Postoperative Intestinal Fistula in Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery
Journal: 2021/January - Cancer Management and Research
Abstract:
Background: Advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) requires an aggressive surgery with large visceral resections in order to achieve an optimal or complete cytoreduction and increase the patient's survival. However, the surgical aggressiveness in the treatment of AOC is not exempt from major complications, such as the gastrointestinal fistula (GIF), which stands out among others due to its high morbidity and mortality.
Methods: We evaluated the clinicopathological features in patients with AOC and their association with GI. Data for 107 patients with AOC who underwent primary debulking surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Clinicopathological features, including demographic, surgical procedures and follow-up data, were analyzed in relation to GIF.
Results: GIF was present in 11% of patients in the study, 5 (4.5%) and 7 (6.4%) of colorectal and small bowel origin, respectively. GIF was significantly associated with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) >20, more than 2 visceral resections, and multiple digestive resections. Overall and disease-free survival were also associated with GIF. Multivariate analysis identified partial bowel obstruction and operative bleeding as independent prognostic factors for survival. The presence of GIF is positively associated with poor prognosis in patients with AOC.
Conclusion: Given the importance of successful cytoreductive surgery in AOC, the assessment of the amount of tumor and the aggressiveness of the surgery to avoid the occurrence of GIF become a priority in patients with AOC.
Keywords: advanced ovarian cancer surgery; complications; intestinal fistula; intestinal leakage.
Relations:
Content
References
(22)
Diseases
(1)
Conditions
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Cancer Manag Res 13: 13-23

Postoperative Intestinal Fistula in Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery

+6 authors
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University General Hospital of Castellon, Castellón, Spain
Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), University General Hospital of Castellon, Castellón, Spain
Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), Castellon, Spain
Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Castellon, Castellón, Spain
Department of Radiology, University General Hospital of Castellon, Castellón, Spain
Research Laboratory in Biomarkers in Reproduction, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fundación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gynecology Oncology, Houston, Texas, USA
Correspondence: Antoni Llueca Email antonillueca@gmail.com
Received 2020 Sep 5; Accepted 2020 Nov 27.
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

Abstract

Background

Advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) requires an aggressive surgery with large visceral resections in order to achieve an optimal or complete cytoreduction and increase the patient’s survival. However, the surgical aggressiveness in the treatment of AOC is not exempt from major complications, such as the gastrointestinal fistula (GIF), which stands out among others due to its high morbidity and mortality.

Methods

We evaluated the clinicopathological features in patients with AOC and their association with GI. Data for 107 patients with AOC who underwent primary debulking surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Clinicopathological features, including demographic, surgical procedures and follow-up data, were analyzed in relation to GIF.

Results

GIF was present in 11% of patients in the study, 5 (4.5%) and 7 (6.4%) of colorectal and small bowel origin, respectively. GIF was significantly associated with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) >20, more than 2 visceral resections, and multiple digestive resections. Overall and disease-free survival were also associated with GIF. Multivariate analysis identified partial bowel obstruction and operative bleeding as independent prognostic factors for survival. The presence of GIF is positively associated with poor prognosis in patients with AOC.

Conclusion

Given the importance of successful cytoreductive surgery in AOC, the assessment of the amount of tumor and the aggressiveness of the surgery to avoid the occurrence of GIF become a priority in patients with AOC.

Keywords: advanced ovarian cancer surgery, complications, intestinal leakage, intestinal fistula
Abstract

Acknowledgments

We thank Begoña Belles, PhD, for editing a draft of this manuscript.

MUAPOS working group (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery):

Gomez-Quiles L., Játiva R., Cebrian G., Bosso, V., Villarin, A., Maiocchi, K., Delgado-Barriga K., Rodrigo-Aliaga M., Ruiz N., Herrero C., Frances, A., Beato I, Ferrer C., Aracil JP, Boldo E, Boldo A, Adell R.

Acknowledgments

Funding Statement

This work received financial support from de Medtronic University Chair for Training and Surgical Research, University Jaume I (UJI), Castellón, Spain and also supported by a research grant from ISCIII-FEDER (PI17/01945).

Funding Statement

References

  • 1. Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM). Full-Text. Las cifras del cáncer en España 2018 [Internet]; 2018. 24 Available from: . Accessed December17, 2020.[PubMed]
  • 2. Du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized Phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;115(6):1234. doi:10.1002/cncr.24149 [] [[PubMed]
  • 3. Bartels HC, Rogers AC, Postle J, et al. Morbidity and mortality in women with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery compared to cytoreductive surgery for recurrent disease: a meta-analysis. Pleura Peritoneum. 2019;4(2):20190014. doi:10.1515/pp-2019-0014 ] [
  • 4. Llueca A, Herraiz JL, Catala C. Effectiveness and safety of cytoreduction surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: initial experience at a University General Hospital. J Clin Gynecol Obstetrics. 2015;4(3):251–257. doi:10.14740/jcgo345w [[PubMed]
  • 5. Llueca A, Serra A, Maiocchi K, et al. Predictive model for major complications after extensive abdominal surgery in primary advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Women’s Health. 2019;11:161–167. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S190493 ] [
  • 6. Hoffman MS, Zervose E. Colon resection for ovarian cancer: intraoperative decisions. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(2):S 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.055 [] [[PubMed]
  • 7. Tebes SJ, Cardosi R, Hoffman MS. Colorectal resection in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(2):585–589. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.079 [] [[PubMed]
  • 8. Bristow RE, Peiretti M, Gerardi M, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery including rectosigmoid colectomy for recurrent ovarian cancer: operative technique and clinical outcome. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):173–177. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.004 [] [[PubMed]
  • 9. Kato K, Nomura H, Nagashima M, Takeshima N. Secondary debulking surgery for isolated pelvic nodal recurrence requiring external iliac vein excision and reconstruction in a patient with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(3):684–685. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.008 [] [[PubMed]
  • 10. Llueca A, Serra-Rubert A, Escrig J. MUAPOS working group (Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology Surgery). Prognostic value of peritoneal cancer index in primary advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:163–169. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.003 [] [[PubMed]
  • 11. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–526. [[PubMed]
  • 12. Goenka MK, Goenka U. Endotherapy of leaks and fistula. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(7):702–713. doi:10.4253/wjge.v7.i7.702 ] [
  • 13. Prat J. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging Classification for cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;124:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.10.001 [] [[PubMed]
  • 14. Sugarbaker PH, Jablonski KA. Prognostic features of 51 colorectal and 130 appendiceal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 1995;221(2):124–132. doi:10.1097/00000658-199502000-00002 ] [
  • 15. Koscielny A, Ko A, Egger E, Kuhn W, Kalff JC, Keyver-Paik MD. Prevention of anastomotic leakage in ovarian cancer debulking surgery and Its impact on overall survival. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(9):5209–5218. [[PubMed]
  • 16. Kalogera E, Dowdy SC, Mariani A, et al. Multiple large bowel resections: potential risk factor for anastomotic leak. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(1):213–218. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.002 ] [
  • 17. Bartl T, Schwameis R, Stift A, et al. Predictive and prognostic implication of bowel resections during primary cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(9):1664–1671. doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001369 [] [[PubMed]
  • 18. Llueca A, Serra A, Rivadulla I, Gomez L, Escrig J. MUAPOS working group (multidisciplinary unit of abdominal pelvic oncology surgery). Prediction of suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer based on preoperative and intraoperative determination of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16:37. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1339-0 ] [
  • 19. Glasgow MA, Shields K, Vogel RI, Teoh D, Argenta PA. Postoperative readmissions following ileostomy formation among patients with a gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(3):561–565. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.005 ] [
  • 20. Richardson DL, Mariani A, Cliby WA. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after recto-sigmoid resection for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(2):667–672. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.003 [] [[PubMed]
  • 21. Garcia Martínez T, Montanes Pauls B, Vicedo Cabrera A, et al. Evaluacion y soporte nutricional en pacientes con carcinomatosis peritoneal por cáncer de ovario con citorreducción quiruúrgica. Nutr Cli´n Diet Hosp. 2016;36(1):31–40. [PubMed]
  • 22. Oldham MC, Langfelder P, Horvath S. Network methods for describing sample relationships in genomic datasets: application to Huntington’s disease. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6(63). doi:10.1186/1752-0509-6-63. ] [
  • 23. Grimm C, Harter P, Alesina PF, et al. The impact of type and number of bowel resections on anastomotic leakage risk in advanced ovarian cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146(3):498–503. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.007 [] [[PubMed]
  • 24. Gallotta V, Fanfani F, Vizzielli G. Douglas peritonectomy compared to recto-sigmoid resection in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer patients: analysis of morbidity and oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(12):1085–1092. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.09.003 [] [[PubMed]
  • 25. Gallotta V, Fanfani F, Fagotti A. Mesenteric lymph node involvement in advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing rectosigmoid resection: prognostic role and clinical considerations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(7):2369–2375. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3558-0 [] [[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.