Scholar
Marketplace
Lab
Feedback
$
English
Sign In
Home
Search
My boards
Insights
Collaborators
Reader
Blog
Help
Home
Search
My boards
Insights
Collaborators
Reader
Blog
Help
Mutation Drivers of Immunological Responses to Cancer.
Translate
Afrikaans
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Български
Catalan
Cebuano
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Corsican
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Georgian
Deutsch
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Kazakh
Khmer
Korean
Kyrgyz
Lao
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malay
Maltese
Maori
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Serbian
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Xhosa
Zulu
Eduard Porta-Pardo
Adam Godzik
Journal:
2016/October
-
Cancer immunology research
ISSN:
2326-6074
PUBMED:
27401919
DOI:
10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0233
Abstract:
In cancer immunology, somatic missense mutations have been mostly studied with regard to their role in the generation of neoantigens. However, growing evidence suggests that mutations in certain genes, such as CASP8 or TP53, influence the immune response against a tumor by other mechanisms. Identifying these genes and mechanisms is important because, just as the identification of cancer driver genes led to the development of personalized cancer therapies, a comprehensive catalog of such cancer immunity drivers will aid in the development of therapies aimed at restoring antitumor immunity. Here, we present an algorithm, domainXplorer, that can be used to identify potential cancer immunity drivers. To demonstrate its potential, we used it to analyze a dataset of 5,164 tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and to identify protein domains in which mutation status correlates with the presence of immune cells in cancer tissue (immune infiltrate). We identified 122 such protein regions, including several that belong to proteins with known roles in immune response, such as C2, CD163L1, or FCγR2A. In several cases, we show that mutations within the same protein can be associated with more or less immune cell infiltration, depending on the specific domain mutated. These results expand the catalog of potential cancer immunity drivers and highlight the importance of taking into account the structural context of somatic mutations when analyzing their potential association with immune phenotypes. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(9); 789-98. ©2016 AACR.
Open in
PUBMED
|
DOI
|
Google Scholar
|
Wikipedia
Relations:
Citations
(4)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.
Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.
Learn More
Search and select entities to see details here. Details will include lists of related entities (via publication). Explore related entities further.
Learn More