OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia in patients receiving prophylaxis or treatment for venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

We assessed the database of the National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1979 through 2005 and complemented this with a meta-analysis of published literature.

RESULTS

Among 10,554,000 patients discharged from short-stay hospitals throughout the US with venous thromboembolism during the 27 years of study, secondary thrombocytopenia was coded in 38,000 patients (0.36%). From 1979 through 1992, secondary thrombocytopenia was coded in only 0.15% of hospitalized patients with venous thromboembolism. The frequency increased sharply to 0.54% from 1993 through 2005. Secondary thrombocytopenia was rarely diagnosed among 1,446,000 patients aged <40 years and among 77,000 women who had venous thromboembolism with deliveries. Meta-analysis of published literature showed a higher incidence among patients who received unfractionated heparin (UFH) for prophylaxis than those who received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis. Treatment resulted in smaller differences of the incidence between UFH and LMWH.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin-associated thrombocytopenia is rare among patients aged <40 years and women following delivery. The risk of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia is more duration-related than dose-related, and higher with UFH when used for an extended duration. Our findings and those of the literature suggest that although heparin-associated thrombocytopenia is uncommon, the incidence can be minimized by use of LMWH, particularly if extended prophylaxis or extended treatment is required.

OBJECTIVE

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with a decrease of platelet counts that usually begins after at least 5 days of heparin treatment. Uncertainty exists about the risk of early onset of HIT (ie, < 5 days) in relation to previous heparin exposure. We therefore analyzed the temporal pattern of thrombocytopenia in patients with laboratory-confirmed HIT to assess whether patients with previous heparin exposure have an increased risk of early onset of HIT.

METHODS

Platelet count patterns in patients with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of HIT were examined in a retrospective chart review of a clinical study database. The onset of thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10(9)/L associated with the current heparin treatment (mainly unfractionated heparin) was analyzed using nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients with 125 treatment episodes were assessed: HIT developed in 79 patients during initial exposure to heparin, and in 46 patients during reexposure. Early onset (< 5 days) of thrombocytopenia was associated with very recent heparin exposure. Patients reexposed to heparin within 3 months had an earlier onset of thrombocytopenia as compared to patients reexposed to heparin after 3 months (4.9 +/- 4.4 days vs 11.5 +/- 5.5 days [mean +/- SD], p = 0.001). There was no difference between onset on thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10(9)/L in patients reexposed to heparin within 3 to 12 months and after 1 year (9.7 +/- 6.4 days vs 12.3 +/- 5.2 days, p = 0.41). Whether platelet counts were obtained daily or less regularly did not affect the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Early onset of thrombocytopenia in HIT is associated with recent heparin treatment (< 3 months). In contrast, for patients who did not receive heparin within the previous 3 months, HIT is an unlikely explanation for thrombocytopenia that occurs within the first 5 days.

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing neurosurgery has been reported to be as high as 25%, with a mortality rate from PE between 9 and 50%. Even with the use of pneumatic compression devices, the incidence of DVT has been reported to be 32% in these patients, making prophylactic heparin therapy desirable. Both unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin have been shown to reduce the incidence of DVT consistently by 40 to 50% in neurosurgical patients. The baseline rate for major intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following craniotomy has been reported to be between 1 and 3.9%, but after initiation of heparin therapy this rate has been found to be as high as 10.9%. Therefore, neurosurgeons must balance the risk of PE against the increased risk of postoperative ICH from prophylactic heparin for DVT. The authors review the literature on the incidence of DVT and PE in neurosurgical patients, focusing on the incidence of ICH related to the use of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin in this patient population.

Even though new anticoagulants are being devised with the notion that they do not require regular monitoring, when bleeding occurs, it is important to have an antidote and a reliable test to confirm whether the anticoagulant effects are persisting. We examined the effects of five heparinoids, unfractionated heparin (UFH), tinzaparin, enoxaparin, danaparoid and fondaparinux on the traditional APTT and anti-Xa assays as well as on the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT). We also studied the ability of protamine sulphate (PS), NovoSeven, FEIBA and FFP to reverse maximum anticoagulation induced by the different heparinoids. The CAT was the only test to detect the coagulopathy of all the anticoagulants. PS produced complete reversal of UFH, and this could be monitored with all three tests. Tinzaparin can also be completely neutralised in vitro with high doses of PS, but the maximum enoxaparin reversal achieved with PS is only approximately 60%. Fondaparinux does not significantly affect the APTT and PS has no significant effect on its reversal. Only NovoSeven was able to correct the fondaparinux induced CAT abnormalities whilst having no effect on the anti-Xa level. None of the reversal agents was very effective in danaparoid spiked plasma but NovoSeven, at high dose, increased the ETP by 40% and reduced the anti-Xa level from 0.93 to 0.78 IU/ml. We conclude that the CAT is superior to the traditional coagulation tests in that it not only detects the coagulopathy of all the heparinoids but can be also be used to monitor their reversal.

It has been suggested that protamine sulfate is a poor antidote for the bleeding side-effects of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in vivo, since protamine sulfate does not completely neutralize the anti-factor Xa activity of LMWHs in vitro or ex vivo. Therefore, we performed experiments to compare directly the abilities of protamine sulfate to neutralize the anticoagulant activities of the LMWH, enoxaparine, and unfractionated heparin ex vivo, with its ability to neutralize the bleeding side-effects of both compounds in vivo. Bleeding was measured as the amount of blood lost from 5 cuts made in rabbits ears before and after treatment with enoxaparine or unfractionated heparin +/- protamine sulfate. Plasma anti-factor Xa and anti-thrombin activities ex vivo, were measured chromogenically. Doses of 400 and 1,500 anti-factor Xa U/kg of heparin and enoxaparine, respectively, were required to enhance blood loss to the same extent. Protamine sulfate completely neutralized blood loss induced by both compounds, but did not neutralize the anti-factor Xa nor antithrombin activities ex vivo. We conclude that protamine sulfate is an effective antidote for the bleeding side-effects of enoxaparine and unfractionated heparin, despite its inability to completely neutralize their anticoagulant activities.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, or HIT, can present in many ways, ranging from common-isolated thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism, acute limb ischemia-to less common but specific presentations-necrotizing skin lesions at heparin injection sites, post-bolus acute systemic reactions, and adrenal hemorrhagic necrosis (secondary to adrenal vein thrombosis). Many patients with HIT have mild or moderate thrombocytopenia: the median platelet count nadir is 60 x 10(9)/L, and ranges from 15 to 150 x 10(9)/L in 90% of patients, most of whom evince a 50% or greater fall in the platelet count. HIT that begins after stopping heparin ("delayed-onset HIT") is increasingly recognized. Factors influencing risk of HIT include type of heparin (unfractionated heparin>> low-molecular-weight heparin), type of patient (surgical>> medical), and gender (female>> male). Since timely diagnosis and treatment of HIT may reduce the risk of adverse outcomes, this review focuses on those clinical circumstances that should prompt the clinician to "think of HIT." Coumarin anticoagulants such as warfarin are ineffective in acute HIT and can even be deleterious by predisposing to micro-thrombosis via protein C depletion (venous limb gangrene and skin necrosis syndromes). Thus, it is important to avoid or postpone coumarin while managing HIT hypercoagulability, focusing on agents that inhibit thrombin directly (lepirudin, argatroban) or that inhibit its generation (danaparoid, fondaparinux). Post-marketing experience suggests that standard dosing of lepirudin is too high; current recommendations are to avoid the initial lepirudin bolus and to begin with lower infusion rates, even in patients without overt renal dysfunction.

BACKGROUND

Factor Xa plays a central role in the generation of thrombin, making it a novel target for treatment of arterial thrombosis. Fondaparinux is a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to be superior to standard therapies for the prevention of venous thrombosis. We performed a randomized trial to determine the safety and feasibility of fondaparinux in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) setting.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI were randomized in a blinded manner to receive unfractionated heparin (UFH), 2.5 mg fondaparinux IV, or 5.0 mg fondaparinux IV. Randomization was stratified for planned or no planned use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists. The primary safety outcome was total bleeding, which was a combination of major and minor bleeding events. The incidence of total bleeding was 7.7% in the UFH group and 6.4% in the combined fondaparinux groups (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 1.84; P=0.61). Bleeding was less common in the 2.5-mg fondaparinux group compared with the 5-mg fondaparinux group (3.4% versus 9.6%, P=0.06). The composite efficacy outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or need for a bailout GPIIb/IIIa antagonist was 6.0% in the UFH group and 6.0% in the fondaparinux group, with no significant difference in efficacy among the fondaparinux doses compared with UFH. Coagulation marker analysis at 6 and 12 hours after PCI demonstrated that fondaparinux was superior to UFH in inducing a sustained reduction in markers of thrombin generation, as measured by prothrombin fragment F1.2 (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study of patients undergoing contemporary PCI, factor Xa inhibition with the synthetic anticoagulant fondaparinux in doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg was comparable to UFH for clinical safety and efficacy outcomes. These data form the basis for further evaluation of fondaparinux in arterial thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE

Reversal of pharmacologic anticoagulation is an issue that arises when an anticoagulated patient has major bleeding or when a patient on chronic anticoagulant therapy requires urgent reversal of anticoagulation, for example, for surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature to determine what strategies are available to reverse anticoagulation caused by older agents, such as warfarin or unfractionated heparin (UFH), as well as newer agents, for example, low-molecular-weight heparin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, lepirudin, and argatroban.

RESULTS

Specific "antidotes" exist for the "classic" anticoagulant agents: protamine sulfate for UFH, and vitamin K for warfarin. However, vitamin K only begins to reverse warfarin's anticoagulant effect by four to six hours, so urgent situations additionally require blood products, such as plasma (fresh frozen or cryosupermatant plasma), prothrombin complex concentrates, or, possibly, recombinant factor VIIa. A growing problem arises from the increasing use of new anticoagulants that lack specific antidotes. For example, protamine sulfate reverses only about 60% of the anti-factor Xa activity of low-molecular-weight heparin, has negligible effects on danaparoid (a mixture of anticoagulant glycosaminoglycans used to treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) and fondaparinux (a novel synthetic antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide with exclusive anti-factor Xa activity approved in the United States for antithrombotic prophylaxis following orthopedic surgery). The new direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) also have no specific antidote.

CONCLUSIONS

Newer anticoagulant agents generally lack specific antidotes. Thus, careful choice of an anticoagulant agent and laboratory monitoring where appropriate are needed to minimize risk of bleeding complications.

The tests currently employed within most haemostasis laboratories to monitor anticoagulant therapy largely comprise the prothrombin time (PT)/ International Normalised Ratio (INR) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). These are respectively used to monitor Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin, and unfractionated heparin. Additional tests that laboratories may also employ for assessing or monitoring unfractionated heparin include thrombin time (TT) and the anti-Xa assay, which can also be used to monitor low molecular weight heparin. Several new anti-thrombotic agents have recently emerged, or are in the final process of clinical evaluation. These novel drugs that include Dabigatran etexilate and Rivaroxaban would not theoretically require monitoring; however, testing is useful in specific situations. The tests currently used to monitor VKAs and heparin are typically either too sensitive or too insensitive to the new drugs to be used as 'typically performed in laboratories', and may thus require some methodological adjustments to increase or decrease their sensitivity. Alternately, different tests may be better employed in these assessments. Whatever the case, laboratories may soon be performing a reduced or possibly increased number of tests, the same kind of tests but perhaps differently, or conceivably different assay panels. Specific laboratory guidance on the choice of the appropriate test to be ordered according to the drug being administered, as well as on appropriate interpretation of test results, will also be necessary. The current report reviews the current state of play and provides a glimpse to the possible future of the coagulation laboratory.

For over 50 years, anticoagulant options for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis have been limited mainly to traditional agents such as unfractionated heparin and oral vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. These traditional agents are fraught with limitations that complicate their clinical use. A variety of novel anticoagulants with improved pharmacologic and clinical profiles have recently been introduced or are in development, offering benefits over traditional therapies. Specifically, progress has been made in the development of low-molecular-weight heparins, factor Xa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Because of their convenience and ease of use, some of these novel compounds are competing with the traditional anticoagulants and are needed additions to the antithrombotic arsenal.

In a double-blind, randomized multicentre trial, the efficacy and safety of two regimens for the prevention of postoperative venous thrombo-embolism, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) CY 216 and unfractionated heparin (UH), were compared in 341 patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. A group of 169 patients received one subcutaneous injection of 48 mg (approximately 10,000 anti-Xa IC units) LMWH and two placebo injections per day and 172 patients received a fixed dose of 5000 IU UH t.i.d. Deep vein thrombosis was assessed by bilateral phlebography on day 14 +/- 1 after surgery. Phlebography was successfully performed in 136 patients in the LMWH group and 137 patients in the UH group. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 45 of 137 patients (33.1%) treated with LMWH CY 216 and in 47 of 136 patients (34.3%) who received UH. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 2 of 167 evaluable patients (1.2%) in the LMWH group and in 6 of 168 patients (3.6%) in the UH group. In addition, the incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was evaluated and was found to be 10.3% (14/137 patients) in the LMWH group and 19% (26/136 patients) in the UH group (P = 0.044, two-sided). The safety of the treatments, as assessed by the incidence of major haemorrhage, intra- and postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, haemoglobin drop and frequency of wound haematomata, was similar in the two groups. It is concluded that prophylaxis of postoperative thrombo-embolism in hip surgery with one subcutaneous injection (48 mg) of LMWH CY 216 is as effective and as safe as prevention with fixed low-dose heparin (5000 IU t.i.d.). A tendency to reduced rates of pulmonary embolism (3.6% vs. 1.2%) and proximal deep vein thrombosis (19% vs. 10.3%) was observed in favour of LMWH CY 216.

BACKGROUND

Timing and type of chemoprophylaxis (CP) that should be used in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unclear. We reviewed our institutions experience with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in TBI.

METHODS

The charts of all TBI patients with a head abbreviated injury severity score >2 (HAIS) and an intensive care unit length of stay >48 hours admitted during a 42-month period between 2006 and 2009 were reviewed. CP was initiated after intracranial hemorrhage was considered stable. We reviewed all operative notes and radiologic reports in these patients to analyze the rate of significant intracranial hemorrhagic complications, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolus.

RESULTS

A total of 386 patients with TBI were identified; 158 were treated with LMWH and 171 were treated with UFH. HAIS was significantly different between the LMWH (3.8 ± 0.7) and UFH (4.1 ± 0.7) groups; the time to initiation of CP was not. The UFH group had a significantly higher rate of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus. Progression of ICH that occurred after the initiation of CP was significantly higher in the UFH-treated patients (59%) when compared with those treated with LMWH (40%). Two patients in the UFH group required craniotomy after the initiation of CP.

CONCLUSIONS

LMWH is an effective method of CP in patients with TBI, providing a lower rate of venous thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications when compared with UFH. A large, prospective, randomized study would better evaluate the safety and efficacy of LMWH in patients suffering blunt traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative safety and efficacy of a low-molecular-weight heparinoid (ORG 10172) with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Double-blind randomized trial.

METHODS

Seven Canadian university-affiliated hospitals.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting in lower-limb paresis.

METHODS

Patients received either low-molecular-weight heparinoid, 750 anti-factor Xa units twice daily, or unfractionated heparin, 5000 units subcutaneously twice daily. Treatment was continued for 14 days or until hospital discharge if sooner.

METHODS

Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed using 125I-labeled fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. Venography was indicated if either test was positive. Overt hemorrhage, major or minor, was assessed clinically.

RESULTS

Venous thrombosis occurred in four patients (9%) given low-molecular-weight heparinoid and in 13 patients (31%) given heparin (relative risk reduction, 71%; 95% CI, 16% to 93%. The corresponding rates for proximal vein thrombosis were 4% and 12%, respectively (relative risk reduction, 63%; P greater than 0.2). The incidence of hemorrhage was 2% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-molecular-weight heparinoid, given in a fixed dose of 750 anti-factor Xa units subcutaneously twice daily, is more effective than subcutaneous low-dose heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

A total of 1290 patients (Pts) undergoing general surgery were enrolled in a randomized, multicentre double-blind study in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (Logiparin) for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis. Patients were randomized to either 5,000 IU unfractionated heparin twice daily, 2,500 anti-Xa or 3,500 anti-Xa units of Logiparin once daily. Each treatment was given subcutaneously two hours before surgery and continued for seven to ten days. All coagulation tests were performed blindly in a core laboratory. Blood samples were collected before surgery and then 3 hours after injection on Day 3 and 5 after surgery. Anti-Xa amidolytic activities were significantly higher in the two LMW Heparin groups than in the unfractionated heparin group (mean peak levels +/- s.e.m. on Day 3: 0.097 +/- 0.004; 0.152 +/- 0.004 and 0.034 +/- 0.003 IU respectively). As expected a significant correlation was observed between anti-Xa activity and the dose of LMW Heparin injected. The correlation coefficient was higher when the doses were expressed in anti-Xa units/kg body weight. However, the body weight accounts for only 16% of the interindividual variability of anti-Xa activity. Therefore, there is no clear evidence to suggest that weight-adjusted doses should be recommended when this LMW Heparin is used as prophylactic treatment in general surgery. A weak negative correlation was found between anti-Xa activity and thrombosis as demonstrated by a positive radiolabelled fibrinogen uptake test and confirmed by positive phlebography. No significant correlation was demonstrated between anti-Xa activity and the occurrence of postoperative bleeding.

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Effective anticoagulation is therefore critical in such patients but remains problematic, since oral anticoagulation and both unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin may be associated with important fetal and maternal side effects.

OBJECTIVE

To review information related to the use of anticoagulation with both warfarin and heparin and reassess the safety and efficacy of these therapies in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search from 1966 to October 2003 for English and non-English language articles that reported the use of anticoagulation in pregnancy was conducted. Articles were included if they reported use of anticoagulation in pregnancy with emphasis on those that included women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation prophylaxis with both warfarin and heparin (unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin) may be associated with important fetal and maternal side effects. Optional regimens for the treatment of low-risk and high-risk patients are proposed to minimize potential complications.

Three consecutive randomized open studies have been carried out to determine the optimal dosage of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the prevention of postoperative thrombosis in general surgery (892 patients). All patients undergoing abdominal, gynaecological, thoracic or urological surgery were over 40 years old and presented at least one of the following risk factors for thrombosis: previous thromboembolism, obesity, varicose veins, malignancy (30 per cent), pre-operative hospitalization over 5 days, oestrogen therapy, chronic cardiac disease or bronchitis. Isotopic venous thrombosis and bleeding complications were assessed after subcutaneous administration of a LMWH fragment (LMWH, Enoxaparine) or unfractionated heparin (UH). The three studies compared 3 X 5000 units UH daily with 1 X 60 mg, 1 X 40 mg, 1 X 20 mg LMWH daily. Thromboembolic events rates were not significantly different from group to group (UH: 3.8 per cent, 2.7 per cent, 7.6 per cent respectively compared with LMWH: 2.9 per cent, 2.8 per cent, 3.8 per cent). Bleeding episodes including wound haematoma formation, perioperative blood losses and systemic haemorrhage were not significantly different in patients receiving LMWH or UH. Significant decreases in haematocrit and haemoglobin were only observed in patients receiving 60 mg Enoxaparine (as compared to UH). An analysis using the 'intention to treat' approach gave results consistent with those of an analysis of good compliers. An overview of isotopic thromboses in the three studies gave no evidence of differences amongst the effects of the three doses of LMWH (P = 0.20), and pooling the results of the three studies using the Mantel-Haenszel procedure gave no evidence of a global difference between Enoxaparine and UH (P = 0.54). These results suggest that an optimal dosage of 20 mg/day of Enoxaparine is safe and effective in the prevention of postoperative thrombosis in this population.

OBJECTIVE

Whether prasugrel plus bivalirudin is a superior strategy to unfractionated heparin plus clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has never been assessed in specifically designed randomized trials.

RESULTS

The Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE) 4 study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial, designed to test the hypothesis that in STEMI patients with planned primary PCI a strategy based on prasugrel plus bivalirudin is superior to a strategy based on clopidogrel plus heparin in terms of net clinical outcome. Owing to slow recruitment, the trial was stopped prematurely after enrolment of 548 of 1240 planned patients. At 30 days, the primary composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization of the infarct related artery, stent thrombosis, stroke, or bleeding was observed in 42 patients (15.6%) randomized to prasugrel plus bivalirudin and 40 patients (14.5%) randomized to clopidogrel plus heparin [relative risk, 1.09; one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0-1.79, P = 0.680]. The composite ischaemic endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization of the infarct-related artery, stent thrombosis, or stroke occurred in 13 patients (4.8%) in the prasugrel plus bivalirudin group and 15 patients (5.5%) in the clopidogrel plus heparin group (relative risk, 0.89; 95% CI 0.40-1.96, P = 0.894). Bleeding according to the HORIZONS-AMI definition was observed in 38 patients (14.1%) in the prasugrel plus bivalirudin group and 33 patients (12.0%) in the clopidogrel plus heparin group (relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI 0.74-1.88, P = 0.543). Results were consistent across various subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized trial of STEMI patients, we were unable to demonstrate significant differences in net clinical outcome between prasugrel plus bivalirudin and clopidogrel plus heparin. Neither the composite of ischaemic complications nor bleeding were favourably affected by prasugrel plus bivalirudin compared with a regimen of clopidogrel plus unfractionated heparin. However, the results must be interpreted in view of the premature termination of the trial.

BACKGROUND

Unique identifier NCT00976092 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

BACKGROUND

Acute deep vein thrombosis has traditionally been treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), administered intravenously, but low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), administered subcutaneously, have recently become available. The authors sought to determine which therapy was more cost-effective for inpatient and outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

METHODS

An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis based on a decision tree was performed for 4 treatment strategies for deep vein thrombosis. Rate of major hemorrhage while receiving heparin, rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism 3 months after treatment and mortality rate 3 months after treatment were determined by meta-analysis. Costs for the UFH therapy were prospectively collected by a case-costing accounting system for 105 patients with deep vein thrombosis treated in fiscal year 1995/96. The costs for LMWH therapy were modelled, and cost-effectiveness was determined by decision analysis.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed a mean difference in risk of hemorrhage of -1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.4% to 0.3%), a mean difference in risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism of -2.6% (95% CI -4.5% to -0.7%) and a mean difference in risk of death of -1.9% (95% CI -3.6% to -0.4%), all in favour of subcutaneous unmonitored administration of LMWH. The cost to treat one inpatient was $2993 for LMWH and $3048 for UFH. Even more would be saved if LMWH was delivered on an outpatient basis (cost of $1641 per patient). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that LMWH in any treatment setting is more cost effective than UFH. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of this conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of deep vein thrombosis with LMWH is more cost effective than treatment with UFH in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) is a common but heterogeneous disorder with patients exhibiting widely varying risks. Early risk stratification is at the center of the management program and can be achieved using clinical criteria and biomarkers, or a combination. In addition to anti-ischemic therapy and aspirin, the thienopyridine clopidogrel is indicated except in patients who are potential candidates for urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists are indicated in high-risk patients likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but are not indicated in the management of lower-risk patients who do not undergo PCI. There is a growing body of evidence to support the substitution of the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin for unfractionated heparin (UFH). Three recent trials have demonstrated the benefit of an early invasive strategy with catheterization followed by revascularization in patients at high and intermediate risk. Lower-risk patients should undergo early noninvasive stress testing. An intensive program of secondary prevention is mandatory and should be begun before hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND

The A-to-Z Trial is an ongoing international, multicenter, randomized study designed to investigate 2 issues concerning contemporary care of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The first issue is whether the use of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin affects outcomes and safety when used as a therapy adjunctive to baseline treatment with tirofiban and aspirin in patients with non-ST-elevation (nSTE) ACS. The second issue is whether early use of an aggressively dosed statin is superior to a current trial-based "accepted care" regimen of a lower-dose statin started 3 to 6 months after an acute event.

METHODS

The study is conceptually and functionally divided into 2 sequential parts-the "A" Aggrastat and "Z" Zocar phases. The primary A-phase end point is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and documented refractory ischemia at 7 days. Both nSTE-ACS patients from the A phase and patients with ST-elevation ACS who meet specific risk criteria are eligible to enter the subsequent "Z" (Zocor) chronic phase (Z phase). The primary end point of the Z phase is a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, readmission for ACS, and stroke. The trial will continue until 970 primary events have occurred in the Z-phase population.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial is evaluating 2 temporally connected sequences of phamacotherapy for ACS. At completion, trial results will provide definitive evidence regarding efficacy and safety of early, intensive statin therapy and better define the role of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with nSTE ACS.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and overall risk-benefit profile of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

Patients with ischaemic stroke resulting in lower-limb paralysis lasting for at least 24 h and necessitating bedrest, were randomized within 48 h of the onset of stroke, and treated with enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously once daily) or UFH (5000 IU subcutaneously thrice daily) for 10 +/- 2 days. Main outcome measures were deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), death from any cause, intracranial haemorrhage including haemorrhagic infarction, or any other major bleeding.

RESULTS

Outcome events occurred within 3 months of stroke in 40/106 patients treated with enoxaparin (37.7%) and 52/106 patients treated with UFH (49.1%, P=0.127). Fewer patients treated with enoxaparin (14, 13.2%) than with UFH (20, 18.9%) had evidence of haemorrhagic transformation of ischaemic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin administered subcutaneously once daily was as safe and effective as subcutaneous UFH given thrice daily in the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with lower limb paralysis caused by acute ischaemic stroke.

A multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of a low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin, Logiparin, with that of an unfractionated (UF) heparin in the prophylactic treatment of thrombosis in patients undergoing general surgery. A total of 1,290 patients were randomised to receive a single daily dose of Logiparin (2,500 IU: 431 patients; 3,500 IU: 430 patients) or UF heparin (2 x 5,000 IU: 429 patients). The incidence of the main end point, deep venous thrombosis, was found to be significantly different between the groups (p = 0.03), whereas the incidence of severe haemorrhage was not (p = 0.05). The plasma anti-Xa activity was found to be correlated with body weight, but correlated only very weakly with antithrombotic activity (p = 0.045) after adjustment in a stepwise multivariate analysis, and did not significantly correlate with the incidence of haemorrhage. Logiparin at 3,500 IU and UF heparin showed similar efficacy. Although a correlation between plasma anti-Xa activity and body weight was observed, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend the adjustment of the Logiparin dose on patient's weight for prophylaxis in general surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary embolism is a leading cause of death for bariatric patients. Numerous regimens have been proposed, but a comprehensive, simple approach is lacking. This study provides a simple, easily implemented prophylaxis regimen.

METHODS

One hundred fifty bariatric surgery patients were evaluated. Patients considered at high risk for venous thromboembolism had heart failure, a BMI of>>/=50 kg/m(2), or a history of venous thromboembolism or pelvic surgery. Preoperatively and postoperatively, all patients received subcutaneous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. High-risk patients received either preoperatively inserted inferior vena cava filters or continuous heparin infusions intraoperatively. All high-risk patients were anticoagulated with warfarin (Coumadin; Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, NJ) for at least 3 months postoperatively. Initially, some patients experienced significant hemorrhage; to prevent this, sutures were oversewn into staple lines.

RESULTS

No patient experienced venous thromboembolism; a binomial test showed that the regimen reduced the risk of this complication to less than 2% (p < 0.05). Hemorrhage sufficient to require transfusion occurred in 4 of the first 20 patients; of the remaining 130 patients, into whose staple lines sutures were oversewn, none required transfusion (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should be divided into those who are at high risk and those who are at low risk for venous thromboembolism. All patients should receive pre- and postoperative anticoagulation. High-risk patients should also receive either an inferior vena cava filter or intraoperative heparin infusions, as well as at least 3 months of Coumadin therapy. Oversewing of staple lines may reduce the risk of hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND

In high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there have been concerns relating to the safety of using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in combination with a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, and the continued use of LMWH in patients brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study was an open-label observational study of enoxaparin in combination with any 1 of 3 available GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation ACS. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Data were also recorded on the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization for repeat ischemia.

RESULTS

A total of 671 patients with validated data were treated with enoxaparin; 628 of these patients also received a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban, n = 229; eptifibatide, n = 272; abciximab, n = 127); 283 of 628 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 30-day incidence of non-CABG major bleeding was 1.9%, and was not significantly higher than a prespecified historical control rate of 2.0%. Outcome events included death (1.0% at hospital discharge and 1.6% at 30 days), MI (3.5% and 5.1%, respectively), and urgent revascularization (2.7% and 6.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety of enoxaparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist was comparable to that of unfractionated heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, as reported in other recent major trials. Patients undergoing PCI can be safely managed with enoxaparin and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, without supplemental use of unfractionated heparin.