Protective pathways against colitis mediated by appendicitis and appendectomy.
Journal: 2011/September - Clinical and Experimental Immunology
ISSN: 1365-2249
Abstract:
Appendicitis followed by appendectomy (AA) at a young age protects against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Using a novel murine appendicitis model, we showed that AA protected against subsequent experimental colitis. To delineate genes/pathways involved in this protection, AA was performed and samples harvested from the most distal colon. RNA was extracted from four individual colonic samples per group (AA group and double-laparotomy control group) and each sample microarray analysed followed by gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The gene-expression study was validated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of 14 selected genes across the immunological spectrum. Distal colonic expression of 266 gene-sets was up-regulated significantly in AA group samples (false discovery rates < 1%; P-value < 0·001). Time-course RT-PCR experiments involving the 14 genes displayed down-regulation over 28 days. The IBD-associated genes tnfsf10, SLC22A5, C3, ccr5, irgm, ptger4 and ccl20 were modulated in AA mice 3 days after surgery. Many key immunological and cellular function-associated gene-sets involved in the protective effect of AA in experimental colitis were identified. The down-regulation of 14 selected genes over 28 days after surgery indicates activation, repression or de-repression of these genes leading to downstream AA-conferred anti-colitis protection. Further analysis of these genes, profiles and biological pathways may assist in developing better therapeutic strategies in the management of intractable IBD.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(9)
References
(42)
Diseases
(4)
Chemicals
(6)
Organisms
(3)
Processes
(4)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Clin Exp Immunol 165(3): 393-400

Protective pathways against colitis mediated by appendicitis and appendectomy

Click here to view.(434K, doc)
Department of Medicine, St George Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Inflammation and Infection Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
R. Cheluvappa, Inflammation and Infection Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Wallace Wurth Building, University of New South Wales, Gate 9 High Street, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. E-mail: ua.ude.wsnu@appavulehc.r
Accepted 2011 May 19.

Abstract

Appendicitis followed by appendectomy (AA) at a young age protects against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Using a novel murine appendicitis model, we showed that AA protected against subsequent experimental colitis. To delineate genes/pathways involved in this protection, AA was performed and samples harvested from the most distal colon. RNA was extracted from four individual colonic samples per group (AA group and double-laparotomy control group) and each sample microarray analysed followed by gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The gene-expression study was validated by quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) of 14 selected genes across the immunological spectrum. Distal colonic expression of 266 gene-sets was up-regulated significantly in AA group samples (false discovery rates < 1%; P-value < 0·001). Time–course RT–PCR experiments involving the 14 genes displayed down-regulation over 28 days. The IBD-associated genes tnfsf10, SLC22A5, C3, ccr5, irgm, ptger4 and ccl20 were modulated in AA mice 3 days after surgery. Many key immunological and cellular function-associated gene-sets involved in the protective effect of AA in experimental colitis were identified. The down-regulation of 14 selected genes over 28 days after surgery indicates activation, repression or de-repression of these genes leading to downstream AA-conferred anti-colitis protection. Further analysis of these genes, profiles and biological pathways may assist in developing better therapeutic strategies in the management of intractable IBD.

Keywords: appendectomy, appendicitis, colitis, Th17 system
Abstract

The gene-set groups chosen for further evaluation had stringent cut-off values (FDR < 1% and P < 0·001). Using these criteria, there were no gene-sets up-regulated in the SS group. However, 266 gene-sets were up-regulated in the AA group. SS group: sham and sham group; AA group: appendicitis and appendectomy group; FDR: false discovery rate.

Acknowledgments

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for funding this study. We acknowledge Warren Kaplan and Mark J Cowley from Peter Wills Bioinformatics Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia who conducted the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis for us.

Acknowledgments

References

  • 1. Becker RS, Knight KLSomatic diversification of immunoglobulin heavy chain VDJ genes: evidence for somatic gene conversion in rabbits. Cell. 1990;63:987–97.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dasso JF, Howell MDNeonatal appendectomy impairs mucosal immunity in rabbits. Cell Immunol. 1997;182:29–37.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. Weinstein PD, Anderson AO, Mage RGRabbit IgH sequences in appendix germinal centers: VH diversification by gene conversion-like and hypermutation mechanisms. Immunity. 1994;1:647–59.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RVThe epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–25.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. Larner AJThe aetiology of appendicitis. Br J Hosp Med. 1988;39:540–2.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Velanovich V, Satava RBalancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg. 1992;58:264–9.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BIReview of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:745–9.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Koutroubakis IE, Vlachonikolis IG, Kouroumalis EARole of appendicitis and appendectomy in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis: a critical review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8:277–86.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lopez Ramos D, Gabriel R, Cantero Perona J, Moreno Otero R, Fernandez Bermejo M, Mate Jimenez JAssociation of MALTectomy (appendectomy and tonsillectomy) and inflammatory bowel disease: a familial case-control study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2001;93:303–14.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom AAppendectomy and protection against ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:808–14.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Radford-Smith GL, Edwards JE, Purdie DM, et al Protective role of appendicectomy on onset and severity of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Gut. 2002;51:808–13.[Google Scholar]
  • 12. Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom AAppendectomy is followed by increased risk of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:40–6.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Chiba C, et al Cytokine imbalance and autoantibody production in T cell receptor-alpha mutant mice with inflammatory bowel disease. J Exp Med. 1996;183:847–56.[Google Scholar]
  • 14. Krieglstein CF, Cerwinka WH, Laroux FS, et al Role of appendix and spleen in experimental colitis. J Surg Res. 2001;101:166–75.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 15. Farkas SA, Hornung M, Sattler C, et al Preferential migration of CD62L cells into the appendix in mice with experimental chronic colitis. Eur Surg Res. 2005;37:115–22.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. Watson Ng WS, Hampartzoumian T, Lloyd AR, Grimm MCA murine model of appendicitis and the impact of inflammation on appendiceal lymphocyte constituents. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;150:169–78.[Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, et al PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–73.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. Flach CF, Eriksson A, Jennische E, Lange S, Gunnerek C, Lonnroth IDetection of elafin as a candidate biomarker for ulcerative colitis by whole-genome microarray screening. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:837–42.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. Seidelin JB, Nielsen OHExpression profiling of apoptosis-related genes in enterocytes isolated from patients with ulcerative colitis. APMIS. 2006;114:508–17.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cao D, Wilentz RE, Abbruzzese JL, Ho L, Maitra AAberrant expression of maspin in idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease is associated with disease activity and neoplastic transformation. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;36:39–46.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. Costello CM, Mah N, Hasler R, et al Dissection of the inflammatory bowel disease transcriptome using genome-wide cDNA microarrays. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e199.[Google Scholar]
  • 22. Uthoff SM, Eichenberger MR, Lewis RK, et al Identification of candidate genes in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease using cDNA array technology. Int J Oncol. 2001;19:803–10.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dieckgraefe BK, Stenson WF, Korzenik JR, Swanson PE, Harrington CAAnalysis of mucosal gene expression in inflammatory bowel disease by parallel oligonucleotide arrays. Physiol Genomics. 2000;4:1–11.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rivera E, Flores I, Appleyard CBMolecular profiling of a rat model of colitis: validation of known inflammatory genes and identification of novel disease-associated targets. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:950–66.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. de Buhr MF, Mahler M, Geffers R, et al Cd14, Gbp1, and Pla2g2a: three major candidate genes for experimental IBD identified by combining QTL and microarray analyses. Physiol Genomics. 2006;25:426–34.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Dooley TP, Curto EV, Reddy SP, et al Regulation of gene expression in inflammatory bowel disease and correlation with IBD drugs: screening by DNA microarrays. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:1–14.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kristensen NN, Olsen J, Gad M, Claesson MHGenome-wide expression profiling during protection from colitis by regulatory T cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:75–87.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bernstein H, Holubec H, Bernstein C, et al Deoxycholate-induced colitis is markedly attenuated in Nos2 knockout mice in association with modulation of gene expression profiles. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:628–42.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 29. Nakajima A, Wada K, Katayama K, et al Gene expression profile after peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma ligand administration in dextran sodium sulfate mice. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(Suppl 14):62–6.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 30. Brazma AMinimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)–successes, failures, challenges. Scientific World J. 2009;9:420–3.[Google Scholar]
  • 31. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, et al Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) – toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001;29:365–71.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 32. Affymetrix Online User Manual – GeneChip® Whole Transcript (WT) Sense Target Labeling Assay Available at: .[PubMed]
  • 33. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TPSummaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e15.[Google Scholar]
  • 34. Storey JD, Tibshirani RStatistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9440–5.[Google Scholar]
  • 35. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.[Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brost S, Koschny R, Sykora J, et al Differential expression of the TRAIL/TRAIL-receptor system in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Pathol Res Pract. 2010;206:43–50.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lundgren BA, Rorsman F, Portela-Gomes GM, et al Identification of complement C3 as an autoantigen in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:429–36.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 38. Oki M, Ohtani H, Kinouchi Y, et al Accumulation of CCR5+ T cells around RANTES+ granulomas in Crohn's disease: a pivotal site of Th1-shifted immune response? Lab Invest. 2005;85:137–45.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 39. Grimm MC, Newman R, Hassim Z, et al Cutting edge: vasoactive intestinal peptide acts as a potent suppressor of inflammation in vivo by trans-deactivating chemokine receptors. J Immunol. 2003;171:4990–4.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 40. Libioulle C, Louis E, Hansoul S, et al Novel Crohn disease locus identified by genome-wide association maps to a gene desert on 5p13.1 and modulates expression of PTGER4. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e58.[Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kaser A, Ludwiczek O, Holzmann S, et al Increased expression of CCL20 in human inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Immunol. 2004;24:74–85.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rioux JD, Silverberg MS, Daly MJ, et al Genomewide search in Canadian families with inflammatory bowel disease reveals two novel susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1863–70.[Google Scholar]
  • 43. Waterman M, Xu W, Stempak JM, et al Distinct and overlapping genetic loci in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: correlations with pathogenesis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010 e-publication ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.