African Health Sciences. Nov/30/2017; 17(4): 1022-1028

Seroprevalence of hepatitis E in swine abattoir workers

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis E (HE) caused by Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging global public health threat. It has been identified as potentially zoonotic and swine act as main reservoirs.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors associated with HEV in swine abattoir workers.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study where 45 workers were sampled (N=50), serum collected and tested for presence of anti HEV IgM using ELISA.

Results

A seroprevalence of 13.3% was obtained with the highest 50% among slaughterers and the lowest amongst sanitary cleaner, cloth cleaners and inspector. Those in direct contact with live pigs, their carcasses and tissues were at a higher risk compared to those in indirect contact. Seroprevalence was seen to increase with age, with the highest rate among those above 24 years.

Conclusion

There is silent HE virus infection in abattoir workers at Wambizi as reflected by presence anti HEV IgM in 13% of the tested serum. However, no single case of HE has ever been reported in swine abattoir workers or general population in Kampala city. This silent maintenance of HEV infection amongst swine abattoir workers is an occupational risk that could challenge public health systems.

Introduction

Back ground

Hepatitis due to HEV is an emerging global public health problem. Twenty million cases are reported annually of which 3.4 million are acute resulting in 70,000 deaths worldwide1. HEV is the second most important cause of acute clinical hepatitis in adults in Asia and Africa2. The disease had been considered a sanitation problem in resource limited countries. However, the zoonotic form has emerged in industrialized countries with high sero-prevalence3–6. Hepatitis E was first documented in Uganda in 2007 as a sporadic outbreak in Kitgum where it caused over 10,196 illnesses and 160 deaths7. The primary exposure in this outbreak was not elucidated. The disease has since remained endemic in Karamoja Sub-region with high morbidity. Between 2009 and September 2012, 987 cases of HE were reported with 22 deaths8. HEV is mainly transmitted through the oral-fecal route. Consumption of feacal contaminated water and food has been implicated in major outbreaks9–15. HEV is zoonotically transmitted mainly through consumption of meat from infected animals16–18. Swine have been singled out as the most important source of zoonotic infection; and HEV seroprevalence of 51% has been reported in pig handlers and 14% in wild boar handlers19–22. The zoonotic transmission of HEV presents a high risk to a larger population especially for individuals that work in game parks, abattoirs, butcheries and consumers of animal products such as pork, pig liver and undercooked game meat9,23. Given that many people in Uganda depend on pigs and their products for a livelihood, HEV should be of public health concern.

HEV is a positive sense; non enveloped single stranded RNA virus of the family Hepeviridae24–26. It causes viral hepatitis in humans that has been reported worldwide since it was first reported in Burma, India in 195527; and confirmed in 198328. The disease affects mainly persons aged 15–40 which is the most productive age bracket. Severity of HE increases in pregnant women, with a mortality rate as high as 25%. The disease poses economic challenges not only as loss of lives and huge medical bills but also millions of man hours are lost due to direct or indirect disease devastation. Although the zoonotic form has been suggested as the cause of the disease in the developed world4–9–18–29–31, zoonotic trasmission is not documented in Uganda.

There are five HEV genotypes .i.e.. HEV I, II, III, IV reported to affect humans and the fifth genotype causes disease in avian species32,33. However, only genotypes III and IV infect both swine and humans; and are responsible for the zoonotic HEV infections34. This underscores the role swine and swine handlers could play in the epidemiology of HEV that has unfortunately not been studied in Uganda. Swine HEV (genotypes III and IV) shares similar antigenic epitopes with the capsid protein of the human HEV, with the accompanying antibody cross reactivity and 90–100% sequence homology17–23–35–39, a clear indication of a common ancestor. Such findings coupled with the popularity of pigs as a source of food and icome in Uganda underscore the potential role of swine to the epidemiology of HE. Bearing in mind that abattoir workers are in constant interaction with pigs and their products, the possibility of introducing the virus in their communities cannot be underestimated. Furthermore, research has shown that HEV can also be transmitted through blood transfusion40. This study sought to understand the seroprevalence of HE and the factors associated with transmission in swine abattoir workers in Kampala. The findings offer evidence based guidelines to public health practitioners and epidemiologists in understanding HEV dynamics.

Methology

A cross-sectional study was carried out in Wambizi pig abattoir located in Nalukolongo, Lubaga Division, in Kampala, Central Uganda. The abattoir supplies pork to consumers in and around Kampala. The study population involved abattoir workers at the different levels of the pork value chain within and around the abattoir. Although sampling was intended for all the 50 workers, only forty five workers were present at the day of sampling. Blood (2mls) was collected from 45 abattoir workers (90%) by venous puncture into plain vacutainer tubes labeled with the subjects' unique identification number. Quantitative data was collected using a structured questionnaire to assess the risk factors for transmission of HEV. This Sampling was conducted in April 2015. Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from Makerere University, School of Medicine's research and ethics committee. Informed consent was sought from the participants before sampling.

In the laboratory, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes and the supernatant (serum) was recovered and stored at -20°C until analysed. Analysis was done using DS-EIA-Anti HEV-M ELISA IgM assay kit (DSI S.r.l, VA, Italy) for HEV IgM antibodies according to the manufacturer's instructions. Results from the structured questionnaire were analysed using STATA statistical package version 1.2 (College station, TX: StataCorp LP.) to determine the degree of association between risk factors and the results.

Results

Six out of forty five samples collected tested positive for anti HEV IgM, giving a general seroprevalence of 13.3% at a confidence interval of 95%. Specifically seroprevalence varied with the activity someone was involved in (identified as risk factors) as summarised in table 1.

Table 1

Analysis of factors associated with HEV in workers at Wambizi pig abattoir.

	Hepatitis E		N=45
Variable	Neg N=39	Pos N=6	n	cPR*	aPR	95%CI	p-value
Occupation Cloth cleaners Sanitary Cleaner Supplier Cook Trader Slaughter Inspector(reference)	1(100%) 1(100%) 1(50%) 3(75%) 8(88.9%) 24(88.9%) 1(100%)	0(0%) 0(0%) 1(50%) 1(25%) 1(11.1%) 3(11.1%) 0(0%)	1 1 2 4 9 27 1	1.0 1.0 5.0×10⁶ 2.5×10⁶ 1.1×10⁶ 1.1×10⁶ 1.0	0.7 1 4.2e6 2.1e6 9.6e5 8.8e5	0.04;14.09 0.68;14.65 3.1e5;8e7 1.9e5;2.4e7 4.9e4;1.9e7 1.02e5;7.6e6	1.0 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Work duration <4yrs >4yrs (reference)	23(95.8%) 16(76.2)	1(4.2%) 5(23.8)	24 21	1.05 1.0			0.34
Sex Females Males (reference)	12(85.7%) 27(87.1%)	2(14.2%) 4(12.9%)	14 31	1.107 1.0			0.9
Age <24yrs 24–35yrs >35yrs	4(100%) 23(85.2%) 12(85.7%)	0(0%) 4(14.8%) 2(14.3)	4 27 14
Eat pork Yes No	37(88.1%) 2(66.7)	2(18.2%) 4(11.8%)	11 34	1.55 1.0			0.588

*cPR= Crude Prevalence ratio

HE Seroprevalence in different occupations

The results showed 50% (3/6) of the positive samples were from study subjects directly involved in the slaughter of animals (slaughterers), 16.67% (1/6) for the traders, suppliers and cooks.

Discussion

This study was done in a population of swine abattoir workers where HE infection has not been reported either in workers or in pigs. A seroprevalence of 13.3% (n=45) was observed. The general seroprevalence range reported in developing countries is 3–80%41–42. Studies in healthy individuals in the United States where HEV is not endemic indicated a significant proportion of anti HEV antibodies of up to 22%43–44. This increased seroprevalence in a developed country is associated with consumption of swine products such as pork and pig liver and travelling to areas where HEV is endemic. Other studies done in Africa indicated a seroprevalence ranging from 6–80%41. In Egypt a country where pork consumption is uncommon due to the dominant Islamic religion, HEV seroprevalence was reported to be 80%41. This can be attributed to other routes of transmission r than pork consumption probably the oral faecal route or other zoonotic sources. Hepatitis E virus RNA has been detected in faecal wastes and has been seen to persist in the environment45–46. In developing countries where farming methods and sewage treatment are poor, introduction of faecal wastes in the water system is likely. This compromises water quality and increases chances of disease outbreak. Exposure to animal wastes and fluids is another important source of infection47.

Increased seroprevalence was observed in people who were in direct contact with pigs, pig wastes and carcasses such as slaughterers, traders and suppliers. This is comparable to previous studies which indicated a seroprevalence as high as 66%19,47 among swine farmers. This may be due to the fact that these individuals are exposed to swine wastes and blood when cleaning and assisting in birth. Of the 6 positives, 50% was observed in slaughterers (3/6), 16.67% in cooks and 16.7% (1/6) was observed in Traders and suppliers. There was an association between the type of work and HEV seropositivity (Table 1) suggesting animal-to-human transmission probably through animal wastes and other tissues. In this study exposure could also be from water or hands to the food they eat since no relationship was found between pork consumption and HEV seropositivity. On the contrary, inspectors who are equally exposed did not show any sero-reactivity for IgM. This may be due to fact that inspectors have a higher level of education and practice good personal hygiene than other workers, as this is reported to influence HEV exposure47. However, it remains a speculation as the association between seropositivity and education level of the participants was never investigated in the current study.

None of the seropositive subjects was showing clinical signs. However, HEV infections are associated with HEV viremia and faecal excretion of the virus for a few weeks sometimes in absence of clinical symptoms41. The detection of anti HEV IgM antibodies indicates a recent active infection which suggests that the positive subjects had recently acquired the infection. These findings therefore allude to the fact that HEV is being transmitted asymptomatically among swine abattoir workers but the implication of this is moot. Although pigs have been reported as a source of zoonotic HEV infection in different regions of the world,19, there is no documentations to show this in Uganda. There were two suppliers in the tested population of which one was positive. Since suppliers move to several pig farms purchasing animals, it cannot be concluded whether he got infected in the abattoir or the farms where he buys animals. Studies have shown that persons engaged in occupations related to swine farming were found to have a higher risk of infection than those in other occupations48.

The results show a high seroprevalence of 23.8% (n=21) among those who have spent over four years as compared to the 4.2% (n=24) among those who have spent 4 years and less in the abattoir. This compares to other studies where period of occupational exposure to swine was associated with HEV infection19. IgM antibody levels decline rapidly in 6 weeks41 while IgG persists in the host for long period providing protection against subsequent infections. The duration of persistence of circulating IgG antibodies remains unclear as they have been found in healthy subjects living in all geographical areas, although the prevalence varies widely41. Since the workers were not tested for IgG antibodies, it cannot be determined whether those who had spent four years and less in the abattoir had already been exposed and were immune-competent or those above four years in the abattoir their immunity had waned.

Seroprevalence of HE was seen to increase with age. These results indicate a seroprevalance of 18.8% and 18.3% among the middle aged workers between 24 and 35 years and above 35 years respectively as compared to none among those below 24 years. This trend has been observed in other studies where a prevalence of 3 to 30% was observed in young adults between ages of 20 and 40 years than in children (0.3 to 10%)46. This can be attributed to the fact that middle aged adults may be involved in activities such as tending to animals and casual labour in places where they eat and drink poor quality food and water. However in another study in Nigeria a high seroprevalence was observed among those below 10 and above 60 years and the lowest seroprevalence among those between 20 and 40 years47. In this study, the increased seroprevalence among the middle aged may be explained by the fact that most of them are energetic males who are involved in slaughtering animals in the abottoir which increases their degree of exposure.

Males had a high seroprevalence compared to females. This is beacause males are more involved in activities of slaughtering and supplying animals thus more exposed to animals and animal carcasses compared to females.

Pork consumption is advanced as another source of HEV infection23–49–51. The results of this study however indicate no association of HEV infection with consumption of pork (P value= 0.267). Probably, workers eat well cooked pork and other vehicles of HEV transmission such as exposure to the animal wastes during slaughtering and handling come into play. Although the animals were not tested the results indicate that those in direct contact with animals have higher chances of acquiring the infection as compared to those who were in indirect contact within the abattoir environment.

Conclusion

There is silent HEV infection amongst abattoir workers at Wambizi, as reflected by the high seroprevalence and this should raise public health concern. This silent infection is maintained by other means than pork consumption. Direct contact with pigs and pig products has high association with HEV infection. More investigation involving pigs and more humans in various occupations should be conducted to help understand the epidemiology of HEV and guide control measures. Bearing in mind that recent HE outbreaks in Uganda have been sporadic with an elusive primary source, such studies would improve our understanding of HEV epidemiology.

Acknowledgements

Dr. B. Bakamutumaho from Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) for the assistance provided during sample analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1. ReinD BStevensG ATheakerJWittenbornJ SWiersmaS TThe global burden of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 and 2 in 2005Hepatology2012554988997[PubMed][Google Scholar]
2. PurcellRHSUE. Hepatitis E: An emerging awareness of an old diseaseJournal of Hepatology2008482008494503[PubMed][Google Scholar]
3. IjazSamreenArnoldEveBanksMalcolmBendallRichard PCrampMatthew ECunninghamRichardNon-Travel-Associated Hepatitis E in England and Wales: Demographic, Clinical, and Molecular Epidemiological CharacteristicsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases2005192166172[PubMed][Google Scholar]
4. OkamotoHTakahashiMNishizawaTFeatures of hepatitis E virus infection in JapanInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2003421110651071[Google Scholar]
5. SmithJA review of hepatitis E virusJournal of food Protection2001644572586[PubMed][Google Scholar]
6. HarrisonTJHepatitis E virus- an updateLiver199919171176[PubMed][Google Scholar]
7. TeshaleEHGrytdalSPHowardCBarryVKamiliSDrobeniucJEvidence of person-to-person transmission of hepatitis E virus during a large outbreak in Northern UgandaClinical infectious diseases201050710061010[PubMed][Google Scholar]
8. CummingsM JWamalaJ FKomakechILukwagoLMalimboMOmekeM EBakamutumahoBHepatitis E in Karamoja, Uganda, 2009–2012: epidemiology and challenges to control in a setting of semi-nomadic pastoralismTransactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene201410810648655[PubMed][Google Scholar]
9. ColsonPBorentainPQueyriauxBKabaMMoalVGallianPPig liver sausage as a source of hepatitis E virus transmission to humansJournal of Infectious Diseases20102026825834[PubMed][Google Scholar]
10. MengXHepatitis E virus: animal reservoirs and zoonotic riskVeterinary microbiology20101403256265[PubMed][Google Scholar]
11. MengXRecent advances in hepatitis E virusJournal of viral hepatitis2010173153161[PubMed][Google Scholar]
12. LiT-CChijiwaKSeraNIshibashiTEtohYShinoharaYHepatitis E virus transmission from wild boar meatEmerging infectious diseases200511121958[PubMed][Google Scholar]
13. MatsubayashiKKangJHSakataHTakahashiKShindoMKatoMA case of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E caused by blood from a donor infected with hepatitis E virus via zoonotic food-borne routeTransfusion200848713681375[PubMed][Google Scholar]
14. MatsudaHOkadaKTakahashiKMishiroSSevere hepatitis E virus infection after ingestion of uncooked liver from a wild boarJournal of Infectious Diseases20031886944[PubMed][Google Scholar]
15. PurcellRHEmersonSUAnimal models of hepatitis A and EILAR Journal2001422161177[PubMed][Google Scholar]
16. VasickovaPPsikalIKralikPWidenFHubalekZPavlikIHepatitis E virus: a reviewVeterinarni Medicina2007529365384[Google Scholar]
17. MengXSwine hepatitis E virus: cross-species infection and risk in xenotransplantation Xeno-transplantation2003Springer185216
18. MengX-JHalburPGShapiroMSGovindarajanSBrunaJDMushahwarIKGenetic and experimental evidence for cross-species infection by swine hepatitis E virusJournal of virology1998721297149721[PubMed][Google Scholar]
19. DrobeniucJFavorovMOShapiroCNBellBPMastEEDaduAHepatitis E virus antibody prevalence among persons who work with swineJournal of Infectious Diseases20011841215941597[PubMed][Google Scholar]
20. KunoAIdoKIsodaNSatohYOnoKSatohSSporadic acute hepatitis E of a 47-year-old man whose pet cat was positive for antibody to hepatitis E virusHepatology Research2003263237242[PubMed][Google Scholar]
21. RenouCCadranelJ-FBourlièreMHalfonPOuzanDRiffletHPossible zoonotic transmission of hepatitis E from pet pig to its ownerEmerging infectious diseases20071371094[PubMed][Google Scholar]
22. KaretnyiYVGilchristMJNaidesSJHepatitis E virus infection prevalence among selected populations in IowaJournal of clinical virology19991415155[PubMed][Google Scholar]
23. YazakiYMizuoHTakahashiMNishizawaTSasakiNGotandaYSporadic acute or fulminant hepatitis E in Hokkaido, Japan, may be food-borne, as suggested by the presence of hepatitis E virus in pig liver as foodJournal of general virology200384923512357[PubMed][Google Scholar]
24. MayoMAChanges to virus taxonomy 2004Archives of virology2005150189198[Google Scholar]
25. EmersonSUArankalleVAPurcellRHThermal stability of hepatitis E virusJournal of Infectious Diseases20051925930933[PubMed][Google Scholar]
26. TamAWSmithMMGuerraMEHuangC-CBradleyDWFryKEHepatitis E virus (HEV): molecular cloning and sequencing of the full-length viral genomeVirology19911851120131[PubMed][Google Scholar]
27. GuptaSmetanaThe histopathology of viral hepatitis as seen in the Delhi epidemicIndian Journal of Medical Research195745101113[PubMed][Google Scholar]
28. BalayanMAndjaparidzeASavinskayaSKetiladzeEBraginskyDSavinovAEvidence for a virus in non-A, non-B hepatitis transmitted via the fecal-oral routeIntervirology19832012331[PubMed][Google Scholar]
29. NishizawaTTakahashiMMizuoHMiyajimaHGotandaYOkamotoHCharacterization of Japanese swine and human hepatitis E virus isolates of genotype IV with 99% identity over the entire genomeJournal of general virology200384512451251[PubMed][Google Scholar]
30. TeiKitajimaTakahashiMishiroZoonotic transmission of hepatitis E virus from deer to human beingsLancet2003362371373[PubMed][Google Scholar]
31. MengX-JPurcellRHHalburPGLehmanJRWebbDMTsarevaTSA novel virus in swine is closely related to the human hepatitis E virusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1997941898609865[Google Scholar]
32. SchlauderMushahwarGenetic heterogeneity of hepatitis E virusJournal of medical virology200165282292[PubMed][Google Scholar]
33. HuangFSunZEmersonSPurcellRShivaprasadHPiersonFMengXDetermination and analysis of the complete genomic sequence of avian hepatitis E virus (avian HEV) and attempts to infect rhesus monkeys with avian HEVJournal of general virology200485616091618[PubMed][Google Scholar]
34. OkamotoHGenetic variability and evolution of hepatitis E virusVirus research20071272216228[PubMed][Google Scholar]
35. SchlauderGGDawsonGJErkerJCKwoPYKniggeMFSmalleyDLThe sequence and phylogenetic analysis of a novel hepatitis E virus isolated from a patient with acute hepatitis reported in the United StatesJournal of general virology1998793447456[PubMed][Google Scholar]
36. Van der PoelWVerschoorFvan der HeideRHerreraM-IVivoAKooremanMHepatitis E virus sequences in swine related to sequences in humans, The NetherlandsEmerging infectious diseases200176970[PubMed][Google Scholar]
37. FuHongweiLiLingjunZhuYonghongWangLingGengJiabaoChangYibinHepatitis E Virus Infection among Animals and Humans in Xinjiang, China: Possibility of Swine to Human Transmission of Sporadic Hepatitis E in an Endemic AreaAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine2010825961966[Google Scholar]
38. HsiehMengWuLiuTamLinIdentity of a novel swine hepatitis virus in Taiwan froming a monophyletic group with Taiwan isolates of human hepatitis E virusJournal of Clinical Microbiology1999371238283834[PubMed][Google Scholar]
39. BanksBendallGriersonHeathMitchellDaltonHuman and Porcine hepatitis E virus strains, United KingdomEmerging infectious diseases2004105953955[PubMed][Google Scholar]
40. ArankalleVChobeLRetrospective Analysis of Blood Transfusion Recipients: Evidence for Post-Transfusion Hepatitis EVox sanguinis20007927274[PubMed][Google Scholar]
41. AggarwalRThe global prevalence of Hepatitis E Virus infection and susceptibility: A systematic review2010WHO
42. HoofnagleJHNelsonKEPurcellRHHepatitis ENew England Journal of Medicine20123671312371244[PubMed][Google Scholar]
43. KuniholmMHPurcellRHMcQuillanGMEngleREWasleyANelsonKEEpidemiology of hepatitis E virus in the United States: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994Journal of Infectious Diseases200920014856[PubMed][Google Scholar]
44. DitahIDitahFDevakiPDitahCKamathPSCharltonMCurrent epidemiology of hepatitis E virus infection in the United States: low seroprevalence in the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation SurveyHepatology2014603815822[PubMed][Google Scholar]
45. dos SantosDRLde PaulaVSde OliveiraJMMarchevskyRSPintoMAHepatitis E virus in swine and effluent samples from slaughterhouses in BrazilVeterinary microbiology20111491236241[PubMed][Google Scholar]
46. AggarwalRKrawczynskiKHepatitis E: an overview and recent advances in clinical and laboratory researchJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2000151920[PubMed][Google Scholar]
47. JunaidSAAginaSEAbubakarKAEpidemiology and associated risk factors of hepatitis e virus infection in plateau state, NigeriaVirology: research and treatment2014515[PubMed][Google Scholar]
48. ZhengYGeSZhangJGuoQNgMHWangFSwine as a principal reservoir of hepatitis E virus that infects humans in eastern ChinaJournal of Infectious Diseases20061931216431649[PubMed][Google Scholar]
49. PurcellRHEmersonSUHidden danger: the raw facts about hepatitis E virusJournal of Infectious Diseases20102026819821[PubMed][Google Scholar]
50. FeaginsAOpriessnigTGuenetteDHalburPMengX-JDetection and characterization of infectious Hepatitis E virus from commercial pig livers sold in local grocery stores in the USAJournal of general virology2007883912917[PubMed][Google Scholar]
51. MasudaJ-IYanoKTamadaYTakiiYItoMOmagariKAcute hepatitis E of a man who consumed wild boar meat prior to the onset of illness in Nagasaki, JapanHepatology Research2005313178183[PubMed][Google Scholar]