COVID-19 is an infection induced by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, and severe forms can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management. Severe forms are associated with coagulation changes, mainly characterized by an increase in D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, with a higher risk of thrombosis, particularly pulmonary embolism. The impact of obesity in severe COVID-19 has also been highlighted.In this context, standard doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be inadequate in ICU patients, with obesity, major inflammation, and hypercoagulability. We therefore urgently developed proposals on the prevention of thromboembolism and monitoring of hemostasis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Four levels of thromboembolic risk were defined according to the severity of COVID-19 reflected by oxygen requirement and treatment, the body mass index, and other risk factors. Monitoring of hemostasis (including fibrinogen and D-dimer levels) every 48 h is proposed. Standard doses of LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin 4000 IU/24 h SC) are proposed in case of intermediate thrombotic risk (BMI < 30 kg/m², no other risk factors and no ARDS). In all obese patients (high thrombotic risk), adjusted prophylaxis with intermediate doses of LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin 4000 IU/12 h SC or 6000 IU/12 h SC if weight > 120 kg), or unfractionated heparin (UFH) if renal insufficiency (200 IU/kg/24 h, IV), is proposed. The thrombotic risk was defined as very high in obese patients with ARDS and added risk factors for thromboembolism, and also in case of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), unexplained catheter thrombosis, dialysis filter thrombosis, or marked inflammatory syndrome and/or hypercoagulability (e.g., fibrinogen > 8 g/l and/or D-dimers > 3 μg/ml). In ICU patients, it is sometimes difficult to confirm a diagnosis of thrombosis, and curative anticoagulant treatment may also be discussed on a probabilistic basis. In all these situations, therapeutic doses of LMWH, or UFH in case of renal insufficiency with monitoring of anti-Xa activity, are proposed.In conclusion, intensification of heparin treatment should be considered in the context of COVID-19 on the basis of clinical and biological criteria of severity, especially in severely ill ventilated patients, for whom the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism cannot be easily confirmed.

Keywords: Anticoagulant; COVID-19; Coagulation; Heparin; Obesity; Thrombosis.

Heparin can induce heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The combined effect of type of surgery (major vs minor) and heparin on this prothrombotic immune reaction to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin was analyzed. In a randomized, double-blind study, trauma patients receiving low-molecular-weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thrombosis prophylaxis were assessed for PF4/heparin-antibody seroconversion, HIT, and thrombosis according to type of surgery. The risk for seroconversion was higher than major versus minor surgery odds ratio, 7.98 [95% confidence interval, 2.06-31.00], P = .003, controlled for potential confounders, as was the risk for HIT (2.2% [95% confidence interval, 0.3%-4.1%] vs 0.0%, P = .010). During LMWH compared with UFH thromboprophylaxis, HIT (1 of 298 vs 4 of 316; P = .370) and PF4/heparin seroconversion (1.7% vs 6.6%; P = .002) were less frequent, driven by differences in patients undergoing major surgery (incidence of HIT: LMWH 0.8% vs UFH 4.0%; P = .180; seroconversion rates: 4.0% vs 17.0%; P = .001). After minor surgery, no case of HIT occurred. The severity of trauma and the need for major surgery strongly influence the risk of an anti-PF4/heparin immune response, which is then increased by UFH. In major trauma certoparin may be safer than UFH because it induces HIT-antibody seroconversion, and the corresponding risk of HIT, less frequently.

BACKGROUND

Unfractionated heparin has been the primary anticoagulant therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention for >20 years. Despite the availability of rapid "point of care" testing, little clinical data defining the optimal level of anticoagulation are available. Furthermore, recent reports have advocated the use of low-dose heparin regimens in the absence of large-scale, well-conducted studies to support this practice.

RESULTS

We pooled the data from 6 randomized, controlled trials of novel adjunctive antithrombotic regimens for percutaneous coronary interventions in which unfractionated heparin constituted the control arm. Patients were divided into 25-s intervals of activated clotting times (ACTs), from <275 s to >476 s. In a total of 5216 patients, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization and major or minor bleeding at 7 days were calculated for each group and compared. An ACT in the range of 350 to 375 s provided the lowest composite ischemic event rate of 6.6%, or a 34% relative risk reduction in 7-day ischemic events compared with rates observed between 171 and 295 s by quartile analysis (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to recent reports, the optimal suppression of ischemic events with unfractionated heparin therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention demands treatment to ACT levels that are substantially higher than currently appreciated. These data define a goal for heparin dosing within coronary interventions and establish a benchmark of optimal unfractionated heparin therapy against which future trials of novel antithrombotic regimens in percutaneous interventions can be compared.

Binding of heparin and low molecular weight heparin fragments (CY 222, Mr range 1500-8000) to human vascular endothelial cells was studied. Primary culture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and either 125I or 3H-labeled heparin or [125I]CY 222 were used. Slow, saturable and specific binding was found. No other tested glycosaminoglycan, excepting a highly sulfated heparan fraction, was able to compete for heparin binding. Two groups of binding sites for [3H]heparin could be distinguished: one with high affinity (Kd = 0.12 microM) and another with lower affinity (Kd = 1.37 microM) and a relative large capacity of binding (1.16 X 10(7) molecules/cell) was calculated. The Kd for unlabeled heparin, as calculated from competition experiments, was 0.23 microM. Much lower affinity was calculated for unlabeled low molecular weight heparin fragments CY 222 (Kd = 4.3 microM) from competition experiments with [125I]CY 222. The binding reversibility was only partial for unfractionated heparin. Even by chasing with unlabeled compound, a fraction of 25-30% was not dissociable from endothelial cells. This fraction was much lower if incubation was carried out at 4 degrees C. The addition of basic proteins (histones) to the incubation medium greatly enhanced the undissociable binding at 37 degrees C, but not at 4 degrees C. The undissociable fraction of heparin was not available to degradation by purified microbial heparinase. These results suggest that a fraction of bound heparin is internalized by the vascular endothelium.

Several new anticoagulants have entered the clinical arena or are under clinical development. These drugs include indirect (fondaparinux) and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban), and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Especially the oral direct FXa and FIIa inhibitors overcome many of the shortcomings of heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). They are administered orally at a fixed dose; regular monitoring is not necessary; interaction with other drugs or nutrition occur less than with VKAs and they are at least as effective as VKAs for most indications tested. They are associated with about 50 % less intracranial bleeding than VKAs. Nevertheless, they are still associated with bleeding complications. Bleeding can occur spontaneously or as a result of trauma or urgent surgery. In such situations rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect is highly desirable. For unfractionated heparin protamine, and for VKAs prothrombin complex concentrates are available as specific antidotes. Under clinical development are: for the direct and indirect FXa inhibitors a modified recombinant FXa (andexanet alpha), which lacks enzymatic activity; and for dabigatran a Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody (idarucizumab). In addition a small molecule (aripazine) has entered phase I clinical trials, which seems to inhibit nearly all anticoagulants but VKAs and argatroban. This review summarises the current options and strategies in development to antagonise anticoagulants with a focus on the status of the development of antidotes for the oral direct FXa and FIIa inhibitors.

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are now standard therapy for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). No published trials have compared LMWHs, and few studies have examined outpatient therapy for PE. Only tinzaparin sodium has demonstrated superiority to unfractionated heparin in a clinical trial.

METHODS

We compared 2 LMWH products, tinzaparin and dalteparin sodium, for the treatment of acute DVT and PE in a randomized, controlled clinical trial of consecutive outpatients presenting to a venous thromboembolism service at 4 tertiary-care hospitals. Patients were treated with subcutaneous tinzaparin sodium, 175 IU/kg every 24 hours, or subcutaneous dalteparin sodium, 200 IU/kg every 24 hours, for at least 5 days. Warfarin sodium therapy was started simultaneously and continued for 90 days. The primary end point was efficacy (recurrence of venous thromboembolism); safety (bleeding) was a composite end point.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four patients received tinzaparin (39 with PE and 215 with DVT) and 251 received dalteparin (51 with PE and 200 with DVT). Most patients had an active malignancy or idiopathic DVT/PE. The outcome events occurred in 11 (4.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2%-7.7%) and 15 patients (5.9%; 95% CI, 3.3%-9.5%) in the dalteparin and tinzaparin groups, respectively, including 9 and 10 recurrences, respectively, and 2 and 5 major hemorrhages, respectively (P = .44). The 95% CI on the difference of -1.5% was -5.3% to 2.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Tinzaparin and dalteparin are safe and effective for the outpatient treatment of DVT or PE. Our finding of no differences between the LMWHs based on major clinical end points means that practical issues can be the deciding factor on which drug to use.

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin or the combination of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban with unfractionated heparin independently have shown superior efficacy over unfractionated heparin alone in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It is not clear if combining enoxaparin with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors is as safe or as effective as the current standard combination of unfractionated heparin with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and safety of the combination of enoxaparin and tirofiban compared with unfractionated heparin and tirofiban in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS.

METHODS

A prospective, international, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial of 1 mg/kg of enoxaparin every 12 hours (n = 2026) compared with weight-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (n = 1961) in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS receiving tirofiban and aspirin. Phase A of the A to Z trial was conducted between December 1999 and May 2002.

METHODS

Death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 7 days in the intent-to-treat population with boundaries set for superiority and noninferiority. Safety based on measures of bleeding using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classification system.

RESULTS

A total of 169 (8.4%) of 2018 patients randomized to enoxaparin experienced death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 7 days compared with 184 (9.4%) of 1952 patients randomized to unfractionated heparin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.08). This met the prespecified criterion for noninferiority. All components of the composite primary and secondary end points favored enoxaparin except death, which occurred in only 1% of patients (23 for enoxaparin and 17 for unfractionated heparin). Rates for any TIMI grade bleeding were low (3.0% for enoxaparin and 2.2% for unfractionated heparin; P =.13). Using a worst-case approach that combined 2 independent bleeding evaluations, use of enoxaparin was associated with 1 additional TIMI major bleeding episode for each 200 patients treated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving tirofiban and aspirin, enoxaparin is a suitable alternative to unfractionated heparin for treatment of non-ST-elevation ACS. The 12% relative and 1% absolute reductions in the primary end point in favor of enoxaparin met criterion for noninferiority and are consistent with prior trials performed without the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

BACKGROUND

The advantages of enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes are well established. However, no data are available about the safety and efficacy in patients who are obese and patients with severe renal impairment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of treatment effects was performed on patients who were obese and patients with severe renal impairment from the Efficacy Safety Subcutaenous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B trials, in which patients were treated with enoxaparin or UFH. The primary composite end point was death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization (UR), and the secondary end points were major and any hemorrhage.

RESULTS

When compared with UFH, enoxaparin reduced the rate of the primary end point in patients who were obese (14.3% vs 18.0%, P =.05), patients who were not obese (16.1% vs 19.2%, P <.01), and patients without severe renal impairment (15.7% vs 18.4%, P <.01). There was no significant difference in major bleeding between enoxaparin and UFH in any of the 4 subgroups. There were no differences in either the primary end point (17.6% vs 16.2%, P =.39) or major hemorrhage (1.3% vs 0.8%, P =.12) in patients who were obese receiving either UFH or enoxaparin compared with patients who were not obese. Patients with severe renal impairment tended toward a higher rate of the primary end point (25.9% vs 17%, P =.09) and experienced more major hemorrhages (6.6% vs 1.1%, P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin reduced the rate of the combined end point of death/MI/UR in the subgroups of patients who were obese, patients who were not obese, and patients without renal insufficiency. Obesity did not impact clinical outcomes in the combined analysis of ESSENCE and TIMI 11B. Patients with severe renal impairment have a higher risk of clinical events and major and any hemorrhages than patients without severe renal impairment, whether they are treated with UFH or enoxaparin.

OBJECTIVE

The European Network for Acute Coronary Treatment (ENACT) study was designed to collect prospective information across Europe on the relative frequency, diagnosis and management of the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Cardiologists, who were respondents to mailings sent out to 17 European countries with the target of reaching one centre per million inhabitants, completed a prospective patient record, each physician providing information on 10 consecutive patients with a working diagnosis on admission of acute coronary syndrome, and a questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 390 responses were received (0.91/10(6)population) with data on 3092 patients in 29 countries. The patient population comprised 1431 (46%) with an initial working diagnosis of unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 1205 (39%) with myocardial infarction and 445 (14%) with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The ratio of unstable angina to myocardial infarction was 1.2:1 and this was similar across Europe. An initial diagnosis of myocardial infarction was more likely to be confirmed than unstable angina or suspected acute coronary syndrome. There were wide variations in the rates of angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention across Europe. Most unstable angina patients received aspirin, nitrates and heparin (unfractionated heparin 44% intravenous, 16% subcutaneous; low-molecular-weight heparin 50%). Overall, 50% of unstable angina patients and 34% of myocardial infarction patients received low-molecular-weight heparin and 6% and 8% respectively received a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, but there were large inter-country differences. There were also national differences in the use of calcium antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

The ENACT study provides robust data, for the first time, on the relative frequency of unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction across Europe. It provides insight into differences in management across Europe and a reference benchmark of current treatment.

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory and coagulation processes are both affected in meningococcaemia. Severe acquired protein-C deficiency in meningococcaemia is usually associated with substantial mortality: in survivors, skin grafts, amputation, and end-organ failure are not uncommon. Protein C is a natural anticoagulant and also has important anti-inflammatory activity. We assessed the effects of early replacement therapy with protein-C concentrate together with continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration and conventional treatment in meningococcaemia.

METHODS

12 patients aged between 3 months and 27 years with meningococcaemia and severe acquired protein-C deficiency (mean 0.20 IU/mL) were studied. All patients had septic shock, widespread purpura, skin necrosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. After a test dose of protein-C concentrate, patients received a continuous infusion with the dose adjusted daily to keep the plasma concentration between 0.8 and 1.2 IU/mL. 11 patients were given unfractionated intravenous heparin (10-15 IU kg-1 h-1). Nine patients had haemodiafiltration and one had peritoneal dialysis. The Glasgow meningococcal septicaemia prognostic score and the paediatric risk of mortality score predicted a minimum mortality of 80% and 57%, respectively.

RESULTS

No patient died. No adverse reactions to the treatment were seen. Two patients had lower-limb amputations, one of whom had a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident; both patients had received the protein-C concentrate and heparin later than the rest of the group (60 h [16.97] vs 12 h [3.13]). One patient developed chronic renal failure despite receiving protein-C infusion 15 h after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The acquired severe deficiency of protein C in meningococcaemia contributes to the pathogenesis of the thrombotic necrotic lesions in the skin and other organs and probably has an important role in the inflammatory response. Protein-C therapy is merely one approach to improve the host response in this syndrome. We suggest that a double-blind, randomised, controlled multicentre trial is needed to confirm our results.

OBJECTIVE

The optimal prophylactic strategy and treatment regimen for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized pediatric patients is not clearly established. This study assessed the incidence, risk factors, and treatment patterns for DVT among pediatric patients admitted to a hospital ward.

METHODS

Children (aged <17 years) admitted to a single tertiary-care hospital during a 14-year period who developed or presented with DVT were retrospectively identified. Patient demographic and clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who developed DVT in the hospital were stratified according to the Wells clinical probability scoring system from criteria noted before the diagnosis. Treatment patterns and outcomes were evaluated between the two time intervals of 1992 to 2001 (group I) and 2002 to 2005 (group II).

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 2005, 358 children were evaluated for DVT, and 99 (52 boys, 47 girls) were admitted to the hospital and were determined to have DVT by confirmatory imaging. A prior DVT (12 total) was present in eight of the 21 patients admitted for DVT treatment; of the remaining, only seven received DVT prophylaxis on admission. In those developing a DVT, the inpatient clinical probability score was 21% (low), 40% (moderate), and 39% (high). The most common risk factor in those with prehospital DVT was a prior DVT (38%) or thrombophilic condition (33%), whereas inpatients had a central catheter (45%), with nearly 50% in the femoral vein. Children acquiring an inpatient DVT had concomitant severe respiratory (17%), oncologic (14%), and/or infectious (15%) diseases and required a prolonged intensive care unit (12.7 days) stay. Prehospital DVT was lower extremity predominant (90%) and statistically different from inpatient-acquired DVT (62%, P = .01). Treatment patterns between periods I and II revealed a trend to more low-molecular-weight heparin and less unfractionated heparin use (P = .09). Three patients died (one fatal pulmonary embolism). The number of recognized cases per 10,000 admissions increased from 0.3 to 28.8 from 1992 to 2005.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DVT in hospitalized children is increasing. Those presenting with DVT typically have prior DVT, thrombophilia, or lower extremity disease. Our study suggests that children admitted with severe medical conditions who require a prolonged intensive care unit stay in addition to central venous access (especially via the femoral vein) should be considered candidates for DVT prophylaxis. A clinical probability scoring system alone cannot stratify patients sufficiently to forgo prophylaxis in hopes of a rapid clinical diagnosis. Childhood-specific level 1 trials aimed at determining guidelines for DVT prophylaxis are urgently required.

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be effective and safe in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE). They may also be effective for the initial treatment of VTE. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999 and previously updated in 2004.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of LMWH compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of VTE.

METHODS

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Specialised Register and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library). Colleagues and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for additional information.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials comparing fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH with adjusted dose intravenous or subcutaneous UFH in people with VTE.

METHODS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and quality, and extracted data independently.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included (n = 9587). Thrombotic complications occurred in 3.6% of participants treated with LMWH compared with 5.3% treated with UFH (odds ratio (OR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.85). Thrombus size was reduced in 53% of participants treated with LMWH and 45% treated with UFH (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81). Major haemorrhages occurred in 1.1% of participants treated with LMWH compared with 1.9% treated with UFH (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83). In 19 trials, 4.3% of participants treated with LMWH died compared with 5.8% of participants treated with UFH (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93).Nine studies (n = 4451) examined proximal thrombosis, 2192 participants were treated with LMWH and 2259 with UFH. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant reductions favouring LMWH in thrombotic complications and major haemorrhage. By end of follow up, 80 (3.6%) participants treated with LMWH had thrombotic complications compared with 143 (6.3%) treated with UFH (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75). Major haemorrhages occurred in 18 (1.0%) participants treated with LMWH compared with 37 (2.1%) treated with UFH (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85). Nine studies showed a statistically significant reduction in mortality favouring LMWH. By the end of follow up, 3.3% (70/2094) of participants treated with LMWH had died and 5.3% (110/2063) treated with UFH.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed dose LMWH is more effective and safer than adjusted dose UFH for the initial treatment of VTE. Compared to UFH, LMWH significantly reduced the incidence of thrombotic complications, the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at follow up.

BACKGROUND

We reviewed our experience in managing intracardiac ultrasound-detected left atrial thrombus and analyzed the impact of the timing of heparin therapy on thrombus incidence.

RESULTS

We identified 508 patients undergoing ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation in which intracardiac ultrasound was used. All patients received unfractionated heparin during the procedure: 31 patients before the first transseptal puncture (preTS1), 257 between the first and second transseptal punctures (TS1-TS2), and 220 following both punctures (postTS2). By using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), thrombus was detected in 30 of these 508 patients (5.9%). Of these, 29 were in the left atrium and constituted our study group. In 21 patients, the thrombi were successfully aspirated from the left atrium using strong suction through the transseptal sheath. All patients in whom thrombi were aspirated did well without neurological event or death. When patients received heparin therapy either preTS1 or TS1-TS2, there was a significant decrease in the occurrence of ICE-detected left atrial thrombus compared with those who received heparin postTS2 (0 of 31 patients (0%) preTS, 9 of 257 (3.5%) TS1-TS2, and 20 of 220 (9.1%) postTS2; (preTS1 vs postTS2, p = 0.01; preTS2 [preTS1 and TS1-TS2] vs postTS2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of intravenous heparin, specifically before transseptal puncture, decreases the incidence of left atrial thrombi.

OBJECTIVE

Many anticoagulant strategies are available for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, yet little guidance exists regarding which drug is most effective and safe.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and compare the efficacy and safety outcomes associated with 8 anticoagulation options (unfractionated heparin [UFH], low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH], or fondaparinux in combination with vitamin K antagonists); LMWH with dabigatran or edoxaban; rivaroxaban; apixaban; and LMWH alone) for treatment of venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the evidence-based medicine reviews from inception through February 28, 2014.

METHODS

Eligible studies were randomized trials reporting rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Of the 1197 studies identified, 45 trials including 44,989 patients were included in the analyses.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently extracted trial-level data including number of patients, duration of follow-up, and outcomes. The data were pooled using network meta-analysis.

METHODS

The primary clinical and safety outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with the LMWH-vitamin K antagonist combination, a treatment strategy using the UFH-vitamin K antagonist combination was associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.15-1.79). The proportion of patients experiencing recurrent venous thromboembolism during 3 months of treatment were 1.84% (95% CrI, 1.33%-2.51%) for the UFH-vitamin K antagonist combination and 1.30% (95% CrI, 1.02%-1.62%) for the LMWH-vitamin K antagonist combination. Rivaroxaban (HR, 0.55; 95% CrI, 0.35-0.89) and apixaban (HR, 0.31; 95% CrI, 0.15-0.62) were associated with a lower risk of bleeding than was the LMWH-vitamin K antagonist combination, with a lower proportion of patients experiencing a major bleeding event during 3 months of anticoagulation: 0.49% (95% CrI, 0.29%-0.85%) for rivaroxaban, 0.28% (95% CrI, 0.14%-0.50%) for apixaban, and 0.89% (95% CrI, 0.66%-1.16%) for the LMWH-vitamin K antagonist combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Using meta-analytic pooling, there were no statistically significant differences for efficacy and safety associated with most treatment strategies used to treat acute venous thromboembolism compared with the LMWH-vitamin K antagonist combination. However, findings suggest that the UFH-vitamin K antagonist combination is associated with the least effective strategy and that rivaroxaban and apixaban may be associated with the lowest risk for bleeding.

Heparin, a sulfated polysaccharide, has been used as a clinical anticoagulant for over 90 years. Newer anticoagulants, introduced for certain specialized applications, have not significantly displaced heparin and newer heparin-based anticoagulants in most medical procedures. This chapter, while reviewing anticoagulation and these newer anticoagulants, focuses on heparin-based anticoagulants, including unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins and ultra-low molecular weight heparins. Heparin's structures and its biological and therapeutic roles are discussed. Particular emphasis is placed on heparin's therapeutic application and its adverse effects. The future prospects are excellent for new heparins and new heparin-based therapeutics with improved properties.

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) includes antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and heparin. Although emerging data suggest that low-molecular weight preparations offer distinct advantages over unfractionated heparin, limited information on patient-related factors that may influence dosing, safety, and efficacy is available.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was the determination of the impact of patient age, sex, body weight, and renal function on factor Xa inhibition pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after enoxaparin administration in patients with ACS.

RESULTS

Patients enrolled in the TIMI 11A trial received a full complement of antiischemic therapy, aspirin, and enoxaparin (30 mg intravenously, followed by weight-adjusted doses of either 1 mg/kg or 1.25 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours). Before and after the third and last doses, blood samples were obtained from 445 patients for measurement of anti-Xa activity. The mean apparent clearance, distribution volume, and plasma half-life were 0.733 L/h, 5.24 L, and 5 hours, respectively. Among a wide range of clinical and laboratory covariates, creatinine clearance emerged as the most influential factor on apparent clearance, area under the curve, and anti-Xa activity. Patients with marked renal impairment (creatinine clearance <40 mL/min) had higher trough and peak anti-Xa activity compared with those with normal renal function and were more likely to have major hemorrhagic events.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles after enoxaparin administration are consistent across a broad range of patients with ACS. Dose adjustments or anti-Xa coagulation monitoring or both will be necessary rarely in routine clinical practice, with the exception of patients with severe renal insufficiency.

The purpose of this study was to produce mucoadhesive nanocarriers made from chitosan (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA), and containing the macromolecular drug heparin, suitable for pulmonary delivery. For the first time, this drug was tested in ex vivo experiments performed in mast cells, in order to investigate the potential of the heparin-loaded nanocarriers in antiasthmatic therapy. CS and mixtures of HA with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin (UFH and LMWH, respectively) were combined to form nanoparticles by the ionotropic gelation technique. The resulting nanoparticles loaded with UFH were between 162 and 217 nm in size, and those prepared with LMWH were 152 nm. The zeta potential of the nanoparticle formulations ranged from +28.1 to +34.6 mV, and in selected nanosystems both types of heparin were associated with a high degree of efficiency, which was approximately 70%. The nanosystems were stable in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, for at least 24h, and released 10.8% of UFH and 79.7% of LMWH within 12h of incubation. Confocal microscopy experiments showed that fluorescent heparin-loaded CS-HA nanoparticles were effectively internalized by rat mast cells. Ex vivo experiments aimed at evaluating the capacity of heparin to prevent histamine release in rat mast cells indicated that the free or encapsulated drug exhibited the same dose-response behaviour.

BACKGROUND

Because of ongoing controversy, renal and vital outcomes are compared between systemically administered unfractionated heparin and regional anticoagulation with citrate-buffered replacement solution in predilution mode, during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

In this multi-center randomized controlled trial, patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring CVVH and meeting inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to citrate or heparin. Primary endpoints were mortality and renal outcome in intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Safety was defined as absence of any adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the assigned anticoagulant. For efficacy, among other parameters, survival times of the first hemofilter were studied.

RESULTS

Of the 139 patients enrolled, 66 were randomized to citrate and 73 to heparin. Mortality rates at 28 and 90 days did not differ between groups: 22/66 (33%) of citrate-treated patients died versus 25/72 (35%) of heparin-treated patients at 28 days, and 27/65 (42%) of citrate-treated patients died versus 29/69 (42%) of heparin-treated patients at 90 days (P = 1.00 for both). Renal outcome, i.e. independency of renal replacement therapy 28 days after initiation of CVVH in surviving patients, did not differ between groups: 29/43 (67%) in the citrate-treated patients versus 33/47 (70%) in heparin-treated patients (P = 0.82). Heparin was discontinued in 24/73 (33%) of patients whereas citrate was discontinued in 5/66 (8%) of patients (P < 0.001). Filter survival times were superior for citrate (median 46 versus 32 hours, P = 0.02), as were the number of filters used (P = 0.002) and the off time within 72 hours (P = 0.002). The costs during the first 72 hours of prescribed CVVH were lower in citrate-based CVVH.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal outcome and patient mortality were similar for citrate and heparin anticoagulation during CVVH in the critically ill patient with AKI. However, citrate was superior in terms of safety, efficacy and costs.

BACKGROUND

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00209378. Registered 13th September 2005.

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory conditions provoke essential processes in the human vascular system. It leads to the formation of ultralarge von Willebrand factor (VWF) fibers, which are immobilized on the endothelial cell surface and transform to highly adhesive strings under shear conditions. Furthermore, leukocytes release a meshwork of DNA (neutrophil extracellular traps) during the process of the recently discovered cell death program NETosis. In the present study, we characterized the interaction between VWF and DNA and possible binding sites to underline the role of VWF in thrombosis and inflammation besides its function in platelet adhesion.

RESULTS

Both functionalized surfaces and intact cell layers of human umbilical vein endothelial cells were perfused with isolated, protein-free DNA or leukocytes from whole blood at distinct shear rates. DNA-VWF interaction was monitored using fluorescence microscopy, ELISA-based assays, molecular dynamics simulations, and electrostatic potential calculations. Isolated DNA, as well as DNA released by stimulated leukocytes, was able to bind to shear-activated, but not inactivated, VWF. However, DNA-VWF binding does not alter VWF degradation by a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13. Moreover, DNA-VWF interaction can be blocked using unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin, and DNA-VWF complexes attenuate platelet binding to VWF. These findings were supported using molecular dynamics simulations and electrostatic calculations of the A1- and A2-domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that VWF directly binds and immobilizes extracellular DNA released from leukocytes. Therefore, we hypothesize that VWF might act as a linker for leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells, supporting leukocyte extravasation and inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare results of low-dose tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in children with arterial and venous thrombi relative to standard published dosing.

METHODS

Subjects consisted of all consecutive children with objectively confirmed thrombi for whom TPA thrombolysis was clinically ordered by the authors. Initial dosing used published standard dose (0.1-0.5 mg/kg per hour). With experience, a low-dose regimen (0.01-0.06 mg/kg per hour) was given in an attempt to derive a minimal effective dose.

RESULTS

Thirty-five children were treated with TPA. Either standard or low-dose infusions of TPA resulted in complete thrombolysis of 28 of 29 (97%) acute thrombi, while all 6 chronic thrombi had a partial response. In contrast to the recommended adult-derived dosages of 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg per hour, the authors found that initial doses of less than 0.01 mg/kg per hour were effective in 12 of 17 patients with acute thrombosis. Neonates required 0.06 mg/kg per hour. Route of administration (local or systemic) did not affect efficacy. Major bleeding occurred in only one extremely preterm infant. Minor bleeding, primarily oozing at intravenous sites, occurred in 27% of children during TPA infusions. Prophylactic unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin was infused concomitant with TPA in 42% of the children and did not increase the risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

TPA in very low doses appears to be safe and effective for thrombolysis of acute thromboses in most children, given appropriate patient selection.

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral embolism is a possible serious complication during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this prospective pilot study was to analyse the incidence and possible impact of cryo ablation on cerebral lesions and possible differences to radiofrequency (RF) ablation during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

RESULTS

Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 89 patients, either with the cryoballoon technique (n = 45) or with RF ablation (n = 44). Phenprocoumon was stopped 3 days before intervention and replaced by subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. During the catheter procedure, an infusion of unfractionated heparin was maintained to achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) of>> 300 s. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed 1 day before and after PVI, and at 3-month follow-up. Chronic lesions were observed in 11 patients (12.3%) before PVI without statistically significant difference between the two groups. None of the patients had neurological symptoms during or following the procedure. Seven patients (7.9%) developed acute lesions 1 day after PVI, without statistically significant difference between the group treated by cryoenergy (8.9%) and RF ablation (6.8%). Patients with acute lesions were significantly older compared with those without acute cerebral lesions. No additional cerebral lesions during follow-up were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable portion of patients with AF but without any neurological symptoms had chronic cerebral lesions before PVI. Additional acute lesions could be added after the procedure. Both ablation techniques showed additional cerebral acute lesions with no neurological symptoms after PVI.

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparins can effectively replace unfractionated heparin in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for these patients when they require cardiac catheterization is still unclear. Therefore, we evaluated a new and simple strategy of anticoagulation in these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 451 consecutive patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction were treated for at least 48 hours with subcutaneous injections of enoxaparin (1 mg [100 IU]/kg every 12 hours, cycled at 6 AM and 6 PM). Of this unselected population, 293 patients (65%) underwent a coronary angiography within 8 hours of the morning LMW heparin injection, followed by immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 132 patients (28%). PCI was performed without any additional bolus of unfractionated/LMW heparin and without coagulation monitoring. Anti-Xa activity at the time of catheterization was 0.98+/-0.03 IU/mL, was >0.5 IU/mL in 97.6% of patients, and did not relate to the LMW heparin injection-to-catheterization time. There were no in-hospital abrupt closures or urgent revascularizations after PCI. The death/myocardial infarction rate at 30 days was 3.0% in the PCI group (n=132) but 6.2% in the whole population (n=451) and 10.8% in the patients not undergoing catheterization (n=158). The 30-day major bleeding rate was 0.8% in the PCI group, which was comparable to that of patients without catheterization (1.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI within 8 hours of the last enoxaparin subcutaneous injection seems to be safe and effective. The safety of subcutaneous LMW heparin in combination with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade awaits further study.

A multicenter, randomized double-blind study compared in two parallel groups the efficacy and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin 20 mg once daily, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 IU twice daily, administered subcutaneously for 10 days, in the prevention of venous thrombosis disease in 442 hospitalized elderly patients bedridden for an acute medical illness. The main efficacy endpoint was defined as the occurrence of venous thrombosis, diagnosed by a daily fibrinogen uptake test, and/or documented clinical pulmonary embolism. Intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy showed that the incidence of venous thromboembolic events was low: 4.8% (10/207) in the LMWH group (9 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis and one of scintigraphic pulmonary embolism), and 4.6% (10/216) in the UFH group (10 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis). The two treatments were equivalent, where equivalence was defined as a maximum difference of 7% between the two groups (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in terms of safety between the 216 patients in the LMWH group and the 223 patients in the UFH group who received at least one injection of the randomized treatment. During the study period, 15 patients (3.4%) died (7 in the LMWH group and 8 in the UFH group): 2 sudden deaths, one in each group including one case in which pulmonary embolism could not be excluded since no autopsy was performed, and 13 others deaths unrelated to the study treatments. Six patients (1.4%) presented a bleeding complication: 2 (0.9%) in the enoxaparin group (one major and one minor hemorrhage), and 4 (1.8%) in the UFH group (2 major and 2 minor hemorrhages). These results indicate that subcutaneous enoxaparin 20 mg once daily for 10 days is as effective and well tolerated as subcutaneous UFH 5000 IU twice daily in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in bedridden elderly in-patients presenting an acute medical illness.

The interaction of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) with heparan sulfate and with size-fractionated fragments of heparin was characterized by several approaches (stabilization, sedimentation, surface plasmon resonance, circular dichroism, fluorescence). The results show that heparin decasaccharides form a 1:1 complex with dimeric LPL and that decasaccharides are the shortest heparin fragments which can completely satisfy the heparin binding regions in dimeric LPL. Equimolar concentrations of octasaccharides also stabilized dimeric LPL, while shorter fragments (hexa- and tetrasaccharides) were less efficient. Binding of heparin did not induce major rearrangements in the conformation of LPL, supporting the view that the heparin binding region is preformed in the native structure. Interaction of LPL with heparan sulfate, as studied by surface plasmon resonance, was found to be a fast exchange process characterized by a high value for the association rate constant, 1.7 x 10(8) M-1 s-1, a relatively high dissociation rate constant, 0.05 s-1, and as a result a very low equilibrium dissociation constant equal to 0.3 nM at 0.15 M NaCl. The contribution of electrostatics was estimated to be 44% for the binding of LPL to heparan sulfate, 49% for the binding of LPL to unfractionated heparin, and 60% for the binding of LPL to affinity-purified heparin decasaccharides at 0.15 M NaCl. The number of ionic interactions between LPL and high-affinity decasaccharides was estimated to be 10. We propose an essential role of electrostatic steering in the association. Monomeric LPL had 6000-fold lower affinity for heparin than dimeric LPL had, expressed as a ratio of equilibrium dissociation constants. A model for binding of LPL to heparan sulfate-covered surfaces is proposed. Due to the fast rebinding, LPL is concentrated to the close proximity of the heparan sulfate surface. As the dissociation is also fast, the enzyme exchanges rapidly between specific binding sites on the immobilized heparan sulfate, without leaving the surface. This model may also apply to LPL at the endothelium of blood vessels.