Regulation and consequences of monocytosis
Introduction
Monocytes are an essential part of vertebrates’ cellular innate immune system. In humans and mice, steady state monocyte levels in blood are 2×10/ml. In mice, there are two major monocyte subsets, Ly-6c Cx3cr1 and Ly-6c Cx3cr1, with proinflammatory function (1) and patrolling behavior (2), respectively. At least three human monocyte subsets have been identified(3): CD14 CD16 (classical), which resemble Ly-6c monocytes; CD14 CD16 (intermediate), with pro-inflammatory roles and CD14 CD16 monocytes with patrolling behavior. All blood monocytes are produced by hematopoietic progenitors in the bone marrow and spleen. Monocyte release from the bone marrow follows circadian rhythms, and migration into and through blood is finely tuned by a panoply of signals. Once in blood, monocytes travel to inflammatory sites to aid in the host’s initial immune response through, for instance, their role in mediating antimicrobial defense. In contrast to their numerous beneficial functions, monocytes also fuel acute and chronic inflammation in all major diseases. Our review focuses on monocytes in cardiovascular disorders, such as atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, while highlighting instructive parallels and differences in other organ systems and diseases.
Once recruited into tissue, monocytes may differentiate into macrophages and certain dendritic cells. Major macrophage functions include phagocytosis of tissue debris and foreign materials, steady state defense and tissue repair after injuries. When macrophages become dysfunctional, they may promote disease; for example, ineffective clearance of dead cells by macrophages exacerbates atherosclerosis. The cells are also nodes of information transfer and signal amplification, facilitated, for instance, by amplifying pro-or anti-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, macrophages are antigen presenting cells and express major histocompatibility antigens.
Macrophage diversity stems from the tissue environment, including specific cytokines reflecting various inflammatory phenotypes, that instructs a wide range of macrophage specialization resulting in a plethora of macrophage subsets with distinct functions (4). Classically activated macrophages (M1) mediate inflammation and anti-microbial immunity. Alternatively activated macrophages (M2) are involved in wound healing and immunity against parasites. In addition to these, IL-10-producing regulatory macrophages and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been reported. Although TAMs have been thought similar to M2 macrophages, a recent study showed they are actually more like M1 macrophages (5). It has become clear that understanding functionally distinct monocyte and macrophage subsets will lead to advanced, narrowly targeted therapeutics that modulate the presence or character of harmful myeloid cells while avoiding severe side effects that typically arise from compromising important monocyte and macrophage steady-state functions.
Macrophage origin: blood monocytes versus tissue residents
Myeloid cells, including monocytes, arise from two successive versions of hematopoiesis, ‘primitive’ and ‘definitive’ hematopoiesis, that occur during development (6). During primitive hematopoiesis in the embryonic stage, red blood cells produced by the yolk sac address the embryo’s increased oxygen demands during rapid growth. The yolk sac also gives rise to primitive tissue macrophages that can self-maintain in tissue by proliferation (7). For example, brain microglia renewal is independent of circulating progenitors, i.e. circulating bone marrow derived monocytes, and microglia are sustained by proliferation throughout adult life (8). Using mice with constitutive or conditional Cre recombinase in CX3CR1 loci, Steffen Jung and his colleagues (9) demonstrated that tissue resident macrophages, including peritoneal, splenic and lung macrophages, plus Kupffer cells, are derived from the yolk sac before birth. During steady state, these cells are maintained independently from monocyte input. In an interesting contrast, steady state IL-10-producing CX3CR1 resident intestinal macrophages derive from Ly-6c monocytes (10, 11). Intestinal inflammation leads to accumulation of TLR-responsive CX3CR1 macrophages that produce inflammatory cytokines. Nevertheless, intestinal resident macrophages as well as inflammatory macrophages in the gut derive from the same precursor.
In the heart, monocytes and macrophages are crucial to healing after ischemic injury of the myocardium (12-14). They clear dead cells after infarction and produce cytokines that facilitate tissue repair. Genetic fate mapping revealed that steady state cardiac macrophages are derived from the yolk sac and fetal monocyte progenitors (15). They self-maintain by local proliferation in the myocardium (16). However, in inflammation induced after myocardial infarction, the resident macrophage pool is replaced by macrophages that derive from Ly-6c monocytes (16). Likely depending on the changing environmental cues, Ly-6c monocytes may give rise to inflammatory macrophages early after ischemic injury but also to macrophages with pro-resolution phenotypes if recruited later (13). The origin of macrophages and dendritic cells that reside in blood vessel walls during steady state has yet to be described. Given the data recently obtained from many organ systems including the heart, these cells likely self-maintain locally, independent from blood monocytes, despite being so close to this pool of cells.
Role of downstream myeloid progenitors in monocyte production
The very short turnover rate for monocytes and macrophages in inflammatory tissues (17) indicates a sufficiently increased myeloid cell supply, likely through continuous replenishment by hematopoietic progenitor cells (Fig. 1). Macrophage dendritic cell progenitors (MDPs) can give rise to monocytes (18) and dendritic cells but not granulocytes (19). Interestingly, this finding was challenged by a recent study (20) that demonstrated that macrophage and dendritic cells do not share a common progenitor. Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs), precursors of MDPs, can give rise to granulocytes. MDPs express CX3CR1, which distinguishes them from GMPs, which do not express the receptor. CX3CR1-deficient mice display normal monocyte levels in the bone marrow; however, MDPs isolated from CX3CR1-deficient mice produce fewer monocytes in recipients’ spleens after adoptive transfer when compared to monocytes isolated from wild type mice, indicating that CX3CR1 is important in the development, recruitment, proliferation, and survival of monocytes in the spleen (19). MDPs also express CD115, the receptor for csf-1 (also known as the M-CSF receptor), which promotes survival, proliferation, and differentiation of macrophages. In addition to giving rise to monocytes, MDPs can also differentiate into common dendritic cell precursors (CDPs). MDPs and CDPs are phenotypically overlapping cell populations, though CDPs lack the ability to differentiate into monocytes and can only produce dendritic cells. A committed monocyte and macrophage progenitor that differentiates into monocytes but not dendritic cells has recently been identified in the bone marrow (21).

Infection and sterile inflammation, such as myocardial infarction, decrease production of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) retention factors by hematopoietic niche cells. This leads to increased HSC cycling resulting in elevated hematopoiesis. HSC-derived monocytes in the bone marrow can intravasate into blood circulation in an MCP-1-dependent manner. HSCs can also circulate in the blood and lodge in the spleen, where they produce monocytes in presence of SCF, G-MCSF, IL-3, and IL1β. Release of splenic HSC into the blood depends on AT-II-AT1r signaling. Finally, blood monocytes are recruited to sites of inflammation, where they differentiate into macrophages with several functions, including inflammation, healing, and resolution of inflammation.
Role of upstream HSCs in monocyte production
Downstream myeloid progenitors were long thought to be the immediate source of myeloid blood cells during acute or chronic inflammation, but MDPs and GMPs have limited lifespans and cannot self-renew. Hence, they must be continuously replenished by upstream self-renewing hematopoietic cells. We now know that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are the source of myeloid blood cells. HSC frequency in the bone marrow is 1 in 10,000 cells, but only 1 in 100,000 cells in the blood. A major difficulty in HSC research has been identifying and characterizing the cells in vivo, since they behave like other hematopoietic cells in ex vivo culture. The ‘gold standard’ for identifying HSCs is their ability to reconstitute all lineages in lethally irradiated mice. In steady state, the vast majority of HSCs are quiescent, as only ~5% (or less) are in the cell cycle (22), and HSCs divide every 145 days or about 5 times in a mouse’s life time (22). During stress, however, these stem cells enter the cell cycle to produce hematopoietic progenitor cells (23). In an in vivo mouse model of Mycobacterium avium infection, HSC proliferate in response to interferon-γ (IFNγ) (24). HSCs sorted from IFN γ-deficient mice have lower proliferation in steady state and inflammation. In response to interferon-α (IFNα) treatment, dormant HSCs exit G0 phase and enter the cell cycle (25). IFNα-triggered HSC proliferation is STAT1 and Sca-1-dependent. IFN-mediated HSC proliferation is at least partly dependent on IFN receptor expression by HSCs (26). Most recently, we found that psychosocial stress in mice increases SLAM HSC numbers in the bone marrow and instigates higher proliferation rates (27). Despite these changes, functional Iong-term HSC numbers, quantified by limiting dilution assays, remained constant. This illustrates that SLAM FACS surface markers are not specific for long-term HSC and that this most upstream gate contains a heterogeneous stem cell population.
A recent study (28) demonstrated that short-term HSCs produce copious cytokines in response to Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling. Among these HSC-derived cytokines, IL-6 acts to instigate downstream progenitors’ myeloid differentiation in a paracrine manner. The study also showed that HSC have functional TLR/ NF-κB signaling capacity that can be directly activated by TLR-4 and TLR-2 ligands. Cytokines produced by HSC transferred by bone marrow transplantation may have regulatory roles in hematopoietic cell reconstitution. From these studies (24, 25, 28), it is clear that circulating alarmins liberated during infection or injury can push quiescent HSC into the cell cycle. However, we do not fully understand precisely how HSCs can sense danger. Especially in the setting of cardiovascular disease, data on how HSCs are alerted are scarce. There may be two scenarios, either (i) direct sensing through pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) receptors expressed by HSCs or (ii) indirect sensing through cells that regulate HSC activity in the bone marrow microenvironment. To directly sense danger and an increased need for peripheral leukocytes to defend the host, HSCs express PAMPs. Indeed, HSCs express TLRs and their co-receptors (29). Stimulating HSCs with TLR ligands propels HSC into proliferation (30) and leads to GMP differentiation.
Increased HSC proliferation in response to infection or injury may also be triggered by changes in bone marrow microenvironment. For example, myocardial infarction decreases HSPC retention factors such as Cxcl12, Scf, Ang-1, and Vcam-1 (31). This drastic change may increase HSC proliferation and release cells from their niches. An ensemble of supporting cells that reside in hematopoietic tissue in close proximity to HSC and hematopoietic progenitors, including macrophages (32, 33), regulatory T cells (34), endothelial cells (35, 36) and CXCL12-abundant reticular cells (37) maintain the hematopoietic niche and regulate HSC proliferation and differentiation. Changes in niche cell activity during acute or chronic inflammation influence hematopoiesis (Fig. 1). For example, high levels of G-CSF produced in atherosclerosis may suppress CXCL12 production by osteoblasts, leading to HSC proliferation and release. LPS treatment, which mimics systemic infection, increases MCP-1 production by bone marrow endothelial cells and nestin mesenchymal stem cells, which results in monocyte release into the blood (38). Another example is the activation of the parathyroid hormone receptor, which induces expression of IL-6, RANKL and Jagged1 in osteoblasts and thus influences hematopoiesis (39, 40).
We know relatively little about the pathways HSCs use to sustain myelopoiesis during inflammation. There are several transcription factors reported to be involved in myeloid lineage determination (Table 1), including PU.1, which binds to GATA-binding protein 1 to inhibit commitment towards megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors, thus facilitating myeloid differentiation (41). Another important transcription factor, the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (Cebpa), directs GMP differentiation. Interestingly, committed B and T lymphocytes can be transdifferentiated into functional macrophages through Cebpa expression (6, 42, 43). The early growth response gene-1 and IFN consensus sequence binding protein (Irf8) can selectively induce monocyte and macrophage differentiation (44-47). In contrast, Gata-1 complements PU.1 and inhibits myeloid differentiation (48). Although long-term HSC are pluripotent and give rise to all blood cells, myeloid-biased HSC, such as PU.1 M-CSFR HSC (49) and MyrP HSC (50) are poised to react to danger by giving rise to myeloid cells important for host defense.
Table 1
Protein/transcription factors that regulate HSC commitment towards different hematopoietic lineages
| Protein/ Transcription factor | Gene symbol | Function | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCAAT/enhancer- binding protein alpha | Cebpa | Committed B and T lymphoid cells can be reprogrammed to functional macrophages through C/EBPalpha expression. | 6, 42, 43 |
| PU.1 | Sfpi1 | PreT cells can be reprogrammed to myeloid dendritic cells through PU.1 expression | 6 |
| Erythroid transcription factor | Gata-1 | Gata-1 complements PU.1 and inhibits myeloid differentiation (i.e. promotes erythroid/ megakaroocytic/ eosinophil differentiation). | 6, 48 |
| Early growth response gene-1 | Egr-1 | Egr-1 induces by PU.1 and can selectively induce macrophage differentiation. | 44, 45, 46 |
| IFN consensus sequence binding protein | Irf8 (Icsbp) | Drives monocyte differentiation. | 44, 47 |
| Kruppel-like factor | Klf4 | Selectively rescues monocyte differentiation of PU.1 progenitors. | 113 |
| V-maf musculoaponeuro tic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B | Mafb | Inhibits erythroid differentiation and induces monocyte commitment of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. | 115 |
| V-maf musculoaponeuro tic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog | Maf (Maf2) | Induces monocyte differentiation from bipotent myeloid progenitors. | 114 |
Monocytosis in cardiovascular diseases
Myocardial infarction (MI) triggers monocyte recruitment to the infarct in two sequential phases (14). At first, Ly-6c monocytes are recruited via MCP-1, which is followed by Ly-6c monocyte recruitment via fractalkine. It is clear that monocyte recruitment is essential for infarct healing; however, the precise tasks and fates of involved cells are under intense investigation. Ly-6c monocytes may differentiate into macrophages to clear myocardial resident cells that died of ischemia, and Ly-6c monocytes may facilitate the healing process. During the first week after myocardial ischemia, monocyte and macrophage turnover in the infarct is surprisingly quick (<24 hours) (17). This shows that reactive leukocytosis after myocardial infarction, which occurs in mice and humans and correlates closely with survival, plays an important role in the just-in-time leukocyte supply to the infarct. Depleting monocytes after MI leads to a precipitous drop in monocyte and macrophage numbers in both the blood pool and the infarct, indicating that blood supply and cell levels in the inflamed end-organ tissue are closely linked. Oversupply of blood monocytes in mice with pre-existing atherosclerosis increases recruitment into the ischemic heart and impairs healing (51). These observations motivated us to study cell supply as a therapeutic target, hypothesizing that decreasing cells that can migrate into the infarct will reduce inflammatory macrophage numbers in the heart and enhance resolution of inflammation. Indeed, reducing the expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2 by nanoparticle-enabled RNAi attenuates monocyte traffic to the heart (52) and reduces post-MI heart failure (53).
Immediately after MI, splenic monocytes deploy to the infarct (54) and drastically, though temporarily, reduce spleen size in mice after coronary artery ligation. Soon thereafter, MI-induced extramedullary hematopoiesis replenishes monocytes in the spleen, which continues IL-1β-dependent monocyte supply to the infarct (17). In the absence of the orphan nuclear hormone receptor, Nr4a1, Ly-6c monocytes express higher CCR2 levels (13), increasing inflammatory monocyte accumulation in the infarct. Moreover, Nr4a1-deficient Ly-6c monocytes differentiate into abnormally inflammatory macrophages that resemble M1 macrophages and lead to ventricular dysfunction after MI. M1 macrophages can promote inflammation and destruction of extracellular matrix, whereas M2 macrophages facilitate extracellular matrix regeneration and angiogenesis. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) inhibition makes macrophages M2-biased and hastens myocardial healing after MI (55).
Atherosclerosis is characterized by pathological lipid deposition in the arterial wall. The lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques are infiltrated by inflammatory cells, including monocytes. Atherosclerosis induces profound expansion of Ly-6c monocytes into the blood (56, 57). In mice with atherosclerosis, bone marrow hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) relocate to the spleen. The cells proliferate and differentiate into Ly-6c monocytes in presence of GM-CSF and IL-3 in the splenic red pulp (58). These inflammatory monocytes intravasate, circulate in the blood and finally accumulate in atheromata. The recruited monocytes then differentiate into macrophages, ingest lipids and turn into foam cells. During the first 4-8 weeks after initiation of a high fat diet, plaque macrophages are maintained by monocyte recruitment from the blood. In older mice, scavenger receptor A-mediated local proliferation of macrophages dominates macrophage supply to plaque (59). Even in these later stages, plaque macrophages derive from bone marrow-produced monocytes. Interestingly, the migrating intermediate in blood, i.e. the monocyte, is temporarily unable to proliferate. Once it differentiates into a macrophage, the cell regains the ability to divide, like its bone marrow progenitors. The processes that inhibit monocyte proliferation, and regulate the switch from recruiting to locally proliferating macrophage supply in plaque, are mostly unknown. Studies exploring these cellular mechanisms may reveal new therapeutic targets that support resolution of inflammation.
Though the mechanisms of monocyte activity during atherosclerosis are still being investigated, researchers have made progress on its causes. Work by Allan Tall’s group (60-62) showed that defective cholesterol efflux increases HSC proliferation, and accelerates myelopoiesis and ultimately fuels inflammatory macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaque. ApoE regulates HSPC proliferation through cholesterol efflux-promoting ABC transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1. In ApoE-deficient mice fed a high fat diet, this regulation is disturbed, resulting in higher HSPC proliferation in the bone marrow and spleen. This leads to systemically increased myelopoiesis. Moreover, splenic macrophages and dendritic cells in mice that lack ABCA1 and ABCG1 produce high levels of IL-23, which results in high serum G-CSF levels (63) that favor lineage decisions toward granulocytes rather than macrophages.
Recurrent myocardial infarction occurs frequently and is often fatal. To better understand the mechanism of recurrent MI, we investigated atherosclerosis progression in ApoE mice after coronary ligation. We found that mice had larger plaques 3 weeks after ischemic injury of the heart or brain. Moreover, the plaques had higher cathepsin protease activity, as measured by fluorescence molecular tomography-computed tomography and fluorescence reflectance imaging, indicating increased lesion ‘vulnerability’. Quantitative PCR of aortic roots revealed elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, MMP9, MPO and Ly-6c, consistent with higher numbers of myeloid cells and monocytes in the aorta. MI activated the sympathetic nervous system, which suppressed CXCL12, SCF, Ang-1 and VCAM-1 production in bone marrow niche cells and triggered HSPC release from the bone marrow into the blood stream. The egressed HSPC accumulated in the spleen and proliferated in a stem cell factor (SCF)-dependent manner, leading to systemic monocytosis. Inflammatory monocytes recruited to atherosclerotic plaques enriched lesions’ protease, decreased fibrous cap thickness, and increased necrotic core size. Our findings in ApoE mice (31) accord with recently published human data. Chen et al. assessed non-culprit coronary lesion progression in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography over a mean follow-up period of 12.3 months (64). Compared to a coronary artery disease control group, STEMI significantly accelerated atherosclerosis in non-culprit coronary lesions. A different study by Kim et al. (65) revealed significantly higher uptake of the PET imaging agent F-FDG in the spleen and bone marrow of patients with acute myocardial infarction. This clinical molecular imaging strategy reports on tissue-level glucose uptake. While not specific to a certain cell class, the increased imaging signal can be linked to the higher energy demands of cycling stem cells that need to increase protein production when entering the cell cycle (66). Overall, these clinical data indicate increased cell proliferation after acute ischic events in the hematopoietic organs. Signer et al. (66) also revealed a positive correlation between spleen and bone marrow PET signal and higher PET imaging signal in carotid arterial plaques. This correlation suggests that inflammatory activity in human atherosclerotic plaque is not an isolated process, but rather intricately coupled with systemic monocyte levels and the activity of their progenitors in the spleen and bone marrow.
Release of monocytes and their progenitors from hematopoietic organs
Though it is a rare event, HSC do egress from bone marrow and circulate in blood during steady state. The exact purpose of HSC traveling through extramedullary tissue is unclear, though circulating HSC are known to conduct surveillance, and we do know HSC migration exhibits robust circadian fluctuation that peaks at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 5 (67). HSC release from the bone marrow niche depends on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), which, when activated, decreases levels of HSC retention factors, such as CXCL12 that are produced by bone marrow niche cells, resulting in HSC release into the blood stream. At night, the sympathetic nervous system mediates increased expression of adhesion molecules and triggers HSC homing back to the bone marrow (68). These observations are supported by the finding that HSC injected into lethally irradiated mice at night engraft better than if this transfer is done during the day.
Like HSC, Ly-6c inflammatory monocytes also egress with diurnal variations, peaking high at ZT 4 and reaching nadir at ZT 16 in the blood and spleen (69). The amplitude of this normal circadian rhythm is quite astounding, as monocyte blood levels can easily be seen to double depending on the time of blood sampling. These cellular changes are accompanied by oscillating expression of clock genes- Bmal1, Nrld1 and Dbp in monocytes. If mice were infected with Listeria monocytogenes when blood monocyte numbers were high, higher mortality occurred. This high mortality was attributed not to high systemic bacterial burden but rather to a massive ‘cytokine storm’ resulting in septic shock. Ly-6c monocyte fluctuation depended on Bmal1-mediated regulation of Ccl2 levels.
Besides circadian cycling, monocytes leave the bone marrow during both infection and sterile inflammation, such as myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis. Monocytes were shown departing the bone marrow after an LPS challenge that correlated with high MCP-1 levels not in the blood but in mesenchymal stem cells and CXCL12-abundant reticular cells that line bone marrow sinusoids (38). Conditionally deleting Mcp-1 in these two bone marrow cell types abrogated Ly-6c monocyte release from the bone marrow. Our group observed that the spleen acts as a monocyte reservoir after myocardial infarction (70). Monocytes are stored in subscapular red pulp in the spleen. Upon acute injury, such as myocardial infarction, angiotensin II- angiotensin 1 receptor signaling promotes splenic monocytic motility and emigration from the spleen (Fig. 1). These monocytes are then recruited to the site of inflammation. Thus the spleen is a reservoir for rapid monocyte deployment that can regulate inflammation after acute injury by, for instance, inhibiting systemic angiotensin-2 signaling. Using an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, a drug that is clinically used for treatment of hypertension, we were able to dampen splenic monocyte release and decrease their migration to acute infarcts in mice (71).
Recruitment of monocytes to sites of inflammation
Monocytes are recruited from the blood to sites of inflammation where they can either directly take part in inflammation or differentiate into macrophages that mediate inflammation. Monocytes are also recruited to infected tissues, as reviewed in detail elsewhere (72). During infection, monocytes may also differentiate into dendritic cells, resulting in anti-microbial inflammation. Additionally, these monocyte-derived dendritic cells can prime cytotoxic T cells. Although dendritic cells’ ability to stimulate adaptive immunity in infection is well known, their role in innate defense remains unclear. Pamer and his colleagues (73) showed, for the first time, that dendritic cells can directly exert anti-bacterial immunity without priming T cells. After Listeria monocytogenes infection, the CD11b CD11c dendritic cell population increased in the spleen, the major site of the infection. Moreover, these cells produce high amounts of TNFα and iNOS; hence, they are called TNF iNOS-producing dendritic cells (TipDC). In CCR2-deficient mice, the dendritic cell population does not increase after infection, which correlates with less TNFα and iNOS production and delayed clearance of the infection even though T cell responses to L. monocytogenes were preserved.
Besides infection, monocytes also contribute to sterile inflammation, as in atherosclerosis, which is an inflammatory disease (74, 75) characterized by monocyte infiltration into lipid-laden plaques (76). Just after initiation of high-fat diet, blood leukocytes start attaching to endothelial cells. In a rabbit model of atherosclerosis, endothelial cells express VCAM-1 during early atherogenesis (77). High VCAM-1 expression is confined to activated endothelium lining atherosclerotic plaques. VLA-4 expressed on monocytes can bind with VCAM-1. Adhesion to endothelial cells may also be mediated by ICAM-1, which binds to LFA-1 expressed by monocytes. Once monocytes attach to arterial endothelial cells, they can enter the intima by diapedesis at the junction of neighboring endothelial cells. This process is mediated by chemoattractant cytokines such as MCP-1, and MCP-1 mRNA has been detected in human and rabbit atherosclerotic plaques (78). In early atherogenesis, the main chemokine sources are vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, though, lipid-laden foam cells can also make MCP-1. ApoE-deficient mice lacking CCR2, a receptor for MCP-1, exhibit markedly reduced lesion formation and decreased macrophage numbers in the aorta (79), indicating an active role for the MCP-1-CCR2 pathway in monocyte recruitment. In addition to CCR2, Ly-6c monocytes require CX3CR1 to accumulate within plaques (56). However, Ly-6c monocytes depend on CCR5 to enter plaques. Collectively, CCR2-MCP-1, CX3CR2-CX3CL1 and CCR5-CCL5 axes are important for monocyte recruitment to plaques (80). Indeed, inhibiting these three pathways in combination almost completely abolished atherosclerosis (81). Interrupting monocyte migration from the blood pool to the atherosclerotic plaque is a promising therapeutic option currently being investigated by multiple groups (82, 83). Our work on RNAi revealed that silencing the chemokine receptor CCR2 in monocytes drastically reduces their migratory capabilities and lowers both monocyte and macrophage numbers in atherosclerotic plaque (52, 84).
Myocardial infarction (MI), another form of sterile inflammation, is the most frequent cause of death in the USA (85). After MI, dead myocardium must be cleared effectively for proper wound healing. MI triggers recruitment of Ly-6c monocytes followed by Ly-6c monocytes (14). Ly-6c monocyte recruitment is CCR2-dependent, whereas Ly-6c monocytes are recruited via CX3CR1. Ly-6c monocytes digest damaged tissue by releasing proteolytic enzymes and inducing phagocytosis. In contrast, Ly-6c monocytes may promote healing by encouraging myofibroblast accumulation, collagen deposition and angiogenesis in the ischemic tissue.
Fate of macrophages in tissue
In atherosclerosis, lipoprotein is engulfed by monocyte-derived macrophages that subsequently become foam cells. Oxidative stress in the arterial wall modifies low-density lipoprotein (LDL), which is then taken up by macrophages through scavenger receptors such as SR-A1, MARCO (SR-A2), CD36, SR-B1, LOX1, SREC1, and SR-PSOX (80). The scavenger receptors can recognize and process modified LDL. Free cholesterol is then trafficked to endoplasmic reticulum where it undergoes esterification to form cholesterol fatty acid esters.
The number of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques is determined by monocyte recruitment and local macrophage proliferation. Monocyte recruitment is dominant in the first 4-8 weeks after initiation of high-fat diet (59), but local macrophage proliferation dominates later. In early atherosclerosis, monocyte recruitment comprises 70% of the plaque macrophage pool, with in situ proliferation making up the remaining 30%, whereas in established atherosclerosis, plaque macrophage origins are 87% proliferated monocytes versus 13% recruited.
Plaque macrophage pool size is also determined by cell retention or egress cues (86). In addition to plaque macrophage phenotype, the net kinetics of supply, exit, and/or death decide between atherosclerotic progression and regression. When plaque-enriched aortic arches collected from ApoE mice were transplanted into the abdomen of ApoE mice (progressive atherosclerosis), very few plaque macrophages egressed into iliac lymph nodes (87). In contrast, when aortic arches were transplanted into the abdomen of ApoE mice, substantial numbers of macrophages egressed from plaques, resulting in regression of atherosclerosis. In a regressive environment, the departed macrophages had higher CCR7 mRNA levels than in progressive atherosclerotic disease. When mice with regressive atherosclerosis were treated with antibodies against CCR7 ligands CCL19 and CCL21, macrophage egress was abrogated (88), resulting in unaltered lesion size and foam cell content in the transplanted aortae. Expression of CCR7 depends on liver X receptor α and β (LXR α and β). Macrophages lacking the receptors exhibit significantly less emigration from atherosclerotic plaques (89). Besides these macrophage egress cues, retention cues also regulate plaque macrophage migration. Netrin-1, a neuroimmune guidance molecule expressed by human and mouse macrophages, inhibits migration of macrophages directed by CCL2 and CCL19. Netrin-1 deficiency in hematopoietic cells resulted in reduced atherosclerosis (90). Macrophage egress and retention cues, together with monocyte recruitment, determine the net macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaque. Suppressing monocyte recruitment with ApoE treatment successfully reduced atherosclerotic plaque burden and macrophage content without involvement of macrophage migratory cues (91).
Monocyte and macrophage functions
Macrophages remove apoptotic cells and debris in homeostatic conditions. Autoantigen clearance in homeostasis has various functions, such as preventing autoimmunity by inducing self-tolerance. Kronke and his colleagues (92) showed that resident macrophages take up apoptotic cells in a 12/15-lipoxygenase-dependent manner, which acts as sink for apoptotic cells and blocks their uptake by inflammatory monocytes. Inhibiting 12-15-lipoxygenase led inflammatory monocytes to process self-antigens; subsequently, self-antigens presented to cytotoxic T cells, which resulted in lupus-like autoimmune disease.
Resident macrophages can also participate in tissue or organ regeneration. Adult salamanders can regrow complete body structures, a process that involves myeloid cell accumulation in the wound (93). Systemic myeloid ablation blocked limb generation and led to scarring. Macrophages, which are abundant in the adult heart (16, 94), may have similar roles in heart regeneration (95). Myocardial infarction in adult mice and humans leads to damage and death of cardiomyocytes, which triggers inflammation and clearance of dead cells and facilitates infarct healing and scar formation (96). However, in young zebrafish and neonate mice, the heart can regenerate after injury without scarring (93, 95). Ischemic injury in the neonatal mouse heart, in the presence of abundant macrophages, resulted in complete regeneration, with no scar, while depleting macrophages resulted in incomplete healing with scar formation. Macrophages can also participate in adaptive thermogenesis (97). Upon cold exposure, adipose tissue macrophages undergo IL-4 and IL13-dependent alternative activation, which leads activated macrophages to secrete catecholamines. This induces thermogenic gene expression in brown adipose tissue and lipolysis of white adipose tissue.
As discussed above, monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages are also important in mediating and resolving inflammation. Myocardial infarction causes an inflammatory reaction (96, 98) that is essential to healing and scar formation. However, excessive inflammation may also increase mortality. Patients with myocardial infarction exhibit high leukocyte count in the blood and the infarct, which impedes infarct healing. Post-MI mortality correlates with white blood cells count. Peak blood monocyte count after MI positively correlates with left ventricular end-diastolic volume and negatively correlates with ejection fraction (99). Excessive inflammation in the infarct after MI, which is very common in patients with atherosclerosis, promotes left ventricular dilation and heart failure. Similarly, high fat diet causes monocytosis in ApoE mice. These monocytes are recruited to atherosclerotic plaques and produce various inflammatory cytokines, such as MPO, MMP2 and MMP9. They can digest extracellular matrix and weaken the fibrous caps overlying plaques, rendering the plaques more vulnerable to rupture.
Systemic monocytosis also contributes to metabolic diseases such as obesity (100) and diabetes (101). Adipose tissue inflammation plays a major role in metabolic diseases (102). Groundbreaking obesity research by Chen (103) and Ferrante (104), for the first time, showed that macrophages accumulate in adipose tissue and play a crucial role in obesity-related insulin resistance. Macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue is CCR2 dependent, as CCR2-deficient mice have reduced adipose macrophages and improved insulin sensitivity (105). In lean mice, 10-15% of cells in adipose tissue express F4/80, a macrophage marker, whereas about 50% of the cells in obese mice are F4/80 (106). Moreover, adipose tissue macrophages in lean mice are the M2 phenotype (ARG1 CD206 CD301) (107), but adipose tissue macrophages in obese mice produce NOS2 and TNFα, indicating an M1 phenotype. Alternative activation of adipose tissue macrophages depends on peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) (108). Myeloid cell-specific PPARγ deletion made mice more prone to obesity and insulin resistance.
Resolution of inflammation
As soon as infectious agents are neutralized and dead cells are removed, inflammation must be resolved and tissue homeostasis is reestablished to ensure repair and regeneration. Atherosclerosis has defective resolution of inflammation (109), which leads to vulnerable plaques and myocardial infarction. The process of inflammation is considered to be active rather than passive (110), and its resolution is similarly active. Effective resolution of inflammation involves efficient clearance of apoptotic cells by phagocytes, a mechanism known as efferocytosis. Apoptotic cell death may also instigate resolution. At one week after MI, apoptosis of immune cells in the infarct exceeds leukocyte recruitment, which is followed by phagocytosis of tissue debris by macrophages, resulting in resolution of inflammation (17). Efferocytosis promotes resolution of inflammation by engulfing dying cells capable of releasing inflammatory contents and producing anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-10 and TGF beta (111). Following encounter with apoptotic cells, macrophages exhibit increased expression of lipoxygenase. This promotes production of resolvin and maserin, which are important mediators in inflammation resolution (112). Granulocytes are one of the first cell types to infiltrate injured tissues. Once the ‘threat’ is abolished, granulocytes die to allow resolution of inflammation. In non-complicated inflammation, granulocytes undergo apoptosis. Death of granulocytes can also be mediated by nitric oxide produced by alternatively activated (M2) macrophages (110). Additionally, lipid mediators, such as cycloxygenase (COX)-generated eicosanoid and prostaglandin E2, generate pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution mediators that facilitate resolution of inflammation.
Conclusions
Acute and chronic inflammation results in systemic monocytosis. Monocytes are recruited to inflammatory sites where they mediate inflammation and differentiate into tissue macrophages. Blood monocytosis enables eradication of infection and removal of cellular debris after injury and ischemia. Monocyte-derived macrophages may also support resolution of inflammation, if their phenotype permits. However, exaggerated monocytosis during inflammation likely harms tissues by limiting resolution of inflammation and propagating exaggerated immune activation, for instance in sepsis. Despite growing evidence of inflammation’s importance in post-MI left ventricular remodeling and heart failure, specific anti-inflammatory therapy has yet to be implemented. Monocytosis can be therapeutically regulated at different stages: monocyte production in the hematopoietic niche, release from the bone marrow and spleen, recruitment to sites of inflammation and/or macrophage polarization. Stem cell factor (31), IL-1β (17), IL-3, and G-MCSF (58) are candidate targets for reducing monocytosis following MI and in atherosclerosis. MCP-1, CCR2 and angiotensin-II receptor 1 may be blocked to reduce monocyte release from bone marrow and splenic niches. siRNA or small molecule inhibitors that target adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1, ICAMs, E-selectins, and chemokines such as MCP-1, CX3CL1, and CCL5 can reduce monocyte recruitment to inflammatory sites. Since alternatively activated macrophages support resolution of inflammation, therapeutics facilitating M1-to-M2 macrophage phenotype transition, for example by inhibiting the transcription factor IRF5, will resolve inflammation more quickly (55). Tissue healing and resolution of inflammation require balanced pro- and anti-inflammatory responses. Monocytes and macrophages secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines that can render atherosclerotic plaques vulnerable to rupture, promote heart failure and support insulin resistance in type II diabetic patients. On the other hand, alternatively activated macrophages stimulate tissue repair by encouraging collagen production, bolster angiogenesis and secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines that can increase insulin sensitivity in lean animals. This emerging complexity of the innate immune system implies that we must develop therapies that precisely target the right cells at the right time to maximize benefits and limit collateral damage.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was funded in part by grants from the National Institute of Health R01-HL096576, R01HL117829, R01HL114477 (M.N.); K99-HL121076 (P.D.).
Summary
Monocytes are part of the vertebrate innate immune system. Blood monocytes are produced by bone marrow and splenic progenitors that derive from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). In cardiovascular disease, such as atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, HSCs proliferate at higher levels that in turn increase production of hematopoietic cells, including monocytes. Once produced in hematopoietic niches, monocytes intravasate blood vessels, circulate, and migrate to sites of inflammation. Monocyte recruitment to atherosclerotic plaque and the ischemic heart depends on various chemokines, such as CCL2, CX3CL1, and CCL5. Once in tissue, monocytes can differentiate into macrophages and dendritic cells. Macrophages are end-effector cells that regulate the steady state and tissue healing, but they can also promote disease. At sites of inflammation, monocytes and macrophages produce inflammatory cytokines, which can exacerbate disease progression. Macrophages can also phagocytose tissue debris and produce pro-healing cytokines. Additionally, macrophages are antigen-presenting cells and can prime T cells. The tissue environment, including cytokines and types of inflammation, instructs macrophage specialization. Understanding monocytosis and its consequences in disease will reveal new therapeutic opportunities without compromising steady state functions.
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
References
- 1. Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DRBlood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity. 2003;19:71–82.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 2. Auffray C, Fogg D, Garfa M, Elain G, Join-Lambert O, Kayal S, Sarnacki S, Cumano A, Lauvau G, Geissmann FMonitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behavior. Science. 2007;317:666–670.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 3. Ingersoll MA, Spanbroek R, Lottaz C, Gautier EL, Frankenberger M, Hoffmann R, Lang R, Haniffa M, Collin M, Tacke F, Habenicht AJ, Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Randolph GJComparison of gene expression profiles between human and mouse monocyte subsets. Blood. 2010;115:e10–e19.[Google Scholar]
- 4. Murray PJ, Wynn TAProtective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:723–737.[Google Scholar]
- 5. Franklin RA, Liao W, Sarkar A, Kim MV, Bivona MR, Liu K, Pamer EG, Li MOThe cellular and molecular origin of tumor-associated macrophages. Science. 2014;344:921–925.[Google Scholar]
- 6. Orkin SH, Zon LIHematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell. 2008;132:631–644.[Google Scholar]
- 7. Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE, Taylor PRTissue-resident macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:986–995.[Google Scholar]
- 8. Ajami B, Bennett JL, Krieger C, Tetzlaff W, Rossi FMLocal self-renewal can sustain CNS microglia maintenance and function throughout adult life. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1538–1543.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 9. Yona S, Kim KW, Wolf Y, Mildner A, Varol D, Breker M, Strauss-Ayali D, Viukov S, Guilliams M, Misharin A, Hume DA, Perlman H, Malissen B, Zelzer E, Jung SFate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity. 2013;38:79–91.[Google Scholar]
- 10. Bain CC, Scott CL, Uronen-Hansson H, Gudjonsson S, Jansson O, Grip O, Guilliams M, Malissen B, Agace WW, Mowat AMResident and pro-inflammatory macrophages in the colon represent alternative context-dependent fates of the same Ly6Chi monocyte precursors. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6:498–510.[Google Scholar]
- 11. Zigmond E, Varol C, Farache J, Elmaliah E, Satpathy AT, Friedlander G, Mack M, Shpigel N, Boneca IG, Murphy KM, Shakhar G, Halpern Z, Jung SLy6C hi monocytes in the inflamed colon give rise to proinflammatory effector cells and migratory antigen-presenting cells. Immunity. 2012;37:1076–1090.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 12. Ben-Mordechai T, Holbova R, Landa-Rouben N, Harel-Adar T, Feinberg MS, Abd Elrahman I, Blum G, Epstein FH, Silman Z, Cohen S, Leor JMacrophage subpopulations are essential for infarct repair with and without stem cell therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1890–1901.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 13. Hilgendorf I, Gerhardt LM, Tan TC, Winter C, Holderried TA, Chousterman BG, Iwamoto Y, Liao R, Zirlik A, Scherer-Crosbie M, Hedrick CC, Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R, Swirski FKLy-6Chigh Monocytes Depend on Nr4a1 to Balance Both Inflammatory and Reparative Phases in the Infarcted Myocardium. Circ Res. 2014;114:1611–1622.[Google Scholar]
- 14. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo JL, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJThe healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med. 2007;204:3037–3047.[Google Scholar]
- 15. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE, Sojka DK, Carrero JA, Calderon B, Brija T, Gautier EL, Ivanov S, Satpathy AT, Schilling JD, Schwendener R, Sergin I, Razani B, Forsberg EC, Yokoyama WM, Unanue ER, Colonna M, Randolph GJ, Mann DLEmbryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity. 2014;40:91–104.[Google Scholar]
- 16. Heidt T, Courties G, Dutta P, Sager H, Sebas M, Iwamoto Y, Sun Y, Da Silva N, Panizzi P, van der Laan AM, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MDifferential Contribution of Monocytes to Heart Macrophages in Steady-State and After Myocardial Infarction. Circ Res. 2014[Google Scholar]
- 17. Leuschner F, Rauch PJ, Ueno T, Gorbatov R, Marinelli B, Lee WW, Dutta P, Wei Y, Robbins C, Iwamoto Y, Sena B, Chudnovskiy A, Panizzi P, Keliher E, Higgins JM, Libby P, Moskowitz MA, Pittet MJ, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MRapid monocyte kinetics in acute myocardial infarction are sustained by extramedullary monocytopoiesis. J Exp Med. 2012;209:123–137.[Google Scholar]
- 18. Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M, Ley KDevelopment of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science. 2010;327:656–661.[Google Scholar]
- 19. Auffray C, Fogg DK, Narni-Mancinelli E, Senechal B, Trouillet C, Saederup N, Leemput J, Bigot K, Campisi L, Abitbol M, Molina T, Charo I, Hume DA, Cumano A, Lauvau G, Geissmann FCX3CR1+ CD115+ CD135+ common macrophage/DC precursors and the role of CX3CR1 in their response to inflammation. J Exp Med. 2009;206:595–606.[Google Scholar]
- 20. Sathe P, Metcalf D, Vremec D, Naik SH, Langdon WY, Huntington ND, Wu L, Shortman KLymphoid tissue and plasmacytoid dendritic cells and macrophages do not share a common macrophage-dendritic cell-restricted progenitor. Immunity. 2014;41:104–115.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 21. Hettinger J, Richards DM, Hansson J, Barra MM, Joschko AC, Krijgsveld J, Feuerer MOrigin of monocytes and macrophages in a committed progenitor. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:821–830.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 22. Wilson A, Laurenti E, Oser G, van der Wath RC, Blanco-Bose W, Jaworski M, Offner S, Dunant CF, Eshkind L, Bockamp E, Lio P, Macdonald HR, Trumpp AHematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell. 2008;135:1118–1129.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 23. King KY, Goodell MAInflammatory modulation of HSCs: viewing the HSC as a foundation for the immune response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:685–692.[Google Scholar]
- 24. Baldridge MT, King KY, Boles NC, Weksberg DC, Goodell MAQuiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN-gamma in response to chronic infection. Nature. 2010;465:793–797.[Google Scholar]
- 25. Essers MA, Offner S, Blanco-Bose WE, Waibler Z, Kalinke U, Duchosal MA, Trumpp AIFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2009;458:904–908.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 26. Giron-Michel J, Weill D, Bailly G, Legras S, Nardeux PC, Azzarone B, Tovey MG, Eid PDirect signal transduction via functional interferon-alphabeta receptors in CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 2002;16:1135–1142.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 27. Heidt T, Sager HB, Courties G, Dutta P, Iwamoto Y, Zaltsman A, von Zur Muhlen C, Bode C, Fricchione GL, Denninger J, Lin CP, Vinegoni C, Libby P, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MChronic variable stress activates hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2014[Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhao JL, Ma C, O’Connell RM, Mehta A, DiLoreto R, Heath JR, Baltimore DConversion of danger signals into cytokine signals by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for regulation of stress-induced hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:445–459.[Google Scholar]
- 29. Nagai Y, Garrett KP, Ohta S, Bahrun U, Kouro T, Akira S, Takatsu K, Kincade PWToll-like receptors on hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulate innate immune system replenishment. Immunity. 2006;24:801–812.[Google Scholar]
- 30. Takizawa H, Regoes RR, Boddupalli CS, Bonhoeffer S, Manz MGDynamic variation in cycling of hematopoietic stem cells in steady state and inflammation. J Exp Med. 2011;208:273–284.[Google Scholar]
- 31. Dutta P, Courties G, Wei Y, Leuschner F, Gorbatov R, Robbins CS, Iwamoto Y, Thompson B, Carlson AL, Heidt T, Majmudar MD, Lasitschka F, Etzrodt M, Waterman P, Waring MT, Chicoine AT, van der Laan AM, Niessen HW, Piek JJ, Rubin BB, Butany J, Stone JR, Katus HA, Murphy SA, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS, Vinegoni C, Moskowitz MA, Pittet MJ, Libby P, Lin CP, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MMyocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis. Nature. 2012;487:325–329.[Google Scholar]
- 32. Chow A, Lucas D, Hidalgo A, Mendez-Ferrer S, Hashimoto D, Scheiermann C, Battista M, Leboeuf M, Prophete C, van Rooijen N, Tanaka M, Merad M, Frenette PSBone marrow CD169+ macrophages promote the retention of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the mesenchymal stem cell niche. J Exp Med. 2011;208:261–271.[Google Scholar]
- 33. Winkler IG, Sims NA, Pettit AR, Barbier V, Nowlan B, Helwani F, Poulton IJ, van Rooijen N, Alexander KA, Raggatt LJ, Levesque JPBone marrow macrophages maintain hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niches and their depletion mobilizes HSCs. Blood. 2010;116:4815–4828.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 34. Fujisaki J, Wu J, Carlson AL, Silberstein L, Putheti P, Larocca R, Gao W, Saito TI, Lo Celso C, Tsuyuzaki H, Sato T, Cote D, Sykes M, Strom TB, Scadden DT, Lin CPIn vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature. 2011;474:216–219.[Google Scholar]
- 35. Ding L, Saunders TL, Enikolopov G, Morrison SJEndothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2012;481:457–462.[Google Scholar]
- 36. Ding L, Morrison SJHaematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature. 2013;495:231–235.[Google Scholar]
- 37. Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa TMaintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity. 2006;25:977–988.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 38. Shi C, Jia T, Mendez-Ferrer S, Hohl TM, Serbina NV, Lipuma L, Leiner I, Li MO, Frenette PS, Pamer EGBone marrow mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells induce monocyte emigration in response to circulating toll-like receptor ligands. Immunity. 2011;34:590–601.[Google Scholar]
- 39. Calvi LM, Adams GB, Weibrecht KW, Weber JM, Olson DP, Knight MC, Martin RP, Schipani E, Divieti P, Bringhurst FR, Milner LA, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DTOsteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 40. Morrison SJ, Scadden DTThe bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2014;505:327–334.[Google Scholar]
- 41. Friedman ADTranscriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development. Oncogene. 2007;26:6816–6828.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 42. Laiosa CV, Stadtfeld M, Xie H, de Andres-Aguayo L, Graf TReprogramming of committed T cell progenitors to macrophages and dendritic cells by C/EBP alpha and PU.1 transcription factors. Immunity. 2006;25:731–744.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 43. Xie H, Ye M, Feng R, Graf TStepwise reprogramming of B cells into macrophages. Cell. 2004;117:663–676.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 44. Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissmann FBlood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:669–692.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 45. Krishnaraju K, Hoffman B, Liebermann DAEarly growth response gene 1 stimulates development of hematopoietic progenitor cells along the macrophage lineage at the expense of the granulocyte and erythroid lineages. Blood. 2001;97:1298–1305.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 46. Nguyen HQ, Hoffman-Liebermann B, Liebermann DAThe zinc finger transcription factor Egr-1 is essential for and restricts differentiation along the macrophage lineage. Cell. 1993;72:197–209.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 47. Tamura T, Nagamura-Inoue T, Shmeltzer Z, Kuwata T, Ozato KICSBP directs bipotential myeloid progenitor cells to differentiate into mature macrophages. Immunity. 2000;13:155–165.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 48. Galloway JL, Wingert RA, Thisse C, Thisse B, Zon LILoss of gata1 but not gata2 converts erythropoiesis to myelopoiesis in zebrafish embryos. Dev Cell. 2005;8:109–116.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 49. Mossadegh-Keller N, Sarrazin S, Kandalla PK, Espinosa L, Stanley ER, Nutt SL, Moore J, Sieweke MHM-CSF instructs myeloid lineage fate in single haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2013;497:239–243.[Google Scholar]
- 50. Yamamoto R, Morita Y, Ooehara J, Hamanaka S, Onodera M, Rudolph KL, Ema H, Nakauchi HClonal analysis unveils self-renewing lineage-restricted progenitors generated directly from hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 2013;154:1112–1126.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 51. Panizzi P, Swirski FK, Figueiredo JL, Waterman P, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Pittet M, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MImpaired infarct healing in atherosclerotic mice with Ly-6C(hi) monocytosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1629–1638.[Google Scholar]
- 52. Leuschner F, Dutta P, Gorbatov R, Novobrantseva TI, Donahoe JS, Courties G, Lee KM, Kim JI, Markmann JF, Marinelli B, Panizzi P, Lee WW, Iwamoto Y, Milstein S, Epstein-Barash H, Cantley W, Wong J, Cortez-Retamozo V, Newton A, Love K, Libby P, Pittet MJ, Swirski FK, Koteliansky V, Langer R, Weissleder R, Anderson DG, Nahrendorf MTherapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory monocytes in mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:1005–1010.[Google Scholar]
- 53. Majmudar MD, Keliher EJ, Heidt T, Leuschner F, Truelove J, Sena BF, Gorbatov R, Iwamoto Y, Dutta P, Wojtkiewicz G, Courties G, Sebas M, Borodovsky A, Fitzgerald K, Nolte MW, Dickneite G, Chen JW, Anderson DG, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MMonocyte-directed RNAi targeting CCR2 improves infarct healing in atherosclerosis-prone mice. Circulation. 2013;127:2038–2046.[Google Scholar]
- 54. Swirski FK, Nahrendorf MLeukocyte behavior in atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Science. 2013;339:161–166.[Google Scholar]
- 55. Courties G, Heidt T, Sebas M, Iwamoto Y, Jeon D, Truelove J, Tricot B, Wojtkiewicz G, Dutta P, Sager HB, Borodovsky A, Novobrantseva T, Klebanov B, Fitzgerald K, Anderson DG, Libby P, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MIn vivo silencing of the transcription factor IRF5 reprograms the macrophage phenotype and improves infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1556–1566.[Google Scholar]
- 56. Tacke F, Alvarez D, Kaplan TJ, Jakubzick C, Spanbroek R, Llodra J, Garin A, Liu J, Mack M, van Rooijen N, Lira SA, Habenicht AJ, Randolph GJMonocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:185–194.[Google Scholar]
- 57. Swirski FK, Libby P, Aikawa E, Alcaide P, Luscinskas FW, Weissleder R, Pittet MJLy-6Chi monocytes dominate hypercholesterolemia-associated monocytosis and give rise to macrophages in atheromata. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:195–205.[Google Scholar]
- 58. Robbins CS, Chudnovskiy A, Rauch PJ, Figueiredo JL, Iwamoto Y, Gorbatov R, Etzrodt M, Weber GF, Ueno T, van Rooijen N, Mulligan-Kehoe MJ, Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Pittet MJ, Weissleder R, Swirski FKExtramedullary hematopoiesis generates Ly-6C(high) monocytes that infiltrate atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation. 2012;125:364–374.[Google Scholar]
- 59. Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, Theurl I, Iwamoto Y, Figueiredo JL, Gorbatov R, Sukhova GK, Gerhardt LM, Smyth D, Zavitz CC, Shikatani EA, Parsons M, van Rooijen N, Lin HY, Husain M, Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R, Swirski FKLocal proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1166–1172.[Google Scholar]
- 60. Yvan-Charvet L, Pagler T, Gautier EL, Avagyan S, Siry RL, Han S, Welch CL, Wang N, Randolph GJ, Snoeck HW, Tall ARATP-binding cassette transporters and HDL suppress hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Science. 2010;328:1689–1693.[Google Scholar]
- 61. Murphy AJ, Akhtari M, Tolani S, Pagler T, Bijl N, Kuo CL, Wang M, Sanson M, Abramowicz S, Welch C, Bochem AE, Kuivenhoven JA, Yvan-Charvet L, Tall ARApoE regulates hematopoietic stem cell proliferation, monocytosis, and monocyte accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4138–4149.[Google Scholar]
- 62. Westerterp M, Murphy AJ, Wang M, Pagler TA, Vengrenyuk Y, Kappus MS, Gorman DJ, Nagareddy PR, Zhu X, Abramowicz S, Parks JS, Welch C, Fisher EA, Wang N, Yvan-Charvet L, Tall ARDeficiency of ATP-binding cassette transporters A1 and G1 in macrophages increases inflammation and accelerates atherosclerosis in mice. Circ Res. 2013;112:1456–1465.[Google Scholar]
- 63. Westerterp M, Gourion-Arsiquaud S, Murphy AJ, Shih A, Cremers S, Levine RL, Tall AR, Yvan-Charvet LRegulation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization by cholesterol efflux pathways. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:195–206.[Google Scholar]
- 64. Han Y, Jing J, Tu S, Tian F, Xue H, Chen W, Chen J, Reiber JH, Chen YST elevation acute myocardial infarction accelerates non-culprit coronary lesion atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:253–261.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 65. Kim EJ, Kim S, Kang DO, Seo HSMetabolic Activity of the Spleen and Bone Marrow in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Evaluated by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomograpic Imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:454–460.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 66. Signer RA, Magee JA, Salic A, Morrison SJHaematopoietic stem cells require a highly regulated protein synthesis rate. Nature. 2014;509:49–54.[Google Scholar]
- 67. Mendez-Ferrer S, Lucas D, Battista M, Frenette PSHaematopoietic stem cell release is regulated by circadian oscillations. Nature. 2008;452:442–447.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 68. Scheiermann C, Kunisaki Y, Lucas D, Chow A, Jang JE, Zhang D, Hashimoto D, Merad M, Frenette PSAdrenergic nerves govern circadian leukocyte recruitment to tissues. Immunity. 2012;37:290–301.[Google Scholar]
- 69. Nguyen KD, Fentress SJ, Qiu Y, Yun K, Cox JS, Chawla ACircadian gene Bmal1 regulates diurnal oscillations of Ly6C(hi) inflammatory monocytes. Science. 2013;341:1483–1488.[Google Scholar]
- 70. Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M, Etzrodt M, Wildgruber M, Cortez-Retamozo V, Panizzi P, Figueiredo JL, Kohler RH, Chudnovskiy A, Waterman P, Aikawa E, Mempel TR, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJIdentification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites. Science. 2009;325:612–616.[Google Scholar]
- 71. Leuschner F, Panizzi P, Chico-Calero I, Lee WW, Ueno T, Cortez-Retamozo V, Waterman P, Gorbatov R, Marinelli B, Iwamoto Y, Chudnovskiy A, Figueiredo JL, Sosnovik DE, Pittet MJ, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition prevents the release of monocytes from their splenic reservoir in mice with myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2010;107:1364–1373.[Google Scholar]
- 72. Shi C, Pamer EGMonocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:762–774.[Google Scholar]
- 73. Serbina NV, Salazar-Mather TP, Biron CA, Kuziel WA, Pamer EGTNF/iNOS-producing dendritic cells mediate innate immune defense against bacterial infection. Immunity. 2003;19:59–70.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 74. Libby PInflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420:868–874.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 75. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GKProgress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature. 2011;473:317–325.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 76. Moore KJ, Tabas IMacrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145:341–355.[Google Scholar]
- 77. Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MAJEndothelial expression of a mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecule during atherogenesis. Science. 1991;251:788–791.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 78. Yla-Herttuala S, Lipton BA, Rosenfeld ME, Sarkioja T, Yoshimura T, Leonard EJ, Witztum JL, Steinberg DExpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in macrophage-rich areas of human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:5252–5256.[Google Scholar]
- 79. Boring L, Gosling J, Cleary M, Charo IFDecreased lesion formation in CCR2−/− mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature. 1998;394:894–897.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 80. Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EAMacrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:709–721.[Google Scholar]
- 81. Combadiere C, Potteaux S, Rodero M, Simon T, Pezard A, Esposito B, Merval R, Proudfoot A, Tedgui A, Mallat ZCombined inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 abrogates Ly6C(hi) and Ly6C(lo) monocytosis and almost abolishes atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Circulation. 2008;117:1649–1657.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 82. Park JG, Ryu SY, Jung IH, Lee YH, Kang KJ, Lee MR, Lee MN, Sonn SK, Lee JH, Lee H, Oh GT, Moon K, Shim HEvaluation of VCAM-1 antibodies as therapeutic agent for atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 2013;226:356–363.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 83. Ley K, Huo YVCAM-1 is critical in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1209–1210.[Google Scholar]
- 84. Majmudar MD, Yoo J, Keliher EJ, Truelove JJ, Iwamoto Y, Sena B, Dutta P, Borodovsky A, Fitzgerald K, Di Carli MF, Libby P, Anderson DG, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf MPolymeric nanoparticle PET/MR imaging allows macrophage detection in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Res. 2013;112:755–761.[Google Scholar]
- 85. The top 10 causes of death. World Health Organization; 2014. [PubMed]
- 86. Gerszten RE, Tager AMThe monocyte in atherosclerosis--should I stay or should I go now? N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1734–1736.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 87. Llodra J, Angeli V, Liu J, Trogan E, Fisher EA, Randolph GJEmigration of monocyte-derived cells from atherosclerotic lesions characterizes regressive, but not progressive, plaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11779–11784.[Google Scholar]
- 88. Trogan E, Feig JE, Dogan S, Rothblat GH, Angeli V, Tacke F, Randolph GJ, Fisher EAGene expression changes in foam cells and the role of chemokine receptor CCR7 during atherosclerosis regression in ApoE-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3781–3786.[Google Scholar]
- 89. Feig JE, Pineda-Torra I, Sanson M, Bradley MN, Vengrenyuk Y, Bogunovic D, Gautier EL, Rubinstein D, Hong C, Liu J, Wu C, van Rooijen N, Bhardwaj N, Garabedian M, Tontonoz P, Fisher EALXR promotes the maximal egress of monocyte-derived cells from mouse aortic plaques during atherosclerosis regression. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:4415–4424.[Google Scholar]
- 90. van Gils JM, Derby MC, Fernandes LR, Ramkhelawon B, Ray TD, Rayner KJ, Parathath S, Distel E, Feig JL, Alvarez-Leite JI, Rayner AJ, McDonald TO, O’Brien KD, Stuart LM, Fisher EA, Lacy-Hulbert A, Moore KJThe neuroimmune guidance cue netrin-1 promotes atherosclerosis by inhibiting the emigration of macrophages from plaques. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:136–143.[Google Scholar]
- 91. Potteaux S, Gautier EL, Hutchison SB, van Rooijen N, Rader DJ, Thomas MJ, Sorci-Thomas MG, Randolph GJSuppressed monocyte recruitment drives macrophage removal from atherosclerotic plaques of Apoe-/- mice during disease regression. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2025–2036.[Google Scholar]
- 92. Uderhardt S, Herrmann M, Oskolkova OV, Aschermann S, Bicker W, Ipseiz N, Sarter K, Frey B, Rothe T, Voll R, Nimmerjahn F, Bochkov VN, Schett G, Kronke G12/15-lipoxygenase orchestrates the clearance of apoptotic cells and maintains immunologic tolerance. Immunity. 2012;36:834–846.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 93. Godwin JW, Pinto AR, Rosenthal NAMacrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:9415–9420.[Google Scholar]
- 94. Pinto AR, Paolicelli R, Salimova E, Gospocic J, Slonimsky E, Bilbao-Cortes D, Godwin JW, Rosenthal NAAn abundant tissue macrophage population in the adult murine heart with a distinct alternatively-activated macrophage profile. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36814.[Google Scholar]
- 95. Aurora AB, Porrello ER, Tan W, Mahmoud AI, Hill JA, Bassel-Duby R, Sadek HA, Olson ENMacrophages are required for neonatal heart regeneration. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1382–1392.[Google Scholar]
- 96. Swirski FK, Nahrendorf MLeukocyte behavior in atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Science. 2013;339:161–166.[Google Scholar]
- 97. Nguyen KD, Qiu Y, Cui X, Goh YP, Mwangi J, David T, Mukundan L, Brombacher F, Locksley RM, Chawla AAlternatively activated macrophages produce catecholamines to sustain adaptive thermogenesis. Nature. 2011;480:104–108.[Google Scholar]
- 98. Frangogiannis NG, Smith CW, Entman MLThe inflammatory response in myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53:31–47.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 99. Maekawa Y, Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Asakura Y, Takahashi T, Ishikawa S, Mitamura H, Ogawa SPrognostic significance of peripheral monocytosis after reperfused acute myocardial infarction:a possible role for left ventricular remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:241–246.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 100. Nagareddy PR, Kraakman M, Masters SL, Stirzaker RA, Gorman DJ, Grant RW, Dragoljevic D, Hong ES, Abdel-Latif A, Smyth SS, Choi SH, Korner J, Bornfeldt KE, Fisher EA, Dixit VD, Tall AR, Goldberg IJ, Murphy AJAdipose tissue macrophages promote myelopoiesis and monocytosis in obesity. Cell Metab. 2014;19:821–835.[Google Scholar]
- 101. Nagareddy PR, Murphy AJ, Stirzaker RA, Hu Y, Yu S, Miller RG, Ramkhelawon B, Distel E, Westerterp M, Huang LS, Schmidt AM, Orchard TJ, Fisher EA, Tall AR, Goldberg IJHyperglycemia promotes myelopoiesis and impairs the resolution of atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2013;17:695–708.[Google Scholar]
- 102. Odegaard JI, Chawla APleiotropic actions of insulin resistance and inflammation in metabolic homeostasis. Science. 2013;339:172–177.[Google Scholar]
- 103. Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, Sole J, Nichols A, Ross JS, Tartaglia LA, Chen HChronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1821–1830.[Google Scholar]
- 104. Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AWJObesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1796–1808.[Google Scholar]
- 105. Weisberg SP, Hunter D, Huber R, Lemieux J, Slaymaker S, Vaddi K, Charo I, Leibel RL, Ferrante AWJCCR2 modulates inflammatory and metabolic effects of high-fat feeding. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:115–124.[Google Scholar]
- 106. Chawla A, Nguyen KD, Goh YPMacrophage-mediated inflammation in metabolic disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:738–749.[Google Scholar]
- 107. Lumeng CN, Bodzin JL, Saltiel ARObesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:175–184.[Google Scholar]
- 108. Odegaard JI, Ricardo-Gonzalez RR, Goforth MH, Morel CR, Subramanian V, Mukundan L, Red Eagle A, Vats D, Brombacher F, Ferrante AW, Chawla AMacrophage-specific PPARgamma controls alternative activation and improves insulin resistance. Nature. 2007;447:1116–1120.[Google Scholar]
- 109. Tabas IMacrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:36–46.[Google Scholar]
- 110. Maskrey BH, Megson IL, Whitfield PD, Rossi AGMechanisms of resolution of inflammation: a focus on cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1001–1006.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 111. Korns D, Frasch SC, Fernandez-Boyanapalli R, Henson PM, Bratton DLModulation of macrophage efferocytosis in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2011;2:57.[Google Scholar]
- 112. Ariel A, Serhan CNNew Lives Given by Cell Death: Macrophage Differentiation Following Their Encounter with Apoptotic Leukocytes during the Resolution of Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2012;3:4.[Google Scholar]
- 113. Feinberg MW, Wara AK, Cao Z, Lebedeva MA, Rosenbauer F, Iwasaki H, Hirai H, Katz JP, Haspel RL, Gray S, Akashi K, Segre J, Kaestner KH, Tenen DG, Jain MKThe Kruppel-like factor KLF4 is a critical regulator of monocyte differentiation. EMBO J. 2007;26:4138–4148.[Google Scholar]
- 114. Hegde SP, Zhao J, Ashmun RA, Shapiro LHc-Maf induces monocytic differentiation and apoptosis in bipotent myeloid progenitors. Blood. 1999;94:1578–1589.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 115. Sieweke MH, Tekotte H, Frampton J, Graf TMafB is an interaction partner and repressor of Ets-1 that inhibits erythroid differentiation. Cell. 1996;85:49–60.[PubMed][Google Scholar]