Learning letter identification in peripheral vision.
Journal: 2005/July - Vision Research
ISSN: 0042-6989
Abstract:
Performance for a variety of visual tasks improves with practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of the processes underlying perceptual learning of identifying letters in peripheral vision. To do so, we tracked changes in contrast thresholds for identifying single letters presented at 10 degrees in the inferior visual field, over a period of six consecutive days. The letters (26 lowercase Times-Roman letters, subtending 1.7 degrees) were embedded within static two-dimensional Gaussian luminance noise, with rms contrast ranging from 0% (no noise) to 20%. We also measured the observers' response consistency using a double-pass method on days 1, 3 and 6, by testing two additional blocks on each of these days at luminance noise of 3% and 20%. These additional blocks were the exact replicates of the corresponding block at the same noise contrast that was tested on the same day. We analyzed our results using both the linear amplifier model (LAM) and the perceptual template model (PTM). Our results showed that following six days of training, the overall reduction (improvement across all noise levels) in contrast threshold for our seven observers averaged 21.6% (range: 17.2-31%). Despite fundamental differences between LAM and PTM, both models show that learning leads to an improvement of the perceptual template (filter) such that the template is more capable of extracting the crucial information from the signal. Results from both the PTM analysis and the double-pass experiment imply that the stimulus-dependent component of the internal noise does not change with learning.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(24)
References
(27)
Grants
(49)
Drugs
(1)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Vision Res 45(11): 1399-1412

Learning letter identification in peripheral vision

College of Optometry and Center for Neuro-Engineering and Cognitive Science, University of Houston, 505 J Davis Armistead Bldg, Houston, TX 77204-2020, United States
School of Optometry and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 713 743 2308; fax: +1 713 743 2053. E-mail address: ude.hu.yrtemotpo@gnuhcs (S.T.L. Chung)

Abstract

Performance for a variety of visual tasks improves with practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of the processes underlying perceptual learning of identifying letters in peripheral vision. To do so, we tracked changes in contrast thresholds for identifying single letters presented at 10° in the inferior visual field, over a period of six consecutive days. The letters (26 lowercase Times-Roman letters, subtending 1.7°) were embedded within static two-dimensional Gaussian luminance noise, with rms contrast ranging from 0% (no noise) to 20%. We also measured the observers’ response consistency using a double-pass method on days 1, 3 and 6, by testing two additional blocks on each of these days at luminance noise of 3% and 20%. These additional blocks were the exact replicates of the corresponding block at the same noise contrast that was tested on the same day. We analyzed our results using both the linear amplifier model (LAM) and the perceptual template model (PTM). Our results showed that following six days of training, the overall reduction (improvement across all noise levels) in contrast threshold for our seven observers averaged 21.6% (range: 17.2–31%). Despite fundamental differences between LAM and PTM, both models show that learning leads to an improvement of the perceptual template (filter) such that the template is more capable of extracting the crucial information from the signal. Results from both the PTM analysis and the double-pass experiment imply that the stimulus-dependent component of the internal noise does not change with learning.

Keywords: Perceptual learning, Training, Letter identification, Peripheral vision
Abstract

Footnotes

The original “double-pass” method was developed based on a two-alternative forced choice paradigm. To apply the method to our experiment, which consisted of 26 alternatives, we assumed that all 26 letters are equally detectable.

Instead of using the term “sampling efficiency”, Gold et al. (1999) used the term “calculation efficiency” in their paper, which is taken to quantify the degree of optimality in terms of accuracy of the deterministic computation used to reach a perceptual decision. We prefer the less assumption-laden term “sampling efficiency

Footnotes
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.