BACKGROUND
Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent them. One of these side effects is oral mucositis (mouth ulcers).
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic agents for oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment, compared with other potentially active interventions, placebo or no treatment.
METHODS
Electronic searches of Cochrane Oral Health Group and PaPaS Trials Registers (to 1 June <em>2</em>010), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library <em>2</em>010, Issue <em>2</em>), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 1 June <em>2</em>010), EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 1 June <em>2</em>010), CINAHL via EBSCO (1980 to 1 June <em>2</em>010), CANCERLIT via PubMed (1950 to 1 June <em>2</em>010), OpenSIGLE (1980 to <em>2</em>005) and LILACS via the Virtual Health Library (1980 to 1 June <em>2</em>010) were undertaken. Reference lists from relevant articles were searched and the authors of eligible trials were contacted to identify trials and obtain additional information.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials of interventions to prevent oral mucositis in patients receiving treatment for cancer.
METHODS
Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures, results and risk of bias were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. Authors were contacted for further details where these were unclear. The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines were followed and risk ratios calculated using random-effects models.
RESULTS
A total of 131 studies with 10,514 randomised participants are now included. Nine interventions, where there was more than one trial in the meta-analysis, showed some statistically significant evidence of a benefit (albeit sometimes weak) for either preventing or reducing the severity of mucositis, compared to either a placebo or no treatment. These nine interventions were: allopurinol, aloe vera, amifostine, cryotherapy, glutamine (intravenous), honey, keratinocyte growth factor, laser, and polymixin/tobramycin/amphotericin (PTA) antibiotic pastille/paste.
CONCLUSIONS
Nine interventions were found to have some benefit with regard to preventing or reducing the severity of mucositis associated with cancer treatment. The strength of the evidence was variable and implications for practice include consideration that benefits may be specific for certain cancer types and treatment. There is a need for further well designed, and conducted trials with sufficient numbers of participants to perform subgroup analyses by type of disease and chemotherapeutic agent.