Intermediates in influenza induced membrane fusion.
Journal: 1991/February - EMBO Journal
ISSN: 0261-4189
PUBMED: 2265606
Abstract:
Our results show that the mechanism by which influenza virus fuses with target membranes involves sequential complex changes in the hemagglutinin (HA, the viral fusion protein) and in the contact site between virus and target membrane. To render individual steps amenable to study, we worked at 0 degree C which decreased the rate of fusion and increased the efficiency. The mechanism of fusion at 0 degree C and 37 degrees C was similar. The process began with a conformational change in HA which exposed the fusion peptides but did not lead to dissociation of the tops of the ectodomain of the trimer. The change in the protein led to immediate hydrophobic attachment of the virus to the target liposomes. Attachment was followed by a lag period (4-8 min at 0 degree C, 0.6-2 s at 37 degrees C) during which rearrangements occurred in the site of membrane contact between the virus and liposome. After a further series of changes the final bilayer merger took place. This final fusion event was not pH dependent. At 0 degree C efficient fusion occurred without dissociation of the top domains of the HA trimer, suggesting that a transient conformation of HA is responsible for fusion at physiological temperatures. The observations lead to a revised model for HA mediated fusion.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(95)
References
(39)
Chemicals
(6)
Organisms
(3)
Processes
(6)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
EMBO J 9(13): 4231-4241

Intermediates in influenza induced membrane fusion.

Abstract

Our results show that the mechanism by which influenza virus fuses with target membranes involves sequential complex changes in the hemagglutinin (HA, the viral fusion protein) and in the contact site between virus and target membrane. To render individual steps amenable to study, we worked at 0 degree C which decreased the rate of fusion and increased the efficiency. The mechanism of fusion at 0 degree C and 37 degrees C was similar. The process began with a conformational change in HA which exposed the fusion peptides but did not lead to dissociation of the tops of the ectodomain of the trimer. The change in the protein led to immediate hydrophobic attachment of the virus to the target liposomes. Attachment was followed by a lag period (4-8 min at 0 degree C, 0.6-2 s at 37 degrees C) during which rearrangements occurred in the site of membrane contact between the virus and liposome. After a further series of changes the final bilayer merger took place. This final fusion event was not pH dependent. At 0 degree C efficient fusion occurred without dissociation of the top domains of the HA trimer, suggesting that a transient conformation of HA is responsible for fusion at physiological temperatures. The observations lead to a revised model for HA mediated fusion.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.5M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Brunner J. Testing topological models for the membrane penetration of the fusion peptide of influenza virus hemagglutinin. FEBS Lett. 1989 Nov 6;257(2):369–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Burger KN, Knoll G, Verkleij AJ. Influenza virus-model membrane interaction. A morphological approach using modern cryotechniques. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Mar 22;939(1):89–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clague MJ, Schoch C, Zech L, Blumenthal R. Gating kinetics of pH-activated membrane fusion of vesicular stomatitis virus with cells: stopped-flow measurements by dequenching of octadecylrhodamine fluorescence. Biochemistry. 1990 Feb 6;29(5):1303–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Copeland CS, Doms RW, Bolzau EM, Webster RG, Helenius A. Assembly of influenza hemagglutinin trimers and its role in intracellular transport. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1179–1191.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels RS, Douglas AR, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Analyses of the antigenicity of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH optimum for virus-mediated membrane fusion. J Gen Virol. 1983 Aug;64(Pt 8):1657–1662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doms RW, Helenius A. Quaternary structure of influenza virus hemagglutinin after acid treatment. J Virol. 1986 Dec;60(3):833–839.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doms RW, Gething MJ, Henneberry J, White J, Helenius A. Variant influenza virus hemagglutinin that induces fusion at elevated pH. J Virol. 1986 Feb;57(2):603–613.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellens H, Bentz J, Mason D, Zhang F, White JM. Fusion of influenza hemagglutinin-expressing fibroblasts with glycophorin-bearing liposomes: role of hemagglutinin surface density. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 16;29(41):9697–9707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • FOLCH J, LEES M, SLOANE STANLEY GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goud B, Salminen A, Walworth NC, Novick PJ. A GTP-binding protein required for secretion rapidly associates with secretory vesicles and the plasma membrane in yeast. Cell. 1988 Jun 3;53(5):753–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Green N, Alexander H, Olson A, Alexander S, Shinnick TM, Sutcliffe JG, Lerner RA. Immunogenic structure of the influenza virus hemagglutinin. Cell. 1982 Mar;28(3):477–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Harter C, James P, Bächi T, Semenza G, Brunner J. Hydrophobic binding of the ectodomain of influenza hemagglutinin to membranes occurs through the "fusion peptide". J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6459–6464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoekstra D, de Boer T, Klappe K, Wilschut J. Fluorescence method for measuring the kinetics of fusion between biological membranes. Biochemistry. 1984 Nov 20;23(24):5675–5681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Junankar PR, Cherry RJ. Temperature and pH dependence of the haemolytic activity of influenza virus and of the rotational mobility of the spike glycoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Jan 29;854(2):198–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Malhotra V, Orci L, Glick BS, Block MR, Rothman JE. Role of an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive transport component in promoting fusion of transport vesicles with cisternae of the Golgi stack. Cell. 1988 Jul 15;54(2):221–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsh M, Helenius A. Virus entry into animal cells. Adv Virus Res. 1989;36:107–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mayer LD, Hope MJ, Cullis PR. Vesicles of variable sizes produced by a rapid extrusion procedure. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Jun 13;858(1):161–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morris SJ, Sarkar DP, White JM, Blumenthal R. Kinetics of pH-dependent fusion between 3T3 fibroblasts expressing influenza hemagglutinin and red blood cells. Measurement by dequenching of fluorescence. J Biol Chem. 1989 Mar 5;264(7):3972–3978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarkar DP, Morris SJ, Eidelman O, Zimmerberg J, Blumenthal R. Initial stages of influenza hemagglutinin-induced cell fusion monitored simultaneously by two fluorescent events: cytoplasmic continuity and lipid mixing. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;109(1):113–122.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sato SB, Kawasaki K, Ohnishi S. Hemolytic activity of influenza virus hemagglutinin glycoproteins activated in mildly acidic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(11):3153–3157.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scholtissek C. Stability of infectious influenza A viruses at low pH and at elevated temperature. Vaccine. 1985 Sep;3(3 Suppl):215–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Skehel JJ, Bayley PM, Brown EB, Martin SR, Waterfield MD, White JM, Wilson IA, Wiley DC. Changes in the conformation of influenza virus hemagglutinin at the pH optimum of virus-mediated membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Feb;79(4):968–972.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spruce AE, Iwata A, White JM, Almers W. Patch clamp studies of single cell-fusion events mediated by a viral fusion protein. Nature. 1989 Nov 30;342(6249):555–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Steck TL, Kant JA. Preparation of impermeable ghosts and inside-out vesicles from human erythrocyte membranes. Methods Enzymol. 1974;31:172–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stegmann T, Hoekstra D, Scherphof G, Wilschut J. Kinetics of pH-dependent fusion between influenza virus and liposomes. Biochemistry. 1985 Jun 18;24(13):3107–3113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stegmann T, Hoekstra D, Scherphof G, Wilschut J. Fusion activity of influenza virus. A comparison between biological and artificial target membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 25;261(24):10966–10969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stegmann T, Booy FP, Wilschut J. Effects of low pH on influenza virus. Activation and inactivation of the membrane fusion capacity of the hemagglutinin. J Biol Chem. 1987 Dec 25;262(36):17744–17749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stegmann T, Doms RW, Helenius A. Protein-mediated membrane fusion. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:187–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stegmann T, Nir S, Wilschut J. Membrane fusion activity of influenza virus. Effects of gangliosides and negatively charged phospholipids in target liposomes. Biochemistry. 1989 Feb 21;28(4):1698–1704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Struck DK, Hoekstra D, Pagano RE. Use of resonance energy transfer to monitor membrane fusion. Biochemistry. 1981 Jul 7;20(14):4093–4099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Webster RG, Brown LE, Jackson DC. Changes in the antigenicity of the hemagglutinin molecule of H3 influenza virus at acidic pH. Virology. 1983 Apr 30;126(2):587–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wharton SA, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Studies of influenza haemagglutinin-mediated membrane fusion. Virology. 1986 Feb;149(1):27–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • White JM. Viral and cellular membrane fusion proteins. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:675–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • White JM, Wilson IA. Anti-peptide antibodies detect steps in a protein conformational change: low-pH activation of the influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;105(6 Pt 2):2887–2896.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • White J, Kartenbeck J, Helenius A. Membrane fusion activity of influenza virus. EMBO J. 1982;1(2):217–222.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiley DC, Skehel JJ. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:365–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiley DC, Wilson IA, Skehel JJ. Structural identification of the antibody-binding sites of Hong Kong influenza haemagglutinin and their involvement in antigenic variation. Nature. 1981 Jan 29;289(5796):373–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson IA, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Structure of the haemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus at 3 A resolution. Nature. 1981 Jan 29;289(5796):366–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson IA, Niman HL, Houghten RA, Cherenson AR, Connolly ML, Lerner RA. The structure of an antigenic determinant in a protein. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):767–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Abstract
Our results show that the mechanism by which influenza virus fuses with target membranes involves sequential complex changes in the hemagglutinin (HA, the viral fusion protein) and in the contact site between virus and target membrane. To render individual steps amenable to study, we worked at 0 degree C which decreased the rate of fusion and increased the efficiency. The mechanism of fusion at 0 degree C and 37 degrees C was similar. The process began with a conformational change in HA which exposed the fusion peptides but did not lead to dissociation of the tops of the ectodomain of the trimer. The change in the protein led to immediate hydrophobic attachment of the virus to the target liposomes. Attachment was followed by a lag period (4-8 min at 0 degree C, 0.6-2 s at 37 degrees C) during which rearrangements occurred in the site of membrane contact between the virus and liposome. After a further series of changes the final bilayer merger took place. This final fusion event was not pH dependent. At 0 degree C efficient fusion occurred without dissociation of the top domains of the HA trimer, suggesting that a transient conformation of HA is responsible for fusion at physiological temperatures. The observations lead to a revised model for HA mediated fusion.
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.