Protective effect of Astragalus membranaceus on intestinal mucosa reperfusion injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats.
Journal: 2005/October - World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN: 1007-9327
PUBMED: 16124050
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE
To study the protective effect of Astragalus membranaceus on intestinal mucosa reperfusion injury and its mechanism after hemorrhagic shock in rats.
METHODS
A total of 32 SD rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8, each group): normal group, model group, low dosage group (treated with 10 g/kg Astragalus membranaceus) and high dosage group (treated with 20 g/kg Astragalus membranaceus). The model of hemorrhagic shock for 60 min and reperfusion for 90 min was established. Therapeutic solution (3 mL) was administrated before reperfusion. At the end of the study, the observed intestinal pathology was analyzed. The blood concentrations of lactic acid (LD), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), malondialdehyde (MDA) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) in intestinal mucosa were determined.
RESULTS
The intestinal mucosa pathology showed severe damage in model group and low dosage group, slight damage in high dosage group and no obvious damage in normal group. The Chiu's score in low dose group and high dose group was significantly lower than that in model group. The content of MDA in model group was higher than that in low and high dose groups, while that in high dose group was almost the same as in normal group. The activity of SOD and GSH-PX was the lowest in model group and significantly higher in high dose group than in normal and low dose groups. The concentrations of LD and ET-1 in model group were the highest. The concentrations of NO in model group and low dose group were significantly lower than those in high dose group and normal group.
CONCLUSIONS
High dose Astragalus membranaeus has much better protective effect on hemorrhagic shock-reperfusion injury of intestinal mucosa than low dose Astragalus membranaceus. The mechanism may be that Astragalus membranaceus can improve antioxidative effect and regulate NO/ET level during hemorrhagic reperfusion.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(9)
References
(27)
Conditions
(2)
Drugs
(1)
Chemicals
(1)
Organisms
(4)
Processes
(1)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
World J Gastroenterol 11(32): 4986-4991

Protective effect of <em>Astragalus membranaceus</em> on intestinal mucosa reperfusion injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats

Zi-Qing Hei, Jing-Jun Zhang, Bing-Xue Chen, Xiao-Yun Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
He-Qing Huang, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.

Correspondence to: Dr. Zi-Qing Hei, Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China. moc.anis@gniqizieh

Telephone:+86-20-85516867-3132

Zi-Qing Hei, Jing-Jun Zhang, Bing-Xue Chen, Xiao-Yun Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
He-Qing Huang, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.

Correspondence to: Dr. Zi-Qing Hei, Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China. moc.anis@gniqizieh

Telephone:+86-20-85516867-3132

Received 2004 Oct 29; Revised 2005 Jan 8; Accepted 2005 Jan 12.

Abstract

AIM: To study the protective effect of Astragalus membranaceus on intestinal mucosa reperfusion injury and its mechanism after hemorrhagic shock in rats.

METHODS: A total of 32 SD rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8, each group): normal group, model group, low dosage group (treated with 10 g/kg Astragalus membranaceus) and high dosage group (treated with 20 g/kg Astragalus membranaceus). The model of hemorrhagic shock for 60 min and reperfusion for 90 min was established. Therapeutic solution (3 mL) was administrated before reperfusion. At the end of the study, the observed intestinal pathology was analyzed. The blood concentrations of lactic acid (LD), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), malondialdehyde (MDA) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) in intestinal mucosa were determined.

RESULTS: The intestinal mucosa pathology showed severe damage in model group and low dosage group, slight damage in high dosage group and no obvious damage in normal group. The Chiu’s score in low dose group and high dose group was significantly lower than that in model group. The content of MDA in model group was higher than that in low and high dose groups, while that in high dose group was almost the same as in normal group. The activity of SOD and GSH-PX was the lowest in model group and significantly higher in high dose group than in normal and low dose groups. The concentrations of LD and ET-1 in model group were the highest. The concentrations of NO in model group and low dose group were significantly lower than those in high dose group and normal group.

CONCLUSION: High dose Astragalus membranaeus has much better protective effect on hemorrhagic shock-reperfusion injury of intestinal mucosa than low dose Astragalus membranaceus. The mechanism may be that Astragalus membranaceus can improve antioxidative effect and regulate NO/ET level during hemorrhagic reperfusion.

Keywords: Hemorrhage shock, Intestinal reperfusion injury, Astragalus membranaceus
Abstract

Footnotes

Supported by the Chinese Traditional Medicine Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, No. 102061

Science Editor Wang XL and Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Guarner F, Malagelada JRGut flora in health and disease. Lancet. 2003;361:512–519.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Farhadi A, Banan A, Fields J, Keshavarzian AIntestinal barrier: an interface between health and disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:479–497.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. Meng ZH, Dyer K, Billiar TR, Tweardy DJEssential role for IL-6 in postresuscitation inflammation in hemorrhagic shock. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;280:C343–C351.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Guo W, Magnotti LJ, Ding J, Huang Q, Xu D, Deitch EAInfluence of gut microflora on mesenteric lymph cytokine production in rats with hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma. 2002;52:1178–1185; disciussion 1185.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pape HC, Grotz M, Remmers D, Dwenger A, Vaske R, Wisner D, Tscherne HMultiple organ failure (MOF) after severe trauma--a sheep model. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:590–598.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mitsuoka H, Kistler EB, Schmid-Schönbein GWProtease inhibition in the intestinal lumen: attenuation of systemic inflammation and early indicators of multiple organ failure in shock. Shock. 2002;17:205–209.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bedirli A, Sözüer EM, Muhtaroğlu S, Alper MThe role of oxygen free radicals and nitric oxide in organ injury following hemorrhagic shock and reinfusion. Int J Surg Investig. 2000;2:275–284.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mota-Filipe H, McDonald MC, Cuzzocrea S, Thiemermann CA membrane-permeable radical scavenger reduces the organ injury in hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 1999;12:255–261.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hierholzer C, Kalff JC, Billiar TR, Bauer AJ, Tweardy DJ, Harbrecht BGInduced nitric oxide promotes intestinal inflammation following hemorrhagic shock. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;286:G225–G233.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Massberg S, Boros M, Leiderer R, Baranyi L, Okada H, Messmer KEndothelin (ET)-1 induced mucosal damage in the rat small intestine: role of ET(A) receptors. Shock. 1998;9:177–183.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Denizbaşi A, Yegen C, Oztürk M, Yegen BRole of nitric oxide in gastric injury induced by hemorrhagic shock in rats. Pharmacology. 2000;61:106–112.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. Izumi M, McDonald MC, Sharpe MA, Chatterjee PK, Thiemermann CSuperoxide dismutase mimetics with catalase activity reduce the organ injury in hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 2002;18:230–235.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wattanasirichaigoon S, Menconi MJ, Fink MPLisofylline ameliorates intestinal and hepatic injury induced by hemorrhage and resuscitation in rats. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1540–1549.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Matheson PJ, Wilson MA, Garrison RNRegulation of intestinal blood flow. J Surg Res. 2000;93:182–196.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 15. Morini S, Yacoub W, Rastellini C, Gaudio E, Watkins SC, Cicalese LIntestinal microvascular patterns during hemorrhagic shock. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:710–722.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nakajima Y, Baudry N, Duranteau J, Vicaut EMicrocirculation in intestinal villi: a comparison between hemorrhagic and endotoxin shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1526–1530.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fruchterman TN, Spain DA, Wilson MA, Harris PD, Garrison RNSelective microvascular endothelial cell dysfunction in the small intestine following resuscitated hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 1998;10:417–422.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mailman DModulation of hemorrhagic shock by intestinal mucosal NG-nitro-L-arginine and L-arginine in the anesthetized rat. Shock. 1999;12:155–160.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bauer C, Kuntz W, Ohnsmann F, Gasser H, Weber C, Redl H, Marzi IThe attenuation of hepatic microcirculatory alterations by exogenous substitution of nitric oxide by s-nitroso-human albumin after hemorrhagic shock in the rat. Shock. 2004;21:165–169.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kawata K, Takeyoshi I, Iwanami K, Sunose Y, Aiba M, Ohwada S, Matsumoto K, Morishita YA spontaneous nitric oxide donor ameliorates small bowel ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:1748–1756.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. Oktar BK, Gulpinar MA, Bozkurt A, Ghandour S, Cetinel S, Moini H, Yegen BC, Bilsel S, Granger DN, Kurtel HEndothelin receptor blockers reduce I/R-induced intestinal mucosal injury: role of blood flow. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;282:G647–G655.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. Anadol AZ, Bayram O, Dursun A, Ercan SRole of endogenous endothelin peptides in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1998;59:279–283.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Akcakaya A, Alimoglu O, Sahin M, Abbasoglu SDIschemia-reperfusion injury following superior mesenteric artery occlusion and strangulation obstruction. J Surg Res. 2002;108:39–43.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 24. Riaz AA, Wan MX, Schäfer T, Dawson P, Menger MD, Jeppsson B, Thorlacius HAllopurinol and superoxide dismutase protect against leucocyte-endothelium interactions in a novel model of colonic ischaemia-reperfusion. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1572–1580.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cuzzocrea S, Mazzon E, Dugo L, Caputi AP, Aston K, Riley DP, Salvemini DProtective effects of a new stable, highly active SOD mimetic, M40401 in splanchnic artery occlusion and reperfusion. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132:19–29.[Google Scholar]
  • 26. Muzakova V, Kandar R, Vojtisek P, Skalicky J, Cervinkova ZSelective antioxidant enzymes during ischemia/reperfusion in myocardial infarction. Physiol Res. 2000;49:315–322.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. Akçil E, Tuğ T, Döşeyen ZAntioxidant enzyme activities and trace element concentrations in ischemia-reperfusion. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2000;76:13–17.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.