of local recurrence at 4 years (median follow-up) for patients with macroscopic clearance < or =1 cm (n = 42) and >1 cm (n = 124) was 11.3% and 15.4%, respectively (P = 0.514); the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.23-2.07. The corresponding values for patients with microscopic clearance < or =1 cm (n = 51) and >1 cm (n = 101) were 9.6% and 17.6% (P = 0.220; HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.17-1.53).

CONCLUSIONS

After preoperative radiotherapy, distal bowel clearance < or =1 cm did not compromise local control.

OBJECTIVE

Gemcitabine and capecitabine (gem-cap), gemcitabine and erlotinib (gem-e), and folfirinox (5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-irinotecan-oxaliplatin) are new treatment options for metastatic pancreatic cancer, but they are also more expensive and potentially more toxic than gemcitabine alone (gem). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of these treatment options compared with gem.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to examine costs and outcomes of gem-cap, gem-e, folfirinox, and gem in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer from the perspective of a government health care plan. Ontario health economic and costing data (2010 Canadian dollars) were used. Efficacy data for the treatments were obtained from the published literature. Resource utilization data were derived from a chart review of consecutive metastatic patients treated for pancreatic cancer at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, 2008-2009, and supplemented with data from the literature. Utilities were obtained by surveying medical oncologists across Canada using the EQ-5D. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (icers) were calculated.

RESULTS

The icers for gem-cap, gem-e, and folfirinox compared with gem were, respectively, CA$84,299, CA$153,631, and CA$133,184 per quality-adjusted life year (qaly). The model was driven mostly by drug acquisition costs. Given a willingness-to-pay (wtp) threshold greater than CA$130,000/qaly, folfirinox was most cost-effective treatment. When the wtp threshold was less than CA$80,000/qaly, gem alone was most cost-effective. The gem-e option was dominated by the other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The most cost-effective treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer depends on the societal wtp threshold. If the societal wtp threshold were to be relatively high or if drug costs were to be substantially reduced, folfirinox might be cost-effective.

The cumulative pharmacokinetic pattern of oxaliplatin, a new diamminecyclohexane platinum derivative, was studied in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin was administered by i. v. infusion (130 mg/m2) over 2 h every 3 weeks, and 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin were administered weekly. A very sensitive method, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, allowed for the determination of total plasma and ultracentrifugable (UC) and RBC platinum levels on day 1, at 0, 2, and 5 h, and on days 8, 15, and 22. Sixteen patients underwent three or more courses, and six of them underwent six or more courses. The platinum concentration curves were quite similar from one course to another, with a high peak value 2 h after administration (day 1, Cmax = 3201 +/- 609 microgram/liter) and a rapid decrease (day 8, 443 +/- 99 microgram/liter). Cmax of both total and UC platinum levels in plasma remained unchanged throughout the treatment. The mean total platinum half-life in plasma was 9 days. We found residual levels of total platinum on day 22 (161 +/- 45 microgram/liter), but we observed no significant accumulation for the four first cycles (P = 0.57). In contrast, platinum accumulated significantly in RBCs after three courses (+91% at day 22 of the third cycle versus day 22 of the first cycle, P = 0.000018), and its half-life there was equivalent to that of RBCs. The patterns of UC and total platinum concentration curves were very similar and correlated significantly (P < 10(-6)) at all sampling times. The mean UC:total platinum ratio was 15% at day 1 and 5% at days 8, 15, and 22 in the 3-week treatment course. Unlike cisplatin, which rapidly accumulates in plasma as both free and bound platinum, oxaliplatin does not accumulate in plasma, but it does accumulate in RBCs, after repeated cycles at the currently recommended dose (130 mg/m2) and schedule of administration (every 3 weeks).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), using a biweekly LV5FU2 regimen and increasing doses of CPT-11, and to assess the efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

All patients had metastatic CRC and a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. CPT-11 was administered over a 90-minute infusion every 2 weeks at a range of dose levels (100, 120, 150, 180, 200, 220, and 260 mg/m(2)). LV5FU2 was started 1 hour after the end of the biweekly CPT-11 infusion and was also administered on day 2.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were entered onto this trial; 549 cycles were administered. The MTD was not reached at 260 mg/m(2), and a dose level of 300 mg/m(2) was added. The MTD as defined in the protocol was not reached at this dose level either, but all patients had cycles delayed and/or required a dose reduction. This dose was deemed to be the MTD. To take into account both the toxicity of and compliance with the biweekly schedule, the recommended CPT-11 dose was established at 180 to 200 mg/m(2). Antitumor activity was observed at almost all dose levels, with an objective response rate of 22%. Median time to progression was 6.3 months and overall survival was 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The biweekly CPT-11/LV5FU2 combination is feasible and safe, without overlapping toxicity. CPT-11 at 180 to 200 mg/m(2) in combination with LV5FU2 has been selected as the recommended dose for further studies.

The primary curative therapy of colorectal cancer is surgical resection. However, within the last 15 years, prospectively randomized appropriately powered clinical trials have convincingly demonstrated that adjunctive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit to all patients with node-positive disease (stage III) and arguably to high-risk node-negative (stage II) cases. In the United States, the clinical trials encompassing greater than 5,000 cases have demonstrated that fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin used in a variety of doses and schedules improves disease-free and overall survival in resected node-positive (stage III) colorectal cancer. The postoperative use of 5-FU/leucovorin for approximately 6 months represents standard of care for such patients. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of nonfluorinated pyrimidine chemotherapeutic agents in adjuvant chemotherapy for resected large bowel cancer. 5-FU/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) versus 5-FU/leucovorin are being tested in a national intergroup clinical trial. Another trial is evaluating 5-FU/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin versus 5-FU/leucovorin alone. These clinical trials will be important in defining the appropriate standard of care for patients with resected colorectal cancer, since recent studies in advanced colorectal cancer in the United States and in Western Europe have demonstrated that combinations of 5-FU/leucovorin and CPT-11 or 5-FU/ leucovorin and oxaliplatin are superior to 5-FU/leucovorin alone.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the presence and frequency of micrometastasis in lymph nodes of patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiation followed by curative resection.

METHODS

All 56 patients included were treated with 5-FU and leucovorin plus 5,040 cGy, followed by radical surgery and were diagnosed with stage II distal rectal adenocarcinoma after complete pathological examination (ypT3-4N0M0). Immunohistochemistry was assessed with cytokeratin monoclonal antibody AE1/AE3. Three 4-microm paraffin sections were obtained from each lymph node, cut at 50 microm apart from each other. The results were reviewed by two independent pathologists.

RESULTS

Mean number of lymph nodes was 9.6 per patient. Four patients (7%) and seven lymph nodes (1.35%) were positive for micrometastasis. Three patients had pT3 and one a pT4 tumor. One of the patients had positive micrometastasis and the presence of mucinous deposits. One other patient had mucinous deposits without any micrometastasis. All four patients are alive with no evidence of recurrent disease. Fourteen patients negative for micrometastasis had recurrent disease (25%), eight systemic (14.7%) and six locoregional (10.3%). There were two cancer-related deaths. The mean follow-up period was 39 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiation showed a surprisingly low rate of micrometastasis detection (7%), even in high-risk patients (T3 and T4 tumors). Lymph node micrometastasis was not associated with decreased overall or disease-free survival. The identification of mucinous deposits on lymph nodes with no viable tumor cells may be direct evidence of lymph node downstaging. The downstaging effect of preoperative chemoradiation therapy may be significant in reducing even micrometastasis detection in low rectal cancer managed by this treatment strategy.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this exploratory subgroup analysis of the fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel (FLOT)65+ trial was to determine tolerability and feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy in elderly, potentially operable esophagogastric cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥65 with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were randomized to perioperative chemotherapy consisting of four pre- and four postoperative cycles of infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FLO) without or with docetaxel 50 mg m(-)(2) (FLOT), every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with a median age of 70 years were randomized and 43 patients started preoperative chemotherapy (FLO, 22; FLOT, 21). Thirty-eight (86.4%) patients completed four cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and 32 (74.4%) proceeded to surgery, with 67.4% R0 resections on intent-to-treat analysis (90.1% of the 32 patients who underwent resection). Median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.3 months. Compared with the FLO group, the FLOT group showed a trend towards an improved median PFS (21.1 vs 12.0 months; P=0.09), however, associated with increased chemotherapy related toxicity. No perioperative mortality was observed. Postoperative morbidity was observed in 46.9% of patients (FLO, 35.3%; FLOT, 60%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant FLO or FLOT may offer a reasonable chance of curative surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced resectable gastroesophageal cancer. However, the increase in side effects with the FLOT regimen and postoperative morbidity should be carefully considered when an intensive chemotherapy regimen is planned.

Chemotherapeutic regimens that markedly improve survival and quality of life in patients with bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma) have not yet been developed. Currently, radical resection is the only potentially curative treatment modality for these patients. However, complete resection is often impossible and, even when achieved, is typically followed by metastasis and/or local recurrence. During the past 25 years, patients with cholangiocarcinoma have received chemotherapy in an attempt to improve their prognosis; effective methods are systemic administration, hepatic arterial infusion, and intraductal infusion. 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, mitomycin C, and cisplatin remain the agents used most frequently (either singly or in combination) for treating cholangiocarcinoma. In particular, 5-fluorouracil has been a component of most chemotherapy regimens for bile duct cancer. However, regardless of the administration scheme, results from the use of 5-fluorouracil as a single agent have been disappointing. Recent phase II (albeit small-population) trials that addressed the biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in combination with methotrexate, leucovorin, cisplatin, interferon, or mitomycin C yielded better results than did a classic (combination of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and mitomycin C) FAM regimen. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was associated with the highest response rate and survival in patients with localized cholangiocarcinoma (localized in the liver, with no extra-hepatic metastasis); however, these results need to be confirmed in large, randomized trials. Studies regarding intraductal chemotherapy for patients with obstructive jaundice are still in the preliminary stages; therefore, no associated benefit could be ascertained. The present review discusses current chemotherapy regimens for bile duct cancer and outlines possible future clinical investigations.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to evaluate the efficacy, defined as 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), and safety of bevacizumab/chemoradiation in preoperative and adjuvant settings for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and adequate organ function, and received preoperative (cohort A) or adjuvant (cohort B) treatment at physician discretion. Patients received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as an intravenous infusion (IVCI) 225 mg/m(2)/d on days 1-42, bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously (I.V.) on days 1 and 15 (cohort A), or every 2 weeks (cohort B), with radiation therapy to 50.4 Gy. After surgery (cohort A) or chemoradiation (cohort B), FOLFOX6 (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) and bevacizumab were administered for 4 months and then bevacizumab was given alone for up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (cohort A = 35; cohort B = 31) were enrolled from August 2006-April 2009: median age was 57 years; male patients, 62%; ECOG PS 0, 75%; stage II/III, 31%/69%. In cohort A, the complete pathologic response (pCR) rate was 29% (11% microscopic residual disease, 49% gross disease). Four patients did not undergo surgery (toxicity, 2 patients; progressive disease, 1 patient; patient decision, 1 patient). One- and 2-year DFS for cohorts A/B were 85%/not reached and 97%/89%, respectively (median survival not reached for either cohort). Frequent grade 3/4 toxicity included diarrhea (A cohort, 14%; B cohort, 29%), neutropenia (A cohort, 14%, B cohort, 23%), mucositis (A cohort, 23%, B cohort, 0%), and fatigue (A cohort, 6%, B cohort, 10%). Other serious toxicity included bowel perforation and pelvic infection (cohort A, 1 patient each), bowel perforation (2 patients), anal wound dehiscence (1 patient), perianal infection (2 patients), and rectovaginal fistula (1 patient) (cohort B), without treatment-related death in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab can be added to standard preoperative and adjuvant chemoradiation in most patients with expected and manageable toxicity and may increase treatment efficacy.

BACKGROUND

Although KRAS mutation has a predictive role in stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy, there have been controversies in the prognostic impact of KRAS mutation in stage II or III disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX).

METHODS

KRAS exon 2 and BRAF codon 600 were analyzed in patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection followed by adjuvant FOLFOX. Clinicopathologic features and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared.

RESULTS

Among a total of 437 patients, mutational data of KRAS and BRAF were available in 388 and 433 patients, respectively. KRAS mutation (codon 12 and 13) and BRAF V600E mutation was found in 26.5 and 3.7 % of patients. DFS was significantly worse in the KRAS mutant patients compared to KRAS wild type patients (3-year DFS 79 and 92 %, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed KRAS mutation as an independent negative prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted hazard ratio 2.30, 95 % confidence interval 1.23-4.32). Among the various subtypes of KRAS mutation, G13D (3-year DFS 76 %, p = 0.008) was significantly associated with poor DFS, while G12D was not associated with prognosis (3-year DFS 86 %, p = 0.61). There was no association between BRAF mutation and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutation has an adverse prognostic impact on stage II or III CRC treated with adjuvant FOLFOX.

The basis for current clinical trials in the treatment of colorectal cancer with the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (FUra) with or without leucovorin (LV) is their proven activity as single agents, their different mechanisms of action, and lack of CPT-11 cross-resistance to previous FUra/LV treatment. The role of drug dose and administration sequence in this combination was studied in vivo using a rat colon tumor model (Ward colon carcinoma); we administered CPT-11 and FUra by i.v. push once a week for four consecutive weeks (weekly x 4), a clinically relevant schedule. The maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of CPT-11 and FUra administered as single agents were 100 mg/kg/week for both agents. Three different combination administration sequences were evaluated: (a) CPT-11 administered simultaneously with FUra (sequence I); (b) FUra administered 24 h before CPT-11 (sequence II); and (c) CPT-11 administered 24 h before FUra (sequence III). When combining the two drugs at 50% of their respective MTD, the antitumor efficacy was sequence dependent with 62, 38, and 95% complete tumor regression rate for sequences I, II, and III, respectively. For sequences I and II, dose escalation to 75% of the MTD for each drug was paralleled by reversible host toxicity with no significant increase in the antitumor activity of the combination. With sequence III, however, the combination was lethal in 100% of treated animals when the doses of both drugs were at 75% of the MTD or higher. With the sequential combination of CPT-11 followed 24 h later by FUra (sequence III), the high complete tumor regression rate (cure) could be maintained, even when the dose of CPT-11 was reduced to 12.5% of the MTD as long as the doses of FUra was kept at 50 -75 % of the MTD. The data demonstrate that the antitumor activity and toxicity of combining CPT-11 with FUra is highly sequence dependent and that a sequence of CPT-11 preceding FUra is superior with a significant increase in the therapeutic index over the other sequences tested. In addition, the data also demonstrate that toxicity associated with high dose of CPT-11 can be eliminated without loss of the antitumor efficacy by reducing the dose of CPT-11 to at least 50% of its MTD, whereas the dose of FUra is kept at 50-75 % of its MTD.

In 2010, the FOLFIRINOX regimen (bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) emerged as a new option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and a good performance status. However, at that time, some doubts were raised regarding safety issues. Similarly, no data on FOLFIRINOX were published in patients with unresectable/locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This article presents the available experience with FOLFIRINOX outside clinical trials in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients. The safety of the regimen in patients with biliary stents and in previously treated patients is also described. FOLFIRINOX usage in clinical practice, including modification of the regimen (omission of bolus 5-fluorouracil; FOLFOXIRI regimen), is also presented. These data suggest that a phase III randomized study is warranted to further explore the role of FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate high-dose intravenous methotrexate in primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

An uncontrolled pilot trial.

METHODS

An infectious diseases department in Paris, France.

METHODS

All consecutive AIDS patients with primary CNS lymphoma attending the same unit from August 1994 to March 1996.

METHODS

Methotrexate was intravenously administered at a dose of 3 g/m2 every 14 days with leucovorin rescue. A maximum of six cycles was planned. Steroids were given to all patients and haematological growth factors were administered as required.

METHODS

Rate of response, time to response and survival.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (10 with histological documentation) were recruited. The median time since clinical onset was 27 days (range, 7-69 days), median Karnofsky score was 51 (range, 30-70), and mean CD4+ cell count was 30 +/- 19 x 10(6)/l (range, 7-69 x 10(6)/l). Complete responses, defined as clinical improvement and disappearance of contrast-enhancing brain abnormalities on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, were obtained in seven out of 15 patients (three out of 10 patients with histological diagnosis and four out of five patients without histological confirmation). The Karnofsky score of these seven patients improved to 80 +/- 10 (range, 70-100). The mean time taken to respond was 62 +/- 20 days (range, 45-90 days). One patient relapsed at 6 months. Six patients failed to respond, and two died of severe sepsis on days 15 and 45. The median survival time was 290 days (range, 11-570 days): 73 days (range, 11-570 days) in the 10 patients with histological diagnosis, and 347 days (range, 286-409 days) in the five patients without histological confirmation. Side-effects occurred in 10 patients, with gastrointestinal disorders in five, mucositis and skin rash in two, and fever in three patients; however, these events were mild and did not require cycle postponement or dose changes. No cognitive dysfunction occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate appears to be an attractive alternative to radiation therapy for primary CNS lymphoma and is associated with a far greater improvement in quality of life relative to historical series of radiation therapy.

Advanced colorectal cancer remains an urgent health concern, despite improvements in systemic chemotherapy. Targeted therapeutics promise effective tumor therapy with minimal side effects. Angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) is essential for tumor growth and metastasis and may be an ideal target in the search for new antineoplastic agents. Vascular endothelial growth factor is one of the best characterized of the proangiogenic growth factors that regulate angiogenesis and is a logical target in colorectal cancer therapy. Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc.; South San Francisco, CA), a humanized murine monoclonal antibody directed at vascular endothelial growth factor, is being evaluated in the treatment of various types of cancer. It has shown promising efficacy in phase II clinical trials in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Addition of bevacizumab at a dose of 5 mg/kg to chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin) resulted in a higher objective response rate (40% versus 17%), longer time to disease progression (9.0 versus 5.2 months), and longer median survival time (21.5 versus 13.8 months). Hypertension and thrombosis were the principal safety concerns, but were manageable. Further phase II/III studies of bevacizumab, administered with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin, with or without irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin, in colorectal cancer, are under way.

UNASSIGNED

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to radiotherapy alone for treating locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Whether adding induction chemotherapy (IC) further improves the outcome warrants investigation.

UNASSIGNED

This open-label multicenter phase III trial was conducted at 11 institutions in Taiwan. Patients with stage IVA or IVB NPC were randomized to receive IC followed by CCRT (I-CCRT) or CCRT alone. Patients in the I-CCRT arm received three cycles of mitomycin C, epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (MEPFL). All patients received 30 mg/m2 cisplatin weekly during radiotherapy, which was delivered as 1.8-2.2 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week, to a total dose of 70 Gy or greater to the primary tumor and 66-70 Gy to the involved neck. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

UNASSIGNED

In this study, 240 and 239 patients were randomized to CCRT and I-CCRT arm, respectively. The most prominent toxicities of induction were leukopenia (grade 3 and 4: 47% and 12%) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 and 4: 24% and 3%). During radiotherapy, severe mucositis was the major side-effect in both arms; an increased number of patients in the I-CCRT arm had myelosuppression; hence, discontinuation of weekly cisplatin was more common. After a median follow-up of 72.0 months, the I-CCRT arm had significantly higher DFS than that of the CCRT arm [5-year rate 61% versus 50%; hazard ratio=0.739, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.565-0.965; P = 0.0264], after stratified for N3b and LDH, and adjusted for T stage.

UNASSIGNED

Induction with MEPFL before CCRT was tolerable and significantly improved the DFS of patients with stage IVA and IVB NPC though overall survival not improved.

UNASSIGNED

NCT00201396.

BACKGROUND

Peripheral sensory neurotoxicity is a frequent adverse effect of oxaliplatin therapy. Calcium and magnesium (Ca/Mg) infusions are frequently used as preventatives, but a recent phase III trial failed to show that they prevent neurotoxicity. We therefore conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) with and without Goshajinkigan (GJG), a traditional Japanese herbal medicine (Kampo), to determine GJG's potential for reducing peripheral neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with colon cancer who were undergoing adjuvant therapy with infusional mFOLFOX6 were randomly assigned to GJG (7.5 mg three times daily) or placebo in a double-blind manner. The primary endpoint was the time to grade 2 or greater neuropathy, which was determined at any point during or after oxaliplatin-based therapy using version 3 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE).

RESULTS

An interim analysis was performed when 142 of the planned 310 patients had been enrolled and the safety assessment committee recommended that the study be discontinued. One hundred eighty-two patients were evaluable for response. They included 89 patients in the GJG group and 93 patients in the placebo group. The incidence of grade 2 or greater neurotoxicity was 50.6 % in the GJG group and 31.2 % in the placebo group. A Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that the use of GJG was significantly associated with the incidence of neuropathy (hazard ratio, 1.908; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Goshajinkigan did not prevent oxaliplatin-associated peripheral neuropathy in this clinical trial. The clinical study was therefore terminated.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the toxicity, response rate, and survival of a regimen of hepatic arterial floxuridine (FUDR) with leucovorin (LV) and dexamethasone (Dec) for the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with hepatic metastases (33 previously untreated with chemotherapy) were treated with FUDR (0.30 mg/kg/d) and LV (15 mg/m2/d) and Dec (20 mg total dose) as a 14-day hepatic arterial infusion via an implantable pump alternating with 2 weeks of saline.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) rate was 78% in previously untreated patients, with a median survival duration of 24.8 months; 1- and 2-year survival rates were 91% and 57%, respectively. In the previously treated group, the response rate was 52%, with a median survival duration of 13.5 months. Only 3% of patients (two of 62) developed biliary sclerosis; this was significantly lower than the 21% biliary sclerosis rate observed in our previous trial of hepatic arterial FUDR and LV without Dec (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of Dec to hepatic arterial FUDR and LV reduces biliary toxicity while maintaining an excellent response rate and survival. We recommend that this treatment be studied further.

OBJECTIVE

For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), transarterial embolization with the use of drug-eluting beads with irinotecan (DEBIRI) represents a novel alternative to systemic chemotherapy or local treatments alone. The present systematic review evaluates available data on the efficacy and safety of DEBIRI embolization.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of medical literature identified studies describing the use of DEBIRI in the treatment of CRLM. Data describing adverse events, pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and overall survival were collected.

RESULTS

Five observational studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) were reviewed. A total of 235 patients were included in the descriptive analysis of observational studies. Postembolization syndrome was the most common adverse event. Peak plasma levels of irinotecan were observed at 1-2 hours after administration. Wide variations in tumor response were observed. The median survival time ranged from 15.2 months to 25 months. In the RCT, treatment with DEBIRI was superior to systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan in terms of quality of life and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with unresectable CRLM, particularly after failure to respond to first-line regimens, DEBIRI represents a novel alternative to systemic chemotherapy alone, transarterial embolization with other agents, or other local treatments (eg, microwave or radiofrequency ablation). In these reports, DEBIRI was safe and effective in the in the treatment of unresectable CRLM. Further RCTs comparing DEBIRI with alternative management strategies are required to define the optimal role for this treatment.

BACKGROUND

The MOSAIC trial demonstrated that oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FU/LV) (FOLFOX4) as adjuvant treatment of TNM stage II and III colon cancer significantly improves disease-free survival compared with 5-FU/LV alone. For stage III patients the 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 69% in the FOLFOX4 arm vs 61% in the LV5FU2 arm, P = .002). The cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX4 in stage III patients was evaluated from a US Medicare perspective.

METHODS

By using individual patient-level data from the MOSAIC trial (median follow-up: 44.2 months), DFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated up to 4 years from randomization. DFS was extrapolated from 4 to 5 years by fitting a Weibull model and subsequent survival was estimated from life tables. OS beyond 4 years was predicted from the extrapolated DFS estimates and observed survival after recurrence. Costs were calculated from trial data and external estimates of resources to manage recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients on FOLFOX4 were predicted to gain 2.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63, 3.37) years of DFS over those on 5-FU/LV. The predicted life expectancy of stage III patients on FOLFOX4 and 5-FU/LV was 17.61 and 16.26 years, respectively. Mean total lifetime disease-related costs were $56,300 with oxaliplatin and $39,300 with 5-FU/LV. Compared with 5-FU/LV, FOLFOX4 was estimated to cost $20,600 per life-year gained and $22,800 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, discounting costs and outcomes at 3% per annum.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOX4 is likely to be cost-effective compared with 5-FU/LV in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compares favorably with other funded interventions in oncology.

Toxoplasmosis is a rare disease caused by the obligate intracellular protozoan parasite, Toxoplasma gondii. Most persons with toxoplasmosis in the United States are asymptomatic, but if a woman is infected during pregnancy, the parasite can cross the placenta and cause congenital toxoplasmosis in the fetus. The severity of congenital toxoplasmosis depends on when in the pregnancy the mother is exposed, but it can cause ocular and central nervous system disease as well as lead to growth failure and hearing and vision abnormalities. Congenital toxoplasmosis is treated with a combination of pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and leucovorin. It is important for pediatric nurse practitioners to be aware of the clinical presentation and treatment of congenital toxoplasmosis.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the gefitinib, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and oxaliplatin (IFOX) regimen as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma, and had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Each cycle consisted of 14 days. Cycle 1 consisted of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-FU (FOLFOX-4). All subsequent cycles consisted of FOLFOX-4 with gefitinib at 500 mg orally daily throughout the 14-day cycle.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled and were assessable for toxicity. Forty-three patients were assessable for response. Thirty-one of the 43 patients (72%) had either a complete or partial response by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Median overall survival was 20.5 months. Median time to progression was 9.3 months. Commonly encountered grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea in 67% of patients and neutropenia in 60%. Grade 2 acneiform skin rash typical of gefitinib occurred in 60% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IFOX is an active first-line regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, showing higher response rates but also increased toxicities compared with FOLFOX-4 alone in a similar patient population.