c-Myc suppression of DNA double-strand break repair.
Journal: 2013/July - Neoplasia
ISSN: 1476-5586
PUBMED: 23308051
Abstract:
c-Myc is a transcriptional factor that functions as a central regulator of cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis. Overexpression of c-Myc also enhances DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), genetic instability, and tumorigenesis. However, the mechanism(s) involved remains elusive. Here, we discovered that γ-ray ionizing radiation-induced DSBs promote c-Myc to form foci and to co-localize with γ-H2AX. Conditional expression of c-Myc in HO15.19 c-Myc null cells using the Tet-Off/Tet-On inducible system results in down-regulation of Ku DNA binding and suppressed activities of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and DNA end-joining, leading to inhibition of DSB repair and enhanced chromosomal and chromatid breaks. Expression of c-Myc reduces both signal and coding joins with decreased fidelity during V(D)J recombination. Mechanistically, c-Myc directly interacts with Ku70 protein through its Myc box II (MBII) domain. Removal of the MBII domain from c-Myc abrogates its inhibitory effects on Ku DNA binding, DNA-PKcs, and DNA end-joining activities, which results in loss of c-Myc's ability to block DSB repair and V(D)J recombination. Interestingly, c-Myc directly disrupts the Ku/DNA-PKcs complex in vitro and in vivo. Thus, c-Myc suppression of DSB repair and V(D)J recombination may occur through inhibition of the nonhomologous end-joining pathway, which provides insight into the mechanism of c-Myc in the development of tumors through promotion of genomic instability.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(30)
References
(61)
Conditions
(1)
Chemicals
(7)
Genes
(1)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(6)
Affiliates
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Neoplasia 14(12): 1190-1202

c-Myc Suppression of DNA Double-strand Break Repair<sup><a href="#FN1" rid="FN1" class=" fn">1</a>,</sup><sup><a href="#FN2" rid="FN2" class=" fn">2</a></sup>

Supplementary Figures and Tables:
Click here to view.(1.6M, pdf)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
Address all correspondence to: Xingming Deng, MD, PhD, Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail: ude.yrome@4gnedx
Address all correspondence to: Xingming Deng, MD, PhD, Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail: ude.yrome@4gnedx
Received 2012 Aug 1; Revised 2012 Oct 13; Accepted 2012 Oct 16.

Abstract

c-Myc is a transcriptional factor that functions as a central regulator of cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis. Overexpression of c-Myc also enhances DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), genetic instability, and tumorigenesis. However, the mechanism(s) involved remains elusive. Here, we discovered that γ-ray ionizing radiation-induced DSBs promote c-Myc to form foci and to co-localize with γ-H2AX. Conditional expression of c-Myc in HO15.19 c-Myc null cells using the Tet-Off/Tet-On inducible system results in down-regulation of Ku DNA binding and suppressed activities of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and DNA end-joining, leading to inhibition of DSB repair and enhanced chromosomal and chromatid breaks. Expression of c-Myc reduces both signal and coding joins with decreased fidelity during V(D)J recombination. Mechanistically, c-Myc directly interacts with Ku70 protein through its Myc box II (MBII) domain. Removal of the MBII domain from c-Myc abrogates its inhibitory effects on Ku DNA binding, DNA-PKcs, and DNA end-joining activities, which results in loss of c-Myc's ability to block DSB repair and V(D)J recombination. Interestingly, c-Myc directly disrupts the Ku/DNA-PKcs complex in vitro and in vivo. Thus, c-Myc suppression of DSB repair and V(D)J recombination may occur through inhibition of the nonhomologous end-joining pathway, which provides insight into the mechanism of c-Myc in the development of tumors through promotion of genomic instability.

Abstract

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Frederick W. Alt (Harvard Medical School) for kindly providing the pJH200, pJH290, RAG1, and RAG2 constructs, Shigemi Matsuyama (Case Western Reserve University) for Flag-tagged Ku70 mutants, and John M. Sedivy (Brown University) for HO15.19 c-Myc null cells. We also thank Anthea Hammond for editing the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

HRhomologous recombination
NHEJnonhomologous end-joining
DSBDNA double-strand break
PFGEpulsed-field gel electrophoresis
siRNAsmall interfering RNA
RNAiRNA interference
DOXdoxycycline
DNA-PKcsDNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit
Abbreviations

Footnotes

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health grants R01CA112183 and R01CA136534, by Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute Clinical Innovator Awards, and by National Aeronautics and Space Administration grant NNX12AC30G. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article refers to supplementary materials, which are designated by Figures W1 to W5 and are available online at www.neoplasia.com.

Footnotes

Supplemental References

1. Deng X, Gao F, Flagg T, Anderson J, May WS. Bcl2's flexible loop domain regulates p53 binding and survival. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:4421–4434.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Shin KH, Kang MK, Dicterow E, Kameta A, Baluda MA, Park NH. Introduction of human telomerase reverse transcriptase to normal human fibroblasts enhances DNA repair capacity. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2551–2560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Wu X, Lieber MR. Protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction regions within the DNA end-binding protein Ku70-Ku86. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:5186–5193.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Supplemental References

References

  • 1. Kinner A, Wu W, Staudt C, Iliakis Gγ-H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks in the context of chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5678–5694.[Google Scholar]
  • 2. Richardson C, Jasin MFrequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature. 2000;405:697–700.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rothkamm K, Kuhne M, Jeggo PA, Lobrich MRadiation-induced genomic rearrangements formed by nonhomologous end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3886–3893.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bunting SF, Callen E, Wong N, Chen HT, Polato F, Gunn A, Bothmer A, Feldhahn N, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Cao L, et al 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell. 2010;141:243–254.[Google Scholar]
  • 5. Celeste A, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Kruhlak MJ, Pilch DR, Staudt DW, Lee A, Bonner RF, Bonner WM, Nussenzweig AHistone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:675–679.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fillingham J, Keogh MC, Krogan NJγH2AX and its role in DNA double-strand break repair. Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84:568–577.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WMMegabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:905–916.[Google Scholar]
  • 8. Falck J, Coates J, Jackson SPConserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature. 2005;434:605–611.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stiff T, O'Driscoll M, Rief N, Iwabuchi K, Lobrich M, Jeggo PAATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2390–2396.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Buck D, Malivert L, de Chasseval R, Barraud A, Fondaneche MC, Sanal O, Plebani A, Stephan JL, Hufnagel M, le Deist F, et al Cernunnos, a novel nonhomologous end-joining factor, is mutated in human immunodeficiency with microcephaly. Cell. 2006;124:287–299.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gostissa M, Alt FW, Chiarle Rechanisms that promote and suppress chromosomal translocations in lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:319–350.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fugmann SD, Lee AI, Shockett PE, Villey IJ, Schatz DGThe RAG proteins and V(D)J recombination: complexes, ends, and transposition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:495–527.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. Blunt T, Finnie NJ, Taccioli GE, Smith GC, Demengeot J, Gottlieb TM, Mizuta R, Varghese AJ, Alt FW, Jeggo PA, et al Defective DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is linked to V(D)J recombination and DNA repair defects associated with the murine scid mutation. Cell. 1995;80:813–823.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rooney S, Sekiguchi J, Zhu C, Cheng HL, Manis J, Whitlow S, DeVido J, Foy D, Chaudhuri J, Lombard D, et al Leaky Scid phenotype associated with defective V(D)J coding end processing in Artemis-deficient mice. Mol Cell. 2002;10:1379–1390.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pelengaris S, Khan M, Evan GISuppression of Myc-induced apoptosis in β cells exposes multiple oncogenic properties of Myc and triggers carcinogenic progression. Cell. 2002;109:321–334.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. Klapproth K, Wirth TAdvances in the understanding of MYC-induced lymphomagenesis. Br J Haematol. 2010;149:484–497.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. Blackwood EM, Eisenman RNMax: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science. 1991;251:1211–1217.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. Felsher DW, Bishop JMTransient excess of MYC activity can elicit genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3940–3944.[Google Scholar]
  • 19. Adams JM, Harris AW, Pinkert CA, Corcoran LM, Alexander WS, Cory S, Palmiter RD, Brinster RLThe c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice. Nature. 1985;318:533–538.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. Potter M, Wiener FPlasmacytomagenesis in mice: model of neoplastic development dependent upon chromosomal translocations. Carcinogenesis. 1992;13:1681–1697.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. Felsher DW, Bishop JMReversible tumorigenesis by MYC in hematopoietic lineages. Mol Cell. 1999;4:199–207.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hironaka K, Factor VM, Calvisi DF, Conner EA, Thorgeirsson SSDysregulation of DNA repair pathways in a transforming growth factor alpha/c-myc transgenic mouse model of accelerated hepatocarcinogenesis. Lab Invest. 2003;83:643–654.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Karlsson A, Deb-Basu D, Cherry A, Turner S, Ford J, Felsher DWDefective double-strand DNA break repair and chromosomal translocations by MYC overexpression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9974–9979.[Google Scholar]
  • 24. Louis SF, Vermolen BJ, Garini Y, Young IT, Guffei A, Lichtensztejn Z, Kuttler F, Chuang TC, Moshir S, Mougey V, et al c-Myc induces chromosomal rearrangements through telomere and chromosome remodeling in the interphase nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9613–9618.[Google Scholar]
  • 25. Vafa O, Wade M, Kern S, Beeche M, Pandita TK, Hampton GM, Wahl GMc-Myc can induce DNA damage, increase reactive oxygen species, and mitigate p53 function: a mechanism for oncogene-induced genetic instability. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1031–1044.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ray S, Atkuri KR, Deb-Basu D, Adler AS, Chang HY, Herzenberg LA, Felsher DWMYC can induce DNA breaks in vivo and in vitro independent of reactive oxygen species. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6598–6605.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. Koch HB, Zhang R, Verdoodt B, Bailey A, Zhang CD, Yates JR, III, Menssen A, Hermeking HLarge-scale identification of c-MYC-associated proteins using a combined TAP/MudPIT approach. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:205–217.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mateyak MK, Obaya AJ, Adachi S, Sedivy JMPhenotypes of c-Myc-deficient rat fibroblasts isolated by targeted homologous recombination. Cell Growth Differ. 1997;8:1039–1048.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ager DD, Dewey WC, Gardiner K, Harvey W, Johnson RT, Waldren CAMeasurement of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Radiat Res. 1990;122:181–187.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zha S, Alt FW, Cheng HL, Brush JW, Li GDefective DNA repair and increased genomic instability in Cernunnos-XLF-deficient murine ES cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:4518–4523.[Google Scholar]
  • 31. Gu Y, Jin S, Gao Y, Weaver DT, Alt FWKu70-deficient embryonic stem cells have increased ionizing radiosensitivity, defective DNA end-binding activity, and inability to support V(D)J recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:8076–8081.[Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wang Q, Gao F, May WS, Zhang Y, Flagg T, Deng XBcl2 negatively regulates DNA double-strand-break repair through a nonhomologous end-joining pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;29:488–498.[Google Scholar]
  • 33. Guffei A, Lichtensztejn Z, Goncalves Dos Santos Silva A, Louis SF, Caporali A, Mai Sc-Myc-dependent formation of Robertsonian translocation chromosomes in mouse cells. Neoplasia. 2007;9:578–588.[Google Scholar]
  • 34. Chowdhury D, Keogh MC, Ishii H, Peterson CL, Buratowski S, Lieberman Jγ-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell. 2005;20:801–809.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 35. Modesti M, Kanaar RDNA repair: spot(light)s on chromatin. Curr Biol. 2001;11:R229–R232.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hefferin ML, Tomkinson AEMechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005;4:639–648.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pastwa E, Blasiak JNon-homologous DNA end joining. Acta Biochim Pol. 2003;50:891–908.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 38. Burma S, Chen BP, Chen DJRole of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in maintaining genomic integrity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006;5:1042–1048.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 39. Critchlow SE, Jackson SPDNA end-joining: from yeast to man. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:394–398.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pastink A, Eeken JC, Lohman PHGenomic integrity and the repair of double-strand DNA breaks. Mutat Res. 2001;480–481:37–50.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 41. Pierce AJ, Stark JM, Araujo FD, Moynahan ME, Berwick M, Jasin MDouble-strand breaks and tumorigenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:S52–S59.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ricke RM, Bielinsky AKMcm10 regulates the stability and chromatin association of DNA polymerase-α Mol Cell. 2004;16:173–185.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 43. Pelengaris S, Khan M, Evan Gc-MYC: more than just a matter of life and death. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:764–776.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 44. Vervoorts J, Lüscher-Firzlaff J, Luscher BThe ins and outs of MYC regulation by posttranslational mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:34725–34729.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 45. Luoto KR, Meng AX, Wasylishen AR, Zhao H, Coackley CL, Penn LZ, Bristow RGTumor cell kill by c-MYC depletion: role of MYC-regulated genes that control DNA double-strand break repair. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8748–8759.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 46. Yaneva M, Kowalewski T, Lieber MRInteraction of DNA-dependent protein kinase with DNA and with Ku: biochemical and atomic-force microscopy studies. EMBO J. 1997;16:5098–5112.[Google Scholar]
  • 47. Yarnell Schultz H, Landree MA, Qiu JX, Kale SB, Roth DBJoining-deficient RAG1 mutants block V(D)J recombination in vivo and hairpin opening in vitro. Mol Cell. 2001;7:65–75.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 48. Pusapati RV, Rounbehler RJ, Hong S, Powers JT, Yan M, Kiguchi K, McArthur MJ, Wong PK, Johnson DGATM promotes apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenesis in response to Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:1446–1451.[Google Scholar]
  • 49. Li Q, Dang CVc-Myc overexpression uncouples DNA replication from mitosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:5339–5351.[Google Scholar]
  • 50. Mai S, Hanley-Hyde J, Fluri Mc-Myc overexpression associated DHFR gene amplification in hamster, rat, mouse and human cell lines. Oncogene. 1996;12:277–288.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 51. El-Kady A, Sun Y, Li YX, Liao DJCyclin D1 inhibits whereas c-Myc enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in mouse pancreatic cancer cells via regulation of several members of the NF-κB and Bcl-2 families. J Carcinog. 2011;10:24.[Google Scholar]
  • 52. von Bueren AO, Oehler C, Shalaby T, von Hoff K, Pruschy M, Seifert B, Gerber NU, Warmuth-Metz M, Stearns D, Eberhart CG, et al c-MYC expression sensitizes medulloblastoma cells to radio- and chemotherapy and has no impact on response in medulloblastoma patients. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:74.[Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dominguez-Sola D, Ying CY, Grandori C, Ruggiero L, Chen B, Li M, Galloway DA, Gu W, Gautier J, Dalla-Favera RNon-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc. Nature. 2007;448:445–451.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 54. Cole MD, Cowling VHTranscription-independent functions of MYC: regulation of translation and DNA replication. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:810–815.[Google Scholar]
  • 55. Mu ZM, Yin XY, Prochownik EVPag, a putative tumor suppressor, interacts with the Myc Box II domain of c-Myc and selectively alters its biological function and target gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:43175–43184.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bassing CH, Swat W, Alt FWThe mechanism and regulation of chromosomal V(D)J recombination. Cell. 2002;109:S45–S55.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 57. Johnson K, Chaumeil J, Skok JAEpigenetic regulation of V(D)J recombination. Essays Biochem. 2010;48:221–243.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 58. Balajee AS, Geard CRReplication protein A and γ-H2AX foci assembly is triggered by cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Exp Cell Res. 2004;300:320–334.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 59. Deng X, Gao F, Flagg T, Anderson J, May WSBcl2's flexible loop domain regulates p53 binding and survival. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:4421–4434.[Google Scholar]
  • 60. Shin KH, Kang MK, Dicterow E, Kameta A, Baluda MA, Park NHIntroduction of human telomerase reverse transcriptase to normal human fibroblasts enhances DNA repair capacity. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2551–2560.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wu X, Lieber MRProtein-protein and protein-DNA interaction regions within the DNA end-binding protein Ku70-Ku86. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:5186–5193.[Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.