The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.

The ontogeny of the classical islet hormones insulin (INS), glucagon (GLUC), somatostatin (SOM), and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) as well as insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system of Xenopus laevis (stages 41-66) was studied using double immunofluorescence and morphometric analysis. As early as stage 41, clustered INS-immunoreactive (-IR) and isolated GLUC-IR cells occurred in the pancreas. The first SOM-IR cells appeared at stage 43, followed by PP-IR cells at stage 46. About 79% of the PP immunoreactivity was confined to a subpopulation of the GLUC-IR cells. Both the GLUC/PP-IR cells and the PP-IR cells were located in a distinct area of the pancreas. The first islets occurred in premetamorphosis (around stage 50) and comprised mainly INS-IR and GLUC-IR cells. The majority of SOM-IR, PP-IR, and GLUC/PP-IR cells was dispersed. The numbers of hormone cells remained quite constant until the end of prometamorphosis (stage 58). Around stages 60-62, the islets were partly disintegrated and the numbers of islet cells slightly decreased. At stage 63, the cell number began to increase and reached the levels typical for the adult around stage 66. After metamorphic climax, the islets were reformed. In the gastrointestinal tract, transient INS-IR cells occurred prior to the adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract to feeding (stages 41-44) and during metamorphosis when there is remodeling of the gastrointestinal tract (stages 60-63). Therefore, INS released from the transient mucosal INS-IR cells may be involved in the temporary proliferation of mucosal epithelial cells. The first GLUC-IR and SOM-IR cells were seen at stage 41. PP-IR cells followed at stage 46. In contrast to the islets, GLUC-IR and PP-IR cells constituted different cell populations. Around stage 46, the first IGF-I immunoreactions appeared in the GEP-system. In pancreas, IGF-I immunoreactivity was found in the GLUC/PP-IR, cells (85-99%) but was absent from INS-IR, GLUC-IR, and SOM-IR cells. The IGF-I-IR gastro-entero-endocrine cells, however, seemed to contain none of the classical islet hormones.

Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATLL) is an HTLV-1-associated lymphoproliferative malignancy that is frequently fatal. We compared gene expression profiles (GEPs) of leukemic specimens from nine patients with ATLL at the time of diagnosis and immediately after combination therapy with zidovudine (AZT) and interferon alpha (IFNalpha). GEPs were also related to genetic aberrations determined by comparative genomic hybridization. We identified several genes anomalously over-expressed in the ATLL leukemic cells at the mRNA level, including LYN, CSPG2, and LMO2, and confirmed LMO2 expression in ATLL cells at the protein level. In vivo AZT-IFNalpha therapy evoked a marked induction of interferon-induced genes accompanied by repression of cell-cycle regulated genes, including those encoding ribosomal proteins. Remarkably, patients not responding to AZT-IFNalpha differed most from responding patients in lower expression of these same IFN-responsive genes, as well as components of the antigen processing and presentation apparatus. Demonstration of specific gene expression signatures associated with response to AZT-IFNalpha therapy may provide novel insights into the mechanisms of action in ATLL.

Multiple lesions in genes that are involved in cell cycle control, proliferation, survival and differentiation underlie T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL). We translated these biological insights into clinical practice to improve diagnostic work-ups and patient management. Combined interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (CI-FISH), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and gene expression profiles (GEP) were applied in 51 children with T-ALL who were stratified according to minimal residual disease (MRD) risk categories (AIEOP-BFM ALL2000). CI-FISH identified type A abnormalities in 90% of patients. Distribution of each was in line with the estimated incidence in childhood T-ALL: 37.5% TAL/LMO, 22.5% HOXA, 20% TLX3, 7.5% TLX1, and 2.5% NKX2-1. GEP predictions concurred. SNP detected type B abnormalities in all cases, thus linking type A and B lesions. This approach provided an accurate, comprehensive genomic diagnosis and a complementary GEP-based classification of T-ALL in children. Dissecting primary and secondary lesions within MRD categories could improve prognostic criteria for the majority of patients and be a step towards personalized diagnosis.

BACKGROUND

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is characterized by various cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Detection of these abnormalities is important in the risk-classification of patients but requires laborious experimentation. Various studies showed that gene expression profiles (GEP), and the gene signatures derived from GEP, can be used for the prediction of subtypes in AML. Similarly, successful prediction was also achieved by exploiting DNA-methylation profiles (DMP). There are, however, no studies that compared classification accuracy and performance between GEP and DMP, neither are there studies that integrated both types of data to determine whether predictive power can be improved.

METHODS

Here, we used 344 well-characterized AML samples for which both gene expression and DNA-methylation profiles are available. We created three different classification strategies including early, late and no integration of these datasets and used them to predict AML subtypes using a logistic regression model with Lasso regularization.

RESULTS

We illustrate that both gene expression and DNA-methylation profiles contain distinct patterns that contribute to discriminating AML subtypes and that an integration strategy can exploit these patterns to achieve synergy between both data types. We show that concatenation of features from both data sets, i.e. early integration, improves the predictive power compared to classifiers trained on GEP or DMP alone. A more sophisticated strategy, i.e. the late integration strategy, employs a two-layer classifier which outperforms the early integration strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that prediction of known cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in AML can be further improved by integrating GEP and DMP profiles.

CDK4/6 inhibitors represent a new treatment standard for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (BC) patients. Although efficacious, resistance to these agents is universal. Here, we profiled a large panel of HR+ BC cell lines with conditioned resistance to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, and analyzed cell cycle-related markers by gene expression profiles (GEP) and western blot (WB). GEP showed high molecular heterogeneity among the models, with E2F targets being significantly enriched both during treatment and at the time of resistance. By both WB and GEP, a common molecular feature at the time of palbociclib resistance was the concomitant overexpression of cyclin E1 and down-regulation of Rb. CCNE1 was the only significantly up-regulated gene among E2F targets at resistance with CCNE1 genomic amplification being observed in two resistant models. Rb was downregulated in all resistant models; a reduction of RB1 copy number was observed in three resistant cell lines. In silico analyses showed that CCNE1/RB1 ratio correlated with palbociclib IC50 in different datasets of both breast and non-breast cancer cell lines, performing better than CCNE1 or RB1 taken separately. Finally, the CCNE1/RB1 ratio was shown to be an adverse prognostic factor in patients with ER+ BC and to be able to discriminate palbociclib-sensitive versus resistant among patients enrolled in the NeoPalAna trial, a neoadjuvant trial testing palbociclib, performing better than CCNE1 or RB1 alone. Our data suggest that the CCNE1/RB1 ratio may be a viable biomarker of palbociclib resistance, warranting further clinical validation.

Neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors are rather rare neoplasms with an incidence of 1-2 cases per 100,000 people. They show rather varying tumor biology and present sometimes distinct clinical symptoms such as flushing, diarrhoea, hypoglycemia and gastric ulcers. The biochemical diagnosis is today significantly improved by the introduction of chromogranin A as a general tumor marker, which is also useful in histopathology. Today the localization procedures include somatostatin receptor scintigraphy as the primary investigation together with CT or ultrasonography. The basis for treatment of neuroendocrine GEP tumors is not only a curative intent but merely amelioration of clinical symptoms, abrogation of tumor growth, maintaining and improvement of quality of life. Surgery has always to be considered in the treatment of neuroendocrine GEP tumors. It can be performed whenever during the course of the disease but it may be more productive in earlier stages. Liver dearterialization procedures can furthermore reduce the tumor masses in liver together with laser treatment or radiofrequency therapy. The medical treatment includes cytotoxic agents, alpha interferons and somatostatin analogues. Somatostatin analogues will always be combined with the other two alternatives to reduce clinical symptoms. Chemotherapy is particularly useful for patients with more aggressive tumors with high proliferation capacity, whereas alpha interferon is beneficial in classical midgut carcinoids with low proliferation capacity. Quite recently somatostatin based radioactive tumor targeted treatment has evolved with preliminary promising data but further studies are needed to deliniate its future role in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors in patients.

The metabotropic Group III agonist, (1S,3R,4S)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (ACPT-1), selective for the mGlu(4alpha) receptor, suppresses sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice following its intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration (ED(50) 5.6 [2.9-10.7], nmol i.c.v., 15 min, clonic phase) and in genetically epilepsy-prone (GEP) rats following focal administration into the inferior colliculus (ED(50) 0.08 [0.01-0.50], nmol, 60 min, clonic phase). ACPT-1 also protects against clonic seizures induced in DBA/2 mice by the Group I agonist, (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (3,5-DHPG) (ED(50) 0.60 [0.29-1.2], nmol i.c.v.) and by the Group III antagonist, (RS)-alpha-methylserine-O-phosphate (MSOP) (ED(50) 49.3 [37.9-64.1], nmol i.c.v.). Another Group III agonist, (RS)-4-phosphonophenyl-glycine (PPG), preferentially activating the mGlu(8) receptor, previously shown to protect against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice and GEP rats, also protects against seizures induced in DBA/2 by 3,5-DHPG (ED(50) 3.7 [2.4-5.7], nmol i.c.v.) and by the Group III antagonist, MSOP (ED(50) 40.2 [21.0-77.0], nmol i.c.v.). At very high doses (500 nmol i.c.v. and above), Group III antagonists have pro-convulsant and convulsant activity. The anticonvulsant protection against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice provided by a fully protective dose (20 nmol, i.c.v.) of the mGlu(4) receptor agonist ACPT-1, is partially reversed by the co-administration of the Group III antagonists, MSOP, (RS)-alpha-methyl-4-phosphonophenylglycine (MPPG) or (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-phosphonobutanoic acid (MAP4), in the 20-50 nmol dose range. At doses of 50-200 nmol, MPPG and MAP4 cause further reversal of the ACPT-1 anticonvulsant protection, while the MSOP effect on ACPT-1 protection is abolished at higher doses. In contrast, the anticonvulsant protection against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice provided by a fully protective dose (20 nmol, i.c.v.) of the mGlu(8) receptor agonist PPG, is not significantly affected by the co-administration of the same Group III antagonists, MSOP, MPPG or MAP4. We conclude that activation of either mGlu(4alpha) or mGlu(8) receptors confer anticonvulsant protection in DBA/2 mice. Furthermore, the metabotropic Group III receptor antagonists, MSOP, MPPG, and MAP4 appear to be functionally selective for the mGlu(4) receptor in this system.

BACKGROUND

Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare tumors with varying metastatic potential. The underlying molecular basis for metastasis by GEP-NETs remains undefined.

METHODS

Quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL1) gene and protein expression was performed on a group of localized and metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET samples acquired from a prospectively maintained tissue bank. The ability of extent of UCHL1 IHC staining to differentiate localized and metastatic tumors was compared with Ki-67 index.

RESULTS

Among 46 total samples, UCHL1 expression at both the gene and protein level was significantly greater among localized GEP-NETs compared with metastatic tumors and metastases (p < 0.001). Hypermethylation of the UCHL1 promoter was commonly observed among metastatic primary tumors and metastases (those with the lowest UCHL1 expression) but not among localized tumors (p < 0.001). Poor staining (<50 %) for UCHL1 was observed in 27 % of localized tumors compared with 87 % of metastatic tumors (p = 0.001). The presence of <50 % staining for UCHL1 was 88 % sensitive and 73 % specific for identifying metastatic disease. In contrast, there was no association between Ki-67 index and metastatic disease. In multivariable analysis, only UCHL1 staining <50 % [odds ratio (OR) 24.5, p = 0.035] and vascular invasion (OR 38.4, p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for metastatic disease at the time of initial surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of UCHL1 expression by CpG promoter hypermethylation is associated with metastatic GEP-NETs. Extent of UCHL1 staining should be explored as a potentially clinically useful adjunct to Ki-67 index in evaluating GEP-NETs for aggressive features.

Neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by the expression of different peptides and biogenic amines. These rare tumors tend to grow slowly and are notoriously difficult to localize, at least in the early stages. Surgical removal is the only definitive therapeutic option for neuroendocrine tumors and relief from hyperfunctional status. The effectiveness of surgical treatment is invariably dependent upon the complete surgical excision of all tumor tissue, because microscopic and occult disease not readily seen by the surgeon may remain in situ, leading to shortened survival. Therefore, pre- and intraoperative localization of the primary as well as of metastatic tumors is of utmost importance. Radioguided surgery (RGS) is an intraoperative technique that enables the surgeon to localize radiolabelled tissue based on the characteristics of the various tissues. Concerning gastroenteropancreatic tumors (GEP), intraoperative gamma probe examination is able to reveal small tumor sites accumulating (111In-DTPA-D-Phe1)-pentetreotide more efficiently >> 90%) than somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (68%-77%), because lesions with a size smaller than 5 mm in greatest dimension could be identified. Furthermore, RGS identified 57% more lesions when compared to the "palpating finger" of the surgeon. In medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), surgical removal of the tumor is the first and most efficient treatment of the disease. Persistent or increasing serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels imply tumor recurrence after thyroid ablation. For imaging recurrent MTC many radiopharmaceuticals have been used to visualize tumor sites, but none of them has shown excellent sensitivity. Preoperative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and intraoperative RGS in patients with recurrent MTC demonstrate only part of the tumor sites and cannot visualize small tumor sites (less than 10 mm). In comparison, RGS using 99mTc(V)-DMSA detects metastases with a size of 5 mm in diameter, whereas the "palpating finger" of the surgeon localized metastases with a size of more than 1 cm in diameter. In patients with recurrent MTC, intraoperative gamma probe examination is able to localize over 30% more tumor lesions when compared with conventional preoperative imaging modalities and surgical findings. MIBG scintigraphy is the most sensitive technique for the detection and staging of neuroblastoma (sensitivity 92%; specificity nearly 100%). Intraoperative RGS with iodine labelled MIBG has been developed to improve the definition of tumor limits or to localize small, nonpalpable tumors. Comparison of 123I- and 125I-labelled MIBG revealed a sensitivity of 91% and 92%, respectively; the specificity of 125I (85%) was significantly higher than that of 123I (55%). In addition to scintigraphy of the adrenal glands by precusors of adrenal hormones, imaging with a radiolabelled somatostatin analogue is possible; however, (111In-DTPA-D-Phe1)-pentetreotide is not specific for any adrenal disease or function and the relatively high radioligand accumulation in the kidneys limited the use for detection of tumors in the area of the adrenal glands.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, with different malignant potential and behavior. Many treatment options are available. Surgery should be considered for localized tumors and in some selected cases of metastatic disease. Somatostatin analogs, useful for symptoms control in functioning tumors, are also effective to inhibit tumor progression in specific settings. The multi-TKI sunitinib and of the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus are efficacy for metastatic pancreatic NET (P-NET) treatment. Chemotherapy is generally used in symptomatic and progressive NETs. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) should be recommended after failure of medical therapy. For tumors confined to the liver ablative techniques should be considered. Nevertheless a shared therapeutic sequence for GEP-NET treatment still does not exist. In this review, we analyzed available data trying to identify the better treatment strategy and to suggest potential therapeutic algorithms distinguishing P-NETs from gastrointestinal NETs (GI-NETs).

The place of the long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide in the management of symptoms in patients with functional gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors and of growth in patients with metastatic disease is reviewed in this report. Numerous studies indicate that octreotide is, currently, the therapeutic principle of first choice in the symptomatic treatment of patients with carcinoid syndrome, Verner-Morrison syndrome and glucagonoma syndrome but not of insulinoma and gastrinoma patients. A beneficial effect on tumor growth has been demonstrated in 40% of patients with metastatic GEP tumor with stabilization of the disease as the most favorable response. However, further studies have to identify subgroups of patients in whom octreotide alone or in combination with alpha-interferon inhibits tumor growth.

BACKGROUND

The endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is considered the gold standard in rejection surveillance post cardiac transplant, but is invasive, with risk of complications. A previous trial suggested that the gene expression profiling (GEP) blood test was noninferior to EMB between 6 and 60 months post transplant. As most rejections occur in the first 6 months, we conducted a single-center randomized trial of GEP versus EMB starting at 55 days post transplant (when GEP is valid).

RESULTS

Sixty heart transplant patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomized beginning at 55 days post transplant to either GEP or EMB arms. A positive GEP ≥30 between 2 and 6 months, or ≥34 after 6 months, prompted a follow-up biopsy. The primary end point included a composite of death/retransplant, rejection with hemodynamic compromise or graft dysfunction at 18 months post transplant. A coprimary end point included change in first-year maximal intimal thickness by intravascular ultrasound, a recognized surrogate for long-term outcome. Corticosteroid weaning was assessed in both the groups. The composite end point was similar between the GEP and EMB groups (10% versus 17%; log-rank P=0.44). The coprimary end point of first-year intravascular ultrasound change demonstrated no difference in mean maximal intimal thickness (0.35±0.36 versus 0.36±0.26 mm; P=0.944). Steroid weaning was successful in both the groups (91% versus 95%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, GEP starting at 55 days post transplant seems comparable with EMB for rejection surveillance in selected heart transplant patients and does not result in increased adverse outcomes. GEP also seems useful to guide corticosteroid weaning. Larger randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

BACKGROUND

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT014182482377.

The Spanish and Portuguese working group (GEP) of international society for forensic genetics (ISFG) 1999-2000 collaborative exercise on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) included the analysis of four bloodstain samples and one hair shaft sample by 19 participating laboratories from Spain, Portugal and several Latin-American countries. A wide range of sequence results at position 16,093 of the HV1 (from T or C homoplasmy to different levels of heteroplasmy) were submitted by the different participating laboratories from the hair shaft sample during the first phase of this exercise. During the discussion of these results in the Annual GEP-ISFG 2000 Conference a second phase of this exercise was established with two main objectives: (i) to evaluate the incidence of the HV1 sequence heteroplasmy detected in Phase I across different sample types from the same donor including blood, saliva, and hair shafts, (ii) to perform a technical review of the electropherograms to evaluate the relative levels of heteroplasmies obtained by the different laboratories and also to examine the source of possible errors detected in Phase I. Anonymous review of the raw sequence data permitted the detection of three transcription errors and three errors due to methodological problems. Highly variable levels of heteroplasmy were found in the hair shaft and more stability in blood and saliva. Three laboratories found variable levels of heteroplasmy at position 16,093 across adjacent fragments from the same hair shaft. Two laboratories also described more than one heteroplasmic position from a single hair. The relevance of these findings for the interpretation of mtDNA data in the forensic context is also discussed.

Neuroendocrine gut and pancreatic tumors are known to contain and secret different peptide hormones and amines. During the last two decades, many radioimmunoassays and Elizas have been developed to analyze these substances in blood and urine, which has enabled clinicians to improve the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with various neuroendocrine tumors. Due to cost constraints in medical care, it is important to try to define the most useful biochemical markers from the clinical point of view. The glycoprotein chromogranin A has been shown to be a useful marker for diagnosing various neuroendocrine tumors, both by histopathology and circulating tumor markers. In patients with demonstrable endocrine tumors, about 90 percent of the patients present high circulating levels of chromogranin A. A hundred-fold increase of plasma chromogranin is seen in patients with midgut carcinoid tumors and liver metastases. The plasma levels of chromogranin A reflect the tumor mass and can be used for monitoring the patient during treatment and follow-up, although the day-to-day variation might be 30-40 percent. High circulating levels of the chromogranin A might be an indicator of bad prognosis in patients with malignant carcinoid tumors. Besides analyzing plasma chromogranin A, specific analyses such as urinary 5-HIAA in midgut carcinoid patients, serum gastrin in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and insulin/proinsulin in patients with hypoglycemia should be performed. In patients with small tumor masses or intermittent symptoms, provocative tests such as a meal stimulation test, secretin test or pentagastrin stimulation of tachykinin release can supplement the basal measurements of peptides and amines. To fully evaluate the growth potential in neuroendocrine tumors, traditional biochemical markers should be supplemented with indicators of growth proliferation (Ki-67, PCNA) and immunohistochemical staining for the adhesion molecule CD44 and the PDGF-alpha receptor. Finally, analysis of somatostatin receptor subtypes and induction of the enzymes 2-5A syntethase and PKR are of clinical value.

Due to the increased costs of medical care, a cost-benefit analysis is needed when trying for the 'ultimate' biochemical diagnosis of gastro-enteropancreatic (GEP) tumours. The glycoprotein chromogranin family has proved useful in screening for neuroendocrine tumours. In patients with midgut carcinoid tumours, chromogranin A is more sensitive than urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid but by combining these two biochemical markers most GEP tumours can be diagnosed. Chromogranin A is also a prognostic marker for survival in patients with midgut carcinoid tumours. Pancreastatin constitutes a part of the chromogranin A molecule and is a less sensitive general screening marker for neuroendocrine gut and pancreatic tumours, but levels, in combination with chromogranin A, might give some insight into tumour biology. Specific markers such as gastrin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal peptide, insulin, neuropeptide K and substance P should be used to further characterise hormone production in neuroendocrine tumours. However, in some patients, confirmation of diagnosis requires provocation tests, such as the secretin or meal provocation tests. Staging information can be obtained by new investigations such as intra-operative or endoscopic ultrasound, octreoscan, and positron emission tomography. We combine the biochemical characterisation of neuroendocrine tumours with studies of growth factors/receptors, adhesion molecules, proliferation markers, somatostatin receptor content, induction of the enzymes p68 kinase and 2'5'-A-synthetase, and apoptosis, to establish a sound rationale for therapeutic decisions, enabling every patient to receive individualised treatment.

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represents a various family of rare tumours. Surgery is the first choice in GEP-NENs patients with localized disease whilst in the metastatic setting many other treatment options are available. Somatostatin analogues are indicated for symptoms control in functioning tumours. Furthermore they may be effective to inhibit tumour progression. GEP-NENs pathogenesis has been extensively studied in the last years therefore several driver mutations pathway genes have been identified as crucial factors in their tumourigenesis. GEP-NENs can over-express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic-fibroblastic growth factor, transforming growth factor (TGF-α and -β), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and their receptors PDGF receptor, IGF-1 receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, VEGF receptor, and c-kit (stem cell factor receptor) that can be considered as potential targets. The availability of new targeted agents, such as everolimus and sunitinib that are effective in advanced and metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, has provided new treatment opportunities. Many trials combing new drugs are ongoing.

Standard of care for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) patients relies on platinum-based therapy. However, acquired resistance to platinum occurs frequently and predicts poor prognosis. To understand the mechanisms underlying acquired platinum-resistance, we have generated and characterized three platinum-resistant isogenic EOC cell lines. Resistant cells showed 3-to 5- folds increase in platinum IC50. Cross-resistance to other chemotherapeutic agents commonly used in the treatment of EOC patients was variable and dependent on the cell line utilized. Gene expression profiling (GEP) of coding and non-coding RNAs failed to identify a common signature that could collectively explain the mechanism of resistance. However, we observed that all resistant cell lines displayed a decreased level of DNA platination and a faster repair of damaged DNA. Furthermore, all platinum resistant cell lines displayed a change in their morphology and a higher ability to grown on mesothelium. Overall, we have established and characterized three new models of platinum-resistant EOC cell lines that could be exploited to further dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to platinum. Our work also suggests that GEP studies alone, at least when performed under basal culture condition, do not represent the optimal way to identify molecular alterations linked to DNA repair pathway defects.

BACKGROUND

Determining the primary site of metastatic cancer with confidence can be challenging. Pathologists commonly use a battery of immunohistochemical (IHC) stains to determine the primary site. Gene expression profiling (GEP) has found increasing use, particularly in the most difficult cases. In this pilot study, a direct comparison between GEP and IHC-guided methods was performed.

METHODS

Ten archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded metastatic tumor samples for which the primary site had been clinically determined were selected. Five pathologists who were blinded to the diagnosis were asked to determine the primary site using IHC and other stains selected from a panel of 84 stains. Each pathologist was provided patient sex, biopsy site and gross sample description only. Slides were digitized using ScanScope®XT at 0.25 μm/pixel. Each evaluating pathologist was allowed to provide a diagnosis in three stages: initial (after reviewing the H&E image), intermediate (after reviewing images from the first batch of stains) and final diagnosis (after the second batch of stains if requested). GEP was performed using the only FDA-cleared test for this intended use, the Pathwork Tissue of Origin Test. No sample information was provided for GEP testing except for patient sex. Results were reported as the tumor tissue type with the highest similarity score.

RESULTS

In this feasibility study, GEP determined the correct primary site in 9 of the 10 cases (90%), compared to the IHC-guided method which determined the correct primary site for 32 of 50 case evaluations (average 64%, range 50% to 80%). The five pathologists directing the IHC-guided method ordered an average of 8.8 stains per case (range 1 to 18). GEP required an average of 3 slides per case (range 1 to 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the pilot study suggest that GEP provides correct primary site identification in a higher percentage of metastatic cases than IHC-guided methods, and uses less tissue. A larger comparative effectiveness study using this study design is needed to confirm the results.

UNASSIGNED

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1749854104745508.

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) are classified according to tumour mitotic count or Ki-67 labelling index (LI).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review articles reporting the prognosis of patients by Ki-67 LI and thereby improve the ability of clinicians to prognosticate for their patients.

METHODS

265 abstracts were identified relating Ki-67 and survival. After exclusion criteria were applied, 22 articles remained. Articles were excluded if they described non-human specimens, were non-English language, published prior to 2000, reported non-GEP NETs, reported subgroups selected by treatment modality or included <20 cases. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine studies to estimate survival proportions.

RESULTS

Authors used varied methods in which to present 5-year survival, with often limited survival information. This reduced the number of studies that could be included in the meta-analysis. 5-year survival for patients with grade 1 and 2 GEP NETs were estimated to be 89% (95% CI 85% to 92%, m=12 studies, n=977 participants) and 70% (95% CI 62% to 79%, m=9, n=726), respectively. Using an alternative grade 1/2 boundary of 5%, 5-year survival rates for Ki-67≤5% and 5-20% were estimated as 89% (95% CI 84% to 94%, m=7, n=654) and 51% (95% CI 44% to 59%, m=4, n=183), respectively. For Ki-67>20%, 5-year survival was estimated to be 25% (95% CI 12% to 38%, m=10, n=208).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardisation of grade boundaries has allowed us to combine data from multiple studies and amass a body of evidence linking Ki-67 and survival.

Neuroendocrine tumours of the gastroenteropancreatic tract (GEP NETs) represent a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours. Based on their ontogenetic origin, GEP NETs are classified into foregut, midgut and hindgut tumours. Although they have many features in common, their molecular backgrounds are obviously different. Elucidation of the key factors determining tumour biology has been hampered by the low incidence and high variability of these tumours in terms of origin, morphology and growth. However, recent years have shed some light on molecular genetics of these tumours, revealing important genetic factors as the RET proto-oncogene and the tumour suppressor menin as well as knowledge about the role of growth factors like IGF-1, TGF-beta, VEGF and PDGF for the regulation of differentiation, growth and secretion. In the future, emerging molecular tools in rapid individual genome analysis and in proteomic and array technologies may help to delineate common patterns of NET disease.

Elevated circulating levels of chromogranin A (CgA) are found in the neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but diagnostic usefulness of this marker is still debatable. To assess the role of CgA for the identification and follow up of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET), a multicenter prospective longitudinal study has been carried out in Argentina. CgA was measured by RIA in 119 histologically proven GEP-NET patients and in 39 healthy controls. A cutoff value of 2.8 nmol/L was established from a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, as discriminating between controls and patients with active disease (specificity 100% and sensitivity 92.3%). CgA levels were higher in functioning than in no functioning tumors (median 55 nmol/L vs 5 nmol/L, p < 0.05). Metastases were present in 83 patients and their CgA levels were significantly higher than levels in the 36 patients without metastases (median 44 nmol/L vs 64 nmol/L, p < 0.0001). CgA levels are strongly correlated with tumor metastatic spread. Sensitivity differed between patients with localized disease (median 6 nmol/L), extensive disease (median 22 nmol/L) and very extensive disease (median 44 nmol/L) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, due to its high sensitivity and specificity, CgA is useful in a newly discovered GEP-NET especially when no abnormal hormone secretion can be demonstrated. CgA levels were significantly higher in functioning tumors than in non-functioning tumors and increased with metastatic spread. If serial evaluation of CgA levels is sufficient for the detection of tumor growth changes remains to be prospectively demonstrated.

BACKGROUND

Multiple-endocrine-neoplasia-type-1 (MEN1) is an autosomal-dominant inherited disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP), adenomas of the pituitary gland (APA), adrenal cortical tumors (ADR) and other tumors. As the tumors appear in an unpredictable schedule, uncertainty about screening programs is persisting.

OBJECTIVE

To optimize screening and to analyze possible differences in sporadic versus familial cases.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 419 individuals including 306 MEN-1 patients (138 isolated and168 familial cases out of 102 unrelated families).

RESULTS

A total of 683 tumors occurred consisting of 273 pHPT, 138 APA, 166 GEP, 57 ADR, 24 thymic- and bronchial-carcinoids as well as 25 neoplasms of other tissues. The age-related penetrance was determined as 10%, 35%, 67%, 81% and 100% at 20, 30, 40, 50 and 65 years respectively. Although pHPT being the most frequent first manifestation (41%), also GEP (22%) or APA (21%) were found to be the first presentation. APA occurred significantly more frequent (p<0,05) in isolated (n=138) than in familial (n=168) cases, whereas GEP showed a tendency to occur more often in familial cases. Genotype/phenotype correlation in 140 clinically affected MEN-1 cases showed a tendency for truncating mutations, especially nonsense mutations to be associated to GEP and carcinoids of the lungs and thymus.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the morbidity and frequency in familial cases an effective screening programme should aim at an early diagnosis of GEP particularly when truncating, especially nonsense mutations are found.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the thyroid gland are rare. Apart from medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), metastases of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET may also occur. Features of six patients (five men, one female: age range, 39-67 years) with thyroid metastases from a GEP-NET are described. Thyroid metastases were bilateral in all patients and were associated with enlarged neck lymph nodes in five. In four cases, the thyroid tumor was either the first sign of the disease (n = 2) or was an isolated site of recurrence (n = 2). The tumors were well (n = 3) or poorly differentiated (n = 3). Five tumors for which the primary site could be determined corresponded to foregut-derived tumors (3 lungs, 1 thymus and 1 pancreatic NET). One tumor demonstrated calcitonin (CT) production as shown by immunohistochemistry and elevated plasma CT levels. However, the disease history and the clinical features strongly favored a metastasizing GEP-NET. No tumoral RET proto-oncogene mutation was found in this patient. The differential diagnosis between metastatic GEP-NET and MTC is crucial because prognosis, work-up, and treatment differ greatly.