OBJECTIVE

Heparin is widely used for acute stroke to prevent thrombus propagation and/or multiple emboli generation, although there is, as yet, no demonstrated efficacy. However, all of the available clinical studies allowed long intervals from stroke to treatment. The purpose of this study was to try an intravenous regimen of unfractionated heparin the acute cerebral infarction starting treatment within the first 3 hours of the onset of symptoms.

METHODS

The study was an outcome evaluator-blind design trial. Patients had to display signs of a nonlacunar hemispheric infarction. Selected patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous heparin sodium or saline. Heparin was infused at a rate to maintain activated partial thromboplastin time ratio 2.0 to 2.5 x control for 5 days. The primary end point was recovery of a modified Rankin score zero to 2 at 90 days of stroke at phone interview by a single physician blind to treatment. Safety end points were death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages, and major extracranial bleedings by 90 days of stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 418 stroke patients were included. In the heparin group, there were more self-independent patients (38.9% versus 28.6%; P=0.025). In addition, in the same group, there were fewer deaths (16.8% versus 21.9%; P=0.189), more symptomatic brain hemorrhages (6.2% versus 1.4%; P=0.008), and more major extracerebral bleedings (2.9% versus 1.4%; P=0.491).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous heparin sodium could be of help in the earliest treatment of acute nonlacunar hemispheric cerebral infarction, even keeping into account an increased frequency of intracranial symptomatic brain hemorrhages.

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis has been recommended for nonsurgical patients, but its effectiveness remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefits and harms of prophylaxis in hospitalized adult medical patients and those with acute stroke.

METHODS

MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 1950 through April 2011, reference lists, and study authors.

METHODS

English-language randomized trials were included if they provided clinical outcomes and evaluated therapy with low-dose heparin or related agents or mechanical measures compared with placebo, no treatment, or other active prophylaxis in the target population.

METHODS

Two independent investigators extracted data on study characteristics and clinical outcomes up to 120 days after randomization. The primary outcome was total mortality.

RESULTS

In medical patients, heparin prophylaxis did not reduce total mortality but did result in fewer pulmonary embolisms (PEs) (odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90], but with evidence of publication bias) and an increase in all bleeding events (risk ratio [RR], 1.34 [CI, 1.08 to 1.66]). Heparin prophylaxis had no statistically significant effect on any outcome in patients with acute stroke except for an increase in major bleeding events (OR, 1.66 [CI, 1.20 to 2.28]). When trials of medical patients and those with stroke were considered together (18 studies; 36,122 patients), heparin prophylaxis reduced the incidence of PE (OR, 0.70 [CI, 0.56 to 0.87]; absolute reduction, 3 events per 1000 patients treated [CI, 1 to 5 events]) but increased the incidence of all bleeding (RR, 1.28 [CI, 1.05 to 1.56]) and major bleeding events (OR, 1.61 [CI, 1.23 to 2.10]), with an absolute increase of 9 bleeding events per 1000 patients treated (CI, 2 to 18 events), 4 of which were major (CI, 1 to 7 events). A reduction in total mortality approached statistical significance (RR, 0.93 [CI, 0.86 to 1.00]; P = 0.056; absolute decrease, 6 deaths per 1000 patients treated [CI, 0 to 11 deaths]). No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed in the 14 trials that compared unfractionated heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin. No improvements in clinical outcomes were seen in the 3 studies of mechanical prophylaxis in patients with stroke, but more patients had lower-extremity skin damage (RR, 4.02 [CI, 2.34 to 6.91])-an increase of 39 events per 1000 patients treated (CI, 17 to 77 events).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-English-language studies were not included, but these were few and small.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin prophylaxis had no significant effect on mortality, may have reduced PE in medical patients and all patients combined, and led to more bleeding and major bleeding events, thus resulting in little or no net benefit. No differences in benefits or harms were found according to type of heparin used. Mechanical prophylaxis provided no benefit and resulted in clinically important harm to patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND

American College of Physicians.

OBJECTIVE

The pattern of breast cancer metastasis may be determined by interactions between CXCR4 on breast cancer cells and CXCL12 within normal tissues. Glycosaminoglycans bind chemokines for presentation to responsive cells. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that soluble heparinoid glycosaminoglycan molecules can disrupt the normal response to CXCL12, thereby reducing the metastasis of CXCR4-expressing cancer cells.

METHODS

Inhibition of the response of CXCR4-expressing Chinese hamster ovary cells to CXCL12 was assessed by measurement of calcium flux and chemotaxis. Radioligand binding was also assessed to quantify the potential of soluble heparinoids to prevent specific receptor ligation. The human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and a range of sublines were assessed for their sensitivity to heparinoid-mediated inhibition of chemotaxis. A model of hematogenous breast cancer metastasis was established, and the potential of clinically relevant doses of heparinoids to inhibit CXCL12 presentation and metastatic disease was assessed.

RESULTS

Unfractionated heparin and the low-molecular-weight heparin tinzaparin inhibited receptor ligation and the response of CXCR4-expressing Chinese hamster ovary cells and human breast cancer cell lines to CXCL12. Heparin also removed CXCL12 from its normal site of expression on the surface of parenchymal cells in the murine lung. Both heparin and two clinically relevant dose regimens of tinzaparin reduced hematogenous metastatic spread of human breast cancer cells to the lung in a murine model.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically relevant concentrations of tinzaparin inhibit the interaction between CXCL12 and CXCR4 and may be useful to prevent chemokine-driven breast cancer metastasis.

The association between cancer and thromboembolic disease is a well-known phenomenon and can contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. The spectrum of thromboembolic manifestations in cancer patients includes deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, but also intravascular disseminated coagulation and abnormalities in the clotting system in the absence of clinical manifestations. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and particularly low molecular weight heparins (LMWH-s) are widely used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic manifestations that commonly accompany malignancies. Malignant growth has also been linked to the activity of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans, to neoangiogenesis, to protease activity, to immune function and gene expression. All these factors contribute in the proliferation and dissemination of malignancies. Heparins may play a role in tumour cell growth and in cancer dissemination. The aims of the study are to review the efficiency of heparins in the prevention and treatment of cancer-related thromboembolic complications, and review the biological effects of heparins. Heparins are effective in reducing the frequency of thromboembolic complications in cancer patients. Meta-analyses comparing unfractionated heparins and LMWH-s for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis have shown better outcome with a reduction of major bleeding complications in patients treated with LMWH-s. LMWH have antitumour effects in animal models of malignancy: heparin oligosaccharides containing less than 10 saccharide residues have been found to inhibit the biological activity of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), whereas heparin fragments with less than 18 saccharide residues have been reported to inhibit the binding of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to its receptors on endothelial cells. It has been shown that LMWH, in contrast with UFH, can hinder the binding of growth factors to their high-affinity receptors as a result of its smaller size. In vitro heparin fragments of less than 18 saccharide residues reduce the activity of VEGF, and fragments of less than 10 saccharide residues inhibit the activity of bFGF. Small molecular heparin fractions have also been shown to inhibit VEGF- and bFGF-mediated angiogenesis in vivo, in contrast with UFH. Moreover, heparin may influence malignant cell growth through other different interrelated mechanisms: inhibition of (1) heparin-binding growth factors that drive malignant cell growth; (2) tumour cell heparinases that mediate tumour cell invasion and metastasis; (3) cell surface selectin-mediated tumour cell metastasis and blood coagulation. The above evidence, together with favourable pharmaco-properties and with a reduction in major bleeding complications, suggests an important role for LMWH-s in thromboprophylaxis and in the therapy of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. There is sufficient experimental data to suggest that heparins may interfere with various aspects of cancer proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis formation. Large-scale clinical trials are required to determine the clinical impact of the above activities on the natural history of the disease.

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the formation of blood clots (thrombi) in the deep veins. It commonly affects the deep leg veins (such as the calf veins, femoral vein, or popliteal vein) or the deep veins of the pelvis. It is a potentially dangerous condition that can lead to preventable morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To present an update on the causes and management of DVT.

METHODS

A review of publications obtained from Medline search, medical libraries, and Google.

RESULTS

DVT affects 0.1% of persons per year. It is predominantly a disease of the elderly and has a slight male preponderance. The approach to making a diagnosis currently involves an algorithm combining pretest probability, D-dimer testing, and compression ultrasonography. This will guide further investigations if necessary. Prophylaxis is both mechanical and pharmacological. The goals of treatment are to prevent extension of thrombi, pulmonary embolism, recurrence of thrombi, and the development of complications such as pulmonary hypertension and post-thrombotic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

DVT is a potentially dangerous condition with a myriad of risk factors. Prophylaxis is very important and can be mechanical and pharmacological. The mainstay of treatment is anticoagulant therapy. Low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, and vitamin K antagonists have been the treatment of choice. Currently anticoagulants specifically targeting components of the common pathway have been recommended for prophylaxis. These include fondaparinux, a selective indirect factor Xa inhibitor and the new oral selective direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and selective factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban). Others are currently undergoing trials. Thrombolytics and vena caval filters are very rarely indicated in special circumstances.

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits of heparin reach beyond its anticoagulative properties. Recently, it has been described that leukocytes adhere on immobilized heparin mediated by the integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18, alphaMbeta2, or CR3). Because inhibition of this versatile adhesion molecule could explain various aspects of the beneficial clinical effects of heparin, we evaluated whether soluble heparin modulates Mac-1 function in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Binding of unfractionated heparin to Mac-1 on PMA-stimulated monocytes and granulocytes was directly demonstrated in flow cytometry, whereas no binding of heparin was detected on unstimulated leukocytes. Unfractionated heparin inhibited binding of the soluble ligands fibrinogen, factor X, and iC3b to Mac-1. Adhesion of the monocytic cell line THP-1 and of peripheral monocytes and granulocytes to immobilized ICAM-1 was impaired by unfractionated heparin, to the same extent as with inhibition of Mac-1 by monoclonal antibodies such as c7E3. Low-molecular-weight heparin also inhibits binding of fibrinogen to Mac-1. Additionally, flow cytometry of whole blood preparations of patients treated with unfractionated heparin revealed an inhibitory effect of heparin on the binding of fibrinogen to Mac-1 that correlates (n= 48, r=0.63, P<0.001) to the extent of prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a pharmacologically relevant property of heparin that may contribute to its benefits in clinical use. The binding of heparin to Mac-1 and the resulting inhibition in binding of Mac-1 ligands may directly modulate coagulation, inflammation, and cell proliferation.

The interaction of platelet factor four (PF-4) with glycosaminoglycans (GAG) was evaluated using fluorescence spectroscopy, a radioligand binding assay, and a functional assay utilizing antithrombin III and factor Xa. In these studies, we have (i) characterized the binding parameters for PF-4 to several forms of heparin and to dextran sulfate; (ii) examined the structural features of these glycosaminoglycans which support PF-4 binding; and (iii) examined the effects of selective digestion of the carboxy terminus of PF-4 on binding. The binding of PF-4 to unfractionated porcine intestinal mucosal heparin ([Mr] = 11,000) was specific and saturable, with a molar stoichiometry of PF-4 to heparin of approximately 4:1 and an apparent estimated Kd of 3 X 10(-8) M. Heparin fractions ([Mr] = 6,000) with either low or high affinity for antithrombin III bound to PF-4 with a similar apparent Kd. PF-4 also bound to dextran sulfate ([Mr] = 22,500) with an estimated apparent Kd of 6 X 10(-8) M and a molar stoichiometry of approximately 16:1. Carboxypeptidase Y (CP-Y) digestion of PF-4 progressively decreased GAG binding. After 30 min of digestion, by which time all of the carboxyterminal serine and glutamate, both of the two leucines, and approximately one-quarter of the four lysines were removed, the IC50 for heparin binding shifted from 10 to 150 nM. These studies demonstrated the effect of GAG polymer size and degree of sulfation on the affinity and stoichiometry of PF-4 binding, and the critical importance of the carboxy-terminal amino acids of PF-4 for binding to natural and synthetic GAGs.

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is the most common hemostatic disorder in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of thrombocytopenia in patients admitted to medical-surgical ICUs.

METHODS

Three thousand seven hundred forty-six patients in 67 centers were enrolled in a randomized trial in which unfractionated heparin was compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis. Patients who had baseline platelet counts < 75 × 10(9)/L or severe coagulopathy at screening were excluded. We analyzed the risk of developing mild (100-149 × 10(9)/L), moderate (50-99 × 10(9)/L), and severe (< 50 × 109/L) thrombocytopenia during an ICU stay. We also assessed independent and time-varying predictors of thrombocytopenia and the effect of thrombocytopenia on major bleeding, transfusions, and death.

RESULTS

The incidences of mild, moderate, and severe thrombocytopenia were 15.3%, 5.1%, and 1.6%, respectively. The predictors of each category of thrombocytopenia were APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score, use of inotropes or vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy. The risk of moderate thrombocytopenia was lower in patients who received LMWH thromboprophylaxis but higher in surgical patients and in patients who had liver disease. Each category of thrombocytopenia was associated with subsequent bleeding and transfusions. Moderate and severe thrombocytopenia were associated with increased ICU and hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A high severity of illness, prior surgery, use of inotropes or vasopressors, renal replacement therapy, and liver dysfunction are associated with a higher risk of thrombocytopenia developing in the ICU, whereas LMWH thromboprophylaxis is associated with a lower risk. Patients who develop thrombocytopenia in the ICU are more likely to bleed, receive transfusions, and die.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are well defined anticoagulant agents. Recent data suggest that both LMWH and UFH may also have potent anti-inflammatory properties; however, their mechanism of action responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect is not yet fully elucidated. This study was designed to assess the effect of LMWH and UFH on human monocytes production of inflammatory markers and nuclear translocation of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB. Cultured monocytes were pretreated for 15 min with LMWH or UFH (10 microg and 1 microg/million cells) before stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at a dose of 1 ng/million cells. Proinflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6 and IL-1beta release were subsequently measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at 6 h, and nuclear translocation of the proinflammatory NF-kappaB was assessed at 2 h. Treatment with pharmacological doses of LMWH and UFH significantly attenuated LPS-induced production of TNF-alpha, IL-8, IL-6 and IL-1beta as well as NF-kappaB translocation. These results indicate equivalent and significant heparin anti-inflammatory properties at low doses on monocyte-mediated immune response. The inhibition of NF-kappaB activation certainly represents one of the mechanisms by which heparin exerts its anti-inflammatory effect. LMWH and UFH therefore appear as potential therapeutic inhibitors of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the binding of the sulphated polysaccharides, dextran sulphate and heparin, to CD4 and gp120 in order to examine the anti-HIV mechanisms of these compounds.

METHODS

In order to study the molecular mechanisms involved, the binding of sulphated polysaccharides to recombinant (r) sCD4 and gp120 was investigated in solid-phase binding studies that employed various monoclonal antibodies directed against known epitopes on these proteins, including the V3 loop of gp120.

METHODS

The ability of sulphated polysaccharides to inhibit both the binding of gp120 to CD4 and the binding of the monoclonal antibodies was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

It was demonstrated that dextran sulphate inhibits gp120-sCD4 binding at concentrations of 100 micrograms/ml, whereas heparin has no effect. Heparin does, however, block the binding to rgp120 of monoclonal antibodies recognizing epitopes in the V3 loop. Clinical low molecular weight heparin preparations are as active as unfractionated heparin in this regard. Pre-incubation of gp120 with excess sCD4 increases the potency of heparin in blocking the binding of V3 loop monoclonals severalfold.

CONCLUSIONS

The modes of action of heparin and dextran sulphate differ. Dextran sulphate both inhibits CD4-gp120 binding and binds to the V3 loop of gp120. However, heparin is more selective and appears to function only by interfering with events involving the V3 loop that occur prior to HIV fusion with the plasma membrane.

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines make no specific recommendations for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in patients with renal insufficiency, but some experts recommend some reduction in heparin dose.

METHODS

Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) is an ongoing, prospective registry of consecutively enrolled patients with objectively confirmed, symptomatic, acute VTE. In this analysis we retrospectively analyzed the effect of renal insufficiency on the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and fatal bleeding within 15 days of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Up to March 2005, 10,526 patients with acute VTE were enrolled in RIETE, of whom 9234 (88%) had a creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 60 mL/min, 704 (6.7%) had a CrCl 30 to 60 mL/min, and 588 (5.6%) had a CrCl less than 30 mL/min. The incidence of fatal PE during the study period was 1.0%, 2.6%, and 6.6%, respectively. Fatal bleeding occurred in 0.2%, 0.3%, and 1.2% of the patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with a CrCl less than 30 mL/min were independently associated with an increased risk for fatal PE and fatal bleeding. In addition, initial diagnosis of PE, immobility for 4 days or more, cancer, and initial therapy with unfractionated heparin were independent predictors of fatal PE; whereas immobility for 4 days or more and cancer were independent predictors of fatal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with VTE who have renal insufficiency had an increased incidence of both fatal PE and fatal bleeding, but the risk of fatal PE far exceeded that of fatal bleeding. Our data support the use of full-dose anticoagulant therapy, even in patients with a CrCl less than 30 mL/min.

To determine whether the combination of aerosolized unfractionated heparin and N-acetylcystine reduces 28-days mortality and lung injury scores (LISs) in adult patients with smoke inhalation injury requiring mechanical ventilation. The study was a single-center retrospective study with historical control. The authors included 30 mechanically ventilated adult subjects who were admitted within 48 hours of their bronchoscopy confirmed smoke inhalation injury over a 5-year period. The experimental group was treated with nebulized heparin sulfate, N-acetylcystine, and albuterol sulfate. Controls received ventilation support and albuterol sulfate. The authors calculated acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE)-III scores on admission in addition to daily LIS for 7 days. The experimental group was divided into five APACHE-III subgroups and matched with inhalation lung injury patients in the historical control group. There was no significant difference in initial APACHE-III scores or LISs between groups (alpha = 0.05) upon entry to the study. The experimental group showed significant improvement in LISs, respiratory resistance and compliance measurements, and hypoxia scores as compared with controls throughout the duration of the study. There was a statistically significant survival benefit in the experimental group that was most pronounced in patients with APACHE-III scores >35. Survival for the control vs experimental group was 0.5714 +/- 0.1497 vs 0.9375 +/- 0.0605, respectively, (risk ratio -0.0055; 95% confidence interval -0.0314-0.0204; hazard ratio 1.003; number needed to treat 2.7). The use of aerosolized unfractionated heparin and N-acetylcystine attenuates lung injury and the progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome in ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury following smoke inhalation.

BACKGROUND

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis is particularly important for surgical oncologists given the high rate of DVT in patients with malignancy. Additionally, DVT prophylaxis may soon be implemented by some payers as a "pay for performance" quality measure. This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for DVT prophylaxis in cancer patients undergoing surgery. We examine overall rates of DVT, the efficacy of high versus low-dose heparin prophylaxis, and the rate of bleeding complications.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched for English language RCTs using key words DVT, venous thromboembolism, prophylaxis, and general surgery. Inclusion criteria were RCTs evaluating surgical oncology patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-five RCTs studied DVT prophylaxis in surgery (nonorthopedic) patients. Twenty-six RCTs evaluated 7,639 cancer patients. The overall DVT rate was 12.7% for pharmacologic prophylaxis and 35.2% for controls. High-dose low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was more effective than low dose, lowering the DVT rate from 14.5% to 7.9% (P < 0.01). Heparin decreased the rate of proximal DVTs. Bleeding complications requiring discontinuation of prophylaxis occurred in 3% of the patients. There was no difference between LMWH and unfractionated heparin in efficacy, DVT location, or bleeding complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Using RCT data, this study demonstrates a greatly reduced DVT rate with pharmacologic prophylaxis in cancer patients, and higher doses appear more effective. Complication rates are low and should not prevent the use of prophylaxis in most patients. Finally, we found no difference between LMWH and unfractionated heparin in these RCTs. These results highlight the importance of routine pharmacologic prophylaxis in surgical patients with malignancy.

A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial (the physicians, patients, and staff were not blinded with regard to the regimen that had been used) was conducted, between December 1988 and September 1990, to compare the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, with the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after elective hip replacement. Six hundred and ten patients were randomized, and 607 patients received one of the study medications. The evaluations of efficacy included contrast-media venography, non-invasive vascular examination, and clinical examination. Data on efficacy were available for 604 patients, who had been assigned to one of three treatment groups: thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours (194 patients), forty milligrams of enoxaparin once daily (203 patients), or 5000 units of unfractionated heparin every eight hours (207 patients). All drugs were administered subcutaneously. Dosages were not adjusted on the basis of the results of coagulation tests or the body weight of the patient. Treatment was initiated within twenty-four hours after the operation and continued for a maximum of seven days. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of bleeding episodes. An intent-to-treat patient analysis revealed that deep venous thrombosis occurred in nine (5 per cent) of the 194 patients who received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours, thirty (15 per cent) of the 203 patients who received forty milligrams of enoxaparin once daily, and twenty-four (12 per cent) of the 207 patients who received unfractionated heparin. The rate of deep venous thrombosis was significantly lower in the group that received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours than in the group that received unfractionated heparin (p = 0.03) and in the group that received forty milligrams of enoxaparin once daily (p = 0.0002). No clinically symptomatic pulmonary embolism was observed during the treatment or follow-up phase of this study in the group that received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours. Analysis of evaluable patients revealed a marked reduction in the rate of deep venous thrombosis in the group that received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours (eight [6 per cent] of 136 patients) compared with the group that received heparin (twenty-one [15 per cent] of 145 patients) (p = 0.10); however, this difference was not significant because of the small number of patients included in this analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

BACKGROUND

Heparin therapy may be effective in steroid resistant inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE

A randomized pilot study, to compare unfractionated heparin as a first-line therapy with corticosteroids in colonic inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Twenty patients with severe inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis, n=17; Crohn's colitis, n=3) were randomized to either intravenous heparin for 5 days, followed by subcutaneous heparin for 5 weeks (n=8), or high-dose intravenous hydrocortisone for 5 days followed by oral prednisolone 40 mg daily, reducing by 5 mg per day each week (n=12). After 5 days, non-responders in each treatment group were commenced on combination therapy. Response to therapy was monitored by: clinical disease activity (ulcerative colitis: Truelove and Witt Index; Crohn's colitis: Harvey and Bradshaw Index), stool frequency, serum C-reactive protein and alpha1 acid glycoprotein, endoscopic and histopathological grading.

RESULTS

The response rates were similar in both treatment groups: clinical activity index (heparin vs. steroid; 75% vs. 67%; P=0.23), stool frequency (75% vs. 67%; P=0.61), endoscopic (75% vs. 67%; P=0.4) and histopathological grading (63% vs. 50%; P=0.67). Both treatments were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin as a first line therapy is as effective as corticosteroids in the treatment of colonic inflammatory bowel disease. Large multicentre randomized comparative studies are required to determine the role of heparin in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Long-term heparin treatment causes osteoporosis through, an as yet, undefined mechanism. To investigate this phenomenon and to determine the relative benefits of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) use, we treated rats with once daily subcutaneous injections of either unfractionated heparin (1.0 U/g or 0.5 U/g), the LMWH, Tinzaparin (1.0 U/g or 0.5 U/g), or placebo (saline) for a period of 32 days. The effects on bone were then compared both histomorphometrically and biochemically by measuring urinary type I collagen cross-linked pyridinoline (PYD) and serum alkaline phosphatase, markers of bone resorption and formation, respectively. Histomorphometric analysis of the distal third of the right femur, in the region proximal to the epiphyseal growth plate, demonstrated that both heparin and LMWH decrease cancellous bone volume in a dose-dependent fashion, but that heparin causes significantly more cancellous bone loss than does LMWH. Although both heparin and LMWH decrease osteoblast and osteoid surface to a similar extent, only heparin increases osteoclast surface. In support of these histomorphometric findings, biochemical markers of bone turnover demonstrated that both heparin and LMWH treatment produce a dose-dependent decrease in serum alkaline phosphatase, consistent with reduced bone formation, whereas only heparin causes a transient increase in urinary PYD, consistent with an increase in bone resorption. Based on these observations, we conclude that heparin decreases cancellous bone volume both by decreasing the rate of bone formation and increasing the rate of bone resorption. In contrast, LMWH, causes less osteopenia than heparin because it only decreases the rate of bone formation.

Unfractionated heparin is currently the most widely used anticoagulant for outpatient haemodialysis. However, unfractionated heparin is a series of molecules, and as such has variable pharmacodynamics. Low-molecular-weight heparins were developed to improve both drug pharmacokinetic and dynamics, so to provide a reliable predictable clinical effect. The low-molecular-weight heparins are potent agents, but have an increased half-life compared with unfractionated heparin, and also require specialist laboratory monitoring. Despite these apparent drawbacks, low-molecular-weight heparins have become the anticoagulants of choice in Western Europe for routine outpatient haemodialysis sessions, due to the reliability of their clinical effect, and ease of administration, coupled with cost reduction. In standard clinical practice laboratory monitoring is not routinely performed, with drug dosing assessed by clinical inspection of the extracorporeal circuit, and the time for fistula needle sites to stop bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of bleeding complications in patients with renal insufficiency who receive anticoagulation therapy with the full therapeutic dose, unfractionated heparin (UFH), or with twice-daily enoxaparin.

METHODS

A 325-bed community teaching hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients with renal insufficiency who received anticoagulation therapy with UFH or enoxaparin during a 13-month period were reviewed for the occurrence of major and minor bleeding. Incidence rates were computed per 1,000-person days of anticoagulation therapy. Comparisons were made across categories of renal insufficiency and other potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 620 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates of < 60 mL/min were studied. Of these, 331 received anticoagulation therapy with UFH, 250 with enoxaparin, and 39 with both (not simultaneously). The major bleeding rates were 26.3 per 1,000 person-days for UFH and 20.7 per 1,000 person-days for enoxaparin. Major bleeding complications were similarly increased for both UFH and enoxaparin therapy across categories of worsening renal insufficiency. Patients with severe renal insufficiency while receiving enoxaparin had a 154% excess incidence of minor bleeding compared to those receiving UFH (incidence ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 6.36). Worsening renal insufficiency, female gender, and prolonged duration of anticoagulation therapy emerged as the main determinants for bleeding complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the twice-daily enoxaparin and UFH regimens are associated with comparable increases in major bleeding complications in patients with renal dysfunction receiving full-dose anticoagulation therapy. Both agents should be used with caution in anticoagulation therapy for patients with renal insufficiency.

Anticoagulants remain the primary strategy for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, and warfarin have been studied and employed extensively with direct thrombin inhibitors typically reserved for patients with complications or those requiring intervention. Novel oral anticoagulants have emerged from clinical development and are expected to replace older agents with their ease of use and more favorable pharmacodynamic profiles. Hemorrhage is the main concerning adverse event with all anticoagulants. With their ubiquitous use, it becomes important for clinicians to have a sound understanding of anticoagulant pharmacology, dosing, and toxicity.

BACKGROUND

Basic research and clinical studies have generated the hypothesis that anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through an antitumour effect in addition to the antithrombotic effect.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin (including unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) and fondaparinux to improve survival of patients with cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including (1) A January 2007 electronic search of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science; (2) Hand search of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and of the American Society of Hematology; (3) Checking of references of included studies; and (4) Use of "related article" feature in PubMed.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients without clinical evidence of venous thromboembolism comparing UFH, LMWH or fondaparinux to no intervention or placebo and RCTs comparing two of the three agents of interest.

METHODS

Using a standardized form we extracted in duplicate data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest including all cause mortality, venous thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, major bleeding and minor bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 3986 identified citations five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all included RCTs the intervention consisted of heparin ( either UFH or LMWH). The overall methodological quality of the included studies was acceptable. Overall, heparin therapy was associated with a statistically and clinically significant survival benefit (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.91). In subgroup analyses, patients with limited small cell lung cancer experienced a clear survival benefit (HR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.83). The survival benefit was not statistically significant for either patients with extensive small cell lung cancer (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.06) or patients with advanced cancer (HR = 0.84; 95%: 0.68 to 1.03). The increased risk of bleeding with heparin was not statistically significant (RR = 1.78; 95% CI: 0.73 to 4.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin has a survival benefit in cancer patients in general, and in patients with limited small cell lung cancer in particular. Heparin might be particularly beneficial in cancer patients with limited cancer or a longer life expectancy. Future research should investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants (in different dosing, schedules and duration of therapy) in patients with different types and stages of cancers.

We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of thrombotic and infectious complications in relation with the use of central venous catheters (CVCs), in a series of patients with hematological malignancies and low platelet and leucocyte counts.

METHODS

126 patients with hematological malignancies were analyzed. A total of 207 CVCs were implanted: 137 centrally (CICCs) and 70 peripherally (PICCs). The median duration of the CVCs was 19 days for a total of 4051 catheter-days. Antithrombotic prophylaxis was unfractionated heparin (UFH), 2,500 IU daily by 24 h continuous infusion in 169 CVCs, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), 3,800 IU daily by single bolus intravenous injection (i.v.) in 21 and warfarin in one. No prophylaxis was given in 16 CVCs. Thrombotic complications developed in 15.5% of the CVCs (7.9 events/1000 catheter days), and the frequency of infectious complications was 10.6% (5.2 events/1000 catheter days). On multivariate analysis thromboses were more frequent and earlier with PICCs than CICCs (p = 0.0001), and in patients on UFH (16.6%) than in LMWH prophylaxis (4.7%), but the last difference was not statistically significant. In conclusions the incidence of thrombotic complications in our series was comparable to that observed in non-thrombocytopenic patients and was significantly higher in those carrying PICC than CICC (p = 0.0001). There were fewer thrombotic events in the patients receiving i.v. LMWH prophylaxis than in those receiving i.v. UFH. The use of anticoagulants was safe and not associated with hemorrhages.

About 10% of all episodes of venous thrombosis are due to upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT). Associated risk factors are indwelling central venous catheters, cancer, and coagulation defects; 20% of the episodes are unexplained. The onset of UEDVT is usually heralded by complaints such as arm swelling and pain, but may also be completely asymptomatic, especially in carriers of central venous lines. Objective confirmation is mandatory prior to instituting anticoagulation because the clinical diagnosis is unreliable; ultrasound-based methods represent the preferred diagnostic approach. Prophylaxis with low-dose heparin or low-dose warfarin may be used, especially in carriers of central venous catheters, although its efficacy is still uncertain. Unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins followed by oral anticoagulants should be regarded as the treatment of choice, whereas thrombolysis and surgery may be indicated in selected cases. Up to one third of the patients develop pulmonary embolism that may be fatal; postthrombotic syndrome and recurrent thromboembolism are also frequent complications. UEDVT should no longer be regarded as a rare and benign disease, as reported previously.