Scholar
Marketplace
Lab
Feedback
$
English
Sign In
Home
Search
My boards
Insights
Collaborators
Reader
Blog
Help
Home
Search
My boards
Insights
Collaborators
Reader
Blog
Help
Imitation: what animal imitation tells us about animal cognition.
Translate
Afrikaans
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Български
Catalan
Cebuano
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Corsican
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Georgian
Deutsch
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Kazakh
Khmer
Korean
Kyrgyz
Lao
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malay
Maltese
Maori
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Serbian
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Xhosa
Zulu
Lucy A Bates
Richard Byrne
Journal:
2015/August
-
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
ISSN:
1939-5078
PUBMED:
26271653
DOI:
10.1002/wcs.77
Abstract:
Imitation of actions is widespread in the animal kingdom, but the mental capacities thereby implied vary greatly according to the adaptive function of copying. Behavioral synchrony in social species has many possible benefits, including minimizing predation risk and using food resources optimally, but can be understood by the simple cognitive mechanism of response facilitation by priming. Imitation can send a social message, either one of short-term meshing or group identity. Where the imitative match is opaque, as in neonatal imitation, the correspondence problem may imply an innate system of behavior matching; but in other cases, no more than priming may be involved, although there are persistent suggestions that great ape imitation implies empathic abilities. Imitation in the service of learning new skills by following another's example can be divided into contextual imitation (when to employ a familiar action, and to what problem) and production imitation (learning of new skills by imitation). Cognitively, the former requires little more than response facilitation, whereas production imitation needs at least the ability to extract the statistical regularities of repeated action and to incorporate the result into hierarchical program construction. Among our close relatives, only the great apes show much evidence of production imitation of actions, along with the ability to selectively imitate the most rational components of what they observe. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Open in
PUBMED
|
DOI
|
Google Scholar
|
Wikipedia
Relations:
Citations
(9)
Affiliates
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.
Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.
Learn More
Search and select entities to see details here. Details will include lists of related entities (via publication). Explore related entities further.
Learn More