BACKGROUND

The rate of major hemorrhage during the initial treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in routine clinical practice is understudied. In recent clinical trials an overall average of 3.8% was reported. However, the incidence of this complication in routine patient care might be higher owing to less strict patient selection and lack of standardization in the administration of heparin. We have determined major bleeding rates during heparin treatment for DVT or PE in routine practice and compared these rates with data from clinical trials.

METHODS

Data on the occurrence of major hemorrhage were retrieved according to strict criteria from the records of patients who had received continuous intravenous UFH therapy to treat objectively documented DVT or PE in 3 hospitals.

RESULTS

After exclusion of 29 patients because of lack of objective diagnosis of DVT or PE and 25 patients because of initial treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin, 424 consecutive patients were available for detailed analysis. Among them, 17 patients (4.0%; 95% confidence interval, 2.1%-5.9%) experienced major hemorrhage during UFH treatment, which in most patients occurred at the end of planned heparin therapy; one of the hemorrhages was fatal. Six patients (1.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.3%-2.5%) developed clinically suspected recurrent venous thromboembolism (fatal in 1 case) during UFH treatment or within 7 days' cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of continuous intravenous UFH in patients with DVT or PE in routine clinical practice leads to a major bleeding rate of 4.0%. This rate is comparable to the rate of major bleeding in patients who received UFH in clinical trials. Our findings are relevant to the discussion of major bleeding rates in patients with DVT and PE treated in daily clinical practice with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin and newer antithrombotic drugs.

OBJECTIVE

Hemodialysis activates both platelets and leukocytes, which play a role in the development of multiple organ dysfunctions in critically ill patients. Prostacyclin inhibits both cell types. To examine the hypothesis that prostacyclin prevents cellular activation during clinical hemofiltration, we investigated the expression of activation markers on platelets and leukocytes using whole blood flow cytometry.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

METHODS

Intensive care unit.

METHODS

A total of 24 consecutive, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with acute renal failure secondary to sepsis or major surgery.

METHODS

For anticoagulation during hemofiltration, patients received either unfractionated heparin or unfractionated heparin and prostacyclin (5 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Anticoagulants were administered into the extracorporeal circuit before the hemofilter. Blood samples were obtained from an arterial catheter before hemofiltration and from the inlet and outlet lines of the extracorporeal circuit at 1 and 24 hrs during hemofiltration.

RESULTS

Expression of GP IIb-IIIa and P-selectin on adenosine diphosphate-activated platelets and platelet-leukocyte aggregation were significantly lower after the passage of blood through the hemofilter in patients receiving an extracorporeal infusion of prostacyclin plus heparin when compared with control patients receiving heparin only. There were no statistically significant differences in the expression of CD11b on leukocytes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that prostacyclin reversibly inhibits platelet function by diminishing the expression of platelet fibrinogen receptors and P-selectin and reduces heterotypic platelet-leukocyte aggregation during clinical hemofiltration. However, prostacyclin fails to inhibit leukocyte activation at clinically relevant doses.

An international collaborative study has been carried out with the aim of establishing an international standard for low molecular weight (LMW) heparin. Three preparations of LMW heparin were assayed against the International Standard for unfractionated heparin (UFH) by 25 laboratories in 13 countries, using nine different assay methods. The results confirmed previous findings of non-parallel assays, wide interlaboratory variability and differences between methods when LMW heparins are assayed against a UFH standard. Use of one of the LMW heparins as a standard for the other two gave parallel assays and much closer agreement between laboratories. The preparation in ampoules coded 85/600 was selected as likely to give the best agreement with the largest number of LMW heparins; potencies were assigned by taking the mean of all the anti-Xa assays, and the mean of the thrombin and APTT assays, to represent the two major groups of activities. Preparation 85/600 has been established by WHO as the 1st International Standard for LMW heparin, with potencies of 1,680 iu/ampoule by anti-Xa assays and 665 iu/ampoule by thrombin inhibition and APTT assays.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH), which has been available commercially for over half a century, has been the most widely used agent for quickly suppressing thrombosis. When given intravenously, UFH quickly binds to and activates antithrombin, which then inhibits several activated factors in the clotting cascade. For decades, UFH was invaluable for treating arterial and venous thrombosis, and no alternative was available. The short half-life of UFH and the fact that its action could be reversed readily with protamine made it an almost ideal antithrombotic agent. However, variable pharmacokinetics, together with problems of inaccuracy and unreliability of the activated partial thromboplastin time, have made it difficult to use this drug optimally. In addition, side effects such as osteoporosis, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and delayed HIT have led to increased concerns about the use of UFH in view of the advantages offered by newer agents. Fractionating heparin into low-molecular-weight heparins that still retain the pentasaccharide active site provided a way to achieve the same type of therapeutic effect with more predictable dosing and fewer adverse effects. Similarly, a pentasaccharide has been synthesized and marketed as fondaparinux. Although these advances have improved our therapeutic options, continued advances on the horizon raise the question of whether the use of UFH will soon be abandoned.

Specific inhibition of thrombin is a new method for the prevention of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of desirudin (Revasc, CGP 39393; fifteen milligrams two times a day) with that of unfractionated heparin (5000 international units three times a day) in patients having a primary elective total hip replacement. The medications were administered subcutaneously, starting preoperatively and continuing for eight to eleven days. The primary end point was a confirmed thromboembolic event during the treatment period. The presence of deep-vein thrombosis was evaluated with bilateral venograms, which were centrally assessed by two independent radiologists. A total of 445 eligible patients were randomized: 220, to management with heparin, and 225, to management with desirudin. A per-protocol analysis of efficacy was performed for the 351 patients (79 per cent) for whom an adequate bilateral venogram had been made within eight to eleven days after the operation or who had had a proved thromboembolic event. The prevalence of confirmed deep-vein thrombosis was thirteen (7 per cent) of 174 patients who had received desirudin and forty-one (23 per cent) of 177 patients who had received heparin, a significant difference (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of proximal deep-vein thrombosis was also significantly reduced (p < 0.0001), by 79 per cent, in the group that had received desirudin (six [3 per cent] of 174 patients) compared with in the group that had received heparin (twenty-nine [16 per cent] of 177). There were no confirmed pulmonary embolisms or deaths during the period of prophylaxis. During a six-week follow-up period, pulmonary embolism was confirmed in four patients, all of whom had received heparin. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups with respect to bleeding variables or bleeding complications. These data demonstrate that a fixed dose of fifteen milligrams of desirudin, started preoperatively and administered subcutaneously twice daily for at least eight days, provided effective, safe prevention of thromboembolic complications, with no specific requirements for laboratory monitoring, in patients who had a total hip replacement.

BACKGROUND

In the pathogenesis of sepsis, inflammation and coagulation play a pivotal role. In addition to the anticoagulant activity, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has important immunomodulatory properties. However, different studies have reported conflicting effects on sepsis in association with heparin. The objective of this study is to determine whether UFH is able to reduce endotoxin-induced inflammation and coagulation in mice or produce improved outcome.

METHODS

C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into two groups. Experimental mice were given intravenous injection of 8 units/20 g body weight UFH (heparin sodium) diluted in 20 μl sterile saline while the control mice received vehicle sterile saline only. They were injected with LPS (30 mg/kg, i.p.) 0.5h later. Blood was collected and Livers were harvested at 3 and 6h for analysis. In survival studies, a separate group of mice were treated with 8 units/20 g UFH (n=20) or sterile saline (n=20) given intravenously at 1, 12, 24 and 36 hours after LPS injection. Mice were monitored every 12 hours for a maximum of 72 hrs.

RESULTS

1) Pretreatment of mice with UFH strongly reduced the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β and TAT in plasma at 3 and 6h; 2) Pretreatment of mice with UFH inhibited the expression of TNF-α, IL-1β and tissue factor genes in blood cells at 3h; 3) UFH pretreatment dramatically diminished LPS-induced neutrophil sequestration (at 3 and 6h) , thrombi formation and fibrin(ogen) deposition in the liver (at 6h). 4) The UFH-pretreated group exhibited significantly lower levels of ALT and CRE at 6h. 5) Treatment with UFH could prevent mortality associated with endotoxin challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that UFH attenuates inflammation and coagulation and prevents lethality in endotoxemic mice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety, efficacy, and outcome after combination thrombolytic and anticoagulant therapy.

METHODS

An open nonrandomized clinical protocol with prospective standardized monitoring and data collection. Children with a documented first episode of deep vein thrombosis were treated with urokinase 4400 U/kg load and per hour with unfractionated heparin at 10 U/kg/h. At 48 hours heparin infusions were increased to achieve a therapeutic level for 5 days. Children were given therapeutic warfarin for at least 3 months. Outcome was assessed at 48 hours and>> or =1 year with history, physical examination, high-resolution imaging, and Doppler ultrasonography +/- impedance and photo plethysmography.

RESULTS

Thirty-two children were treated. There was 1 thrombotic death, 1 nonfatal thrombus progression, and 1 pulmonary embolism. At 48 hours half of the children showed substantial clot lysis, and on follow-up these children had complete resolution and had no symptoms. Three children with poor early clot lysis had recurrent thromboemboli, pulmonary embolism, or both, 2 had limb pain and swelling, and 2 had asymptomatic swelling. Two children had minor bleeding, whereas systemic reactions were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy in children (urokinase and unfractionated heparin) was safe and efficacious. A prospective, randomized, controlled study in children is needed.

Changes in the hemostatic system and chronic hemostatic activation are frequently observed in patients with cancer, even in the absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer and contributes to long-term mortality in patients with early as well as advanced-stage cancer. Mounting evidence suggests that components of the clotting cascade and associated vascular factors play an integral part in tumor progression, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis formation. Furthermore, there are intriguing in vitro and animal findings that anticoagulants, in particular the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), exert an antineoplastic effect through multiple mechanisms, including interference with tumor cell adhesion, invasion, metastasis formation, angiogenesis, and the immune system. Several relatively small randomized controlled clinical trials of anticoagulation as cancer therapy in patients without a VTE diagnosis have been completed. These comprise studies with LMWH, unfractionated heparin, and vitamin K antagonists, with overall encouraging but nonconclusive results and some limitations. Meta-analyses performed for the American Society of Clinical Oncology VTE Guidelines Committee and the Cochrane Collaboration suggest overall favorable effects of anticoagulation on survival of patients with cancer, mainly with LMWH. However, definitive clinical trials have been elusive and questions remain regarding the importance of tumor type and stage on treatment efficacy, the impact of fatal thromboembolic events, optimal anticoagulation therapy, and safety with differing chemotherapy regimens. Although the LMWHs and related agents hold promise for improving outcomes in patients with cancer, additional studies of their efficacy and safety in this setting are needed.

Growth factors are critical for regulating and inducing various stem cell functions. To study the effects of growth factor delivery kinetics and presentation on stem cell fate, we developed a series of heparin-containing hyaluronic acid (HyA)-based hydrogels with various degrees of growth factor affinity and retention. To characterize this system, we investigated the effect of heparin molecular weight, fractionation, and relative concentration on the loading efficiency and retention kinetics of TGFβ1 as a model growth factor. At equal concentrations, high MW heparin both loaded and retained the greatest amount of TGFβ1, and had the slowest release kinetics, primarily due to the higher affinity with TGFβ1 compared to low MW or unfractionated heparin. Subsequently, we tested the effect of TGFβ1, presented from various heparin-containing matrices, to differentiate a versatile population of Sca-1(+)/CD45(-) cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) into endothelial cells and form vascular-like networks in vitro. High MW heparin HyA hydrogels stimulated more robust differentiation of CPCs into endothelial cells, which formed vascular-like networks within the hydrogel. This observation was attributed to the ability of high MW heparin HyA hydrogels to sequester endogenously synthesized angiogenic factors within the matrix. These results demonstrate the importance of molecular weight, fractionation, and concentration of heparin on presentation of heparin-binding growth factors and their effect on stem cell differentiation and lineage specification.

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis is the most common serious side effect of long-term unfractionated heparin use. Until recently, it was unknown whether long-term low-molecular-weight heparin was associated with any change in bone mineral density. With increasing long-term low-molecular-weight heparin use, for a variety of indications, this was an important knowledge gap.

RESULTS

We recently completed an a-priori planned substudy to assess the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on bone mineral density in an ongoing multicenter multinational randomized trial designed to compare the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis on pregnancy outcomes in thrombophilic pregnant women. The results revealed that there is no significant difference in mean bone mineral density between a low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis group and a no prophylaxis group. The study was not adequately powered to detect differences in absolute fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent results suggest that the use of long-term prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnancy is not associated with a significant decrease in bone mineral density. Whether higher doses might be a risk factor for osteoporosis is still an unanswered question. It is also possible that subgroups are more susceptible. Overall, women should be reassured regarding the risk of osteoporosis associated with the use of prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin during their pregnancy.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA). Laboratory diagnosis of APLA depends upon the detection of a lupus anticoagulant, which prolongs phospholipid-dependent anticoagulation tests, and/or anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein-1 (β2GPI) antibodies. APLA are primarily directed toward phospholipid binding proteins. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying thrombosis and pregnancy loss in APS include APLA induced cellular activation, inhibition of natural anticoagulant and fibrinolytic systems, and complement activation, among others. There is a high rate of recurrent thrombosis in APS, especially in triple positive patients (patients with lupus anticoagulant, aCL and anti-β2GPI antibodies), and indefinite anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist is the standard of care for thrombotic APS. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in thrombotic APS. Aspirin with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin may reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss in obstetric APS. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of APS have led to the identification of new potential therapeutic interventions, including anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory therapies. Additional research is needed to better understand the effects of APLA on activation of signaling pathways in vascular cells, to identify more predictive biomarkers that define patients at greatest risk for a first or recurrent APLA-related clinical event, and to determine the safety and efficacy of DOACs and novel anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory therapies for refractory APS.

OBJECTIVE

To compare and evaluate the potential benefit of two different anticoagulation regimens during endotoxemia in an ovine model.

METHODS

Animal prospective randomized and controlled study following preliminary dose-range study conforming with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as promulgated by the Council of the American Physiologic Society and reviewed by the Ethical Committee for Animal Research of our institution.

METHODS

Laboratories of anesthesiological investigations and hemostasis, primary care university medical center.

METHODS

Twenty-two adult sheep of either sex, weighing 29-42 kg (mean 35.8 kg), surgically instrumented for chronic studies and randomly allocated to receive three different treatment groups: unfractionated heparin (40 units.kg.hr; n = 7), recombinant hirudin (500 units.kg.hr; n = 7), or saline (nonanticoagulated controls; n = 8).

METHODS

Ovine model of severe endotoxin shock induced by a continuous intravenous endotoxin infusion over 72 hrs (10 ng.kg.min ).

RESULTS

Endotoxin infusion alone produced a progressive hypotensive, hyperdynamic shock state with right ventricle failure leading to the death of all animals of the control group within 44 hrs (median, 12 hrs). Heparin profoundly improved survival rate in this model, whereas effective anticoagulation with hirudin did not significantly increase the survival rate compared with controls. Animals in the control group died from disseminated intravascular coagulation, metabolic acidosis, and hemorrhagic pulmonary edema, whereas sheep treated with hirudin died from severe pulmonary edema (hypoxemia, increased alveoloarterial oxygen gradient associated with an increased wet/dry lung weight ratio) in the absence of disseminated intravascular coagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that systemic anticoagulation with the thrombin inhibitor hirudin is without benefit in this sheep model of lethal endotoxemia, whereas anticoagulation with heparin affords not only effective prevention of endotoxin-induced coagulation disorders but also global protection with prevention of respiratory decompensation and thus markedly improves survival rate in this situation.

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement, or hip fracture repair remains controversial. It is common practice to administer prophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) until discharge from hospital, usually seven to 14 days after surgery. International guidelines recommend extending thromboprophylaxis for up to 35 days following major orthopaedic surgery but the recommendation is weak due to moderate quality evidence. In addition, recent oral anticoagulants that exert effect by direct inhibition of thrombin or activated factor X lack the need for monitoring and have few known drug interactions. Interest in this topic remains high.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of extended-duration anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in people undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, or hip fracture repair.

METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Specialised Register (last searched May 2015) and CENTRAL (2015, Issue 4). Clinical trials databases were searched for ongoing or unpublished studies.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials assessing extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (five to seven weeks) using accepted prophylactic doses of LMWH, UFH, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with short-duration thromboprophylaxis (seven to 14 days) followed by placebo, no treatment or similar extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, UFH, VKA or DOACs in participants undergoing hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair.

METHODS

We independently selected trials and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. We performed fixed-effect model meta-analyses with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used a random-effects model when there was heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included 16 studies (24,930 participants); six compared heparin with placebo, one compared VKA with placebo, two compared DOAC with placebo, one compared VKA with heparin, five compared DOAC with heparin and one compared anticoagulants chosen at investigators' discretion with placebo. Three trials included participants undergoing knee replacement. No studies assessed hip fracture repair.Trials were generally of good methodological quality. The main reason for unclear risk of bias was insufficient reporting. The quality of evidence according to GRADE was generally moderate, as some comparisons included a single study, low number of events or heterogeneity between studies leading to wide CIs.We showed no difference between extended-duration heparin and placebo in symptomatic VTE (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.01; 2329 participants; 5 studies; high quality evidence), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.38; 2019 participants; 4 studies; moderate quality evidence), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.33; 1595 participants; 3 studies; low quality evidence) and major bleeding (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.46; 2500 participants; 5 studies; moderate quality evidence). Minor bleeding was increased in the heparin group (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.81; 2500 participants; 5 studies; high quality evidence). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was not reported.We showed no difference between extended-duration VKA and placebo (one study, 360 participants) for symptomatic VTE (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.94; moderate quality evidence), symptomatic DVT (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.62; moderate quality evidence), symptomatic PE (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.84; moderate quality evidence) and major bleeding (OR 2.89, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.31; low quality evidence). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding and minor bleeding were not reported.Extended-duration DOAC showed reduced symptomatic VTE (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.68; 2419 participants; 1 study; moderate quality evidence) and symptomatic DVT (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.81; 2459 participants; 2 studies; high quality evidence) compared to placebo. No differences were found for symptomatic PE (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.25; 1733 participants; 1 study; low quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 16.02; 2457 participants; 1 study; low quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.95; 2457 participants; 1 study; moderate quality evidence) and minor bleeding (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.88; 2457 participants; 1 study; moderate quality evidence).We showed no difference between extended-duration anticoagulants chosen at investigators' discretion and placebo (one study, 557 participants, low quality evidence) for symptomatic VTE (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.74), symptomatic DVT (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.21), symptomatic PE (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 16.13), and major bleeding (OR 5.05, 95% CI 0.24 to 105.76). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding and minor bleeding were not reported.We showed no difference between extended-duration VKA and heparin (one study, low quality evidence) for symptomatic VTE (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.16; 1279 participants), symptomatic DVT (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.68; 1279 participants), symptomatic PE (OR 9.16, 95% CI 0.49 to 170.42; 1279 participants), major bleeding (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.91 to 7.85; 1272 participants) and minor bleeding (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.76; 1279 participants). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was not reported.We showed no difference between extended-duration DOAC and heparin for symptomatic VTE (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.70; 15,977 participants; 5 studies; low quality evidence), symptomatic DVT (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.27; 15,977 participants; 5 studies; low quality evidence), symptomatic PE (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.94; 14,731 participants; 5 studies; moderate quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54; 16,199 participants; 5 studies; high quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.28; 15,241 participants; 4 studies; high quality evidence) and minor bleeding (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10; 11,766 participants; 4 studies; high quality evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate quality evidence suggests extended-duration anticoagulants to prevent VTE should be considered for people undergoing hip replacement surgery, although the benefit should be weighed against the increased risk of minor bleeding. Further studies are needed to better understand the association between VTE and extended-duration oral anticoagulants in relation to knee replacement and hip fracture repair, as well as outcomes such as distal and proximal DVT, reoperation, wound infection and healing.

Low-molecular-weight heparins have been extensively investigated in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis but limited data are available concerning their use in pulmonary embolism. In an open, pilot, randomized study, we compare the safety and efficacy of Fragmin, a low-molecular-weight heparin with those of unfractionated heparin in 60 patients with non massive pulmonary embolism (Miller Index < 20). Thirty one patients received unfractionated heparin intravenously and 29 received a fixed dose of 120 Anti-Xa IU/kg of Fragmin administered subcutaneously twice a day for 10 days. There was no pulmonary embolism recurrence nor major bleeding in either group during the treatment period. The decrease in pulmonary vascular obstruction on perfusion lung scan between day 0 and day 10 was 17 +/- 13% in the Fragmin group and 16 +/- 13% in the heparin group (NS). These results indicate that Fragmin may be a safe and effective treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism.

Due to problems, especially anaphylactoid reactions, raised by impure unfractionated heparin the quality assessment of heparin has to be reconsidered. Neither the USP nor the European Pharmacopoeia are able to guarantee the purity of heparin, i.e., the limitation of oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) which was found to be the reason for the allergic adverse effects. In the first run the regulatory authorities ask for 1H NMR spectroscopic and capillary electrophoretic measurements in order to characterize the impurity profile of heparin. Using an optimized 1H NMR method the limit of detection for OSCS was found to be 0.1%. In addition, it is possible to reliably quantify both OSCS and dermatan sulfate (DS), the latter being an indicator of poor purification of the unfractionated heparin. Screening of more than 100 heparin samples collected from international markets revealed a high number of samples containing substantial amounts of DS and a number of samples containing OSCS in an amount higher than 0.1%.

Venous thromboembolism remains an important cause of maternal mortality. For women at risk during pregnancy, the recommended venous thromboembolismprophylaxis is unfractionated heparin. Low molecular weight heparins, such as dalteparin, also may be suitable, but randomised trials have not been performed. Pregnant women (105) with confirmed previous or current thromboembolism were randomised to receive either unfractionated heparin twice daily (mean 20569 IU/day) or dalteparin once daily (mean 4631 IU anti-factor Xa units/day) subcutaneously for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and postpartum period. Recurrence of venous thromboembolism and safety of treatments were assessed. Dalteparin administered once daily was safe and effective in thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and postpartum.

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparin were compared with those of unfractionated sodium heparin (standard heparin) in 136 patients who had elective total hip replacement. The patients received subcutaneous injection of either 5000 international units of low-molecular-weight heparin once daily or 5000 international units of standard heparin three times a day. Treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin began twelve hours before the operation, and treatment with standard heparin began two hours preoperatively; both regimens were continued for ten days. Twelve days postoperatively, bilateral ascending phlebography was performed in 122 patients, sixty-three in the treatment group that received low-molecular-weight heparin and fifty-nine in the treatment group that received standard heparin. Pulmonary scintigraphy was performed in 127 patients. Deep-vein thrombosis was diagnosed in forty-four patients: nineteen (30 per cent) of the sixty-three who received low-molecular-weight heparin and twenty-five (42 per cent) of the fifty-nine who received standard heparin. All but four patients, two from each treatment group, were asymptomatic. The difference in the total rate of thrombosis in the two groups was not significant (p = 0.189). However, thrombosis occurred in the thigh in only six (10 per cent) of the patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin but in eighteen (31 per cent) of those who received standard heparin, a significant difference (p = 0.011). Pulmonary embolism was detected in twenty-seven patients: eight (12.3 per cent) of those who received low-molecular-weight heparin and nineteen (30.6 per cent) of those who received standard heparin. Only three patients had clinical signs of embolism. Pulmonary embolism was significantly more frequent in the group that received standard heparin (p = 0.016). Total loss of blood and the total amount of blood that was transfused were significantly reduced in the patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin compared with those who received standard heparin. Prophylaxis was not discontinued because of hemorrhage in any patient. The efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin was superior to that of standard heparin in the prevention of femoral thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, although the over-all incidence of deep-vein thrombosis was not statistically different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Fifty patients presenting with acute deep-vein thrombosis were randomized in a prospective, controlled study to determine the safety and efficacy of a treatment with low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin compared with unfractionated heparin. LMW heparin (n = 24) was administered twice daily subcutaneously at a dose of 2 X 150 anti-Xa units/kg body weight, and unfractionated heparin (n = 26) was given intravenously by continuous infusion at a dose of 450 anti-Xa units/kg body weight daily for 10 days. Doses were adjusted to maintain peak anti-Xa levels between 0.5 and 1.0 anti-Xa units per milliliter. One patient in the unfractionated heparin group and 2 patients in the LMW heparin group suffered from bleeding complications. Two patients on LMW heparin and on unfractionated heparin had high evidence of pulmonary embolism based on defects on ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Control phlebography and duplex sonography demonstrated a significant improvement during both treatment regimens. Reperfusion of the deep-vein system was 70% with LMW heparin and 75% with unfractionated heparin. The anti-Xa levels were significantly higher in the LMW heparin group, and activated partial thromboplastin and thrombin clotting times were significantly higher in the group receiving unfractionated heparin. Thrombin-antithrombin III complexes and D-dimer concentration decreased during the treatment, but did not differ between the two regimens. At the end of the treatment period with LMW heparin, protein C and antithrombin III were significantly higher.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) plus low-dose aspirin (LDA) is comparable in efficacy and safety to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus LDA in the management of pregnant women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion secondary to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

In a randomized prospective study, 60 women with a history of 3 or more consecutive spontaneous abortions and positive antiphospholipid antibodies were assigned in equal numbers to receive either UFH (5000 units, twice daily) plus LDA, or LMWH (enoxaparin 40 mg, once daily) plus LDA as soon as pregnancy was diagnosed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women in the LMWH group (80%) and 20 women in the UFH group (66.67%) delivered a viable infant (P = 0.243). There were no significant differences in pregnancy complications or neonatal morbidity between the 2 groups. There were no incidences of excessive bleeding, thrombocytopenia, or osteoporotic fractures in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

LMWH plus LDA was successfully used as an alternative to UFH plus LDA in the management of recurrent abortion secondary to APS. The results highlight the need for a larger randomized controlled trial to determine whether LMWH plus LDA should be the treatment of choice for recurrent abortion secondary to APS. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01051778.

New carbohydrate-based anticoagulants devoid of the side effects of unfractionated heparin are currently under development and show a major potential for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who still require efficient antithrombotic therapy. As HIT is usually associated with antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complexes, cross-reactivity of the heparin pentasaccharide SR90107A/ORG31540 was tested in the presence of PF4 with the plasma from 49 patients with HIT. No cross-reactivity was observed whatever the pentasaccharide concentrations. Although more extensive studies are required for excluding its total absence of immunogenicity and pathogenicity, this pentasaccharide is a candidate for use in emergency situations in patients with HIT.

BACKGROUND

The optimal anticoagulant regimen for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains to be determined. Otamixaban, a selective and direct inhibitor of factor Xa, was investigated in patients undergoing nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, dose-ranging trial, 947 patients were randomly assigned to either 1 of 5 weight-adjusted otamixaban regimens or weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin (UFH) before percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end points were change in prothrombin fragments 1+2 (F1+2), and anti-factor Xa activity. The main secondary end points were Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding at day 3 or hospital discharge (whichever came first) and 30-day ischemic events. The median change in F1+2 from baseline to the end of infusion was greater with the highest otamixaban dose compared with UFH (-0.3 versus -0.2 ng/mL, P=0.008). Anti-factor Xa levels were 65, 155, 393, 571, and 691 ng/mL with otamixaban doses 1 to 5, respectively. Significant TIMI bleeding (major or minor) occurred in 2.0%, 1.9%, 3.8%, 3.9%, and 2.6% of patients receiving otamixaban doses 1 to 5, respectively, and in 3.8% of patients receiving UFH. Four TIMI major bleeds were observed. Ischemic events occurred in 5.8%, 7.1%, 3.8%, 2.5%, and 5.1% of patients receiving otamixaban doses 1 to 5, respectively, and in 5.6% of patients receiving UFH.

CONCLUSIONS

Otamixaban reduced F1+2 significantly more than UFH at the highest dose regimen, whereas no significant difference in the incidence of TIMI bleeding was observed between the otamixaban and UFH groups. These results set the stage for adequately powered clinical outcome trials of selective direct factor Xa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet agents produce a small, but worthwhile benefit in long-term functional outcome and survival, and have become standard treatment for acute ischaemic stroke. Anticoagulants are often used as an alternative treatment, despite evidence that they are ineffective in producing long-term benefits. We wanted to review trials which have directly compared anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, to assess whether any anticoagulant regimen offers net advantages over antiplatelet agents, overall or in some particular category of patients (e.g. patients with atrial fibrillation).

OBJECTIVE

a) To assess the effectiveness of anticoagulants compared with antiplatelet agents in acute ischaemic stroke b) To assess whether the addition of anticoagulants to antiplatelet agents offers any net advantage over antiplatelet agents alone.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Central/CCTR), the trials register held by the Antithrombotic Therapy Trialists' Collaboration, MEDLINE (1966-2000), and EMBASE (1980-2000). All searches were performed during April and May 2001.

METHODS

Truly unconfounded, randomised-controlled trials comparing anticoagulants with antiplatelet agents, or anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents with antiplatelet agents alone, given within 14 days of onset of presumed or confirmed ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

Both reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion in the review, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

RESULTS

A total of 16,558 patients from four trials contributed to the analyses. The methodological quality was high in all four trials. The anticoagulants tested were unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular-weight heparin. Aspirin was used as control in all trials. Overall, there was no evidence that anticoagulants were superior to aspirin in reducing 'death or dependency' at long-term follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.98-1.15). Compared with aspirin, anticoagulants were associated with a small but significant increase in the number of deaths at the end of follow-up (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.29), equivalent to 20 more deaths (95% CI 0-30) per 1000 patients treated; a significant increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.46); and a non-significant increased risk of 'any recurrent stroke' during treatment (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.46). These neutral or adverse effects outweighed a small, but significant effect on symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.58), equivalent to 10 fewer (95% CI 0-30) DVTs by 14 days per 1000 patients treated with anticoagulants instead of aspirin. Subgroup analysis could not identify any type, dose, or route of administration of anticoagulants associated with net benefit, or any benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation. Overall, the combination of UFH and aspirin did not appear to be associated with a net advantage over aspirin alone. A subgroup analysis showed that, compared with aspirin, the combination of low-dose UFH and aspirin was associated with a marginally significant reduced risk of 'any recurrent stroke' (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-1.03) and a marginally significant reduced risk of death at 14 days (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69-1.01), and with no clear adverse effect on death at end of follow-up (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulants offered no net advantages over antiplatelet agents in acute ischaemic stroke. The combination of low-dose UFH and aspirin appeared in a subgroup analysis to be associated with net benefits compared with aspirin alone, and this merits further research.

This report summarizes the results of some of the studies that have evaluated the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, anticoagulant, and antithrombotic properties of Sulodexide, which consists of a mixture of electrophoretically fast moving heparin (80% of the mass) and dermatan sulfate (the balance), with an average product (Mr) <8000. The low molecular weight (Mr) of the constituents of Sulodexide would predict that the product has the high bioavailability associated with low-Mr heparin and low-Mr dermatan sulfate. Given orally, subcutaneously, or by intravenous injection, Sulodexide exhibits antithrombotic and profibrinolytic properties in several animal models of venous and arterial thrombosis and has relatively high affinity for endothelial (and possibly other) cells. Additionally, in a large multicenter clinical trial involving 3986 patients who had recovered from acute myocardial infarction, oral Sulodexide was associated with a 32% reduction in death and a significant reduction of left ventricular thrombus formation. Compared with heparin, low-Mr heparin, and unfractionated and low-Mr dermatan sulfates, the doses of Sulodexide required for antithrombotic efficacy suggest that the combination of heparin and dermatan sulfate in Sulodexide provides a more effective antithrombotic mechanism than heparin/low-Mr heparins (which catalyze the antiprotease actions of antithrombin III) or dermatan sulfate/low-Mr dermatan sulfate (which catalyze thrombin inhibition by heparin cofactor II).