Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults.
Journal: 2006/February - Archives of Disease in Childhood
ISSN: 1468-2044
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE
Data on acute paediatric anaphylaxis presentations to the emergency department (ED) are limited. All allergic presentations to one Australian paediatric ED were studied to determine epidemiological, clinical, and outcome data.
METHODS
Retrospective, case based study of patients under 16 years attending one metropolitan, paediatric teaching hospital ED in Australia over three years. The medical records of patients presenting with generalised allergic reactions and anaphylaxis satisfying relevant ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes were studied. The incidence, age, sex ratio, co-morbidities, likely aetiology, clinical features, management, and disposal were determined.
RESULTS
A total of 526 children with generalised allergic reactions, and 57 with anaphylaxis were included in the study. This represented incidences of 9.3:1000 ED presentations for generalised allergic reactions and 1:1000 for anaphylaxis. There were no fatalities. In anaphylaxis cases, a cause was recognised in 68.4%. Cutaneous features were present in 82.5%. A past history of asthma was reported in 36.8%. Adrenaline was used in 39.3% of severe anaphylaxis cases. The ED alone definitively cared for 97.8% of all patients. Follow up was inadequate in cases of anaphylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first reported incidence figure for paediatric anaphylaxis ED presentations in Australia, and is less than that reported in adults in the same local population. However, the incidence of generalised allergic reactions of 9.3:1000 was greater than in the adults. Virtually all paediatric allergic cases may be managed in the ED alone, provided that the importance of specialist follow up, particularly for severe anaphylaxis, is recognised.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(35)
References
(22)
Diseases
(4)
Conditions
(1)
Organisms
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Arch Dis Child 91(2): 159-163

Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults

S C Braganza, D R L Mckinnon, A F T Brown, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
J P Acworth, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
J E Peake, University Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
Correspondence to: Associate Professor A F T Brown
Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland 4029 Australia; af.brown@uq.edu.au
S C Braganza, D R L Mckinnon, A F T Brown, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, AustraliaJ P Acworth, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, AustraliaJ E Peake, University Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, AustraliaCorrespondence to: Associate Professor A F T Brown
Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland 4029 Australia; af.brown@uq.edu.au
Accepted 2005 Jun 17.

Abstract

Background and Aims

Data on acute paediatric anaphylaxis presentations to the emergency department (ED) are limited. All allergic presentations to one Australian paediatric ED were studied to determine epidemiological, clinical, and outcome data.

Methods

Retrospective, case based study of patients under 16 years attending one metropolitan, paediatric teaching hospital ED in Australia over three years. The medical records of patients presenting with generalised allergic reactions and anaphylaxis satisfying relevant ICD‐9‐CM diagnostic codes were studied. The incidence, age, sex ratio, co‐morbidities, likely aetiology, clinical features, management, and disposal were determined.

Results

A total of 526 children with generalised allergic reactions, and 57 with anaphylaxis were included in the study. This represented incidences of 9.3:1000 ED presentations for generalised allergic reactions and 1:1000 for anaphylaxis. There were no fatalities. In anaphylaxis cases, a cause was recognised in 68.4%. Cutaneous features were present in 82.5%. A past history of asthma was reported in 36.8%. Adrenaline was used in 39.3% of severe anaphylaxis cases. The ED alone definitively cared for 97.8% of all patients. Follow up was inadequate in cases of anaphylaxis.

Conclusions

This is the first reported incidence figure for paediatric anaphylaxis ED presentations in Australia, and is less than that reported in adults in the same local population. However, the incidence of generalised allergic reactions of 9.3:1000 was greater than in the adults. Virtually all paediatric allergic cases may be managed in the ED alone, provided that the importance of specialist follow up, particularly for severe anaphylaxis, is recognised.

Keywords: anaphylaxis, epidemiology, epinephrine, adrenaline, angioneurotic oedema, angioedema, immediate hypersensitivity
Abstract

Although the term anaphylaxis was introduced as far back as 1902 by Portier and Richet,1 the definition continues to be contentious. A recent guideline from the Anaphylaxis Working Party of the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy Inc. (ASCIA) defined anaphylaxis as “a rapidly evolving generalised multi‐system allergic reaction characterised by one or more symptoms or signs of respiratory and/or cardiovascular involvement, and involvement of other systems such as the skin and/or gastrointestinal tract”.2 ASCIA also defined a generalised allergic reaction as “one or more symptoms or signs of skin and/or gastrointestinal tract involvement without respiratory and/or cardiovascular involvement”.2

There are few data on the emergency department (ED) incidence of this potentially fatal condition, especially in the paediatric population. Most previous paediatric anaphylaxis studies have been based on hospital admissions or in outpatient allergy clinics rather than children presenting to the ED.34

We describe the epidemiology, aetiology, clinical features, and management of patients presenting with generalised allergic reactions or anaphylaxis to one Australian paediatric emergency department during a three year period. The purpose of the study was to describe how undifferentiated paediatric patients present with acute allergic and systemic hypersensitivity reactions and to determine if they differ from allergic reactions and anaphylaxis in adult emergency patients.

Abbreviations

ED - emergency department

GAR - generalised allergic reaction

Abbreviations

Footnotes

Competing interests: none

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Portier P, Richet CDe l'action anaphylactique de quelques venins. Comptes Rendus de Societe Biologique 190254170–172. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. ASCIA Guidelines for EpiPen prescription. ASCIA Anaphylaxis Working Party 2004. http://www.allergy.org.au/anaphylaxis/epipen_guidelines.htm (accessed October 2004)
  • 3. Ewan P WClinical study of peanut and nut allergy in 62 consecutive patients: new features and associations. BMJ 19963121074–1078. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sampson H A, Mendelson L, Rosen J PFatal and near‐fatal anaphylactic reactions to food in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 1992327380–384. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. Brown A F, McKinnon D, Chu KEmergency department anaphylaxis: a review of 142 patients in a single year. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001108861–866. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yocum M W, Butterfield J H, Klein J S. et al Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Olmsted County: a population based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999104452–456. [[PubMed]
  • 7. Gavalas M, Sadana A, Metcalf SGuidelines for the management of anaphylaxis in the emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med 19981596–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Brown S G AClinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004114371–376. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Klein J S, Yocum M WUnderreporting of anaphylaxis in a community emergency room. J Allergy Clin Immunol 199595637–638. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sheikh A, Alves BAge, sex, geographical and socio‐economic variations in admissions for anaphylaxis: analysis of four years of English hospital data. Clin Experim Allergy 2001311571–1576. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gupta R, Sheikh A, Strachan D. et al Increasing hospital admissions for systemic allergic disorders in England: analysis of national admissions data. BMJ 20033271142–1143.
  • 12. Novembre E, Cianferoni A, Bernardini R. et al Anaphylaxis in children: clinical and allergologic features. Pediatrics 1998101e8 [[PubMed]
  • 13. Pumphrey R SLessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clin Experim Allergy 2000301144–1150. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kemp S F, Lockey R F, Wolf B L. et al Anaphylaxis. A review of 266 cases. Arch Intern Med 19951551749–1754. [[PubMed]
  • 15. Brown S G, Blackman K E, Stenlake V. et al Insect sting anaphylaxis; prospective evaluation of treatment with intravenous adrenaline and volume resuscitation. Emerg Med J 200421149–154.
  • 16. Burks W A, Sampson HFood allergies in children. Curr Probl Pediatr 199323230–252. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. Skeikh A, Alves BHospital admissions for acute anaphylaxis: time trend study. BMJ 20003201441–1442. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ewan P W, Clark A TLong‐term prospective observational study of patients with peanut and nut allergy after participation in a management plan. Lancet 2001357111–115. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. Comino E J, Mitchell C A, Bauman A. et al Asthma management in eastern Australia, 1990 and 1993. Med J Aust 1996164403–406. [[PubMed]
  • 20. Roberts G, Patel N, Levi‐Schaffer F. et al Food allergy as a risk factor for life‐threatening asthma in childhood: a case‐controlled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003112168–174. [[PubMed]
  • 21. Bock S A, Munoz‐Furlong A, Sampson H AFatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001107191–193. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. Stewart A G, Ewan P WThe incidence, aetiology and management of anaphylaxis presenting to an accident and emergency department. Q J Med 199689859–864. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee J M, Greenes D SBiphasic anaphylactic reactions in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2000106762–766. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kapoor S, Roberts G, Bynoe Y. et al Influence of a multidisciplinary paediatric allergy clinic on parental knowledge and rate of subsequent allergic reactions. Allergy 200459185–191. [[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.