This review examines how the identification of tumor-specific translocations and fusion proteins has advanced the basic scientific and clinical understanding of sarcomas. Recent genetic advances, including the ASPL-TFE3 fusion of alveolar soft part sarcoma, the JAZF1-JJAZ1 fusion of endometrial stromal sarcoma, and HMGIC fusions in liposarcoma, are discussed. Next, the review addresses the ways in which molecular genetic data have influenced diagnostic and prognostic paradigms. For example, recent studies describe the detection of occult tumor cells and the identification of primary renal neoplasms that are genetically related to alveolar soft part sarcoma. In addition, the review discusses potential therapies based on the targeting of sarcoma-specific fusion proteins. These reports describe the potential use of Gleevec (STI571) for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and the use of tumor-specific fusion proteins as potential targets for immunotherapy. Finally, basic scientific findings are reviewed that elucidate, for example, the aberrant functions of SYT-SSX in chromatin remodeling and of EWS-FLI1 in transcription and mRNA splicing. These and other emerging models of tumorigenesis will help identify new therapeutic targets.

A combination of Southern blot analysis on a panel of tumor-derived somatic cell hybrids and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques was used to map YACs, cosmids and DNA markers from the Xp11.2 region relative to the X chromosome breakpoint of the renal cell carcinoma-associated t(X;1)(p11;q21). The position of the breakpoint could be determined as follows: Xcen-OATL2-DXS146-DXS255-SYP-t(X;1)-TFE 3-OATL1-Xpter. Fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments using TFE3-containing YACs and cosmids revealed split signals indicating that the corresponding DNA inserts span the breakpoint region. Subsequent Southern blot analysis showed that a 2.3-kb EcoRI fragment which is present in all TFE3 cosmids identified, hybridizes to aberrant restriction fragments in three independent t(X;1)-positive renal cell carcinoma DNAs. The breakpoints in these tumors are not the same, but map within a region of approximately 6.5 kb. Through preparative gel electrophoresis an (X;1) chimaeric 4.4-kb EcoRI fragment could be isolated which encompasses the breakpoint region present on der(X). Preliminary characterization of this fragment revealed the presence of a 150-bp region with a strong homology to the 5' end of the mouse TFE3 cDNA in the X-chromosome part, and a 48-bp segment in the chromosome 1-derived part identical to the 5' end of a known EST (accession number R93849). These observations suggest that a fusion gene is formed between the two corresponding genes in t(X;1)(p11;q21)-positive papillary renal cell carcinomas.

Renal cell carcinomas associated with Xp11.2 translocations form a new and little known entity of the WHO 2004 classification. An immunohistochemical (IHC) test aiming at demonstrating the nuclear expression of the protein TFE3, product of a gene frequently involved in translocation, has been proposed as a diagnostic tool. The aims of this work were to define our evaluation criteria of the immunohistochemical test with the antibody anti-TFE3 and to describe new cases of renal cell carcinomas with TFE3 translocations. Using immunohistochemistry with antibody anti-TFE3, we retrospectively studied 83 renal cell carcinomas diagnosed at Edouard Herriot Hospital and Biomnis Laboratory, Lyon, between 2003 and 2009. The patients were 50 years old or younger. We detail our experience of the IHC test using the anti-body anti-TFE3 and the interpretation criteria. This work has enabled two new cases of renal cell carcinomas associated with TFE3 translocations to be detailed, confirmed by molecular biology. The TFE3 immunohistochemical test is a useful tool that demands strict interpretation criteria. In our experience, more than 80% of nuclei stained with an intensity of ++ to +++ is necessary to suspect the diagnosis of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma.

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta regulates gene expression in large part through combinatorial interactions between members of the Smad family and other transcription factors. The basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLHZIP) protein TFE3 and Smad3 synergistically activate transcription of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as well as other genes. We investigated interactions among different bHLHZIP and Smad family proteins. TFE3, TFEB, and Max associated with Smad3 and Smad4 in the absence of DNA and at the PE2.1 element of the PAI-1 promoter. These interactions were mediated by the leucine zipper and MH1 regions of the respective proteins. No interactions were observed with the E47 bHLH family protein. Chimeric proteins, in which leucine zippers from bHLHZIP or bZIP proteins were fused to heterologous bHLH domains, associated with Smad proteins both in the absence of DNA and at the PE2.1 element. The kinetics of bHLHZIP and Smad protein binding at the PE2.1 element were examined using surface plasmon resonance analysis. TFE3 exhibited cooperative DNA binding with Smad proteins, whereas no cooperativity was observed between E47 and Smads. Max inhibited transcription activation by Smad3 and TGF-beta at the PAI-1 promoter, whereas TFE3 and TFEB stimulated transcription activation. These results suggest that Smad family proteins can interact with several bHLHZIP proteins, resulting in different transcriptional outcomes.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in children and young adults is rare and pathologically problematic. RCC can be either hereditary or sporadic and has a guarded prognosis because appropriate management has not been established. A case of RCC in an 11-year-old is reported. The clinical presentation was a right abdominal mass, hematuria, urinary tract infection, and wasting. Radio-logically, the mass was found within the right kidney with calcification and paraaortic lymphadenopathy. The postsurgical diagnosis was Wilms' tumor stage T4N2M0. On gross inspection, the tumor was ill defined, extending across Gerota's fascia and into the ureter lumina. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of malignant epithelial cells with clear and eosinophilic cytoplasm in nested, papillary, and alveolar configuration. Hyaline nodules, psammoma bodies, vascular invasion, capsular invasion, and extension into the ureter were also found. Immunohistochemically, the cells showed strong nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3. We concluded that this case was an RCC associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 fusion, Fuhrman grade 3, stage IV.

Clear cell-papillary renal cell carcinoma (CC-Pap RCC) is a recently described renal tumor initially reported in the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It has unique morphologic and immunohistochemical features that differentiate it from the more common clear cell RCC and papillary RCC. Recently, these tumors have also been described in a sporadic setting. We studied 64 cases of CC-Pap RCC not associated with ESRD (57 CC-Pap RCCs and 7 cases with features of renal angiomyoadenomatous tumors [RAT] including 5 initially diagnosed as such). The morphologic features of all cases and the immunohistochemical profile of 59 cases were studied along with the clinical and molecular features of 30 and 12 cases, respectively. All the tumors were well circumscribed with a mean tumor size of 2.6 cm and showed a wide array of architectural patterns, usually mixed, including tubular (77%), papillary (62%), tubulocystic (52%), and compact nested (21%). Seventy-three percent of the cases showed areas in which the tumor nuclei had a distinct orientation away from the basement membrane. Ninety-two percent of the cases had a low Fuhrman nuclear grade (nuclear grade 2%-86%, and nuclear grade 1%-6%); however, 8% cases showed foci of Fuhrman nuclear grade 3. In 4 cases, epithelial tumor comprised <5% of the tumor; >95% of the tumor was cystic or hyalinized. The stroma varied from being minimal to occasionally prominent myxoid to hyalinized and rarely with organized amianthoid fibers or well-defined smooth muscle bundles. Pathologic stage was reliably assigned in 60 cases, of which 93.3% (56 cases) were pT1, 3.3% (2 cases) were pT2, and 3.3% (2 cases) were pT3a with extension into the perinephric fat. One case had coagulative necrosis; sarcomatoid change and vascular invasion was not identified. The tumors showed a fairly typical immunoprofile characterized by positivity for CK7 (100%), HMCK (96%), CAIX (94%), and vimentin (100%) with negativity for AMACR, RCC, and TFE3; CD10 was positive in 24%. None of the cases tested showed recurrent chromosomal imbalances by virtual karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or 3p loss of heterozygosity analysis. VHL gene mutations were, however, noted in 3 cases (2 in exon 1 and 1 in exon 3). Clinical follow-up information was available in 47% of the patients, with a mean and median follow-up of 47 and 37 months, respectively (range, 18 to 108 mo). One case occurred in the setting of VHL syndrome and multiple benign cysts. None of the cases showed local recurrence, metastasis, or death due to disease. Morphology, immunophenotype, and molecular studies did not vary between typical cases, those with prominent smooth muscle (so-called RAT), and historically published data on cases occurring in ESRD. Our analysis confirms that CC-Pap RCC is a unique subtype of adult renal epithelial neoplasia in which tumors are frequently small, are of low nuclear grade and pathologic stage, and have extremely favorable short to intermediate range prognosis. Tumors occurring sporadically, with prominent smooth muscle stroma (so-called RAT), and occurring in ESRD are in the spectrum of the same category of tumors.

In this study, we reported an additional genetically confirmed case of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) with t(6;11)(p21;q12) showing an unusual histological pattern. Histologically, the tumor was entirely composed of small to intermediate sized tubules and cysts. The tubules and cysts were lined by a single layer of flat, hobnail, cuboidal to columnar epithelial cells. Most cells demonstrated abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with regular, round or oval nuclei and some inconspicuous nucleoli. All these morphological features are suggestive of tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney. However, the tumor demonstrated moderately (2+) or strongly (3+) positive staining for TFEB, Cathepsin K, Ksp-cadherin, and vimentin but negative for TFE3, CD10, HMB45, melan A, CKpan, and CK7. Using a recently developed TFEB split FISH assay, the presence of TFEB rearrangement was demonstrated. Our results support the clinical application of a TFEB break-apart FISH assay for diagnosis and confirmation of TFEB RCC and further expand the morphologic spectrum that may be present in these neoplasms, sometimes raising a challenging differential diagnosis with other renal tumors.

OBJECTIVE

Thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) is upregulated in the hyperglycaemic state and represses glucose uptake, resulting in imbalanced glucose homeostasis. In this study, we propose a mechanism of how TXNIP impairs hepatic glucose tolerance at the transcriptional level.

METHODS

We administered adenoviral Txnip (Ad-Txnip) to normal mice and performed intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (IPGTT), insulin tolerance tests (ITT) and pyruvate tolerance tests (PTT). After Ad-Txnip administration, the expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism, including G6pc and Gck, was analysed using quantitative real-time PCR and western blot. To understand the increased G6pc expression in liver resulting from Txnip overexpression, we performed pull-down assays for TXNIP and small heterodimer partner (SHP). Luciferase reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation using the Txnip promoter were performed to elucidate the interrelationship between carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) and transcription factor E3 (TFE3) in the regulation of Txnip expression.

RESULTS

Overabundance of TXNIP resulted in impaired glucose, insulin and pyruvate tolerance in normal mice. Ad-Txnip transduction upregulated G6pc expression and caused a decrease in Gck levels in the liver of normal mice and primary hepatocytes. TXNIP increased G6pc expression by forming a complex with SHP, which is known to be a negative modulator of gluconeogenesis. Txnip expression in mouse models of diabetes was decreased by Ad-Tfe3 administration, suggesting that TFE3 may play a negative role through competition with ChREBP at the E-box of the Txnip promoter.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that TXNIP impairs glucose and insulin tolerance in mice by upregulating G6pc through interaction with SHP.

It has been postulated that the transcription factors micropthalmia associated factor (Mitf) and PU.1 interact with the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) gene promoter and activate TRAP gene expression in osteoclasts. However, studies on the interaction of these factors with the TRAP promoter employing nuclear extracts from osteoclasts and osteoclast precursors have not been reported. We therefore treated murine mononuclear phagocyte cells with various cytokines to generate cultures of osteoclasts and macrophagic cells with high or low potential to form osteoclasts. The presence of Mitf and PU.1 in nuclear extracts from these cultures and the ability of these factors to bind to the TRAP promoter was then assessed. We demonstrate that Mitf and a related factor, TFE3, are present in nuclear extracts from all cultures and bind the TRAP promoter. While PU.1 is present in nuclear extracts from all cultures, it does not significantly interact with a putative binding site in the TRAP promoter. These results suggest Mitf and PU.1 interactions with the TRAP promoter are not responsible for the specific activation of TRAP gene expression in osteoclasts.

Translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma (t-RCC) is a relatively uncommon subtype of renal cell carcinoma characterized by recurrent gene rearrangements involving the TFE3 or TFEB loci. TFE3 and TFEB are members of the microphthalmia transcription factor (MiT) family, which regulates differentiation in melanocytes and osteoclasts, and MiT family gene fusions activate unique molecular programs that can be detected immunohistochemically. Although the overall clinical behavior of t-RCC is variable, emerging molecular data suggest the possibility of targeted approaches to advanced disease. Thus, distinguishing t-RCC from its morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular mimics may have important clinical implications. The differential diagnosis for t-RCC includes a variety of common renal neoplasms, particularly those demonstrating clear cell and papillary features; in addition, because of immunophenotypic overlap and/or shared molecular abnormalities (ie, TFE3 gene rearrangement), a distinctive set of nonepithelial renal tumors may also warrant consideration. Directed ancillary testing is an essential aspect to the workup of t-RCC cases and may include a panel of immunohistochemical stains, such as PAX8, pancytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen, carbonic anhydrase IX, HMB-45, and Melan-A. Dual-color, break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization for TFE3 or TFEB gene rearrangement may be helpful in diagnostically challenging cases or when molecular confirmation is needed.

OBJECTIVE

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare subtype of kidney tumour characterized by translocations involving the transcription factor TFE3 or TFEB. tRCC was introduced into the World Health Organization classification in 2004, but much is still unknown about the natural history, clinicopathological features and outcomes of the disease. The aim of this study was to describe the landscape of fusion transcript in a large single-institution series of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)-confirmed tRCCs and then to compare it to morphological and clinical data.

RESULTS

Paired-end RNA sequencing was performed within a prospective database of the Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire (Lille, France). The diagnosis of tRCC was confirmed by FISH. Among a total of 1130 identified renal cell carcinomas, 21 cases (1.9%) showed rearrangement of the TFE3 (n = 20) or (TFEB) (n = 1) gene. Median patient age was 31 years (range = 15-47), and the female-to-male ratio was 6:1. Five different TFE3 fusion transcripts were identified; the most frequent TFE3 partners were PRCC (n = 4) and SFPQ (n = 4). The other partners involved were ASPCR1 (n = 1) and MED15 (n = 1) genes as well as a novel TFE3 partner, GRIPAP1.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a new fusion partner, GRIPAP1. The prognostic role of transcript type could not be determined because our number of cases was too small. Four patients (19%) died of the disease, all of which presented with a lymph node involvement at diagnosis. We confirm that tRCC can be an aggressive tumour, especially those of advanced clinical stage.

Autophagy flux deficiency is closely related to the development of hepatic steatosis. Transcription factor E3 (TFE3) is reported to be a crucial gene that regulates autophagy flux and lysosome function. Therefore, we investigated the role of TFE3 in a cell model of hepatic steatosis. We constructed L02 hepatocyte lines that stably over-expressed or knocked down the expression of TFE3. Subsequently, the effects of TFE3 on hepatocellular lipid metabolism were determined by autophagy flux assay, lipid oil red O (ORO) staining, immunofluorescence staining, and mitochondrial β-oxidation assessment. Finally, we analyzed whether peroxisome proliferative activated receptor gamma coactivator 1α (PGC1α) was the potential target gene of TFE3 in the regulation of hepatic steatosis using a chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) assay and a luciferase reporter system. We found that overexpression of TFE3 markedly alleviated hepatocellular steatosis. On the contrary, downregulation of TFE3 resulted in an aggravated steatosis. The mechanistic studies revealed that the TFE3-manipulated regulatory effects on hepatocellular steatosis are dependent on autophagy-induced lipophagy and PGC1α-mediated fatty acid β-oxidation because blocking these pathways with an Atg5 small interfering RNA (siRNA) or PGC1α siRNA dramatically blunted the TFE3-mediated regulation of steatosis. In conclusion, TFE3 gene provides a novel insight into the treatment of hepatic steatosis and other metabolic disease.

In this study, we analyzed the immunohistochemical and molecular profiles of an unusual RCC showed coexistent absence of INI1 and BRG1 expression, rhabdoid morphology, and poor prognosis. Histologically, the tumor had rhabdoid features, which were demonstrated by large round to polygonal cells with eccentric nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and eosinophilic cytoplasm varying from abundant to scanty. Immunohistochemically, the tumor were positive for BRM, PBRM1, ARID1A, CD10, CKpan, Vimentin, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX), and P504S (AMACR) but negative for INI1, BRG1, HMB45, melan A, CK7, CD117, Ksp-cadherin, TFEB, TFE3, and Cathepsin K. We detected all three exons status of the VHL gene of the tumor and observed 1 somatic mutations in 1st exon. Chromosome 3p deletion, coupled with polysomy of chromosome 3 was also found. Based on these findings, it is further indicated that in some cases, rhabdoid RCC may arise from clear cell RCC. SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex may be an attractive candidate for being the "second hit" in RCCs and may play an important role during tumor progression. The role of SWI/SNF complex in rhabdoid RCC should be further studied on a larger number of cases.

To study the clinicopathological and genomic characteristics of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 RCC) in adults, we analyzed 9 Xp11.2 RCCs, confirmed by transcription factor E3 (TFE3) immunohistochemistry, in patients aged ≥20 years. TFE3 expression was also determined in 12 cases of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) served as a positive control. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to investigate genomic imbalances in all Xp11.2 RCC cases. Most of our Xp11.2 RCC patients (5/9) presented with TNM stages 3-4, and 6 patients died 10 months to 7 years after their operation. Histologically, Xp11.2 RCC was composed of a mixed papillary nested/alveolar growth pattern (8/9). Immunostaining showed that all Xp11.2 RCC and ASPS cases had strong TFE3 expression and high positive ratios for p53 and vimentin. However, there were significant differences in the expression of AMACR (p<0.001), AE1/AE3 (p=0.002), and CD10 (p=0.024) between the 2 diseases. CGH profiles showed chromosomal imbalances in all 9 Xp11.2 RCC cases; gains were observed in chromosomes Xp11 (6/9), 7q20-25, 12q25-31 (5/9), 7p16-24 (4/9), 8p12-13, 8q20-21, 16q20-22, 17q25-26, 20q22-23 (4/9), and losses occurred frequently on chromosomes 3p12-16, 9q31-32, 14q22-24 (4/9). Our Conclusions show Xp11.2 RCC that occur in adults may be aggressive cancers, the expressions of AMACR, CD10, AE1/AE3 are helpful in the differential diagnosis between Xp11.2 RCC and ASPS, and CGH assay is a useful complementary method for confirming the diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC.

The spectrum of the renal oncocytic tumors has been expanded in recent years to include several novel and emerging entities. We describe a cohort of novel, hitherto unrecognized and morphologically distinct high-grade oncocytic tumors (HOT), currently diagnosed as "unclassified" in the WHO classification. We identified 14 HOT by searching multiple institutional archives. Morphologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), molecular genetic, and molecular karyotyping studies were performed to investigate these tumors. The patients included 3 men and 11 women, with age range from 25 to 73 years (median 50, mean 49 years). Tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 7.0 cm in the greatest dimension (median 3, mean 3.4 cm). The tumors were all pT1 stage. Microscopically, they showed nested to solid growth, and focal tubulocystic architecture. The neoplastic cells were uniform with voluminous oncocytic cytoplasm. Prominent intracytoplasmic vacuoles were frequently seen, but no irregular (raisinoid) nuclei or perinuclear halos were present. All tumors demonstrated prominent nucleoli (WHO/ISUP grade 3 equivalent). Nine of 14 cases were positive for CD117 and cytokeratin (CK) 7 was either negative or only focally positive in of 6/14 cases. All tumors were positive for AE1-AE3, CK18, PAX 8, antimitochondrial antigen, and SDHB. Cathepsin K was positive in 13/14 cases and CD10 was positive in 12/13 cases. All cases were negative for TFE3, HMB45, Melan-A. No TFEB and TFE3 genes rearrangement was found in analyzable cases. By array CGH, complete chromosomal losses or gains were not found in any of the cases, and 3/9 cases showed absence of any abnormalities. Chromosomal losses were detected on chromosome 19 (4/9), 3 with losses of the short arm (p) and 1 with losses of both arms (p and q). Loss of chromosome 1 was found in 3/9 cases; gain of 5q was found in 1/9 cases. On molecular karyotyping, 3/3 evaluated cases showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on 16p11.2-11.1 and 2/3 cases showed LOH at 7q31.31. Copy number (CN) losses were found at 7q11.21 (3/3), Xp11.21 (3/3), Xp11.22-11.21 (3/3), and Xq24-25 (2/3). CN gains were found at 13q34 (2/3). Ten patients with available follow up information were alive and without disease progression, after a mean follow-up of 28 months (1 to 112 months). HOT is a tumor with unique morphology and its IHC profile appears mostly consistent. HOT should be considered as an emerging renal entity because it does not meet the diagnostic criteria for other recognized eosinophilic renal tumors, such as oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3 and TFEB RCC, SDH-deficient RCC, and eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC.

The differential diagnosis of renal cell neoplasms with solid or nested architecture and eosinophilic cytoplasm has become increasingly complex. Despite recent advances in classifying a number of entities exhibiting this morphology, some tumors remain in the unclassified category. Here we describe a morphologically distinct group of sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with predominantly nested architecture, eosinophilic, and remarkably vacuolated cytoplasm retrospectively identified from a cohort of previously unclassified tumors. We examined the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of these tumors and investigated their mutational and copy number alterations using a targeted next-generation sequencing platform. The study included 7 patients with a mean age of 54 years (range: 40 to 68 y) and a male to female ratio of 3:4. All patients presented with a solitary renal mass and had no prior medical or family history raising concern for syndromic conditions. Tumors were well-circumscribed, unencapsulated, and comprised of nests of eosinophilic cells in a hypocellular and often edematous stroma. Tumor cells had round nuclei with prominent nucleoli and granular cytoplasm with striking vacuolization. Thick-walled vessels and calcifications were also frequently present, whereas increased mitotic activity, necrosis, foamy histiocytes or lymphocytic infiltrates were not identified. All cases were positive for PAX8, had retained expression of SDHB and FH, and exhibited a CK7-/CK20- phenotype. While cathepsin-K was positive in 5 cases, none exhibited immunoreactivity to HMB45 or Melan A, or TFE3 immunostaining. Next-generation sequencing identified somatic inactivating mutations of TSC2 (3/5 tumors tested) or activating mutations of MTOR (2/5) as the primary molecular alterations, consistent with hyperactive mTOR complex 1 signaling which was further demonstrated by phospho-S6 and phospho-4E-BP1 immunostaining. Copy number analysis revealed a loss of chromosome 1 in both cases with MTOR mutation. These tumors represent a novel subset of sporadic RCC characterized by alterations in TSC1-TSC2 complex or the mTOR complex 1 pathway. Recognition of their characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features will allow them to be readily identified and separated from the unclassified RCC category.

Many protein domains for transcriptional activation also function when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain. In mammalian/HeLa cells, we have previously characterized the activation domains of several transcription factors using GAL4 fusion proteins. Here we have tested their transcriptional activity in oocytes and developing embryos of the clawed toad Xenopus laevis. We find that the "acidic" C-terminal domain of the herpesvirus VP16 (= Vmw65) activator, which is active from yeast to man, is also very active in the two Xenopus systems. The constitutive nature of this viral domain may have evolved to be refractory to cellular defense mechanisms. By contrast, activation domains from cellular eukaryotic transcription factors (TFE3, ITF2, MTF-1) are differentially active in oocytes and early embryos. This indicates that their activity can be regulated by protein modification and/or availability of specific coactivators. We have also compared VP16 induced enhancement of transcription from remote and promoter-proximal positions. In both oocytes and late blastula embryos, activation from a promoter-proximal position was more than 50 fold, while only a moderate stimulation (3-8 fold) was observed from remote positions. This may mean that frog oocyte and early embryos are not yet fully geared for gene control by remote enhancers, i.e. respond predominantly to close-by regulatory sequences. The fact that cellular enhancers are naturally located at various distances from the responsive promoters may thus be exploited by multicellular organisms for differential gene control at early and late stages of development.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic effect of age in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and investigate the incidence of Xp11 translocation RCC in young patients who developed recurrence.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2007, 2403 Japanese patients underwent nephrectomy for presumed RCC at 9 institutions. Of those, 1143 patients had localized RCC (Stage pT1-2N0M0). Their clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. In the present study, 131 patients (11%) were considered young (≤45 years at diagnosis). In the young patients with recurrence, the nephrectomy specimens were immunostained with TFE3 to determine the incidence of Xp11 translocation RCC.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 47 months, 3 cancer deaths (2.2%) occurred among young patients and 51 (5.0%) among older patients. The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was significantly better for the younger patients than for the older patients (P = .049). Multivariate analysis showed that age was significantly associated with CSS, as were the pathologic T stage, tumor grade, and symptoms at diagnosis. The hazard ratio of young age was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.077-0.87). The recurrence-free survival curves revealed no difference between these 2 groups. Of the 74 patients with recurrence, the CSS after recurrence was significantly better in the younger patients than in the older patients (P = .0010). Of the 8 young patients with recurrence, 4 had Xp11 translocation RCC, and 3 survived for >5 years after recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the older patients, the young patients with RCC had similar recurrence-free survival rates but better CSS rates. This might have been because significant numbers of the young patients had Xp11 translocation RCC.

Introduction. The recently recognized renal cell carcinomas associated with Xp11.2 translocations are rare tumors predominantly reported in children. Chromosome Xp11.2 translocation results in gene fusion related to transcription factor E3 (TFE3) that plays an important role in proliferation and survival. Case Report. Herein, we present two cases of a TFE3 translocation-associated RCC in young female adults, one detected incidentally and the other one presenting with gross hematuria. Tumor is characterized by immunohistochemistry and a literature review with optimal treatment regimen is presented. Discussion. Xp11.2 translocation RCCs in adult patients are associated with advanced stages, large tumors, and extracapsular disease and usually have an aggressive clinical course. Conclusion. In TFE3 RCC, the genetic background may not only contribute to tumorigenesis, but also determine the response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Therefore it is necessary to diagnose this tumor entity accurately. Because of the small number of TFE3 gene fusion-related renal tumors described in the literature, the exact biologic behavior and impact of current treatment modalities remain to be uncertain.

Renal cell carcinomas with sporadic Xp11.2 translocations are uncommon malignancies in children and young adults associated with several different reciprocal translocations involving the TFE3 gene located on chromosome Xp11.2. Placental metastases are extremely rare, with only a handful of cases reported. This study reports the case of a 20-year-old woman with an Xp11.2 translocation renal carcinoma that metastasized to the placenta. This is the first reported case of a renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the placenta and highlights the aggressive behavior of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected the MRI and CT data of twelve patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC confirmed by pathology. Nine cases underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and 6 cases underwent CT, of which 3 cases underwent MRI and CT simultaneously. The MRI and CT findings were analyzed in regard to tumor position, size, hemorrhagic, cystic or necrotic components, calcification, tumor density, signal intensity and enhancement features.

RESULTS

The age of the 12 patients ranged from 13 to 46 years (mean age: 23 years). T2WI revealed heterogeneous intensity, hyper-intensity, and slight hypo-intensity in 6 cases, 2 cases, and 1 case, respectively. On DCE-MR images, mild, moderate, and marked rim enhancement of the tumor in the corticomedullary phase (CMP) were observed in 1, 6, and 2 cases, respectively. The tumor parenchyma showed iso-attenuation (n = 4) or slight hyper-attenuation (n = 1) compared to the normal renal cortex on non-contrast CT images. Imaging findings were suggestive of hemorrhage (n = 4) or necrosis (n = 8) in the tumors, and there was evidence of calcification in 8 cases by CT (n = 3) and pathology (n = 8). On dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images, 3 cases and 1 case manifested moderate and strong CMP enhancement, respectively. Nine tumors by MRI and 4 tumors by CT showed prolonged enhancement. Three neoplasms presented at stage I, 2 at stage II, 3 at stage III, and 4 at stage IV according the 2010 AJCC staging criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

XP11.2 translocation RCC should be considered when a child or young adult patient presents with a renal tumor with heterogeneous features such as hemorrhage, necrosis, cystic changes, and calcification on CT and MRI and/or is accompanied by metastatic evidence.

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is usually straightforward, based on characteristic histological features. However, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate EHE from a variety of other tumours with epithelioid morphology. The WW domain-containing transcription regulator 1-calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 (WWTR1-CAMTA1) fusion gene, resulting in the overexpression of CAMTA1, is demonstrated in approximately 90% of EHEs, and the yes-associated protein 1-transcription factor E3 (YAP1-TFE3) fusion gene, associated with the strong and diffuse nuclear expression of TFE3, is present in another small subset of EHEs. The aim of our study was to examine CAMTA1 expression in EHEs and a variety of other tumours to evaluate its diagnostic utility, and to analyse TFE3 expression status in EHEs.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 16 EHEs, including five cases with CAMTA1 rearrangement and 276 non-EHE tumours. Fourteen of 16 EHEs and only one case of ductal carcinoma of the breast were positive for CAMTA1 and its expression was focal and weak in the latter (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 99.6%). TFE3 expression was expressed focally and weakly in three (19%) EHEs (two with the CAMTA1 rearrangement).

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear CAMTA1 expression is sensitive and highly specific for EHE and can be applied to diagnostic immunohistochemistry in epithelioid tumours.

To reveal how cells exit human pluripotency, we designed a CRISPR-Cas9 screen exploiting the metabolic and epigenetic differences between naïve and primed pluripotent cells. We identify the tumor suppressor, Folliculin(FLCN) as a critical gene required for the exit from human pluripotency. Here we show that FLCN Knock-out (KO) hESCs maintain the naïve pluripotent state but cannot exit the state since the critical transcription factor TFE3 remains active in the nucleus. TFE3 targets up-regulated in FLCN KO exit assay are members of Wnt pathway and ESRRB. Treatment of FLCN KO hESC with a Wnt inhibitor, but not ESRRB/FLCN double mutant, rescues the cells, allowing the exit from the naïve state. Using co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis we identify unique FLCN binding partners. The interactions of FLCN with components of the mTOR pathway (mTORC1 and mTORC2) reveal a mechanism of FLCN function during exit from naïve pluripotency.

Glucose-regulated transcription of the L-type pyruvate kinase (L-PK) gene is mediated through its glucose response element (GlRE/L4 box) composed of two degenerated E-boxes. Upstream stimulatory factor (USF) is a component of the transcriptional glucose response complex built up on the GlRE. Cooperation of the GlRE with the contiguous binding site (L3 box) for the orphan nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF4) has also been suggested. We compared by transient transfection assays the effects of USF2a and other basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) factors (TFE3, c-Myc, SREBP/ADD1) on the activity and glucose responsiveness of a minimal L-PK promoter directed by oligomerized glucose response units (L4L3 boxes). We found that: (i) although USF2a is intrinsically a moderate transcriptional activator, it has a strong stimulatory effect on the activity of the L4L3-based reporter construct in hepatocyte-derived cells and interferes with the glucose responsiveness; (ii) despite its potent ability as a transactivator, TFE3 alone is barely active on the GlRE in hepatocyte-derived cells; (iii) TFE3 as USF2a acts synergistically with HNF4 and abolishes glucose responsiveness of the promoter when overexpressed; (iv) in contrast, overexpression of HNF4 alone stimulates activity of the promoter without interfering with glucose responsiveness; (v) SREBP/ADD1 has a very weak activity on the L4L3 elements, only detectable in the presence of HNF4, and c-Myc does not interact with the GIRE of the L-PK promoter. Our studies indicate that different bHLH-LZ transcription factors known to recognize CACGTG-type E-boxes are not equivalent in acting through the L-PK glucose response element, with USF proteins being especially efficient in hepatocyte-derived cells.