OBJECTIVE

The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), defined by a high frequency of aberrantly methylated genes, is a characteristic of a subclass of colon tumors with distinct clinical and molecular features. Cohort studies have produced conflicting results on responses of CIMP-positive tumors to chemotherapy. We assessed the association between tumor CIMP status and survival of patients receiving adjuvant fluorouracil and leucovorin alone or with irinotecan (IFL).

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma randomly assigned to groups given fluorouracil and leucovorin or IFL after surgery, from April 1999 through April 2001. The primary end point of the trial was overall survival and the secondary end point was disease-free survival. DNA isolated from available tumor samples (n = 615) was used to determine CIMP status based on methylation patterns at the CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, and SOCS1 loci. The effects of CIMP on survival were modeled using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards; interactions with treatment and BRAF, KRAS, and mismatch repair (MMR) status were also investigated.

RESULTS

Of the tumor samples characterized for CIMP status, 145 were CIMP positive (23%). Patients with CIMP-positive tumors had shorter overall survival times than patients with CIMP-negative tumors (hazard ratio = 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.84). Treatment with IFL showed a trend toward increased overall survival for patients with CIMP-positive tumors, compared with treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin (hazard ratio = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.37-1.05; P = .07), but not for patients with CIMP-negative tumors (hazard ratio = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.00-1.89; P = .049). In a 3-way interaction analysis, patients with CIMP-positive, MMR-intact tumors benefited most from the addition of irinotecan to fluorouracil and leucovorin therapy (for the interaction, P = .01). CIMP was more strongly associated with response to IFL than MMR status. Results for disease-free survival times were comparable among all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage III, CIMP-positive, MMR-intact colon tumors have longer survival times when irinotecan is added to combination therapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin.

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer might be improved if a radical surgical resection of metastases could be performed after a response to chemotherapy.

METHODS

We treated 74 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (not selected for a neoadjuvant approach) with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI and simplified FOLFOXIRI). Because of the high activity of these regimens (response rate, 72%), a secondary curative operation could be performed in 19 patients (26%).

RESULTS

Four patients underwent an extended hepatectomy, nine patients underwent a right hepatectomy, three patients underwent a left hepatectomy, and three patients had a segmental resection. In five patients, surgical removal of extrahepatic disease was also performed. In seven patients, surgical resection was combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. The median overall survival of the 19 patients who underwent operation is 36.8 months, and the 4-year survival rate is 37%. The median overall survival of the 34 patients who were responsive to chemotherapy, but who did not undergo operation, is 22.2 months (P = .0114).

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFOXIRI regimens we studied have significant antitumor activity and allow a radical surgical resection of metastases in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer not selected for a neoadjuvant approach and also those with extrahepatic disease. The median survival of patients with resected disease is promising.

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) was shown to be effective in a large phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the tolerance and effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX as practiced outside of the confines of a clinical trial and to document any dose modifications used by practicing oncologists.

METHODS

Data on patients with all stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with FOLFIRINOX at three institutions was analyzed for efficacy, tolerance, and use of any dose modifications.

RESULTS

Total of 61 patients was included in this review. Median age was 58 years (range: 37 to 72 years), 33 were male (54.1%) and majority had ECOG performance of 0 or 1 (86.9%, 53 patients). Thirty-eight (62.3%) had metastatic disease, while 23 (37.7%) were treated for locally advanced or borderline resectable disease. Patients were treated with a median number of four cycles of FOLFIRINOX, with dose modifications in 58.3% (176/302) of all cycles. Ten patients had stable disease (16.4%), four had a partial response (6.6%) while eight had progressive disease (13.1%) on best imaging following therapy. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.5 months and 13.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia at 19.7% (12 cases), with 4.9% (3 cases) rate of febrile neutropenia. Twenty-one patients (34.4%) were hospitalized as a result of therapy but there were no therapy-related deaths. Twenty-three (37.7%) had therapy eventually discontinued as a result of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial rates of adverse events and use of dose modifications, FOLFIRINOX was found to be clinically effective in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. Regimen toxicity did not detract from overall response and survival.

BACKGROUND

Phase II and III trials of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) have shown superior efficacy versus cisplatin and fluorouracil alone but high rates of hematologic toxicity in advanced gastric cancer. To reduce toxicity while maintaining the efficacy of DCF, we investigated split doses of docetaxel (T), cisplatin (P), leucovorin (L) and fluorouracil (F).

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric-/esophageal adenocarcinomas received T 50 mg/m(2) and P 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15 and 29 and L 500 mg/m(2) plus F 2000 mg/m(2) weekly, every 8 weeks. Because significant dose reductions to <80% became necessary in 80% of patients, the regimen was amended after the first 15 patients to T 40 mg/m(2), P 40 mg/m(2), L 200 mg/m(2) and F 2000 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was response rate.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled: 24 had locally advanced (LA) tumors and 36 had metastatic disease. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (22%), febrile neutropenia (5%), diarrhea (20%) and lethargy (18%). The overall response rate was 47%. Twenty-three LA patients underwent secondary surgical resection (96%); complete resection was achieved in 87%. Overall, median time to progression and overall survival were 9.4 and 17.9 months, respectively (8.1 and 15.1 months, respectively, for patients with metastatic disease).

CONCLUSIONS

T-PLF regimen is highly active and has a favorable toxicity profile.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days.

RESULTS

The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), CPT-11 150 mg/m(2), and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg x 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), LV 400 mg/m(2), and FU 1,400 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This double-blind, phase III study aimed to demonstrate that sunitinib plus FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) was superior to placebo plus FOLFIRI in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI and either sunitinib (37.5 mg per day) or placebo (4 weeks on treatment, followed by 2 weeks off [schedule 4/2]) until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. The correlation between genotype and clinical outcomes was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In all, 768 patients were randomly assigned to sunitinib plus FOLFIRI (n = 386) or placebo plus FOLFIRI (n = 382). Following a second prespecified interim analysis, the study was stopped because of potential futility of sunitinib plus FOLFIRI. Final results are reported. The PFS hazard ratio was 1.095 (95% CI, 0.892 to 1.344; one-sided stratified log-rank P = .807), indicating a lack of superiority for sunitinib plus FOLFIRI. Median PFS for the sunitinib arm was 7.8 months (95% CI, 7.1 to 8.4 months) versus 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.2 months) for the placebo arm. Sunitinib plus FOLFIRI was associated with more grade ≥ 3 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities than placebo (especially diarrhea, stomatitis/oral syndromes, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and febrile neutropenia). More deaths as a result of toxicity (12 v four) and significantly more dose delays, dose reductions, and treatment discontinuations occurred in the sunitinib arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib 37.5 mg per day (schedule 4/2) plus FOLFIRI is not superior to FOLFIRI alone and has a poorer safety profile. This combination regimen is not recommended for previously untreated mCRC.

BACKGROUND

The aim was to determine the values of p53 tumour expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype to predict benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer by 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FL) alone or with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 233 unselected patients with stage III colon cancer treated by FL (n = 124) or FOLFOX (n = 109). The impact of p53 expression and MSI on disease-free survival (DFS) was defined using univariate and multivariate analyses. A Cox proportional hazards model was specifically designed to evaluate the interaction between chemotherapy and these genetic alterations.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, addition of oxaliplatin significantly improved DFS provided that tumour overexpressed p53 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.82; P = 0.01] or displayed MSI phenotype (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.04-0.68; P = 0.01). In multivariate analyses, p53 was confirmed as an independent factor predictive of benefit from FOLFOX (P = 0.03), while the interaction of MSI with chemotherapy could not be determined in the absence of relapse in the MSI group treated with FOLFOX.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations indicate that MSI status and p53 expression may influence the impact of oxaliplatin on adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND

Oral capecitabine achieves a superior response rate with an improved safety profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report here the results of a large phase III trial investigating adjuvant oral capecitabine compared with 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) in Dukes' C colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-75 years with resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with either oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days (n = 993), or i.v. bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) with i.v. leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 28 days (n = 974).

RESULTS

Patients receiving capecitabine experienced significantly (P <0.001) less diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and neutropenia, but more hand-foot syndrome than those receiving 5-FU/LV. Fewer patients receiving capecitabine experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia/sepsis and stomatitis (P <0.001), although more experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than those treated with 5-FU/LV (P <0.001). Capecitabine demonstrates a similar, favorable safety profile in patients aged <65 years or>> or = 65 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on its improved safety profile, capecitabine has the potential to replace 5-FU/LV as standard adjuvant treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in Keywords: Adjuvant treatment, capecitabine, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine whether epirubicin, cisplatin and infused 5FU (ECF) improves overall survival (OS) compared to 5FU, etoposide and leucovorin (FELV) in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary cancer in a prospective randomised study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive epirubicin, cisplatin and infused 5FU ECF or bolus 5FU etoposide and leucovorin (FELV). The primary end point was OS with secondary end points of objective response rate (ORR), failure-free survival (FFS), quality of life (QOL) and toxicity. In all, 54 patients were recruited with 27 randomly assigned to each arm. The median OS for ECF was 9.02 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.46-11.51) and FELV 12.03 months (95% CI: 9.3-14.7), P=0.2059. Objective response rates were similar for both arms: ECF 19.2% (95% CI: 6.55-39.3); FELV 15% (95% CI: 3.2-37.9), P=0.72. There was significantly increased grade 3/4 neutropenia with FELV vs ECF (53.8 vs 29.5%, respectively, P=0.020). Symptom resolution was impressive for both regimens. This is the largest reported randomised study to date in this setting. ECF did not improve OS compared to FELV, but was associated with less acute toxicity. These data suggest that chemotherapy can prolong OS and achieve good symptomatic relief in advanced biliary cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a single cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with longer duration chemotherapy for premenopausal women or chemoendocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer using a quality-of-life-oriented end point, Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted analysis of TWiST: Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity).

METHODS

Multicenter randomized clinical trial--International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG: formerly Ludwig Group) Trial V.

METHODS

IBCSG participating centers in Sweden, Switzerland, Australia, Yugoslavia, Spain, New Zealand, Italy, Germany, and South Africa.

METHODS

Data were available for 1229 eligible patients with node-positive breast cancer who were randomized to receive one of three adjuvant treatments after at least a total mastectomy and axillary clearance.

METHODS

Patients received either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and leucovorin; or six cycles (6 months) of a conventionally timed chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and prednisone for premenopausal women or this combination plus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women; or both perioperative and conventionally timed chemotherapy for a 7-month course of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

At 5 years of median follow-up, patients who received the longer duration therapies had an improved 5-year disease-free survival percentage (53% compared with 36%; P less than 0.001) and 5-year overall survival percentage (73% compared with 63%; P = 0.001) compared with those who received the single perioperative cycle alone. By 3.5 years, the greater burden of toxic effects associated with the longer duration treatments was balanced by their superior control of disease. Within 5 years of follow-up, even after subtracting time with adjuvant treatment toxicity, patients gained an average of 2.2 months of Q-TWiST if treated with the longer duration therapies compared with the single cycle (P = 0.03). The gain for premenopausal patients was 2.8 months (P = 0.05), whereas the gain for postmenopausal women was 1.5 months (P greater than 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Six or seven months of adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoendocrine therapy improve both the quantity and quality of life for patients with node-positive breast cancer compared with a single short course of perioperative combination chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

Major concerns surround combining chemotherapy with bevacizumab in patients with colon cancer presenting with an asymptomatic intact primary tumor (IPT) and synchronous yet unresectable metastatic disease. Surgical resection of asymptomatic IPT is controversial.

METHODS

Eligibility for this prospective, multicenter phase II trial included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1, asymptomatic IPT, and unresectable metastases. All received infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) combined with bevacizumab. The primary end point was major morbidity events, defined as surgical resection because of symptoms at or death related to the IPT. A 25% major morbidity rate was considered acceptable. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and minor morbidity related to IPT requiring hospitalization, transfusion, or nonsurgical intervention.

RESULTS

Ninety patients registered between March 2006 and June 2009: 86 were eligible with follow-up, median age was 58 years, and 52% were female. Median follow-up was 20.7 months. There were 12 patients (14%) with major morbidity related to IPT: 10 required surgery (eight, obstruction; one, perforation; and one, abdominal pain), and two patients died. The 24-month cumulative incidence of major morbidity was 16.3% (95% CI, 7.6% to 25.1%). Eleven IPTs were resected without a morbidity event: eight for attempted cure and three for other reasons. Two patients had minor morbidity events only: one hospitalization and one nonsurgical intervention. Median OS was 19.9 months (95% CI, 15.0 to 27.2 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial met its primary end point. Combining mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab did not result in an unacceptable rate of obstruction, perforation, bleeding, or death related to IPT. Survival was not compromised. These patients can be spared initial noncurative resection of their asymptomatic IPT.

BACKGROUND

Fibrin formation is required for tumor angiogenesis, metastasis, and invasion. D-dimer, a fibrin degradation product, is produced when crosslinked fibrin is degraded by plasmin. The current study prospectively examined D-dimer levels in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated in a Phase II randomized trial comparing bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with 5-FU/LV alone.

METHODS

At least one circulating D-dimer level was evaluable in 98 of the 104 previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma in the current trial. Plasma D-dimer levels were determined using a quantitative immunoassay kit at enrollment, before each treatment, and at the time of trial completion or disease progression.

RESULTS

At trial enrollment, 86 of 104 patients (88%) had elevated D-dimer levels >> 20 ng/mL), and 86 of 102 patients (84%) had elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels >> 3 ng/mL). Baseline D-dimer levels were correlated with the following baseline characteristics: CEA (Pearson coefficient, 0.31; P = 0.002), albumin levels (Pearson coefficient, -0.32; P = 0.002), tumor burden (Pearson coefficient, 0.30; P = 0.003), and number of metastatic sites (Pearson coefficient, 0.21; P = 0.04). At the time of progression, plasma D-dimer levels reached a maximum postbaseline value in 51 of 61 patients (84%), whereas the CEA level was at its maximum postbaseline value in 39 of 55 patients (71%). Baseline D-dimer levels were a strong predictor of overall survival on univariate analysis (P = 0.008) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). Overall, treatment with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) and baseline D-dimer levels were the only predictors of overall survival (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicates that fibrin remodeling is an important prognostic feature in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. D-dimer levels should be incorporated into prognostic models, and D-dimer may represent a useful biomarker for patients treated with antiangiogenic agents.

BACKGROUND

A phase II prospective trial was carried out to study the concept of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dose-intensity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Forty patients were treated with 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV), with individually increasing doses of 5-FU. A 5-FU pharmacokinetic follow up was performed and a relationship was sought between its metabolism and its response to treatment, and between 5-FU's toxicity and patient survival.

METHODS

5-FU was administered weekly by 8 hour continuous infusion. The initial dose of 1000 mg/m2 was individually increased every 3 weeks by 250 mg/m2 steps, potentiated by 400 mg/m2 LV. 5-FU plasma concentrations were determined weekly by liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Eighteen overall objective responses and 22 minor responses, stabilizations, or progressions (NR) were observed. 5-FU plasma levels were significantly higher in cases of complete or partial response, whatever the dose. They reached about 2000 micrograms/l as early as the second dose level (1250 mg/m2). Only seven patients who experienced NR reached equivalent levels after the fourth step (1750 mg/m2). High 5-FU plasma levels were predictive of an objective response and better survival (difference not significant). The acute toxicity, whatever the type, was correlated with 5-FU levels>> 3000 micrograms/l and not with the dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the wide variability of 5-FU metabolism, whatever the dose, the clear relationship between 5-FU plasma levels, toxicity, and efficacy. This relationship points out the problem of the polymorphism of 5-FU metabolism, the usefulness of the therapeutic range determination and the usefulness of the individual 5-FU dose adaptation.

A regimen consisting of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) is widely used in France in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of our study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus FOLFOX-6 for this indication. Patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX or FOLFOX-6 for 6 months. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol (PP) population; however, progression-free and overall survival (OS), time to response and response duration were also assessed. A total of 306 patients were enrolled (XELOX n = 156; FOLFOX-6 n = 150). ORR was 42 and 46% with XELOX and FOLFOX-6, respectively, in the PP population. The difference between groups was 4.7%; the upper limit of the unilateral 95% confidence interval (14.4%) was below the non-inferiority margin of 15%. In the intent-to-treat population, median progression-free survival was 8.8 months with XELOX and 9.3 months with FOLFOX-6, and median OS was 19.9 and 20.5 months, respectively. XELOX patients had significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (12% vs. 5%) and diarrhoea (14% vs. 7%), but significantly less grade 3/4 neutropenia (5% vs. 47%), febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 6%) and neuropathy (11% vs. 26%) than FOLFOX-6 patients. We conclude that XELOX is non-inferior in terms of efficacy to FOLFOX-6 in the first-line treatment of MCRC, but has a different toxicity profile.

Mucositis is a significant dose-limiting toxicity associated with fluorouracil (5FU), particularly when it is combined with leucovorin. We hypothesized that oral cryotherapy would cause local vasoconstriction and would temporarily decrease blood flow to the oral mucous membranes. If cryotherapy were used during the time of peak serum 5FU levels, then the oral mucous membranes would have less exposure to 5FU and thus develop less mucositis. To test this hypothesis, 95 patients scheduled to receive their first cycle of 5FU plus leucovorin were randomized to have oral cryotherapy at the time of chemotherapy administration or to serve as a control group. Subsequent mucositis was significantly reduced in the group assigned to receive cryotherapy as judged by the attending physicians (P = .0002) and by the patients themselves (P = .0001). We now routinely recommend this cryotherapy procedure for our patients receiving daily bolus 5FU plus leucovorin.

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, 2 x 2 factorial study compared a semimonthly regimen (fluorouracil [FU] and leucovorin [LV] semi-monthly is LV5FU2) with a monthly regimen of FU and LV (mFU/LV) as well as 24 weeks versus 36 weeks of each regimen as adjuvant treatment of stage II and III colon cancer.

METHODS

LV5FU2 was administered semimonthly for 2 days as racemate (dl) or levogyre (l-; 200 or 100 mg/m(2)) as a 2-hour infusion, followed by 400 mg/m(2) FU bolus and a 600-mg/m(2) FU 22-hour continuous infusion. FU and LV were administered monthly (mFU/LV) for 5 days as dl- or l-LV 15-minute infusion, followed by a 400 mg/m(2) FU 15-minute infusion. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Between September 1996 and November 1999, 905 patients with stage II (43%) and III (57%) colon cancer were enrolled. The median follow-up was 6 years. There was no statistically significant difference between mFU/LV and LV5FU2 in terms of DFS (150 v 148 events; hazard ratio [HR],1.01; 95% CI, 0.806 to 1.269; P = .94) and overall survival (OS; 104 v 103 events; HR,1.02; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.34; P = .91). No statistical difference was observed between 24 or 36 weeks of chemotherapy. Median survival from metastatic relapse was 24 months. The survival of patients with metastatic relapse (n = 243) was significantly longer for patients with a longer time from random assignment to relapse (< 1, 1 to 2,>>or= 2 years; log-rank test for trend P, .0497).

CONCLUSIONS

DFS and OS were not statistically different between treatment groups and treatment durations. These data confirm the value of LV5FU2 as control arm in the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer and Pan-European Trials in Adjuvant Colon Cancer studies.

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method was used to quantitate the expression levels of low abundance genes relevant to cancer drug activity. RNA from tumor samples as small as 20 mg was isolated and converted to cDNA using random hexamers. The 5' primers for the PCR contained a T7 polymerase promoter sequence, allowing the PCR-amplified DNA to be transcribed to RNA fragments. In each sample, the linear ranges of amplification of each cDNA of interest were established. Relative gene expressions were calculated by extrapolating the amounts of PCR products generated within the linear amplification regions of each gene to equal volumes of the cDNA solution. The method was accurate to less than a 2-fold difference in expression levels. Using beta 2-microglobulin and beta-actin gene expressions as internal reference standards and cDNA from HT-29 cells as an external linearity standard, we measured the relative expressions of thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and DT-diaphorase in a number of clinical tumor samples. The expressions of these genes varied from 50- to 100-fold among different tumors, although most of the values were grouped within about a 10-fold range. The amount of thymidylate synthase gene expression in tumor tissues was directly proportional to the content of thymidylate synthase protein. Those tumors with the lowest thymidylate synthase expression had the best response to both the 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil-cisplatin combinations.

Weight gain, a common side effect among breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, may decrease quality of life and impair survival. Weight gain during treatment is a well-known problem and has been studied by many investigators. However, few controlled studies have been conducted to determine reasons to explain this apparent energy imbalance. An exploratory study was undertaken to quantitate potential changes in energy intake and specific components of energy expenditure in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The research hypothesis was that a reduction in resting metabolic rate (RMR) would be observed during the period in which women received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty premenopausal patients with stage I or II breast cancer and receiving cyclophosphamide+doxorubicin+5-fluorouracil; cyclophosphamide +methotrexate+5-fluorouracil+/-doxorubicin; doxorubicin +cyclophosphamide+/-leucovorin; or methotrexate+5-fluorouracil +leucovorin chemotherapy were recruited. RMR, diet-induced thermogenesis, energy intake, physical activity, and body composition were assessed before the initiation and throughout the course of therapy. Complete data on 18 subjects suggest that RMR decreased significantly from baseline to midtreatment (P = 0.02) and rebounded to levels similar to those at baseline on completion of chemotherapy. Overall, levels of physical activity and energy intake also decreased significantly during treatment compared with baseline levels (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). These findings suggest that chemotherapy provokes many significant changes in body composition and metabolic requirements. Additional research in this area will provide valuable insight into creating optimal interventions to curb weight gain in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

Isolated hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer constitute a frequent and serious therapeutic problem that has led to the evaluation of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of different drugs. Oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin is effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In this context, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate concomitant administration of oxaliplatin by HAI and intravenous (IV) FU plus leucovorin according to the LV5FU2 protocol (leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), FU 400 mg/m(2) IV bolus, FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-hour continuous infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks).

METHODS

Patients had metastatic colorectal cancer that was restricted to the liver and inoperable. The patients were not to have previously received oxaliplatin. After surgical insertion of a catheter in the hepatic artery, patients were treated with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) HAI combined with FU + leucovorin IV according to the LV5FU2 protocol. Treatment was continued until disease progression or toxicity. Response was evaluated every 2 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included, and 26 patients were treated. Two hundred courses of therapy were administered, and the median number of courses received was eight courses (range, zero to 20 courses). The most frequent toxicity consisted of neutropenia. The main toxicity related to HAI was pain. The intent-to-treat objective response rate was 64% (95% CI, 44% to 81%; 18 of 28 patients). With a median follow-up of 23 months, the median overall and disease-free survival times were 27 and 27 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oxaliplatin HAI and FU + leucovorin according to the LV5FU2 protocol is feasible and effective in patients presenting with isolated hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has been treated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV). The tumour-activated, oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine demonstrates superior activity and favourable safety compared with the Mayo regimen, while potentially avoiding the complications and inconvenience associated with i.v. regimens.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with previously untreated advanced/MCRC were randomised to receive capecitabine followed by i.v. 5-FU/LV [Mayo Clinic, in-patient de Gramont (IPdG) or out-patient modified de Gramont (OPdG) regimens], or i.v. 5-FU/LV followed by capecitabine.

RESULTS

Before treatment, of those patients for whom a preference was recorded, almost all (95%) preferred oral treatment (consistent across all treatment groups) and the majority retained this preference after treatment (64% overall; 86%, 63% and 50% in the Mayo, IPdG and OPdG groups, respectively). Following treatment, the principal reasons for oral treatment preference were increased convenience, home-based administration and tablet formulation. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher with capecitabine compared with Mayo (P<0.05) and with OPdG compared with capecitabine (P<0.05). Quality of life (QoL) was largely constant across the regimens, although it appeared better with OPdG than capecitabine (P<0.05). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon in all arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that the majority of patients with MCRC prefer oral to i.v. therapy, although the OPdG regimen appears to be the most popular i.v. option. Capecitabine clearly represents an effective, well-tolerated oral alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV.

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases develop in 40-50% of patients with colorectal cancer and represent the major cause of death in this disease. Surgical resection remains the only treatment procedure that can ensure long-term survival and provide cure when liver metastases can be totally resected with clear margins, when the primary cancer is controlled, and when there is no nonresectable extrahepatic disease. Five-year survival rate after surgical resection of colorectal metastases varies from 25% to 55%, but cancer relapse is observed in most patients.

OBJECTIVE

To review the potential benefits and disadvantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered before surgery to patients with initially resectable metastases.

RESULTS

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 40983 has shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the risk of relapse by one-quarter, and allows to test the chemosensitivity of the cancer, to help to determine the appropriateness of further treatments, and to observe progressive disease, which contraindicates immediate surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can induce damage to the remnant liver. Oxaliplatin-based combination regimen is associated with increased risk of vascular lesions, whereas irinotecan-containing regimens have been associated with increased risks of steatosis and steatohepatitis. Analysis of EORTC study 40983 showed that administration of six cycles of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) was associated with moderate increase of the risk of reversible complications after surgery, but mortality rate was below 1% and not increased. If patients are not overtreated, chemotherapy before surgery is well tolerated. The integration of novel targeted agents in combination with cytotoxic drugs is a promising way to improve outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Preliminary trials have shown that targeted agents combined with cytotoxic regimens can increase tumor response rates. Another impact of preoperative chemotherapy is that metastases that respond to treatment may no longer be visible on computed tomography (CT) scan or at surgery. Patients should be carefully monitored and receive surgery before metastases disappear.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of most patients with liver metastases-those with resectable metastases as well as those with initially unresectable metastases-should start with chemotherapy. If drugs are well chosen and the duration of treatment is monitored with care during multidisciplinary meetings, benefits largely outweigh potential disadvantages.

The circadian timing system (CTS) controls several critical molecular pathways for cancer processes and treatment effects over the 24 hours, including drug metabolism, cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair mechanisms. This results in the circadian time dependency of whole-body and cellular pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents. However, CTS robustness and phase varies among cancer patients, based on circadian monitoring of rest- activity, body temperature, sleep, and/or hormonal secretion rhythms. Circadian disruption has been further found in up to 50% of patients with metastatic cancer. Such disruption was associated with poor outcomes, including fatigue, anorexia, sleep disorders, and short progression-free and overall survival. Novel, minimally invasive devices have enabled continuous CTS assessment in non-hospitalized cancer patients. They revealed up to 12-hour differences in individual circadian phase. Taken together, the data support the personalization of chronotherapy. This treatment method aims at the adjustment of cancer treatment delivery according to circadian rhythms, using programmable-in-time pumps or novel release formulations, in order to increase both efficacy and tolerability. A fixed oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin chronotherapy protocol prolonged median overall survival in men with metastatic colorectal cancer by 3.3 months as compared to conventional delivery, according to a meta-analysis (P=0.009). Further analyses revealed the need for the prevention of circadian disruption or the restoration of robust circadian function in patients on chronotherapy, in order to further optimize treatment effects. The strengthening of external synchronizers could meet such a goal, through programmed exercise, meal timing, light exposure, improved social support, sleep scheduling, and the properly timed administration of drugs that target circadian clocks. Chrono-rehabilitation warrants clinical testing for improving quality of life and survival in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgical resection has been the preferred treatment for patients presenting with locally advanced distal rectal carcinoma at our institutions. We postulated that chemoradiotherapy-induced pathologic response of the primary tumor would identify which patients would be candidates for local excision as definitive surgical therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 60 patients with palpable, locally advanced, distal rectal adenocarcinomas treated from 1995 to 2000 was performed. All patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (325 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) by bolus infusion on Days 1 through 5 and 29 through 33 delivered concurrently with at least 45.0 to 50.4 Gy of pelvic radiation, followed six to eight weeks later by radical surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 60 patients (20 females) there was a mean age of 58.7 (28-84) years. Clinical staging was as follows: Stage II, 14 patients (23 percent); Stage III, 35 patients (58 percent); and Stage IV, 11 patients (18 percent). Pathologic examination revealed that negative margins were obtained in 58 patients (97 percent). Downstaging to T0-2N0 was achieved in 17 patients (28 percent), with five (8 percent) achieving a pathologically complete response. Lymph nodes were positive in 24 patients (40 percent) despite chemoradiotherapy. Pathologic node positivity was found in 0 of 5 pT0 patients, 9 (41 percent) of 22 pT1 or pT2, and 15 (45 percent) of 33 pT3. Clinical stage, tumor size, pathologic stage, and adverse histologic features could not reliably predict pN0 status, except pT0 (5 patients only).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy often downsizes and downstages locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Neither pretreatment clinical characteristics, response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, or pathologic features reliably predict pN0 status. Therefore, local excision is not recommended as an alternative to radical surgery for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum regardless of the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT3, cT4, N+, M0) have a dismal prognosis, despite complete resection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the PLF (cisplatin/leucovorin [folinic acid]/5-fluorouracil [FU]) regimen in these patients. Primary endpoints of the study were the toxicity and the response to chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete resection, survival, and first site of failure.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were enrolled. Staging was based on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, endosonography, and laparoscopy. The intention was to administer two cycles (each containing six courses) of preoperative chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), high-dose folinic acid (HD-FA) 500 mg/m(2), and HD 5-FU (HD-5-FU) 2000 mg/m(2) (PLF). Following chemotherapy all patients were referred to surgery. To be evaluable for response, survival, and first site of failure, the patient had to receive at least one cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Toxicity observed was low, with grade 3 toxicity in fewer than 5% of the patients and two events of grade 4 toxicity (diarrhea and pulmonary embolism). Forty-two of the patients (86%) received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. The clinical response rate in these patients was 26% (11/42 patients). In 76% of the patients (32/42), a complete resection was possible. The median duration of follow-up for the surviving patients was 58 months (range, 38 to 80+ months). The median survival time for the 42 patients assessable for response was 25.4 months (range, 6 to 80+ months). After complete resection, median survival time was 32 months (range, 7.6 to 80+ months). The median survival time for clinically responding patients has not yet been determined, but 5-year survival is 90%. Twenty of the 32 completely resected patients (62.5%) had recurrences. First site of failure was peritoneal dissemination in 10 patients; locoregional and distant recurrences were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PLF in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer has low toxicity and reasonable efficacy, allowing administration on an outpatient basis. Clinically responding patients have an excellent outcome after complete resection. The development of peritoneal dissemination even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and complete resection remains an unsolved problem in patients with nonintestinal type tumors.