Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated celiac disease
Abstract
Background
Rare cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated celiac disease (ICI-CeD) have been reported, suggesting that disruption of tolerance mechanisms by ICIs can unmask celiac disease (CeD). This study aims to characterize the clinicopathological and immunophenotypic features of ICI-CeD in comparison to ICI-associated duodenitis (ICI-Duo) and usual CeD.
Methods
A medical and pathological records search between 2015 and 2019 identified eight cases of ICI-CeD, confirmed by tTG-IgA. Nine cases of ICI-Duo, 28 cases of moderate CeD, as well as 5 normal controls were used as comparison groups. Clinical information was collected from the electronic medical records. Immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD8, T-cell receptor gamma/delta (γδ), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programmed death 1 (PD-1) were performed, with quantification of intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) subsets in three well-oriented villi. CD68, PD-L1, and PD-1 were assessed as a percentage of lamina propria surface area infiltrated by positive cells. Statistical significance was calculated by the Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test.
Results
The eight patients with ICI-CeD (F:M=1:3) and nine patients with ICI-Duo (F:M=5:4) presented similarly with diarrhea (13/17) and abdominal pain (11/17) after a median of 1.6 months on ICI therapy. In patients with ICI-CeD, tTG-IgA ranged from 104 to >300 IU/mL. Histological findings in ICI-CeD and ICI-Duo were similar and included expansion of the lamina propria, active neutrophilic duodenitis, variably increased IELs, and villous blunting. Immunohistochemistry showed that the average number of IELs per 100 enterocytes is comparable between ICI-CeD and ICI-Duo, with increased CD3 CD8 T cells compared with normal duodenum but decreased γδ T cells compared with CeD. Average PD-L1 percentage was 9% in ICI-CeD and 18% in ICI-Duo, in comparison to <1% in CeD and normal duodenum; average PD-1 percentage was very low to absent in all cases (<3%). On follow-up, five patients with ICI-CeD improved on a gluten-free diet (GFD) as the sole therapeutic intervention (with down-trending tTG-IgA) while the other three required immunosuppression. All patients who developed ICI-Duo received immunosuppression with variable improvement in symptoms.
Conclusions
ICI-CeD resembles ICI-Duo clinically and histologically but shares the serological features and response to gluten withdrawal with classic CeD. Immunophenotyping of IELs in ICI-CeD and ICI-Duo also shows similar CD3, CD8, γδ T cell subsets, and PD-L1 populations, all of which differed quantitatively from usual CeD. We conclude that ICI-CeD is biologically similar to ICI-Duo and is likely a variant of ICI-Duo, but treatment strategies differ, with ICI-CeD often improving with GFD alone, whereas ICI-Duo requires systemic immunosuppression.
Background
Rare cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated celiac disease (ICI-CeD) have been reported, suggesting that disruption of tolerance mechanisms by ICIs can unmask celiac disease (CeD). This study aims to characterize the clinicopathological and immunophenotypic features of ICI-CeD in comparison to ICI-associated duodenitis (ICI-Duo) and usual CeD.
Methods
A medical and pathological records search between 2015 and 2019 identified eight cases of ICI-CeD, confirmed by tTG-IgA. Nine cases of ICI-Duo, 28 cases of moderate CeD, as well as 5 normal controls were used as comparison groups. Clinical information was collected from the electronic medical records. Immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD8, T-cell receptor gamma/delta (γδ), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programmed death 1 (PD-1) were performed, with quantification of intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) subsets in three well-oriented villi. CD68, PD-L1, and PD-1 were assessed as a percentage of lamina propria surface area infiltrated by positive cells. Statistical significance was calculated by the Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test.
Results
The eight patients with ICI-CeD (F:M=1:3) and nine patients with ICI-Duo (F:M=5:4) presented similarly with diarrhea (13/17) and abdominal pain (11/17) after a median of 1.6 months on ICI therapy. In patients with ICI-CeD, tTG-IgA ranged from 104 to >300 IU/mL. Histological findings in ICI-CeD and ICI-Duo were similar and included expansion of the lamina propria, active neutrophilic duodenitis, variably increased IELs, and villous blunting. Immunohistochemistry showed that the average number of IELs per 100 enterocytes is comparable between ICI-CeD and ICI-Duo, with increased CD3 CD8 T cells compared with normal duodenum but decreased γδ T cells compared with CeD. Average PD-L1 percentage was 9% in ICI-CeD and 18% in ICI-Duo, in comparison to <1% in CeD and normal duodenum; average PD-1 percentage was very low to absent in all cases (<3%). On follow-up, five patients with ICI-CeD improved on a gluten-free diet (GFD) as the sole therapeutic intervention (with down-trending tTG-IgA) while the other three required immunosuppression. All patients who developed ICI-Duo received immunosuppression with variable improvement in symptoms.
Conclusions
ICI-CeD resembles ICI-Duo clinically and histologically but shares the serological features and response to gluten withdrawal with classic CeD. Immunophenotyping of IELs in ICI-CeD and ICI-Duo also shows similar CD3, CD8, γδ T cell subsets, and PD-L1 populations, all of which differed quantitatively from usual CeD. We conclude that ICI-CeD is biologically similar to ICI-Duo and is likely a variant of ICI-Duo, but treatment strategies differ, with ICI-CeD often improving with GFD alone, whereas ICI-Duo requires systemic immunosuppression.
Footnotes
Twitter: @YRBadran
YRB and AS contributed equally.
MM-K and MD contributed equally.
Correction notice: Since the online publication of this article, the authors have noticed that the middle initial for author Yousef R Badran was missing. This has been corrected.
Contributors: YB, AS, DL, AC and MM-K compiled and reviewed all of the data. MJM assessed and confirmed the accuracy of the details relating to the patients’ oncological history and treatment. AS and MM-K performed the histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of the patients’ samples. AS, JC, MK, JB, JM, and MM-K collected patient samples and identified the appropriate immunohistochemical panel. MD assessed and confirmed the accuracy of the patients’ gastroenterological history, treatment, and endoscopy results. YB, AS, and MD wrote the manuscript with contributions from all of the authors.
Funding: Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award 1K08DK114563-01 and the American Gastroenterological Association Research Scholars Award (MD).
Competing interests: MD is a consultant for Genentech-Roche, Tillotts Pharma, and Partner Therapeutics. He received research funding from Novartis. He is on the scientific advisory board for Neoleukin Therapeutics.
Patient consent for publication: Not required.
Ethics approval: This retrospective analysis was approved by the Partners Human Research Committee and the Institutional Review Board of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement: Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analyzed for this study.
References
- 1. Caio G, Volta U, Sapone A, et al. Celiac disease: a comprehensive current review. BMC Med 2019;17:142. 10.1186/s12916-019-1380-z ] [[Google Scholar]
- 2. Leonard MM, Sapone A, Catassi C, et al. Celiac disease and Nonceliac gluten sensitivity: a review. JAMA 2017;318:647–56. 10.1001/jama.2017.9730 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 3. Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, et al. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut 2013;62:43–52. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 4. Pagliari D, Urgesi R, Frosali S, et al. The interaction among microbiota, immunity, and genetic and dietary factors is the Condicio sine qua non celiac disease can develop. J Immunol Res 2015;2015:1–10. 10.1155/2015/123653 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 5. Fasano A, Catassi C Clinical practice. celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2419–26. 10.1056/NEJMcp1113994 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 6. Regulation and Function of the PD-L1 Checkpoint - PubMed. Available: [Accessed 3 Mar 2020].[PubMed]
- 7. Ribas A, Wolchok JD Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 2018;359:1350–5. 10.1126/science.aar4060 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 8. Kruger S, Ilmer M, Kobold S, et al. Advances in cancer immunotherapy 2019 - latest trends. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019;38:268. 10.1186/s13046-019-1266-0 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 9. Wei SC, Duffy CR, Allison JP Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov 2018;8:1069–86. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 10. Pauken KE, Dougan M, Rose NR, et al. Adverse events following cancer immunotherapy: obstacles and opportunities. Trends Immunol 2019;40:511–23. 10.1016/j.it.2019.04.002 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 11. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD Immune-Related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 2018;378:158–68. 10.1056/NEJMra1703481 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 12. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Thompson JA Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline summary. J Oncol Pract 2018;14:247–9. 10.1200/JOP.18.00005 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 13. Abu-Sbeih H, Ali FS, Alsaadi D, et al. Outcomes of vedolizumab therapy in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: a multi-center study. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:142. 10.1186/s40425-018-0461-4 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 14. Marthey L, Mateus C, Mussini C, et al. Cancer immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies induces an inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2016;10:395–401. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv227 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 15. Collins M, Michot JM, Danlos FX, et al. Inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases associated with PD-1 blockade antibodies. Ann Oncol 2017;28:2860–5. 10.1093/annonc/mdx403 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 16. Soularue E, Lepage P, Colombel JF, et al. Enterocolitis due to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Gut 2018;67:2056–67. 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316948 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 17. Arnouk J, Mathew D, Nulton E, et al. A celiac disease phenotype after checkpoint inhibitor exposure: an example of immune dysregulation after immunotherapy. ACG Case Rep J 2019;6:e00158. 10.14309/crj.0000000000000158 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 18. Alsaadi D, Shah NJ, Charabaty A, et al. A case of checkpoint inhibitor-induced celiac disease. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7:203. 10.1186/s40425-019-0694-x ] [[Google Scholar]
- 19. Schoenfeld SR, Aronow ME, Leaf RK, et al. Diagnosis and management of rare immune-related adverse events. Oncologist 2020;25:6–14. 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0083 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 20. Gentile NM, D'Souza A, Fujii LL, et al. Association between ipilimumab and celiac disease. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:414–7. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.01.015 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 21. Dougan M, Pietropaolo M Time to dissect the autoimmune etiology of cancer antibody immunotherapy. J Clin Invest 2020;130:51–61. 10.1172/JCI131194 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 22. Hughes MS, Molina GE, Chen ST, et al. Budesonide treatment for microscopic colitis from immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7:292. 10.1186/s40425-019-0756-0 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 23. Abu-Sbeih H, Faleck DM, Ricciuti B, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with preexisting inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:576–83. 10.1200/JCO.19.01674 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 24. Tye-Din JA, Galipeau HJ, Agardh D Celiac disease: a review of current concepts in pathogenesis, prevention, and novel therapies. Front Pediatr 2018;6:350. 10.3389/fped.2018.00350 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 25. Geukes Foppen MH, Rozeman EA, van Wilpe S, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition-related colitis: symptoms, endoscopic features, histology and response to management. ESMO Open 2018;3:e000278. 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000278 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 26. PubMed Immune-Related adverse events in the gastrointestinal tract: diagnostic utility of upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Available: [Accessed 3 Mar 2020]. [[PubMed]
- 27. Rust C, Kooy Y, Peña S, et al. Phenotypical and functional characterization of small intestinal TcR gamma delta + T cells in coeliac disease. Scand J Immunol 1992;35:459–68. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1992.tb02881.x [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 28. Dunne MR, Elliott L, Hussey S, et al. Persistent changes in circulating and intestinal γδ T cell subsets, invariant natural killer T cells and mucosal-associated invariant T cells in children and adults with coeliac disease. PLoS One 2013;8:e76008. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076008 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 29. Nijeboer P, van Gils T, Reijm M, et al. Gamma-Delta T lymphocytes in the diagnostic approach of coeliac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019;53:e208–13. 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001060 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 30. Konkel JE, Frommer F, Leech MD, et al. PD-1 signalling in CD4(+) T cells restrains their clonal expansion to an immunogenic stimulus, but is not critically required for peptide-induced tolerance. Immunology 2010;130:92–102. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03216.x ] [[Google Scholar]
- 31. Reynoso ED, Elpek KG, Francisco L, et al. Intestinal tolerance is converted to autoimmune enteritis upon PD-1 ligand blockade. J Immunol 2009;182:2102–12. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802769 ] [[Google Scholar]
- 32. Fife BT, Bluestone JA Control of peripheral T-cell tolerance and autoimmunity via the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways. Immunol Rev 2008;224:166–82. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00662.x [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 33. Dumoulin FL, Leifeld L, Sauerbruch T, et al. Autoimmunity induced by interferon-alpha therapy for chronic viral hepatitis. Biomed Pharmacother 1999;53:242–54. 10.1016/S0753-3322(99)80095-X [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 34. Cammarota G, Cuoco L, Cianci R, et al. Onset of coeliac disease during treatment with interferon for chronic hepatitis C. Lancet 2000;356:1494–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02880-4 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 35. Blecker D, Abraham S, Furth EE, et al. Melanoma in the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:3427–33. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01604.x [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 36. Eshet Y, Baruch EN, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Clinical significance of pancreatic atrophy induced by Immune-Checkpoint inhibitors: a case-control study. Cancer Immunol Res 2018;6:1453–8. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0659 [] [[PubMed][Google Scholar]



