Tuberculous meningitis in BCG vaccinated and unvaccinated children
Abstract
Background: A modified clinical presentation of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in children vaccinated with BCG has been described in the literature. However, most reports are old and not based on actual comparisons and tests of significance. Also, neuroimaging features were not compared. With large scale BCG coverage, it becomes pertinent to describe the "modified" presentation and identify any significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children with TBM.
Methods: A total of 150 consecutive hospitalised children (96 unvaccinated, 54 vaccinated) were enrolled. They all satisfied predefined criteria for diagnosis of TBM. Clinical and radiological features of children with/without a BCG scar were compared.
Results: Univariate analysis revealed that the vaccinated children with TBM had significantly lower rates of altered sensorium (68.5% v 85.4% unvaccinated; OR 2.2 (1.1 to 6.2); p = 0.019) and focal neurological deficits (20.3% v 39.5% unvaccinated; OR 2.6 (1.1 to 6.0); p = 0.016), and higher mean (SD) Glasgow Coma Scale score (10.2 (3.4) v 8.76 (2.7) unvaccinated; p = 0.010) and cerebrospinal fluid cell count (210.9 v 140.9 unvaccinated; p = 0.019). No significant radiological differences were seen. Short term outcome was significantly better in the vaccinated group with 70% of the total severe sequelae and 75% of the total deaths occurring in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.018).
Conclusion: Children with TBM who have been vaccinated with BCG appear to maintain better mentation and have a superior outcome. This may in part be explained by the better immune response to infection, as reflected in the higher CSF cell counts in this group in the present study.
Full Text
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Rao SP, Bharambe MS. Vaccine preventable diseases in eastern Maharashtra--a hospital based analysis. Indian Pediatr. 1991 Jun;28(6):629–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Somu N, Vijayasekaran D, Ravikumar T, Balachandran A, Subramanyam L, Chandrabhushanam A. Tuberculous disease in a pediatric referral centre: 16 years experience. Indian Pediatr. 1994 Oct;31(10):1245–1249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raju VB, Narmada R. Evaluation of B.C.G. vaccination in children below six years. A pilot study. Indian Pediatr. 1970 Oct;7(10):532–541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deshpande NS, Deshpande SV. Tuberculosis in BCG vaccinated children. Indian Pediatr. 1995 Jun;32(6):676–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comstock GW, Webster RG. Tuberculosis studies in Muscogee County, Georgia. VII. A twenty-year evaluation of BCG vaccination in a school population. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 Dec;100(6):839–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comstock GW, Livesay VT, Woolpert SF. Evaluation of BCG vaccination among Puerto Rican children. Am J Public Health. 1974 Mar;64(3):283–291.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart PD, Sutherland I. BCG and vole bacillus vaccines in the prevention of tuberculosis in adolescence and early adult life. Br Med J. 1977 Jul 30;2(6082):293–295.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fifteen year follow up of trial of BCG vaccines in south India for tuberculosis prevention. Tuberculosis Research Centre (ICMR), Chennai. Indian J Med Res. 1999 Aug;110:56–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandra P. Tuberculosis in BCG vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Indian Pediatr. 1975 May;12(5):424–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Udani PM. Protective value of BCG vaccine. Indian Pediatr. 1982 Sep;19(9):739–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa M da C, Mota EL, Pinto LL. Efeito protetor do BCG intradérmico na meningite tuberculosa. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1991 Jan;110(1):26–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parthasarathy A, Narmada R, Krishnamoorthy KA. Tuberculosis in BCG vaccinated children. Indian Pediatr. 1982 Sep;19(9):785–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhandari B, Mandowara SL. A study of tuberculosis in BCG vaccinated children. Indian Pediatr. 1982 Oct;19(10):865–868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar Pankaj, Kumar Rashmi, Srivastava KL, Kumar Mala. Protective role of BCG vaccination against tuberculous meningitis in Indian children: a reappraisal. Natl Med J India. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PAUL FM. Tuberculosis in B.C.G. vaccinated children in Singapore. Arch Dis Child. 1961 Oct;36:530–536.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tandon PN, Singh B, Mohapatra LN, Kumar M, Das S. Experimental tuberculosis of the central nervous system. Neurol India. 1970 Jun;18(2):81–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weigel B. Veränderungen der Tuberkulose des Zentralnervensystems seit Einführung der BCG-Schutzimpfung und der tuberkulostatischen Therapie. Zentralbl Allg Pathol. 1976;120(1):21–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Güler N, Ones U, Somer A, Salman N, Yalçin I. The effect of prior BCG vaccination on the clinical and radiographic presentation of tuberculosis meningitis in children in Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998 Nov;2(11):885–890. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN, Upadhyay SK, Mittal R, Prakash R, Rai S. Physical and sexual growth pattern of affluent Indian children from 5 to 18 years of age. Indian Pediatr. 1992 Oct;29(10):1203–1282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phelps PD, Lloyd GA. High resolution air CT meatography: the demonstration of normal and abnormal structures in the cerebello-pontine cistern and internal auditory meatus. Br J Radiol. 1982 Jan;55(649):19–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Abstract
Background: A modified clinical presentation of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in children vaccinated with BCG has been described in the literature. However, most reports are old and not based on actual comparisons and tests of significance. Also, neuroimaging features were not compared. With large scale BCG coverage, it becomes pertinent to describe the "modified" presentation and identify any significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children with TBM.
Methods: A total of 150 consecutive hospitalised children (96 unvaccinated, 54 vaccinated) were enrolled. They all satisfied predefined criteria for diagnosis of TBM. Clinical and radiological features of children with/without a BCG scar were compared.
Results: Univariate analysis revealed that the vaccinated children with TBM had significantly lower rates of altered sensorium (68.5% v 85.4% unvaccinated; OR 2.2 (1.1 to 6.2); p = 0.019) and focal neurological deficits (20.3% v 39.5% unvaccinated; OR 2.6 (1.1 to 6.0); p = 0.016), and higher mean (SD) Glasgow Coma Scale score (10.2 (3.4) v 8.76 (2.7) unvaccinated; p = 0.010) and cerebrospinal fluid cell count (210.9 v 140.9 unvaccinated; p = 0.019). No significant radiological differences were seen. Short term outcome was significantly better in the vaccinated group with 70% of the total severe sequelae and 75% of the total deaths occurring in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.018).
Conclusion: Children with TBM who have been vaccinated with BCG appear to maintain better mentation and have a superior outcome. This may in part be explained by the better immune response to infection, as reflected in the higher CSF cell counts in this group in the present study.