Structural and biochemical data of Trichoderma harzianum GH1 β-glucosidases.
Journal: 2018/November - Data in Brief
ISSN: 2352-3409
Abstract:
Here the statistics concerning X-ray data processing and structure refinement are given, together with the substrate preference analysis for ThBgl1 and ThBgl2. Finally, the analysis of the influence of temperature and pH on the activities of both enzymes are shown.
Relations:
Content
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Data in Brief. Nov/30/2017; 15: 340-343
Published online Sep/21/2017

Structural and biochemical data of Trichoderma harzianum GH1 β-glucosidases

Abstract

Specifications Table

Table
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaStructural Enzymology
Type of dataTable and Figures
How data was acquiredX-ray diffractometer and plate reader
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsN/A
Experimental featuresX-ray data collected from flash frozen single crystals in a home source using CuKα radiation. Enzyme activity data was measured using the synthetic substrate p-nitrophenyl-glucopyranoside.
Data source locationSão Carlos, SP, Brazil. -22.008911, -47.897772.
Data accessibilityStructural data is public through the protein data bank (PDB), with access codes 5JBK and 5JBO.

Value of the data

  • The data provided in the table shows the quality of the crystal structure used for the analysis of the mechanism of transglycosylation observed in these GH1 β-glucosidases.

  • The substrate preference data provided shows that, although the enzymes are very similar, they have marked differences in substrate preference.

  • The influence of pH and temperature indicate the optimal conditions for catalysis for the enzymes ThBgl1 and ThBgl2.

1Data

Three sets of data are shown. First, the statistics and parameters from the X-ray diffraction data processing and structural refinement are given for the crystal structures of the enzymes ThBgl1 and ThBgl2. Second, the preferences for different natural and synthetic substrates are shown for these enzymes and, finally, the influence of pH and temperature on the enzyme activity is provided.

2Experimental design, materials and methods

The complete description of the methods is found in the associated research article [1]. For the determination of optimum pH and temperatures for enzyme activity, a reaction mixture using the synthetic substrate 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG Fig. 1). Briefly, 50 μL of pNPG (final concentration of 5 mM), 40 μL of 150 mM citrate-phosphate or phosphate buffer at different pHs and 10 μL of enzyme at 0.1 mg/ml were incubated for 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL of Na2CO3 0.5 M and the amount of released products was measured spectrophometrically at 415 nm. For the determination of optimum temperature, the same reactions were incubated in a temperature range spanning 20 to 70 °C in 5 °C steps (Fig. 2). After 10 minutes, the reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL of Na2CO3 1 M and the amount of released products was measured spectrophometrically at 405 nm.

The substrate preferences for ThBgl1 and ThBgl2 were evaluated using different synthetic substrates: pNPG, 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-xylopyranoside (pPNX), 4-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (pNPGal), 2-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside, 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-cellobioside and 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-mannopyranoside (pNPM). All the reactions were tested at 35 °C for ThBgl1 and 40 °C for ThBgl2, using sodium phosphate buffer pH 5.5.

Purified ThBgl1 and ThBgl2 were used for crystallization trials at 25 mg/ml 30 mg/ml, respectively. For ThBgl1 crystals grew in 0.2 M hexahydrated magnesium chloride, 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and 25% PEG3350. For ThBgl2, suitable crystals grew in a solution containing 0.1 MES pH 6.5, 25% PEG 8000. The crystals were flash frozen in a nitrogen stream under 100 K and used for data collection. For ThBgl1 crystal a complete dataset was collected in the MX-2 beamline of the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Source [2]. For ThBgl2 a complete dataset was collected using a Bruker APEX-Duo home source using copper Kα radiation. The scattered intensities were integrated using iMosflm [3] and, after scaling with AIMLESS [4], the structure factors were used for phasing by molecular replacement using the crystal structure of T. reesei GH1 β-glucosidase as the search model [5] and PHASER [6] software. Finally, the crystal structures were refined in iterative cycle of real space manual refinement using Coot [7] and reciprocal space refinement using PHENIX [8] software (Table 1).

Fig. 1

Influence of pH on ThBgl1 (A) and ThBgl2 (B) activities in pNPG.

Fig. 1:
Fig. 2
Temperature influence on ThBgl1 (a) and ThBgl2 (b) activities measured in pNPG.
Fig. 2:
Table 1
Data collection and refinement statistics.
Table 1
ParametersThBgl1ThBgl2
PDB code5JBK5JBO
Wavelength (Å)1.461.54
Resolution range (Å)71.92–2.59 (2.69–2.59)61.64–1.97 (2.04–1.97)
Space GroupP 21 21 21P 21 21 21
Unit cell94.9 97.7 106.257.5 78.1 100.3
90 90 9090 90 90
Total reflections31,180 (3015)32,663 (3212)
Multiplicity2.24.5
Completeness (%)99.7 (97.6)99.9 (100.0)
Mean I/sigma(I)8.3 (2.2)8.7 (3.1)
Wilson B-factor (Å2)17.469.23
Rmerge0.540.50
Rwork0.213 (0.271)0.1681 (0.2193)
Rfree0.254 (0.308)0.2025 (0.2640)
Number of non-hydrogen atoms79734664
Macromolecules74633797
Water498867
Ligands120
Protein residues930475
RMS (bonds) (Å)0.0050.004
RMS (angles) (°)1.061.03
Ramachandran favoured (%)9697
Ramachandran allowed (%)43
Ramachandran outliers (%)00
Clashscore6.252.59
Average B-factor16.4011.80
Macromolecules16.309.20
Ligands16.400
Solvent18.1023.20

Footnotes

Transparency documentTransparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.044.

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted with Mariana Lima, João Renato C. Muniz and Maria A.M. Santos.

Transparency documentSupplementary material

Supplementary material
.

References

  • 2. GuimaraesB.G.SanfeliciL.NeuenschwanderR.T.RodriguesF.GrizolliW.C.RaulikM.A.PitonJ.R.MeyerB.C.NascimentoA.S.PolikarpovI.The MX2 macromolecular crystallography beamline: a wiggler X-ray source at the LNLSJ. Synchrotron Radiat.1620096975[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. PowellH.R.JohnsonO.LeslieA.G.W.Autoindexing diffraction images with iMosflmActa Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.69201311951203[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. EvansP.R.An introduction to data reduction: space-group determination, scaling and intensity statisticsActa Crystallogr. Sect. D-Biol. Crystallogr.672011282292[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. JengW.Y.WangN.C.LinM.H.LinC.T.LiawY.C.ChangW.J.LiuC.I.LiangP.H.WangA.H.J.Structural and functional analysis of three β-glucosidases from bacterium Clostridium cellulovorans, fungus Trichoderma reesei and termite Neotermes koshunensisJ. Struct. Biol.17320114656[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. McCoyA.J.Grosse-KunstleveR.W.AdamsP.D.WinnM.D.StoroniL.C.ReadR.J.Phaser crystallographic softwareJ. Appl. Crystallogr.402007658674[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. EmsleyP.CowtanK.Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphicsActa Crystallogr. Sect. D-Biol. Crystallogr.60200421262132[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. AfonineP.V.Grosse-KunstleveR.W.EcholsN.HeaddJ.J.MoriartyN.W.MustyakimovM.TerwilligerT.C.UrzhumtsevA.ZwartP.H.AdamsP.D.Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refineActa Crystallogr. Sect. D-Biol. Crystallogr.682012352367[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.