Abstract:

1. Visual transduction in macaque cones was studied by measuring the membrane current of single outer segments projecting from small pieces of retina. 2. The response to a brief flash of light was diphasic and resembled the output of a bandpass filter with a peak frequency near 5 Hz. After the initial reduction in dark current there was a rebound increase which resulted from an increase in the number of open light-sensitive channels. The response to a step of light consisted of a prominent initial peak followed by a steady phase of smaller amplitude. 3. Responses to dim light were linear and time-invariant, suggesting that responses to single photons were linearly additive. From the flash sensitivity and the effective collecting area the peak amplitude of the single photon response was estimated as about 30 fA. 4. With flashes of increasing strength the photocurrent amplitude usually saturated along a curve that was gentler than an exponential but steeper than a Michaelis relation. The response reached the half-saturating amplitude at roughly 650 photoisomerizations. 5. The response-intensity relation was flatter in the steady state than shortly after a light step was turned on, indicating that bright light desensitized the transduction with a delay. This desensitization was not due to a reduction in pigment content. In the steady state, a background of intensity I lowered the sensitivity to a weak incremental test flash by a factor 1/(1 + I/IO), where IO was about 2.6 x 10(4) photoisomerizations s-1, or about 3.3 log trolands for the red- and green-sensitive cones. 6. Bleaching exposures produced permanent reductions in flash sensitivity but had little effect on the kinetics or saturating amplitude of subsequent flash responses. The sensitivity reductions were consistent with the expected reductions in visual pigment content and gave photosensitivities of about 8 x 10(-9) microns2 (free solution value) for the red- and green-sensitive pigments. During a steady bleaching exposure the final exponential decline of the photocurrent had a rate constant given by the product of the light intensity and the photosensitivity. 7. In some cells it was possible to measure a light-induced increase in current noise. The power spectrum of the noise resembled the spectrum of the dim flash response and the magnitude of the noise was consistent with a single photon response roughly 20 fA in size. 8. The membrane current recorded in darkness was noisy, with a variance near 0.12 pA2 in the band 0-20 Hz.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Open in

PUBMED | PMC | Google Scholar | Wikipedia

Relations:

Content

Citations

(121)

References

(34)

Chemicals

(1)

Organisms

(2)

Processes

(1)

Anatomy

(1)

Visual transduction in cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.

Abstract

1. Visual transduction in macaque cones was studied by measuring the membrane current of single outer segments projecting from small pieces of retina. 2. The response to a brief flash of light was diphasic and resembled the output of a bandpass filter with a peak frequency near 5 Hz. After the initial reduction in dark current there was a rebound increase which resulted from an increase in the number of open light-sensitive channels. The response to a step of light consisted of a prominent initial peak followed by a steady phase of smaller amplitude. 3. Responses to dim light were linear and time-invariant, suggesting that responses to single photons were linearly additive. From the flash sensitivity and the effective collecting area the peak amplitude of the single photon response was estimated as about 30 fA. 4. With flashes of increasing strength the photocurrent amplitude usually saturated along a curve that was gentler than an exponential but steeper than a Michaelis relation. The response reached the half-saturating amplitude at roughly 650 photoisomerizations. 5. The response-intensity relation was flatter in the steady state than shortly after a light step was turned on, indicating that bright light desensitized the transduction with a delay. This desensitization was not due to a reduction in pigment content. In the steady state, a background of intensity I lowered the sensitivity to a weak incremental test flash by a factor 1/(1 + I/IO), where IO was about 2.6 x 10(4) photoisomerizations s-1, or about 3.3 log trolands for the red- and green-sensitive cones. 6. Bleaching exposures produced permanent reductions in flash sensitivity but had little effect on the kinetics or saturating amplitude of subsequent flash responses. The sensitivity reductions were consistent with the expected reductions in visual pigment content and gave photosensitivities of about 8 x 10(-9) microns2 (free solution value) for the red- and green-sensitive pigments. During a steady bleaching exposure the final exponential decline of the photocurrent had a rate constant given by the product of the light intensity and the photosensitivity. 7. In some cells it was possible to measure a light-induced increase in current noise. The power spectrum of the noise resembled the spectrum of the dim flash response and the magnitude of the noise was consistent with a single photon response roughly 20 fA in size. 8. The membrane current recorded in darkness was noisy, with a variance near 0.12 pA2 in the band 0-20 Hz.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (3.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Baron WS, Boynton RM. Response of primate cones to sinusoidally flickering homochromatic stimuli. J Physiol. 1975 Mar;246(2):311–331.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL. Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(1):163–198.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL. Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):729–758.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL, Lamb TD. The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):685–727.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baylor DA, Lamb TD, Yau KW. Responses of retinal rods to single photons. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:613–634.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baylor DA, Nunn BJ, Schnapf JL. The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol. 1984 Dec;357:575–607.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baylor DA, Nunn BJ, Schnapf JL. Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol. 1987 Sep;390:145–160.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bodoia RD, Detwiler PB. Patch-clamp recordings of the light-sensitive dark noise in retinal rods from the lizard and frog. J Physiol. 1985 Oct;367:183–216.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Boynton RM, Whitten DN. Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials. Science. 1970 Dec 25;170(3965):1423–1426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Brindley GS, Du Croz JJ, Rushton WA. The flicker fusion frequency of the blue-sensitive mechanism of colour vision. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(2):497–500.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cervetto L, Lagnado L, Perry RJ, Robinson DW, McNaughton PA. Extrusion of calcium from rod outer segments is driven by both sodium and potassium gradients. Nature. 1989 Feb 23;337(6209):740–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Geisler WS. Adaptation, afterimages and cone saturation. Vision Res. 1978;18(3):279–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Geisler WS. Effects of bleaching and backgrounds on the flash response of the cone system. J Physiol. 1981 Mar;312:413–434.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Green DG. Sinusoidal flicker characteristics of the color-sensitive mechanisms of the eye. Vision Res. 1969 May;9(5):591–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hodgkin AL, Nunn BJ. Control of light-sensitive current in salamander rods. J Physiol. 1988 Sep;403:439–471.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hodgkin AL, Obryan PM. Internal recording of the early receptor potential in turtle cones. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;267(3):737–766.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hood DC, Ilves T, Maurer E, Wandell B, Buckingham E. Human cone saturation as a function of ambient intensity: a test of models of shifts in the dynamic range. Vision Res. 1978;18(8):983–993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Katz B, Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Koch KW, Stryer L. Highly cooperative feedback control of retinal rod guanylate cyclase by calcium ions. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):64–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kraft TW. Photocurrents of cone photoreceptors of the golden-mantled ground squirrel. J Physiol. 1988 Oct;404:199–213.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lamb TD. Spontaneous quantal events induced in toad rods by pigment bleaching. Nature. 1980 Sep 25;287(5780):349–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lamb TD, McNaughton PA, Yau KW. Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1981;319:463–496.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lamb TD, Simon EJ. Analysis of electrical noise in turtle cones. J Physiol. 1977 Nov;272(2):435–468.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Matthews HR, Murphy RL, Fain GL, Lamb TD. Photoreceptor light adaptation is mediated by cytoplasmic calcium concentration. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):67–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nakatani K, Yau KW. Calcium and light adaptation in retinal rods and cones. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):69–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Piccolino M, Gerschenfeld HM. Activation of a regenerative calcium conductance in turtle cones by peripheral stimulation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 May 16;201(1144):309–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rushton WA, Henry GH. Bleaching and regeneration of cone pigments in man. Vision Res. 1968 Jun;8(6):617–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schnapf JL, Kraft TW, Baylor DA. Spectral sensitivity of human cone photoreceptors. Nature. 325(6103):439–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schnapf JL, McBurney RN. Light-induced changes in membrane current in cone outer segments of tiger salamander and turtle. Nature. 1980 Sep 18;287(5779):239–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stryer L. Molecular basis of visual excitation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53(Pt 1):283–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Valeton JM, van Norren D. Fractional recording and component analysis of primate LERG: separation of photoreceptor and other retinal potentials. Vision Res. 1982;22(3):381–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Valeton JM, van Norren D. Light adaptation of primate cones: an analysis based on extracellular data. Vision Res. 1983;23(12):1539–1547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Whitten DN, Brown KT. The time courses of late receptor potentials from monkey cones and rods. Vision Res. 1973 Jan;13(1):107–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zimmerman AL, Baylor DA. Cyclic GMP-sensitive conductance of retinal rods consists of aqueous pores. Nature. 1986 May 1;321(6065):70–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Department of Neurobiology, Stanford Medical School, CA 94305.

Copyright notice

Abstract

1. Visual transduction in macaque cones was studied by measuring the membrane current of single outer segments projecting from small pieces of retina. 2. The response to a brief flash of light was diphasic and resembled the output of a bandpass filter with a peak frequency near 5 Hz. After the initial reduction in dark current there was a rebound increase which resulted from an increase in the number of open light-sensitive channels. The response to a step of light consisted of a prominent initial peak followed by a steady phase of smaller amplitude. 3. Responses to dim light were linear and time-invariant, suggesting that responses to single photons were linearly additive. From the flash sensitivity and the effective collecting area the peak amplitude of the single photon response was estimated as about 30 fA. 4. With flashes of increasing strength the photocurrent amplitude usually saturated along a curve that was gentler than an exponential but steeper than a Michaelis relation. The response reached the half-saturating amplitude at roughly 650 photoisomerizations. 5. The response-intensity relation was flatter in the steady state than shortly after a light step was turned on, indicating that bright light desensitized the transduction with a delay. This desensitization was not due to a reduction in pigment content. In the steady state, a background of intensity I lowered the sensitivity to a weak incremental test flash by a factor 1/(1 + I/IO), where IO was about 2.6 x 10(4) photoisomerizations s-1, or about 3.3 log trolands for the red- and green-sensitive cones. 6. Bleaching exposures produced permanent reductions in flash sensitivity but had little effect on the kinetics or saturating amplitude of subsequent flash responses. The sensitivity reductions were consistent with the expected reductions in visual pigment content and gave photosensitivities of about 8 x 10(-9) microns2 (free solution value) for the red- and green-sensitive pigments. During a steady bleaching exposure the final exponential decline of the photocurrent had a rate constant given by the product of the light intensity and the photosensitivity. 7. In some cells it was possible to measure a light-induced increase in current noise. The power spectrum of the noise resembled the spectrum of the dim flash response and the magnitude of the noise was consistent with a single photon response roughly 20 fA in size. 8. The membrane current recorded in darkness was noisy, with a variance near 0.12 pA2 in the band 0-20 Hz.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.

Learn More