Met provides essential signals for liver regeneration.
Journal: 2004/August - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 0027-8424
Abstract:
Genetic analysis in mice has demonstrated a crucial role of the Met tyrosine kinase receptor and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), in development of the liver, muscle, and placenta. Here, we use conditional mutagenesis in mice to analyze the function of Met during liver regeneration, using the Mx-cre transgene to introduce the mutation in the adult. After partial hepatectomy in mice carrying the Mx-cre-induced Met mutation, regeneration of the liver is impaired. Comparison of signal transduction pathways in control and mutant livers indicates that Met and other signaling receptors cooperate to fully activate particular signaling molecules, for instance, the protein kinase Akt. However, activation of the Erk1/2 kinase during liver regeneration depends exclusively on Met. Signaling crosstalk is thus an important aspect of the regulation of liver regeneration. Analysis of cell cycle progression of hepatocytes in conditional Met mutant mice indicates a defective exit from quiescence and diminished entry into S phase. Impaired liver regeneration is accompanied by compensatory physiological responses that include prolonged up-regulation of HGF/SF and IL-6 in peripheral blood. Our data demonstrate that the HGF/SF/Met signaling system is essential not only during liver development but also for the regeneration of the organ in the adult.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(159)
References
(49)
Drugs
(1)
Chemicals
(12)
Genes
(1)
Organisms
(3)
Processes
(5)
Anatomy
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(29): 10608-10613

Met provides essential signals for liver regeneration

Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13125 Berlin-Buch, Germany; and Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ed.nilreb-cdm@hcribc.
Communicated by Michael H. Wigler, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, May 20, 2004
Communicated by Michael H. Wigler, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, May 20, 2004
Received 2004 Mar 9

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

Abstract

Genetic analysis in mice has demonstrated a crucial role of the Met tyrosine kinase receptor and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), in development of the liver, muscle, and placenta. Here, we use conditional mutagenesis in mice to analyze the function of Met during liver regeneration, using the Mx-cre transgene to introduce the mutation in the adult. After partial hepatectomy in mice carrying the Mx-cre-induced Met mutation, regeneration of the liver is impaired. Comparison of signal transduction pathways in control and mutant livers indicates that Met and other signaling receptors cooperate to fully activate particular signaling molecules, for instance, the protein kinase Akt. However, activation of the Erk1/2 kinase during liver regeneration depends exclusively on Met. Signaling crosstalk is thus an important aspect of the regulation of liver regeneration. Analysis of cell cycle progression of hepatocytes in conditional Met mutant mice indicates a defective exit from quiescence and diminished entry into S phase. Impaired liver regeneration is accompanied by compensatory physiological responses that include prolonged up-regulation of HGF/SF and IL-6 in peripheral blood. Our data demonstrate that the HGF/SF/Met signaling system is essential not only during liver development but also for the regeneration of the organ in the adult.

Abstract

The Met gene was discovered through its oncogenic potential when mutated (1). The protooncogene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase that binds hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) as its specific ligand (2). HGF/SF was first characterized as a factor that induces hepatocyte proliferation (HGF) and as a motility factor (SF) that dissociates and increases the motility of epithelial cells (36). Met mainly uses the Gab1 scaffolding protein in its initial step of signal transduction (7). Well characterized biochemical responses downstream of Met signaling are the activation of the Ras/Erk/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), PI3K/Akt, Rac/Pak, and Crk/Rap1 pathways (ref. 8; see also ref. 9 for a recent review). In cell culture, activation of Met results in increased cell proliferation and survival, as well as complex motogenic and morphogenic responses. Activation of the Ras/Erk/MAPK response is of particular importance for Met-elicited proliferation (10).

Liver regeneration that follows loss or damage of hepatic tissue is a well known response to liver injury and has been studied extensively on a molecular level (1113). A commonly used experimental model for the analysis of liver regeneration is partial hepatectomy in which two-thirds of the rodent liver is removed, leaving the remaining lobes intact. Remaining hepatic tissue then grows to compensate for the loss, and regeneration is proportional to the amount of removed tissue. Thus, liver mass becomes reconstituted within days. Various experiments have indicated that signal exchange between the body and hepatic tissue regulates liver size, i.e., an optimal liver-to-body weight ratio that is required for correct metabolic function.

Hepatocytes are mostly quiescent highly differentiated cells that retain the ability to replicate and possess an enormous proliferation potential in vivo. Under normal conditions, hepatocytes have minimal replicative activity and a long half-life. After partial hepatectomy, hepatocytes synchronously exit G0, reenter the cell cycle, and undergo one to two rounds of replication before returning to quiescence (1113). Cell cycle entry of hepatocytes during regeneration occurs in two steps. During the initial “priming” phase, hepatocytes leave G0 and enter G1. This step is reversible and starts with the activation of immediate early genes (encoding transcription factors like c-fos and c-jun), followed by the expression of other genes that encode cell cycle regulators such as the G1 cyclin, cyclin D (1416). In a second step, hepatocytes leave G1 and enter S phase, which is accompanied by phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and by up-regulated expression of a number of genes including cyclin E, cyclin A, and DNA polymerase (14, 17, 18). When the liver has reattained its original size, replication ceases, and the hepatocytes enter G0 (refs. 19 and 20; for reviews, see also refs. 2123).

Experimental evidence indicates that signals provided by growth factors are important during liver regeneration. HGF/SF, epidermal growth factor (EGF), or transforming growth factor α are potent mitogens for cultured hepatocytes. Transgenic overexpression of HGF/SF or HB-EGF in mice results in enhanced regeneration and/or increased liver size (24, 25). Levels of HGF/SF protein increase rapidly after partial hepatectomy, a fact that led to the discovery of the factor (46). Furthermore, signals elicited by cytokines including IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) also play important roles during liver regeneration. Shortly after partial hepatectomy, increased levels of IL-6 and TNF-α appear in the blood, and hepatocytes respond by the activation of transcription factors like NF-κB, STAT3, and AP1 (14, 26). Experiments performed with mice mutant for the IL-6, gp130, or the TNF-α receptor 1 genes demonstrated the importance of cytokine signaling during liver regeneration (14, 26, 27). Activation of NF-κB, STAT3, and AP1 is impaired in such mutants, and the expression of immediate early and delayed genes occurs later and is reduced. However, despite a delayed S-phase entry, liver regeneration occurs in such mutant mice (27). Moreover, the analysis of genes encoding cell cycle proteins has demonstrated their role in liver regeneration. P21Cip1/Waf1 inhibits cell cycle-dependent kinases (cdk) 2 and 4 during cell cycle progression and mutation of the gene encoding P21CIP1/WAF1 results in accelerated progression through G1 during liver regeneration (28). Similarly, c-jun or STAT3 are activated during the early stages of liver regeneration, and mutation of c-jun or STAT3 impairs the regeneration process (16, 29).

Signals elicited through binding of HGF/SF to Met are known to be of particular importance for liver development, and both HGF/SF and Met are expressed at high levels in the developing liver. Met embryonic stem cells cannot contribute to the adult liver, and furthermore, HGF/SF or Met embryos display reduced liver size and liver-to-body weight ratio (3032). Proliferation and survival of hepatocytes are impaired in the mutants, but hepatocyte differentiation is normal. A defect in placental development causes SF/HGF or Met embryos to die during the second phase of gestation. This lethality had precluded the genetic analysis of Met or HGF/SF function in the adult liver. Conditional mutagenesis in mice, for instance the use of cre-loxP technology (33), now allows such genetic analyses. We report here the generation of a “floxed” Met allele and its use in the analysis of Met function during liver regeneration. We find a severe impairment of liver regeneration in the conditional Met mutant mice. Analysis of cell cycle progression in the mutant livers indicates that both exit of hepatocytes from G0 and replication are impaired. Furthermore, high levels of phospho-pRb and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) are found in the livers after partial hepatectomy of conditional Met mutant mice at a time point when replication has ceased. Our data thus demonstrate that inhibition of cell cycle progression overrides the signals for S-phase entry and hinders complete liver regeneration in Met mutants.

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Rudolph, A. Leschke, and P. Krause for technical assistance; S. Lier, T. Müller, H. Wende, H. Wildner, C. Özcelik, and H. Brohmann for support in the final phase of this work; D. Krappmann for help with the analysis of AP1 and NF-κB; and E. Gherardi for the HGF/SF antibodies; and we particularly thank U. Ziebold for valuable advice and patient discussions. We also thank W. Birchmeier for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was financially supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research and by a grant from the German Science Foundation.

Acknowledgments

Notes

Abbreviations: HGF/SF, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor; cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; pIpC, poly(deoxyinosinic/deoxycytidylic) acid; pRb, retinoblastoma protein.

Notes
Abbreviations: HGF/SF, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor; cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; pIpC, poly(deoxyinosinic/deoxycytidylic) acid; pRb, retinoblastoma protein.

References

  • 1. Park, M., Dean, M., Cooper, C. S., Schmidt, M., O'Brien, S. J., Blair, D. G. & Vande Woude, G. F. (1986) Cell45, 895–904. [[PubMed]
  • 2. Bottaro, D. P., Rubin, J. S., Faletto, D. L., Chan, A. M., Kmiecik, T. E., Vande Woude, G. F. & Aaronson, S. A. (1991) Science251, 802–804. [[PubMed]
  • 3. Stoker, M., Gherardi, E., Perryman, M. & Gray, J. (1987) Nature327, 239–242. [[PubMed]
  • 4. Nakamura, T., Nishizawa, T., Hagiya, M., Seki, T., Shimonishi, M., Sugimura, A., Tashiro, K. & Shimizu, S. (1989) Nature342, 440–443. [[PubMed]
  • 5. Miyazawa, K., Tsubouchi, H., Naka, D., Takahashi, K., Okigaki, M., Arakaki, N., Nakayama, H., Hirono, S., Sakiyama, O., Takahashi, K., et al. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.163, 967–973. [[PubMed]
  • 6. Zarnegar, R. & Michalopoulos, G. (1989) Cancer Res.49, 3314–3320. [[PubMed]
  • 7. Sachs, M., Brohmann, H., Zechner, D., Müller, T., Hülsken, J., Walther, I., Schaeper, U., Birchmeier, C. & Birchmeier, W. (2000) J. Cell Biol.150, 1375–1384.
  • 8. Ponzetto, C., Bardelli, A., Zhen, Z., Maina, F., dalla Zonca, P., Giordano, S., Graziani, A., Panayotou, G. & Comoglio, P. M. (1994) Cell77, 261–271. [[PubMed]
  • 9. Birchmeier, C., Birchmeier, W., Gherardi, E. & Vande Woude, G. F. (2003) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.4, 915–925. [[PubMed]
  • 10. Paumelle, R., Tulasne, D., Kherrouche, Z., Plaza, S., Leroy, C., Reveneau, S., Vandenbunder, B., Fafeur, V. & Tulashe, D. (2002) Oncogene21, 2309–2319. [[PubMed]
  • 11. Taub, R(1996) FASEB J.10, 413–427. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. Michalopoulos, G. K. & DeFrances, M. C. (1997) Science276, 60–66. [[PubMed]
  • 13. Fausto, N(2000) J. Hepatol.32, 19–31. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cressman, D. E., Greenbaum, L. E., DeAngelis, R. A., Ciliberto, G., Furth, E. E., Poli, V. & Taub, R. (1996) Science274, 1379–1383. [[PubMed]
  • 15. Servillo, G., Penna, L., Foulkes, N. S., Magni, M. V., Della Fazia, M. A. & Sassone-Corsi, P. (1997) Oncogene14, 1601–1606. [[PubMed]
  • 16. Behrens, A., Sibilia, M., David, J. P., Mohle-Steinlein, U., Tronche, F., Schutz, G. & Wagner, E. F. (2002) EMBO J.21, 1782–1790.
  • 17. Fan, G., Xu, R., Wessendorf, M. W., Ma, X., Kren, B. T. & Steer, C. J. (1995) Cell Growth Differ.6, 1463–1476. [[PubMed]
  • 18. Spiewak-Rinaudo, J. A. & Thorgeirsson, S. S. (1997) Cell Growth Differ.8, 301–309. [[PubMed]
  • 19. Steer, C. J. (1995) FASEB J.9, 1396–1400. [[PubMed]
  • 20. Heim, M. H., Gamboni, G., Beglinger, C. & Gyr, K. (1997) Eur. J. Clin. Invest.27, 948–955. [[PubMed]
  • 21. Sherr, C. J. & Roberts, J. M. (1995) Genes Dev.9, 1149–1163. [[PubMed]
  • 22. Weinberg, R. A. (1995) Cell81, 323–330. [[PubMed]
  • 23. Trimarchi, J. M. & Lees, J. A. (2002) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.3, 11–20. [[PubMed]
  • 24. Shiota, G., Wang, T. C., Nakamura, T. & Schmidt, E. V. (1994) Hepatology19, 962–972. [[PubMed]
  • 25. Kiso, S., Kawata, S., Tamura, S., Inui, Y., Yoshida, Y., Sawai, Y., Umeki, S., Ito, N., Yamada, A., Miyagawa, J., et al. (2003) Gastroenterology124, 701–707. [[PubMed]
  • 26. Yamada, Y., Kirillova, I., Peschon, J. J. & Fausto, N. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94, 1441–1446.
  • 27. Wüstefeld, T., Klein, C., Streetz, K. L., Betz, U., Lauber, J., Buer, J., Manns, M. P., Muller, W. & Trautwein, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem.278, 11281–11288. [[PubMed]
  • 28. Albrecht, J. H., Poon, R. Y., Ahonen, C. L., Rieland, B. M., Deng, C. & Crary, G. S. (1998) Oncogene16, 2141–2150. [[PubMed]
  • 29. Li, W., Liang, X., Kellendonk, C., Poli, V. & Taub, R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem.277, 28411–28417. [[PubMed]
  • 30. Schmidt, C., Bladt, F., Goedecke, S., Brinkmann, V., Zschiesche, W., Sharpe, M., Gherardi, E. & Birchmeier, C. (1995) Nature373, 699–702. [[PubMed]
  • 31. Uehara, Y., Minowa, O., Mori, C., Shiota, K., Kuno, J., Noda, T. & Kitamura, N. (1995) Nature373, 702–705. [[PubMed]
  • 32. Bladt, F., Riethmacher, D., Isenmann, S., Aguzzi, A. & Birchmeier, C. (1995) Nature376, 768–771. [[PubMed]
  • 33. Kühn, R., Schwenk, F., Aguet, M. & Rajewsky, K. (1995) Science269, 1427–1429. [[PubMed]
  • 34. Clark, G(1981) in Staining Procedures, ed. Clark, G. (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore), pp. 171–217.[Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hartmann, G., Prospero, T., Brinkmann, V., Özcelik, C., Winter, G., Hepple, J., Batley, S., Bladt, F., Sachs, M., Birchmeier, C., et al. (1998) Curr. Biol.8, 125–134. [[PubMed]
  • 36. Schwenk, F., Baron, U. & Rajewsky, K. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res.23, 5080–5081.
  • 37. Braunwald. E., Fauci, A., Kasper, D., Hauser, S. & Jameson, D. J. (1998) Hepatic Steatosis (Fatty Liver) and Steatohepatitis (McGraw–Hill, New York).
  • 38. Nakamura, T., Mizuno, S., Matsumoto, K., Sawa, Y. & Matsuda, H. (2000) J. Clin. Invest.106, 1511–1519.
  • 39. Matsumoto, K. & Nakamura, T. (2001) Kidney Int.59, 2023–2038. [[PubMed]
  • 40. Rabkin, R., Fervenza, F., Tsao, T., Sibley, R., Friedlaender, M., Hsu, F., Lassman, C., Hausmann, M., Huie, P. & Schwall, R. H. (2001) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.12, 531–540. [[PubMed]
  • 41. Jin, H., Yang, R., Li, W., Ogasawara, A. K., Schwall, R., Eberhard, D. A., Zheng, Z., Kahn, D. & Paoni, N. F. (2003) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.304, 654–660. [[PubMed]
  • 42. Picard, C., Lambotte, L., Starkel, P., Sempoux, C., Saliez, A., Van den Berge, V. & Horsmans, Y. (2002) J. Hepatol.36, 645–652. [[PubMed]
  • 43. Greenbaum, L. E., Li, W., Cressman, D. E., Peng, Y., Ciliberto, G., Poli, V. & Taub, R. (1998) J. Clin. Invest.102, 996–1007.
  • 44. Sakamoto, T., Liu, Z., Murase, N., Ezure, T., Yokomuro, S., Poli, V. & Demetris, A. J. (1999) Hepatology29, 403–411. [[PubMed]
  • 45. DeGregori, J., Kowalik, T. & Nevins, J. R. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol.15, 4215–4224.
  • 46. Macleod, K. F., Sherry, N., Hannon, G., Beach, D., Tokino, T., Kinzler, K., Vogelstein, B. & Jacks, T. (1995) Genes Dev.9, 935–944. [[PubMed]
  • 47. Torbenson, M., Yang, S. Q., Liu, H. Z., Huang, J., Gage, W. & Diehl, A. M. (2002) Am. J. Pathol.161, 155–161.
  • 48. Boccaccio, C., Gaudino, G., Gambarotta, G., Galimi, F. & Comoglio, P. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem.269, 12846–12851. [[PubMed]
  • 49. Ito, E., Nomura, N. & Narayanan, R. (1990) Cell Regul.1, 347–357.
  • 50. Spector, M. S., Auer, K. L., Jarvis, W. D., Ishac, E. J., Gao, B., Kunos, G. & Dent, P. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol.17, 3556–3565.
  • 51. Giordano, V., De Falco, G., Chiari, R., Quinto, I., Pelicci, P. G., Bartholomew, L., Delmastro, P., Gadina, M. & Scala, G. (1997) J. Immunol.158, 4097–4103. [[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.