Structural studies of the streptavidin binding loop.
Journal: 1997/August - Protein Science
ISSN: 0961-8368
Abstract:
The streptavidin-biotin complex provides the basis for many important biotechnological applications and is an interesting model system for studying high-affinity protein-ligand interactions. We report here crystallographic studies elucidating the conformation of the flexible binding loop of streptavidin (residues 45 to 52) in the unbound and bound forms. The crystal structures of unbound streptavidin have been determined in two monoclinic crystal forms. The binding loop generally adopts an open conformation in the unbound species. In one subunit of one crystal form, the flexible loop adopts the closed conformation and an analysis of packing interactions suggests that protein-protein contacts stabilize the closed loop conformation. In the other crystal form all loops adopt an open conformation. Co-crystallization of streptavidin and biotin resulted in two additional, different crystal forms, with ligand bound in all four binding sites of the first crystal form and biotin bound in only two subunits in a second. The major change associated with binding of biotin is the closure of the surface loop incorporating residues 45 to 52. Residues 49 to 52 display a 3(10) helical conformation in unbound subunits of our structures as opposed to the disordered loops observed in other structure determinations of streptavidin. In addition, the open conformation is stabilized by a beta-sheet hydrogen bond between residues 45 and 52, which cannot occur in the closed conformation. The 3(10) helix is observed in nearly all unbound subunits of both the co-crystallized and ligand-free structures. An analysis of the temperature factors of the binding loop regions suggests that the mobility of the closed loops in the complexed structures is lower than in the open loops of the ligand-free structures. The two biotin bound subunits in the tetramer found in the MONO-b1 crystal form are those that contribute Trp 120 across their respective binding pockets, suggesting a structural link between these binding sites in the tetramer. However, there are no obvious signatures of binding site communication observed upon ligand binding, such as quaternary structure changes or shifts in the region of Trp 120. These studies demonstrate that while crystallographic packing interactions can stabilize both the open and closed forms of the flexible loop, in their absence the loop is open in the unbound state and closed in the presence of biotin. If present in solution, the helical structure in the open loop conformation could moderate the entropic penalty associated with biotin binding by contributing an order-to-disorder component to the loop closure.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(56)
References
(21)
Drugs
(2)
Chemicals
(3)
Processes
(4)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Protein Sci 6(6): 1157-1166

Structural studies of the streptavidin binding loop.

Abstract

The streptavidin-biotin complex provides the basis for many important biotechnological applications and is an interesting model system for studying high-affinity protein-ligand interactions. We report here crystallographic studies elucidating the conformation of the flexible binding loop of streptavidin (residues 45 to 52) in the unbound and bound forms. The crystal structures of unbound streptavidin have been determined in two monoclinic crystal forms. The binding loop generally adopts an open conformation in the unbound species. In one subunit of one crystal form, the flexible loop adopts the closed conformation and an analysis of packing interactions suggests that protein-protein contacts stabilize the closed loop conformation. In the other crystal form all loops adopt an open conformation. Co-crystallization of streptavidin and biotin resulted in two additional, different crystal forms, with ligand bound in all four binding sites of the first crystal form and biotin bound in only two subunits in a second. The major change associated with binding of biotin is the closure of the surface loop incorporating residues 45 to 52. Residues 49 to 52 display a 3(10) helical conformation in unbound subunits of our structures as opposed to the disordered loops observed in other structure determinations of streptavidin. In addition, the open conformation is stabilized by a beta-sheet hydrogen bond between residues 45 and 52, which cannot occur in the closed conformation. The 3(10) helix is observed in nearly all unbound subunits of both the co-crystallized and ligand-free structures. An analysis of the temperature factors of the binding loop regions suggests that the mobility of the closed loops in the complexed structures is lower than in the open loops of the ligand-free structures. The two biotin bound subunits in the tetramer found in the MONO-b1 crystal form are those that contribute Trp 120 across their respective binding pockets, suggesting a structural link between these binding sites in the tetramer. However, there are no obvious signatures of binding site communication observed upon ligand binding, such as quaternary structure changes or shifts in the region of Trp 120. These studies demonstrate that while crystallographic packing interactions can stabilize both the open and closed forms of the flexible loop, in their absence the loop is open in the unbound state and closed in the presence of biotin. If present in solution, the helical structure in the open loop conformation could moderate the entropic penalty associated with biotin binding by contributing an order-to-disorder component to the loop closure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.0M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Chilkoti A, Tan PH, Stayton PS. Site-directed mutagenesis studies of the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin complex: contributions of tryptophan residues 79, 108, and 120. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1754–1758.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Devlin JJ, Panganiban LC, Devlin PE. Random peptide libraries: a source of specific protein binding molecules. Science. 1990 Jul 27;249(4967):404–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Giebel LB, Cass RT, Milligan DL, Young DC, Arze R, Johnson CR. Screening of cyclic peptide phage libraries identifies ligands that bind streptavidin with high affinities. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 28;34(47):15430–15435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hemming SA, Bochkarev A, Darst SA, Kornberg RD, Ala P, Yang DS, Edwards AM. The mechanism of protein crystal growth from lipid layers. J Mol Biol. 1995 Feb 17;246(2):308–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hendrickson WA, Pähler A, Smith JL, Satow Y, Merritt EA, Phizackerley RP. Crystal structure of core streptavidin determined from multiwavelength anomalous diffraction of synchrotron radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(7):2190–2194.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. PROMOTIF--a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins. Protein Sci. 1996 Feb;5(2):212–220.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones ML, Kurzban GP. Noncooperativity of biotin binding to tetrameric streptavidin. Biochemistry. 1995 Sep 19;34(37):11750–11756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Katz BA. Binding to protein targets of peptidic leads discovered by phage display: crystal structures of streptavidin-bound linear and cyclic peptide ligands containing the HPQ sequence. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 28;34(47):15421–15429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Katz BA, Cass RT, Liu B, Arze R, Collins N. Topochemical catalysis achieved by structure-based ligand design. J Biol Chem. 1995 Dec 29;270(52):31210–31218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kurzban GP, Bayer EA, Wilchek M, Horowitz PM. The quaternary structure of streptavidin in urea. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 5;266(22):14470–14477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moss K. Seeing a bigger role for vision care. Bus Health. 1993 Apr;11(5):82–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Livnah O, Bayer EA, Wilchek M, Sussman JL. Three-dimensional structures of avidin and the avidin-biotin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5076–5080.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moews PC, Kretsinger RH. Refinement of the structure of carp muscle calcium-binding parvalbumin by model building and difference Fourier analysis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Jan 15;91(2):201–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morag E, Bayer EA, Wilchek M. Reversibility of biotin-binding by selective modification of tyrosine in avidin. Biochem J. 1996 May 15;316(Pt 1):193–199.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pugliese L, Coda A, Malcovati M, Bolognesi M. Three-dimensional structure of the tetragonal crystal form of egg-white avidin in its functional complex with biotin at 2.7 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 5;231(3):698–710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sano T, Cantor CR. Cooperative biotin binding by streptavidin. Electrophoretic behavior and subunit association of streptavidin in the presence of 6 M urea. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 25;265(6):3369–3373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt TG, Koepke J, Frank R, Skerra A. Molecular interaction between the Strep-tag affinity peptide and its cognate target, streptavidin. J Mol Biol. 1996 Feb 9;255(5):753–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber PC, Cox MJ, Salemme FR, Ohlendorf DH. Crystallographic data for Streptomyces avidinii streptavidin. J Biol Chem. 1987 Sep 15;262(26):12728–12729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber PC, Ohlendorf DH, Wendoloski JJ, Salemme FR. Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science. 1989 Jan 6;243(4887):85–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber PC, Pantoliano MW, Thompson LD. Crystal structure and ligand-binding studies of a screened peptide complexed with streptavidin. Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 6;31(39):9350–9354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber PC, Pantoliano MW, Salemme FR. Crystallographic and thermodynamic comparison of structurally diverse molecules binding to streptavidin. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1995 Jul 1;51(Pt 4):590–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742, USA.
Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742, USA.

Abstract

The streptavidin-biotin complex provides the basis for many important biotechnological applications and is an interesting model system for studying high-affinity protein-ligand interactions. We report here crystallographic studies elucidating the conformation of the flexible binding loop of streptavidin (residues 45 to 52) in the unbound and bound forms. The crystal structures of unbound streptavidin have been determined in two monoclinic crystal forms. The binding loop generally adopts an open conformation in the unbound species. In one subunit of one crystal form, the flexible loop adopts the closed conformation and an analysis of packing interactions suggests that protein-protein contacts stabilize the closed loop conformation. In the other crystal form all loops adopt an open conformation. Co-crystallization of streptavidin and biotin resulted in two additional, different crystal forms, with ligand bound in all four binding sites of the first crystal form and biotin bound in only two subunits in a second. The major change associated with binding of biotin is the closure of the surface loop incorporating residues 45 to 52. Residues 49 to 52 display a 3(10) helical conformation in unbound subunits of our structures as opposed to the disordered loops observed in other structure determinations of streptavidin. In addition, the open conformation is stabilized by a beta-sheet hydrogen bond between residues 45 and 52, which cannot occur in the closed conformation. The 3(10) helix is observed in nearly all unbound subunits of both the co-crystallized and ligand-free structures. An analysis of the temperature factors of the binding loop regions suggests that the mobility of the closed loops in the complexed structures is lower than in the open loops of the ligand-free structures. The two biotin bound subunits in the tetramer found in the MONO-b1 crystal form are those that contribute Trp 120 across their respective binding pockets, suggesting a structural link between these binding sites in the tetramer. However, there are no obvious signatures of binding site communication observed upon ligand binding, such as quaternary structure changes or shifts in the region of Trp 120. These studies demonstrate that while crystallographic packing interactions can stabilize both the open and closed forms of the flexible loop, in their absence the loop is open in the unbound state and closed in the presence of biotin. If present in solution, the helical structure in the open loop conformation could moderate the entropic penalty associated with biotin binding by contributing an order-to-disorder component to the loop closure.

Abstract
Full Text
Selected References
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.