Oxidative Stress, Caloric Restriction, and Aging
Abstract
Under normal physiological conditions, the use of oxygen by cells of aerobic organisms generates potentially deleterious reactive oxygen metabolites. A chronic state of oxidative stress exists in cells because of an imbalance between prooxidants and antioxidants. The amount of oxidative damage increases as an organism ages and is postulated to be a major causal factor of senescence. Support for this hypothesis includes the following observations: (i) Overexpression of antioxidative enzymes retards the age-related accrual of oxidative damage and extends the maximum life-span of transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. (ii) Variations in longevity among different species inversely correlate with the rates of mitochondrial generation of the superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide, (iii) Restriction of caloric intake lowers steady-state levels of oxidative stress and damage, retards age-associated changes, and extends the maximum life-span in mammals.
A common feature of the life cycle of virtually all multicellular organisms is the progressive decline in the efficiency of various physiological processes once the reproductive phase of life is over. A variety of strategies and models have been used to understand the nature of the mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of senescence. Frequently the purported explanations or hypotheses deal with the manifestations of aging, which are unlikely to be self-initiating, rather than with a more fundamental underlying cause accounting for the plethora of changes associated with senescence. To elucidate the mechanisms of aging, any causal hypothesis should explain the following three conditions: (i) why organisms undergo progressive and irreversible physiological decline in the latter part of life, (ii) why the life expectancy or rate of aging varies within and among species, and (iii) why experimental regimens such as caloric restriction delay the onset of a variety of age-associated physiological and pathological changes and extend the average and maximum life-span of animals. A mechanistic understanding of the effects of caloric restriction is important because of the efficacy of this regimen in the prolongation of the maximum life-span of mammals and because of its implications for human health.
A hypothesis ascribing one cause for aging postulates that the senescence-associated loss of functional capacity is due to the accumulation of molecular oxidative damage (1–4). This hypothesis is based on the fact that oxygen is potentially a toxic substance, and its use by aerobes, although necessary for their immediate survival, also may be hazardous to their long-term existence. The phenomenon of oxygen toxicity, sometimes referred to as the “oxygen paradox,” is inherent in the atomic structure of oxygen. Molecular oxygen is a biradical that upon single electron additions sequentially generates the partially reduced molecules , H2O2, and ·OH, which by further reactions can generate an array of additional reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs) and cause extensive oxidative damage to biological macromolecules (5–11). This damage manifests as the peroxidation of membrane polyunsaturated fatty acid chains, modification of DNA (including base alterations, single-strand breaks, sister chromatid exchanges, and DNA-protein cross-links), and carbonylation and loss of sulfhydryls in proteins, among other changes. Carbonyl modifications of proteins occur in certain amino acid residues present near transition metal–binding sites and have been shown convincingly to cause enzymatic inactivation and enhance the likelihood of proteolysis (2).
There are several indications that the oxidant challenge to aerobic cells is not trivial. It is estimated that ~2 to 3% of the oxygen consumed by aerobic cells is diverted to the generation of and H2O2 (8). A typical cell in the rat may undergo 100,000 ROM attacks on DNA per day (3), and under steady-state conditions, ~10% of protein molecules may exhibit carbonyl modifications (2). The presence of the products of ROM interactions with macromolecules under steady-state conditions has led to the concept that antioxidative defenses are not fully efficient, that cells are chronically under oxidative stress, and that aging is a consequence of oxidative damage.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
References
- 1. Harman D. J. Gerontol. 1956;11:298.[PubMed]
- 2. Stadtman ER. Science. 1992;257:1220.[PubMed]
- 3. Ames BN, Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 1993;90:7915.Richter C. In: Current Topics in Bioenergetics. Lee CP, editor. vol. 17. Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 1994. pp. 1–19.
- 4. Sohal RS, Orr WC In: Molecular Aspects of Aging. Esser K, Martin GM, editors. Wiley; New York: 1995. pp. 109–127. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 5. Davies KJA. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 1995;61:1231.[PubMed]
- 6. Fridovich I. Science. 1978;201:875.[PubMed]
- 7. Pryor WA. Photochem. Photobiol. 1978;28:787.[PubMed]
- 8. Chance B, Sies H, Boveris A. Physiol. Rev. 1979;59:527.[PubMed]
- 9. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Methods Enzy-mol. 1990;186:1.[PubMed]
- 10. Feig DI, Reid TM, Loeb LA. Cancer Res. 1994;54(suppl.):1890S.[PubMed]
- 11. McCord JM. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1995;209:112.[PubMed]
- 12. Noy N, Schwartz H, Gafni A. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1985;29:63.[PubMed]
- 13. Sohal RS In: Advances in Myochemistry. Benzi G, editor. vol. 2. John Libbey; Paris: 1989. pp. 21–34. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 14. Sagai M, Ichinose T. Life Sci. 1980;27:731.[PubMed]
- 15. Agarwal S, Sohal RS. Proc. Aatl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994;91:12332.
- 16. Turrens JF, McCord JM In: Free Radicals, Lipoproteins, and Membrane Lipids. Paulet AC, Douste-Blazy L, Paoletti R, editors. Plenum; New York: 1990. pp. 203–212. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 17. Sohal RS, Brunk UT. Mutat. Res. 1992;275:295.[PubMed]
- 18. Sohal RS. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1993;14:583.[PubMed]
- 19. Matsuo M, Gomi F, Dooley MM. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1992;64:273.[PubMed]
- 20. Rikans LE, Moore DR, Snowden CD. Biochim. Biophys. Ada. 1991;1074:195.[PubMed]
- 21. Agarwal S, Sohal RS. Exp. Gerontol. 1996;31:387.[PubMed]
- 22. Starke-Reed PE, Oliver CN. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1989;275:559.Agarwal S, Sohal RS. ibid. 1994;309:24.[PubMed]
- 23. Orr WC, Sohal RS. Science. 1994;263:1128.[PubMed]
- 24. Sohal RS, Agarwal S, Orr WC. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:15671.[PubMed]
- 25. Sohal RS, Toy PL, Allen RG. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1986;36:71.[PubMed]
- 26. Sohal RS. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 1993;5:3.[PubMed]
- 27. Rubner M Das Problem der Lebensdauer und Seine Beziehungen zum Wachstrum und Ernäbrung. Oldenbourg; Munich: 1908. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 28. Pearl R The Rate of Living. Knopf; New York: 1928. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 29. Ku H-H, Brunk UT, Sohal RS. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1993;15:621.[PubMed]
- 30. Sohal RS, Sohal BH, Orr WC. ibid. 1995;19:499.[PubMed]
- 31. Sohal RS, Ku H-H, Agarwal S. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;196:7.[PubMed]
- 32. Ku H-H, Sohal RS. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1993;72:67.[PubMed]
- 33. Barja G, Cadenas S, Rojas C, Perez-Campo R, Lopes-Torres M. Free Radical Res. 1994;21:317.[PubMed]
- 34. Weindruch R, Walford RL The Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction. Thomas; Springfield, IL: 1988. Masoro EJ, Shimokawa I, Yu BP. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1991;621337Yu BP, editor. Modulation of Aging Processes by Dietary Restriction. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1994. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 35. Lyman CP, O'Brien RC, Greene GC, Papafrangos ED. Science. 1981;212:668.[PubMed]
- 36. Ingram DK, et al J. Gerontol. 1990;45:B148.Kemnitze JW, et al. ibid. 1993;48:B17.Hansen BC, Ortmeyer HK, Bodkin NL. Obesity Res. 1995;3(suppl. 2):S199.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 37. Kemnitz JW, et al Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:E540.Lane MA, et al. ibid. 1995;268:E941.Bodkin NL, Ortmeyer HK, Hansen BC. J. Gerontol. 1995;50:B142.Lane MA, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996;93:4159.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 38. Weindruch R, Walford RL, Fligiel S, Guthrie D. J. Nutr. 1986;116:641.[PubMed]
- 39. Abelson PH. Science. 1995;270:215.Hart RW, Neuman DA, Robinson RT, editors. Dietary Restriction: Implications for the Design and Interpretation of Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Studies. ILSI Press; Washington, DC: 1995. [PubMed]
- 40. Nelson JF. personal communication [PubMed]
- 41. Cartee GD, Dean DJ. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:E946.[PubMed]
- 42. Van Remmen H, Ward W, Sabia RF, Richardson A In: Handbook of Physiology. Masoro EJ, editor. Oxford Univ. Press; New York: 1995. pp. 171–234. Warner HR, Fernandes G, Wang E. J. Gerontol. 1995;50:B107.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 43. Weindruch R, Walford RL. Science. 1982;215:1415.[PubMed]
- 44. Bertrand HA, Lynd FT, Masoro EJ, Yu BP. J. Gerontol. 1980;35:827.[PubMed]
- 45. Sacher GA In: Handbook of the Biology of Aging. Finch CE, Hayflick L, editors. Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York: 1977. pp. 582–638. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 46. Gonzales-Pacheco DM, Buss WC, Koehler KM, Woodside WF, Alpert SS. J. Nutr. 1993;123:90.[PubMed]
- 47. Koizumi A, Tsukada M, Wada Y, Masuda H, Weindruch R. ibid. 1992;122:1446.[PubMed]
- 48. Duffy PH, Feuers R, Nakamura KD, Leakey J, Hart RW. Chronobiol. Int. 1990;7:113.[PubMed]
- 49. Prosser CL In: Comparative Animal Physiology. Prosser CL, editor. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1973. pp. 362–428. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 50. Sohal RS, Ku H-H, Agarwal S, Forster MJ, Lai H. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1994;74:121.[PubMed]
- 51. Sohal RS, Agarwal S, Candas M, Forster MJ, Lai H. ibid. 1994;76:215.[PubMed]
- 52. Matsuo M, Gomi F, Kuramoto K, Sagai M. J. Gerontol. 1993;48:B133.[PubMed]
- 53. Chen JJ, Yu BP. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1994;17:411.Choi JH, Yu BP. ibid. 1995;18:133.[PubMed]
- 54. Weindruch R, Warner HR, Starke-Reed PE In: Free Radicals in Aging. Yu BP, editor. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1993. pp. 269–275. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 55. Sohal RS, Dubey A. unpublished data [PubMed]
- 56. Masoro EJ, Yu BP, Bertrand HA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1982;79:4239.
- 57. Dubey A, Forster MJ, Lai H, Sohal RS. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. in press. [PubMed]
- 58. Lakowski B, Hakimi S. Science. 1996;272:1010.[PubMed]
- 59. Janssen YM, Van Houten B, Borm PJ, Mossman BT. Lab. Invest. 1993;69:261.[PubMed]


