The molecular basis of CO2 reception in Drosophila.
Journal: 2007/June - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 0027-8424
Abstract:
CO(2) elicits a response from many insects, including mosquito vectors of diseases such as malaria and yellow fever, but the molecular basis of CO(2) detection is unknown in insects or other higher eukaryotes. Here we show that Gr21a and Gr63a, members of a large family of Drosophila seven-transmembrane-domain chemoreceptor genes, are coexpressed in chemosensory neurons of both the larva and the adult. The two genes confer CO(2) response when coexpressed in an in vivo expression system, the "empty neuron system." The response is highly specific for CO(2) and dependent on CO(2) concentration. The response shows an equivalent dependence on the dose of Gr21a and Gr63a. None of 39 other chemosensory receptors confers a comparable response to CO(2). The identification of these receptors may now allow the identification of agents that block or activate them. Such agents could affect the responses of insect pests to the humans they seek.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(166)
References
(35)
Chemicals
(2)
Genes
(4)
Organisms
(3)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(9): 3574-3578

The molecular basis of CO<sub>2</sub> reception in <em>Drosophila</em>

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8103
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ude.elay@noslrac.nhoj
Communicated by Sydney Kustu, University of California, Berkeley, CA, January 4, 2007.

Author contributions: J.Y.K., A.D., and L.A.W. designed research; J.Y.K., A.D., and L.A.W. performed research; J.Y.K., A.D., L.A.W., and J.R.C. analyzed data; and J.Y.K., A.D., L.A.W., and J.R.C. wrote the paper.

Received 2006 Dec 15

Abstract

CO2 elicits a response from many insects, including mosquito vectors of diseases such as malaria and yellow fever, but the molecular basis of CO2 detection is unknown in insects or other higher eukaryotes. Here we show that Gr21a and Gr63a, members of a large family of Drosophila seven-transmembrane-domain chemoreceptor genes, are coexpressed in chemosensory neurons of both the larva and the adult. The two genes confer CO2 response when coexpressed in an in vivo expression system, the “empty neuron system.” The response is highly specific for CO2 and dependent on CO2 concentration. The response shows an equivalent dependence on the dose of Gr21a and Gr63a. None of 39 other chemosensory receptors confers a comparable response to CO2. The identification of these receptors may now allow the identification of agents that block or activate them. Such agents could affect the responses of insect pests to the humans they seek.

Keywords: chemoreceptors, insect, Gr genes
Abstract

Ever since the classic experiments of Joseph Priestley in the 18th century, the role of CO2 in the natural world has been a subject of great interest. However, despite its ubiquity and central role in the metabolism of living organisms, some of the most fundamental questions about how CO2 interacts with biological systems remain unanswered. One such question is how CO2 is detected in the animal world.

CO2 elicits behavioral responses in many insects that seek human hosts, including tsetse flies (1), which carry African sleeping sickness; Aedes mosquitoes (2), which carry dengue and yellow fever; and Anopheles mosquitoes (3), which transmit hundreds of millions of cases of malaria each year. CO2 also acts as an attractive cue for many insects that seek plants as food sources and oviposition sites (46). In Drosophila, high concentrations of CO2 evoke an avoidance response (7, 8).

CO2-sensitive neurons have been identified in many insect species (9) and in most cases are dedicated to the detection of CO2. In adult Drosophila, odors are detected by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) that are housed in sensilla on the antenna and the maxillary palp (10). One class of antennal ORNs, the ab1C class, detects CO2 (11). Axons of these CO2-sensitive neurons project to a single glomerulus in the antennal lobe of the brain, the V glomerulus, which has been shown to be responsive to CO2 (8).

Drosophila contains a family of 60 Odor receptor (Or) genes (1214), and a related family of 60 Gustatory receptor (Gr) genes (14, 15), both of which encode seven-transmembrane-domain proteins. In most ORN classes, a single Or gene defines the odorant response profile (1618). Typically, the Or gene is coexpressed with the noncanonical receptor Or83b, an atypical family member that is required for efficient localization of the canonical Or receptor to the dendrites (19). CO2-sensitive neurons are unique in that they do not express an Or gene (20, 21). Instead, a Gr gene, Gr21a, has been shown to be expressed in this class of neurons (8). Genetic ablation of Gr21a-positive neurons results in defects in the behavioral avoidance response to CO2 in adults (8) as well as in larvae (7). However, there has been no evidence that Gr21a acts in CO2 detection.

Here we show that another Gr gene, Gr63a, is coexpressed with Gr21a in larvae as well as in the adult. Coexpression of Gr21a and Gr63a in an in vivo expression system confers a CO2 response. The response depends on the presence of both Gr genes; neither gene alone confers a CO2 response. The response is highly specific for CO2 and depends on the concentration of CO2. Our results suggest that Gr21a and Gr63a form a heterodimeric receptor for the detection of CO2.

Click here to view.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wynand van der Goes van Naters for help with electrophysiology and suggestions and Scott Kreher for sharing unpublished data. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM63364, DC04729, and DC02174.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviation

ORNolfactory receptor neuron.
Abbreviation

Note Added in Proof.

Similar results were obtained in ref. 39.

Note Added in Proof.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0700079104/DC1.

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Vale GA. Bull Ent Res. 1980;70:563–570.[PubMed]
  • 2. Dekker T, Geier M, Carde RT. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:2963–2972.[PubMed]
  • 3. Takken W, Knols BG. Annu Rev Entomol. 1999;44:131–157.[PubMed]
  • 4. Stange G. Naturwissenschaften. 1999;86:190–192.[PubMed]
  • 5. Guerenstein PG, Yepez EA, Van Haren J, Williams DG, Hildebrand JG. Naturwissenschaften. 2004;91:329–333.[PubMed]
  • 6. Thom C, Guerenstein PG, Mechaber WL, Hildebrand JG. J Chem Ecol. 2004;30:1285–1288.[PubMed]
  • 7. Faucher C, Forstreuter M, Hilker M, de Bruyne M. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2739–2748.[PubMed]
  • 8. Suh GS, Wong AM, Hergarden AC, Wang JW, Simon AF, Benzer S, Axel R, Anderson DJ. Nature. 2004;431:854–859.[PubMed]
  • 9. Stange G, Stowe S. Microsc Res Tech. 1999;47:416–427.[PubMed]
  • 10. Hallem EA, Dahanukar A, Carlson JR. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:113–135.[PubMed]
  • 11. De Bruyne M, Foster K, Carlson JR. Neuron. 2001;30:537–552.[PubMed]
  • 12. Clyne PJ, Warr CG, Freeman MR, Lessing D, Kim J, Carlson JR. Neuron. 1999;22:327–338.[PubMed]
  • 13. Vosshall LB, Amrein H, Morozov PS, Rzhetsky A, Axel R. Cell. 1999;96:725–736.[PubMed]
  • 14. Robertson HM, Warr CG, Carlson JR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:14537–14542.
  • 15. Clyne PJ, Warr CG, Carlson JR. Science. 2000;287:1830–1834.[PubMed]
  • 16. Dobritsa AA, van der Goes van Naters W, Warr CG, Steinbrecht RA, Carlson JR. Neuron. 2003;37:827–841.[PubMed]
  • 17. Hallem EA, Ho MG, Carlson JR. Cell. 2004;117:965–979.[PubMed]
  • 18. Goldman AL, Van der Goes van Naters W, Lessing D, Warr CG, Carlson JR. Neuron. 2005;45:661–666.[PubMed]
  • 19. Larsson MC, Domingos AI, Jones WD, Chiappe ME, Amrein H, Vosshall LB. Neuron. 2004;43:703–714.[PubMed]
  • 20. Couto A, Alenius M, Dickson BJ. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1–13.[PubMed]
  • 21. Fishilevich E, Vosshall LB. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1548–1553.[PubMed]
  • 22. Shanbhag S, Muller B, Steinbrecht A. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 1999;28:377–397.[PubMed]
  • 23. Scott K, Brady R, Jr, Cravchik A, Morozov P, Rzhetsky A, Zuker C, Axel R. Cell. 2001;104:661–673.[PubMed]
  • 24. Yao CA, Ignell R, Carlson JR. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8359–8367.
  • 25. Kreher SA, Kwon JY, Carlson JR. Neuron. 2005;46:445–456.[PubMed]
  • 26. Neuhaus EM, Gisselmann G, Zhang W, Dooley R, Stortkuhl K, Hatt H. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:15–17.[PubMed]
  • 27. Benton R, Sachse S, Michnick SW, Vosshall LB. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e20.
  • 28. Wingrove JA, O'Farrell PH. Cell. 1999;98:105–114.
  • 29. Verma A, Hirsch DJ, Glatt CE, Ronnett GV, Snyder SH. Science. 1993;259:381–384.[PubMed]
  • 30. Gray JM, Karow DS, Lu H, Chang AJ, Chang JS, Ellis RE, Marletta MA, Bargmann CI. Nature. 2004;430:317–322.[PubMed]
  • 31. Reinking J, Lam MM, Pardee K, Sampson HM, Liu S, Yang P, Williams S, White W, Lajoie G, Edwards A, Krause HM. Cell. 2005;122:195–207.[PubMed]
  • 32. Soupene E, Lee H, Kustu S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:3926–3931.
  • 33. Soupene E, King N, Feild E, Liu P, Niyogi KK, Huang CH, Kustu S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:7769–7773.
  • 34. Kustu S, Inwood W. Transfus Clin Biol. 2006;13:103–110.[PubMed]
  • 35. Putnam RW, Filosa JA, Ritucci NA. Am J Physiol. 2004;287:C1493–C1526.[PubMed]
  • 36. Hill CA, Fox AN, Pitts RJ, Kent LB, Tan PL, Chrystal MA, Cravchik A, Collins FH, Robertson HM, Zwiebel LJ. Science. 2002;298:176–178.[PubMed]
  • 37. Robertson HM, Wanner KW. Genome Res. 2006;16:1395–1403.
  • 38. Python F, Stocker RF. J Comp Neurol. 2002;445:374–387.[PubMed]
  • 39. Jones WD, Cayirlioglu P, Kadow IG, Vosshall LB. Nature. 2007;445:86–91.[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.