Imaging PD-L1 Expression with ImmunoPET.
Journal: 2017/November - Bioconjugate Chemistry
ISSN: 1520-4812
Abstract:
High sensitivity imaging tools could provide a more holistic view of target antigen expression to improve the identification of patients who might benefit from cancer immunotherapy. We developed for immunoPET a novel recombinant human IgG1 (termed C4) that potently binds an extracellular epitope on human and mouse PD-L1 and radiolabeled the antibody with zirconium-89. Small animal PET/CT studies showed that 89Zr-C4 detected antigen levels on a patient derived xenograft (PDX) established from a non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient before an 8-month response to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Importantly, the concentration of antigen is beneath the detection limit of previously developed anti-PD-L1 radiotracers, including radiolabeled atezolizumab. We also show that 89Zr-C4 can specifically detect antigen in human NSCLC and prostate cancer models endogenously expressing a broad range of PD-L1. 89Zr-C4 detects mouse PD-L1 expression changes in immunocompetent mice, suggesting that endogenous PD-1/2 will not confound human imaging. Lastly, we found that 89Zr-C4 could detect acute changes in tumor expression of PD-L1 due to standard of care chemotherapies. In summary, we present evidence that low levels of PD-L1 in clinically relevant cancer models can be imaged with immunoPET using a novel recombinant human antibody.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(16)
Affiliates
(5)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Bioconjugate Chemistry. Jan/16/2018; 29(1): 96-103
Published online Nov/9/2017

Imaging PD-L1 Expression with ImmunoPET

+13 authors

Abstract

High sensitivityimaging tools could provide a more holistic viewof target antigen expression to improve the identification of patientswho might benefit from cancer immunotherapy. We developed for immunoPETa novel recombinant human IgG1 (termed C4) that potently binds anextracellular epitope on human and mouse PD-L1 and radiolabeled theantibody with zirconium-89. Small animal PET/CT studies showed that 89Zr-C4 detected antigen levels on a patient derived xenograft(PDX) established from a non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patientbefore an 8-month response to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Importantly,the concentration of antigen is beneath the detection limit of previouslydeveloped anti-PD-L1 radiotracers, including radiolabeled atezolizumab.We also show that 89Zr-C4 can specifically detect antigenin human NSCLC and prostate cancer models endogenously expressinga broad range of PD-L1. 89Zr-C4 detects mouse PD-L1 expressionchanges in immunocompetent mice, suggesting that endogenous PD-1/2will not confound human imaging. Lastly, we found that 89Zr-C4 could detect acute changes in tumor expression of PD-L1 dueto standard of care chemotherapies. In summary, we present evidencethat low levels of PD-L1 in clinically relevant cancer models canbe imaged with immunoPET using a novel recombinant human antibody.

Introduction

The recent clinicalsuccess of inhibitors of immune checkpointproteins (e.g., CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1) has stimulated deserved enthusiasmfor cancer immunotherapy.1,2 Since this milestone,there is now an urgent need to develop translational biomarkers tounderstand which patients will be most likely to respond to immunotherapyand distinguish responsive tumors from treatment refractory diseaseearly after therapy initiation.2

The clinical experience with anti-PDL1 and PD-1 therapies underscoresthe urgency to develop better translational biomarkers to more effectivelyimplement immunotherapies. For example, there is compelling evidencethat a tissue-based biomarker is crucial to identifying potentialresponders, as a recent retrospective analysis of clinical data enrolledin trials with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and MPDL3280A (atezolizumab)showed that the overall response rate was significantly higher inmelanoma and NSCLC patients with PD-L1 positive tumors compared tothose scored as negative.3 That said, whilethe community understands that PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironmentis likely a prerequisite for response, there is very little consensusbeyond this consideration.46 One example of an open questionis the threshold of PD-L1 positive cells required in a tumor biopsyto confer a response. Multiple clinical trial sponsors have set differentthresholds for the percentage of PD-L1 positive cells in a biopsyas inclusion criteria, ranging from very low percentages (e.g., >5%)to higher percentages (e.g., >50%) of cells in the sample.4 Adding to the confusion, different antibodiesrecognizing discrete epitopes on PD-L1 have been used in immunohistochemicalassays of biopsied tissue. Overall, the lack of a gold standard assayfor patient recruitment has made it challenging to interpret the roleof PD-L1 tumor expression in patient outcome.

Immunotherapiesare currently administered to patients with advancedmetastatic cancer, and this also calls into question whether a tumorbiopsy alone is ideal to characterize PD-L1 status in the tumor microenvironment.Indeed, there are many examples of patients whose biopsies are scoredas “PD-L1 positive” yet do not experience clinical responses.This raises the possibility that biopsy at single site may not reflectthe molecular character of the majority of metastases in the patient.Moreover, if PD-L1 status is determined from archival tissue, thepatient’s tumor may have evolved to change PD-L1 expressionover time, a well-documented observation in preclinical models thatmay impact clinical responses to immunotherapies.79

Theseconsiderations have led several groups to propose that atranslational molecular imaging tool to study PD-L1 expression couldimprove how we treat and monitor patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies.10 Five prior reports have described preclinicalassessments of radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies for imaging usingcommercial, nonhumanized antibodies, or atezolizumab. While thesereports arrived at the conclusion that cancer models overexpressinghuman or mouse PD-L1 can be imaged with a potent and selective radiolabeledantibody, it is an entirely open question as to whether tumor typesresponsive to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy express sufficient antigen tobe detected with immunoPET. Moreover, the prior radiotracer developmentefforts with FDA approved IgG atezolizumab suggest it is not an idealtool for nuclear imaging.11,12 Most importantly, radiolabelingthe antibody with copper-64 resulted in a fairly low immunoreactivefraction (∼75%) and high background in PD-L1 null mouse andhuman tissues (∼10% ID/g). On this basis, we campaigned fora new recombinant human antibody to the ectodomain of PD-L1 and proposedto evaluate whether the PD-L1 levels in tumor tissues derived froma true responder to anti-PD-1 therapy could be detected with immunoPET.

Resultsand Discussion

Development and Characterization of C4, aHuman RecombinantAntibody against an Extracellular Epitope on Human and Mouse PD-L1

Anti-PD-L1 antibodies were isolated from a 3 × 1010 diversity Fab phage display library.13 Following 3 rounds of biopanning against the biotinylated ectodomainof the human PD-L1, 27 antigen-positive Fabs of unique sequences wereidentified after screening 249 clones. Of these positive binders,clone C4 was found to cross-react with both human and mouse PD-L1proteins by ELISA, which share 73% protein sequence identity withinthe extracellular domain. C4 was further evaluated for its abilityto recognize full length PD-L1 expressed on cell surface. Using flowcytometry, we show that C4 binds to both human and mouse PD-L1-expressingcells in a dose-dependent manner, with only a slight difference inits EC50 (Table 1).

Table 1

Summary of the Relative Affinity andBinding Constants for C4 and DFO-C4 against Human and Mouse PD-L1a

Abantigen sourcespeciesvendorEC50 (nM)Kd (nM)
C4HEK293-6EhumanN/A0.31
HEK293-6EmouseN/A5.06
RPhumanR&D4.2 ± 0.7
RPmouseR&DND
RPhumanSBI1.5 ± 0.34
RPmouseSBI360 ± 63
PC3humanN/A6.6
B16F10mouseN/A5.5
DFO-C4PC3humanN/A9.9
B16F10mouseN/A5.2

aThe first tworows of data representthe EC50 data obtained from the initial characterizationof the C4 clone using a flow cytometry assay with PE-conjugated C4.The clone was screened against HEK293-6E cells stably overexpressingfull length human or mouse PD-L1. The next four rows of data reportthe Kd values obtained using two differentcommercial sources of recombinant, purified human or mouse PD-L1.The last four rows show the EC50 data for C4 and DFO-C4derived from a competition binding assay on PC3 or B16F10 cells. Abbreviations:RP = recombinant protein, SBI = Sino Biological, Inc., N/A = not applicable,ND = not detected.

We nexttested binding of C4 to recombinant, purified human andmouse PD-L1 from R&D and Sino Biological Inc. C4 antibody bindsto human PD-L1 from R&D and Sino Biological Inc. with a Kd in the low nanomolar range (4.2 ± 0.7nM and 1.5 ± 0.34 nM, respectively). C4 binds weakly to mousePD-L1 from Sino Biological Inc. (360 ± 63 nM) but does not bindto mouse PD-L1 from R&D even at high concentrations (4 μM).These findings may indicate that mouse PD-L1 may harbor features oncells required for C4 binding that are not present on recombinantantigen.

Radiolabeling and in Vitro Pharmacological Assessment of C4IgG

Desferrioxamine B (DFO) is a well-established potentchelator of zirconium-89 and has been used to append 89Zr to antibodies for both animal and human studies.14 On this basis, we conjugated DFO to C4 by reacting commercial N-succinimidyl DFO with solvent exposed lysines. An analysisof chelate number showed that there was approximately 1 DFO per antibody(Supporting Information Figure 1). We nexttested whether DFO impacted the affinity and immunoreactivity of C4.Competition binding assays on B16F10 and PC3 cells showed virtuallyno change in the binding of C4 for mouse and human PD-L1, respectively(Table 1). The immunoreactivefraction of 89Zr-C4 was assayed using PC3 cells, and ∼93%of the radiolabeled lot was immunoreactive for PD-L1 (Supporting Information Figure 2). Lastly, thestability of 89Zr-C4 was measured in serum and was determinedto be >98% over 5 days in mouse serum, making it suitable for invivouse (Supporting Information Figure 3).

89Zr-C4 Specifically Binds Mouse and Human PD-L1in Vivo

To establish whether 89Zr-C4 can detecthuman and mouse PD-L1 expression in vivo, male nu/nu mice bearing H1975 xenografts (a PD-L1 positive model of human non-small-celllung cancer bearing oncogenic EGFR L858R/T790M) were injected withthe radiotracer via the tail vein. The biodistribution of 89Zr-C4 was monitored over time with small animal PET/CT (Figure 1A). Analysis of theimaging data suggested that peak radiotracer accumulation was observedat 48 h after injection. Biodistribution studies at 8, 24, 48, 72,and 120 h after injection confirmed that the highest tumor uptakewas observed at 48 h (Figure 1B and Supporting Information Figure 4). Moreover, radiotracer uptake in the tumor exceeded that of bloodpool and muscle, suggesting it to be receptor mediated uptake andnot nonspecific uptake due to the enhanced permeability and retentioneffect. Lastly, bone uptake was low and did not increase over time,supportive of the stability of 89Zr-C4 in vivo (free Zr4+ salts can have tropism to the bone). To confirm PD-L1 specificuptake in tissues, a separate mouse cohort received 89Zr-C4or 89Zr-C4 with 30-fold excess C4. Clear evidence of invivo blocking in the tumor tissue was observed 48 h after injectionby PET and biodistribution (Figure 1C; see Supporting Information Figure 5).

Figure 1

Defining the optimal time after injection to study PD-L1 expressionlevels in a xenograft model. (A) Representative coronal and transaxialPET/CT images of male nu/nu mice bearing subcutaneousH1975 tumors, a human model of NSCLC , show that peak tumor uptakeof 89Zr-C4 occurs 48 h after injection. (B) Biodistributiondata also show peak tumor uptake of the radiotracer 48 h after injection.High uptake is also observed in PD-L1 positive tissues like the livera spleen. (C) Representative data from a blocking study acquired 48h after injection show the tumor specific uptake of 89Zr-C4.Blocking was performed with 30-fold excess C4. Radiotracer uptakeexceeded that observed in the blood pool and muscle: (∗) P < 0.01.

89Zr-C4 Detects PD-L1 Expression in a Patient DerivedXenograft from an Individual That Responded Durably to Anti-PD-L1Therapy

Using the conditions defined in the study of H1975tumors, we next tested whether 89Zr-C4 can detect PD-L1expression on a PDX model of EGFR mutant (L858R) NSCLC that was isolatedat UCSF in 2014.15 The PDX was established7 months prior to the individual beginning treatment with pembrolizumabplus ipilimumab. The patient experienced a confirmed partial responsedetected by CT that lasted for 8 months (Figure 2A). Immunofluorescence of tissue sectionsshowed that the tumor tissue expresses PD-L1 (Supporting Information Figure 6). Three mice bearing bilateralsubcutaneous PDXs were injected with radiotracer and imaged seriallyout to 48 h. PET/CT showed that 89Zr-C4 clearly resolvedthe tumors (Figure 2B). Moreover, there was no visible accumulation of heat denatured 89Zr-C4 in the tumors from a separate mouse cohort (Figure 2B), suggesting thatthe tumor accumulation of 89Zr-C4 is receptor mediated.Biodistribution data showed that tumor uptake of 89Zr-C4was ∼5% ID/g and also ∼10-fold higher than the tumorassociated activity detected in mice treated with heat denatured 89Zr-C4 (Figure 2C and Supporting Information Figure 7).Moreover, the amount of 89Zr-C4 in the tumor was higherthan the activity observed in blood pool, muscle, and bone, underscoringthat uptake is due to specific receptor binding, and the radiotraceris stable in vivo.

Figure 2

89Zr-C4 detects PD-L1 expression levels ina PDX derivedfrom a NSCLC patient that experienced a durable clinical responseto anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 therapies. (A) Transaxial CT slices showinga soft tissue lesion in the lung prior to the initiation of pembrolizumaband ipilimumab (left), and a smaller mass 3 months after the startof therapy (right). The position of the tumor is indicated witha white arrow. This patient experienced a partial response for 8 months.The PDX was derived 7 months prior to the first CT scan. (B) Smallanimal PET/CT data showing the biodistribution of 89Zr-C4in mice bearing bilateral PDX tumors in the flank. The tumors canbe clearly resolved, and radiotracer uptake in abdominal tissues likethe liver is observed, as expected for a large biomolecule. Mice treatedwith 89Zr-C4 that was heat denatured (HD) for 10 min priorto injection show no evidence of radiotracer uptake in the tumor.(C) Biodistribution data showing the uptake of 89Zr-C4in the PDX tissue 48 h after injection. The uptake is higher in thetumor compared to heat denatured 89Zr-C4 (HD) and standardreference tissues like the blood and muscle. (D) Biodistribution dataacquired 48 h after injection in mice bearing subcutaneous H1975,PC3, A549, and the PDX tumors show the different degree of 89Zr-C4 uptake in the tumors.

We tested specific binding of 89Zr-C4 in PC3 andA549xenografts, two human models of prostate cancer and NSCLC that wedetermined expressed less PD-L1 compared to H1975 using a saturationbinding assay (Supporting Information Figure 8). Biodistribution studies performed 48 h after injection showedradiotracer accumulation in the PC3 and A549 xenografts to be ∼7%ID/g and 5% ID/g, respectively (Figure 2D). In each case, a blocking study was performed andconfirmed that the tumor uptake was receptor-mediated (Supporting Information Figures 9 and 10).

89Zr-C4 Detects Tumor Associated PD-L1 Expressionin Immunocompetent Mice with Endogenous PD-1

To be usefulclinically, a radiotracer targeting PD-L1 must be capable of competingwith PD-1 antigen in the tumor microenvironment. To assess whether 89Zr-C4 can detect mouse PD-L1 in an immunocompetent background,C57 BL/6J mice were inoculated in the flank with the PD-L1 positivemouse melanoma cell line B16 F10. Tumor bearing mice were treatedwith 89Zr-C4 and imaged with PET/CT serially for 5 days(Figure 3A). As withthe H1975 study, visual inspection of the normalized PET slices showedpeak tumor uptake at 48 h after injection. Biodistribution data confirmedthis trend in the tumor associated activity (Figure 3B and Supporting Information Figure 11). Significant accumulation of 89Zr-C4was also detected in liver and the spleen, consistent with data reportedfor other radiotracers targeting PD-L1 (∼7% ID/g and ∼6%ID/g, respectively, 48 h after injection). 89Zr-C4 uptakewas visibly suppressed in the tumor and some normal tissues (liver,spleen) at 48 h after injection with a co-injection of 10-fold molarexcess unlabeled C4 (Figure 3C). Biodistribution data also showed tumor uptake was suppressedby cold C4, as was uptake in the liver and spleen (Figure 3D and Supporting Information Figure 12).

Figure 3

89Zr-C4 can specifically detectmouse PD-L1 in tumorsestablished in an immunocompetent background. (A) Representative coronaland transaxial PET/CT images of male C57BL/6 mice bearing subcutaneousB16 F10 tumors, a mouse model of melanoma, show that peak tumor uptakeof 89Zr-C4 occurs 48 h after injection. (B) Biodistributiondata also show peak tumor uptake of the radiotracer 48 h after injection.High uptake is also observed in PD-L1 positive tissues like the livera spleen. (C) Representative data from a blocking study acquired 48h after injection show the tumor specific uptake of 89Zr-C4.Blocking was performed with 10-fold excess C4. Radiotracer uptakeexceeded that observed in the blood pool and muscle: (∗) P < 0.01.

Pharmacologically Induced Changes in PD-L1 Expression with Standardof Care Chemotherapies Can Be Quantified with 89Zr-C4 ImmunoPET

Numerous reports have disclosed that standard of care chemotherapyor radiation therapy commonly administered prior to anti-PD1/PD-L1therapies can impact PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment.8,16,17 This observation has clear clinicalsignificance, as a standard treatment course could alter the PD-L1status of a patient’s tumor compared to an archival biopsythat might be used to qualify a patient for immunotherapy. On thisbasis, we tested whether 89Zr-C4 PET can measure treatmentinduced changes in PD-L1 expression over time.

We first establishedon H1975 and B16 F10 cells that 48 h of exposure to paclitaxel (Taxol)and doxorubicin induced and repressed PD-L1 transcription and cellsurface expression, respectively, as expected (Supporting Information Figures 13 and 14). We next testedwhether these expression changes were sufficiently large to be quantifiedwith 89Zr-C4 in vivo. A cohort of nu/nu mice bearing subcutaneous H1975 tumors was treated with vehicle,paclitaxel (20 mg/kg), or doxorubicin (2 mg/kg) for 3 days. At day3, 89Zr-C4 was administered via tail vein, and treatmentwith vehicle or drug was continued for 2 days while the radiotracerwas distributed. PET/CT and biodistribution studies revealed that 89Zr-C4 was substantially higher in the tumors of mice treatedwith paclitaxel compared to the other treatment arms, while 89Zr-C4 was significantly lower in tumors from mice treated with doxorubicin(Figure 4A and Figure 4B). There were nosubstantial differences in the biodistribution of 89Zr-C4in normal tissues, with the exception of increased uptake in the spleensof nu/nu mice treated with paclitaxel (Supporting Information Figure 15). An additionalcohort of C57BL/6 mice bearing subcutaneous B16 F10 tumors was treatedusing the same schema. While doxorubicin had limited effect on 89Zr-C4 uptake in the tumor, paclitaxel increased radiotraceruptake in the tumor (Figure 4C and Figure 4D; see Supporting Information Figure 16). Region of interest analysis also showed that the increase in tumoraccumulation of 89Zr-C4 was statistically significant (Supporting Information Figure 17).

Figure 4

89Zr-C4 can detect pharmacologically induced PD-L1 expressionchanges on the tumor cell. (A) Representative coronal and transversePET images showing the distribution of 89Zr-C4 48 h afterinjection in a cohort of male nu/nu mice bearingsubcutaneous H1975 xenografts and treated with vehicle, paclitaxel(Taxol), or doxorubicine. The mice were treated with 20 mg/kg paclitaxelor 2 mg/kg doxorubicine for 2 days prior to radiotracer injection.(B) Representative biodistribution data in the tumor and selectednormal tissues showing that paclitaxel increases tumor PD-L1 expressionlevels, while doxorubicin suppresses it compared to vehicle. No impactwas observed on PD-L1 expressing normal tissues like liver and spleen.(∗) P < 0.01; (#) P <0.05. (C) Representative coronal and transverse PET images showingthe distribution of 89Zr-C4 48 h after injection in a cohortof male C57BL/6 mice bearing subcutaneous B16 F10 xenografts and treatedwith vehicle, paclitaxel, or doxorubicine. The mice were treated with20 mg/kg paclitaxel or 2 mg/kg doxorubicine for 2 days prior to radiotracerinjection. (D) Representative biodistribution data in the tumor andselected normal tissues showing that paclitaxel increases tumor PD-L1expression levels, while doxorubicin had no impact compared to vehicle.PD-L1 expression was upregulated in the spleen of mice treated withdoxorubicin: (∗) P < 0.01.

Of the fourpreviously described radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies,three are neither human nor humanized, which substantially diminishesthe likelihood of near term clinical translation.1820 One humanizedantibody, atezolizumab, has been labeled and studied in animals.11,12 While the authors initially labeled the antibody with indium-111for SPECT and a near-infrared dye, two imaging approaches that arefar more challenging to quantify compared to PET, they have more recentlydisclosed data showing tumors can be detected with 64Cu-labeledantibody and PET. One aspect of the study with 64Cu-atezolizumabperhaps deserving more careful review is the high background of theradiotracer. Indeed, the authors reported ∼10% ID/g in severaltumors known to be PD-L1 null. This value exceeds the specific accumulationof 89Zr-C4 in several tumor models we have shown to bePD-L1 positive, including the clinically relevant NSCLC PDX. Moreover,it exceeds the threshold for the enhanced permeability and retentioneffect, assigned to be ~3–4% ID/g for biomolecules.21 Blood pool values of 64Cu-atezolizumabwere also quite high at late time points after injection (∼10%ID/g at 48 h), something we did not observe with 89Zr-C4despite both being large immunoglobulins. Lastly, all of the priorstudies utilized cell lines that overexpress PD-L1 endogenously orvia stable genetic engineering, and among the breast cancer cell lineswith endogenous overexpression, there was no evidence provided ofresponse to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies which unfortunately makes itchallenging to contextualize the clinical significance of the imagingdata.

Conclusions

In this manuscript, we developed and studieda new 89Zr-labeled recombinant human antibody to measurePD-L1 expressionlevels in vivo with immunoPET. The IgG1 C4 has low nM affinity forhuman PD-L1, an immunoreactive fraction of >90%, and radiolabelingthe antibody did not compromise either feature. Importantly, we showedfor the first time that a PDX derived from a NSCLC patient responsiveto anti-PD-1 therapies expressed sufficient levels of PD-L1 to beimaged with a high quality PET radiotracer. 89Zr-C4 alsospecifically detected low endogenous levels of PD-L1 on a prostatecancer and NSCLC xenograft. Specific radiotracer binding to PD-L1within melanoma tumors was observed in immunocompetent mice, suggestingthat PD-1/2 positive cells in the tumor microenvironment will notpreclude tumor imaging in patients. Lastly, acute changes in PD-L1expression on the tumor cell due to standard chemotherapies were alsodetectable with immunoPET, underscoring the potential utility of serialimaging to measure clinically relevant expression changes over time.These data generally support that imaging PD-L1 expression may befeasible in clinical disease with 89Zr-C4.

Becausewe now understand that patients with as little as 5% ofantigen positive cells on biopsy can experience a response to cancerimmunotherapy, imaging tools with high specificity and low backgroundin antigen-negative tissues are essential. We are optimistic thatthe data reported herein with 89Zr-C4 will stimulate enthusiasmfor translating this tool to the clinic for assessment of PD-L1 expressionin the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, the human nature of theC4 immunoglobulin precludes the need for an expensive and time consuminghumanization process, which can also reduce affinity for the antigen.

Materialsand Methods

General Methods

B16 F10, H1975, A549, and PC3 cellswere acquired from ATCC and subcultured according to manufacturer’srecommendations. Paclitaxel (Taxol) and doxorubicin were purchasedfrom Sigma-Aldrich and solubilized with DMSO for in vitro studies. N-Succinimidyl-DFO was obtained from Macrocyclics (Dallas,TX) and used without further purification. Zirconium-89 was purchasedfrom 3D Imaging, LLC (Maumelle, AR). Iodine-125 was purchased fromPerkinElmer.

Antibody Generation and Characterization

The protocolsfor biopanning, phage amplification, ELISA screening, Fab and IgGexpression and purification, as well as affinity/specificity characterizationof the isolated antibody clone C4, closely followed a previous publication.13 Briefly, biopanning was performed using humanPD-L1 (Sino Biological) biotinylated by the EZ-Link NHS-PEG4-biotinlabeling kit (Pierce). In the first two rounds of biopanning, PD-L1was immobilized on M280 streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Life Technologies);in the third round, biotinylated PD-L1 was immobilized on the neutravidin-coatedmicroplate in order to avoid isolation of streptavidin magnetic beadsbinders. 1013 cfu phage in 1 mL of casein-PBS blockingbuffer was used in the first round, and 1011 cfu phagewas used in the second and third rounds. Binding was performed for1 h at room temperature, and the beads or wells were washed with PBS,0.1% Tween-20. Concentrations of PD-L1 used for biopanning were 100nM, 20 nM, and 0.2 μg/mL, and the number of washes were 5, 10,and 25 times in rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Bound phage wereeluted by 0.1 M triethylamine for 10 min followed by addition of one-halfvolume of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8. Eluted phage were subsequently amplifiedaccording to previously described protocols.22 After three rounds of biopanning, the Fab of selected clones wasexpressed in E. coli TG1 cells (Stratagene) to screenfor PD-L1 binders by ELISA. Unique clones were identified by DNA fingerprintingtechnique and confirmed by DNA sequencing. Fabs were reformatted intohuman IgG1 in the pTT5 vector, and the antibodies were expressed inHEK293-6E cells23 Both the vector and cellswere obtained from National Research Council of Canada. Antibodieswere purified from the culture supernatant using protein G resin (MerckMillipore) following standard protocols.

To characterize cellsurface binding, suspension HEK6E cells were transfected with eitherhuman or mouse PD-L1 gene cloned in a CMV promoter-driven plasmid(Sino Biological, Beijing). 48 h later the cells were exposed to variousconcentration of C4 followed by a PE-labeled anti-human Fc-specificsecondary antibody (Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Mock transfection ofcells using the same plasmid lacking PD-L1 gene was used as a negativecontrol. Binding of C4 to the cells was quantified by the geometricmean fluorescence intensity (MFI), and the half maximal effectiveconcentration (EC50) was determined by the sigmoidal nonlinearregression equation.

Kinetic constants for C4 antibody againsthuman and mouse PD-L1(R&D and Sino Biological Inc.) were determined using an OctetRED384 instrument (ForteBio). Six concentrations of each antigen (250nM, 125 nM, 62.5 nM, 31.25 nM, 15.625 nM, and 7.812 nM for human PD-L1and 4 μM, 2 μM, 1 μM, 500 nM, 250 nM, and 125 nMfor mouse PD-L1) were tested for binding to the C4 antibody immobilizedon anti-human IgG Fc Capture biosensors (Fortebio). All measurementswere performed at room temperature in 384-well microplates, and therunning buffer was PBS with 0.5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA)and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20.

C4 antibody was loaded for 180 s froma solution of 300 nM, baselinewas equilibrated for 60 s, and then the antigens were associated for600 s followed by 1200 s disassociation. Between each sample, thebiosensor surfaces were regenerated three times by exposing them to10 mM glycine, pH 1.5, for 5 s followed by PBS for 5 s. Data wereanalyzed using a 1:1 interaction model on the ForteBio data analysissoftware version 8.2.

Bioconjugation Chemistry

C4 (208μL at a concentrationof 9.6 mg/mL) was dispersed in 200 μL of 0.1 M sodium bicarbonatebuffer (pH 9.0). The final reaction mixture was adjusted to a totalvolume of 0.5 mL by adding a sufficient amount of 0.1 M sodium bicarbonatebuffer. p-Isothiocyanatobenzyldesferrioxamine(Df-Bz-NCS) was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 20 mM. Df-Bz-NCSsolution was added to the antibody solution to give a 3.9 molar excessof the chelator over the molar amount of mAb. The Df-Bz-NCS was addeddropwise and mixed rigorously during the addition. The concentrationof DMSO was kept below 2% v/v to avoid any precipitation. After 30min at 37 °C, the reaction mixture was purified with a PD-10column using a gentisic acid mobile phase (5 mg/mL of gentisic acidin 0.25 M sodium acetate, pH 5.4–5.6). The pH of the elutedC4-DFO solution was adjusted to 7.0 and stored at −20 °Cuntil time of use.

Determination of Relative Binding Affinityof DFO-C4

The binding of fixed concentration of a radioligand 125I-C4 (0.4 μM) was also measured at equilibrium onPC3 and B16F10cells in the presence of an incrementally increasing series of concentrationsof a DFO-C4 and naked C4 (a range of 10 μM to 1 pM). The cocktailwas incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Following incubation, thecells were washed twice with ice cold PBS and retained for analysis(unbound fraction). The cells were lysed with 1 mL of 1 M NaOH andcollected (cell associated fraction). The unbound and cell associatedfractions were counted in a γ counter and expressed as a percentageof the total activity added per number of cells. The data were plotted,and the IC50 was determined using PRISM software.

Radiochemistry

A solution of 89Zr-oxalicacid (5 mCi; 10 μL) was neutralized with 2 M Na2CO3 (5 μL). After 3 min, 0.30 mL of 0.5 M HEPES (pH 7.1–7.3)and 0.5 mg of DFO-C4 (pH = 7) were added into the reaction vial. Afterincubation for 120 min at 37 °C, the reaction progress was monitoredby iTLC using a 20 mM citric acid (pH 4.9–5.1) mobile phase.The decay corrected radiochemical yield was consistently >98.5%.

Iodination with iodine-125 was done in precoated iodination tubes(Pierce). 100 μg of C4 was dispersed in 100 μL of PBSsolution and added to the precoated iodination tubes. In a separate1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, a solution of 1 μL of HCl (0.2 M), 2.5μL of phosphate buffer (0.5 M, pH = 8), and 10 μL of potassiumiodide solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared. 1 mCi of iodine-125 was addedinto the Eppendorf and then added to the iodination tubes. After 15min of reaction the solution was halted and purified via PD10 columnusing PBS as the mobile phase. The purity was assessed via iTLC andwas consistently >98% pure.

Determination of ChelateNumber

The number of DFO attachedto the Ab was measured with a radiometric isotopic dilution assays.From a stock solution, aliquots of 89Zr oxalate (10 μL,20 μCi, pH 7.7–7.9) were added to 12 solutions containing1:2 serial dilutions of nonradioactive ZrCl4(aq) (100 μLfractions; 1000–0.5 pmol, pH 7.7). The mixture was vortexedfor 30 s before adding 5 μL aliquots of C4 (5 mg/mL, 2.5 μgof mAb, sterile PBS). The reactions were incubated at room temperaturefor >2 h before quenching with DTPA (20 μL, 50 mM, pH 7.0).Control experiments confirmed that 89Zr complexation toDFO-conjugated proteins was complete in <2 h. The extent of complexationwas assessed by iTLC and counting the activity at the baseline andsolvent front. The fraction of 89Zr-radiolabeled protein(Ab) was plotted versus the amount of nonradioactive ZrCl4 added. The number of chelates was calculated by measuring the concentrationof ZrCl4 at which only 50% of the protein was labeled,multiplying by a factor of 2, and then dividing by the moles of proteinpresent in the reaction. Isotopic dilution assays revealed an averageof 1.08 ± 0.3 accessible chelates per protein molecule for C4.

Immunoreactive Fraction

Five different dilutions ofcells ranging from 0.5 to 10 million cells/mL were prepared in PBSsolution containing BSA. 10 μCi of 89Zr-C4 was incubatedfor 1 h at room temperature in each cellular fraction. Following theincubation, the cell suspensions were washed twice with ice-cold PBSand centrifuged. The radioactivity associated with cell pellet (cell-boundactivity) was determined by counting the tubes in a γ counterwith corresponding standards and blanks (for nonspecific binding).The inverse of cell-bound radioactivity (total over bound) was plottedas a function of the inverse of cell concentration. The data werefitted to a linear fit according to a least-squares linear regressionmethods. The Y-intercept of the regression line representsthe inverse of immunoreactive fraction.

Serum Stability Determination

In vitro stability ofDFO-mAb was assessed in serum for up to 3 days. For the serum stabilitystudies, 50 μCi 89Zr- DFO-mAb was added to 500 μLof 100% fetal bovine serum and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C.Aliquots were reserved at different time points: 1 h, 4 h, 24 h, 75h, and 5 days and assessed by iTLC. Activity within the serum sampleswas resolved by iTLC, and each experiment was carried out in triplicate.

Saturation Binding Assay

The number of PD-L1 receptorsper cells was determined by a saturation binding experiment performedin H1975, A549, and PC3 cells using 125I-C4. The amountof radioligand added was increased while maintaining a constant numberof cells/receptors. The three saturation binding assays were donewith a range of nine different concentrations between 0.65 and 120nM of the radioligand. The nonspecific binding was determined at threedifferent concentrations (0.65, 10, and 120 nM) by co-incubation ofseparate treatment arms with a 1000-fold excess over the KD of unlabeled C4. Cells were incubated at 4 °C for1 h to achieve equilibrium. Following incubation, the cells were washedtwice with ice cold PBS and retained for analysis (unbound fraction).The cells were lysed with 1 mL of 1 M NaOH and collected (bound fraction).The unbound and cell associated fractions were counted in a γcounter and expressed as a percentage of the total activity addedper number of cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Thespecific binding was obtained by subtracting the nonspecific bindingfrom total. The specific binding was plotted against the concentrationof the radioligand. A Rosenthal plot was used to determine the Bmax with PRISM software.

Cellular UptakeAssays

Cells were seeded at a densityof 4 × 105 cells per well in 12-well plates and grownat 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h. Cells were treated withvehicle or the indicated therapy for 24, 48, or 72 h. Doxorubucinwas used at doses of 100 nM and 1 μM. Paclitaxel was used at200 nM, 2 μM, and 20 μM. On the day of the experiment,cells were subjected to a PBS wash followed by incubation for 1 hat 37 °C, 5% CO2 in PBS with 125I-C4 (0.5μCi). Following incubation, the cells were washed twice withice cold PBS and retained for analysis (externalized fraction). Thecells were lysed with 1 mL of 1 M NaOH and collected (cell associatedfraction). The externalized and cell associated fractions were countedin a γ counter and expressed as a percentage of the total activityadded per equal relative number of cells. Experiments were performedin triplicate. The cell associated activity was expressed as a % oftotal activity to which the cells were exposed. This value was furthernormalized to cell number to correct for treatment induced changesin cell viability (determined by treating and counting separate wellscontaining cells).

Small Animal PET/CT

Three- to five-week-oldmale nu/nuimmunocompromised mice and immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice were purchasedfrom Charles River. Nu/Nu mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 H1975 or A549 cells subcutaneously into one flank in a 1:1mixture (v/v) of PBS and Matrigel (Corning). Tumors were palpablewithin 8–14 days with H1975 and 14–21 days with A549after injection. Three- to five-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (CharlesRiver) were inoculated with 1 × 106 B16F10 subcutaneouslyinto one flank in the same mixture of Matrigel and PBS. Tumors werepalpable within 3–5 days after injection. Tumor bearing mice(n = 5 per treatment arm) received between 50 and300 μCi of solution in 100 μL saline solution volume intravenouslyusing a custom mouse tail vein catheter with a 28-gauge needle anda 100–150 mm long polyethylene microtubing. ∼300 μCiwas injected for the mice for imaging and ∼50 μCi forthe mice for biodistribution. The mice were imaged on a dedicatedsmall animal PET/CT scanner (Inveon, Siemens Healthcare, Malvern,PA). Mice were imaged at multiple time points after injection outto 5 days. Animals were scanned for 20 min for PET, and the CT acquisitionwas 10 min.

The co-registration between PET and CT images wasobtained using the rigid transformation matrix from the manufacturer-providedscanner calibration procedure since the geometry between PET and CTremained constant for each of PET/CT scans using the combined PET/CTscanner. During the imaging procedure, animals were anesthetized withgas isoflurane at 2% concentration mixed with medical grade oxygen.The photon attenuation correction was performed for PET reconstructionusing the co-registered CT-based attenuation map to ensure the quantitativeaccuracy of the reconstructed PET data.

Biodistribution Studies

Biodistribution studies wereconducted to evaluate the uptake of 89Zr-C4 in mice bearingsubcutaneous tumors. At the indicted time after radiotracer injection,animals were euthanized by CO2(g) asphyxiation, and 14tissues (including the tumor) were removed, weighed, and counted ona γ-counter for accumulation of 89Zr radioactivity.The mass of 89Zr-C4 formulation injected into each animalwas measured and used to determine the total number of counts perminute by comparison to a standard syringe of known activity and mass.The data were background- and decay-corrected, and the tissue uptakewas expressed in units of percentage injected dose per gram of drytissue (% ID/g).

Immunofluorescence

PDX tumors wereharvested and snap-frozenin 2-methylbutane and stored at −80 °C. Serial sections(10 μm thickness) were collected using a cryostat (Leica CM3050).The slices were mounted on coated glass slides (Superfrost Ultra Plus,Thermo Scientific) and stored at −80 °C until assayed.Tumors sections were fixed with paraformaldehyde (4% v/v), blockedwith bovine serum albumin (5% m/v) in Tween (0.5% m/v), and then incubatedfor 1 h at temperature room in a humidified chamber with a rabbitmonoclonal primary antibody against PDL1 (E1L3N XP, rabbit mAb no.13684, 1:500) or EGFR L858R (43B2, rabbit mAb no. 3197, cell signaling,1/400). Then the sections were rinsed three times and incubated for30 min at room temperature with a secondary anti-rabbit antibody (AlexaFluor 488, 1:1000). Sections were mounted with ProLong gold antifadereagent containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Invitrogen).Slides were imaged using an AxioObserver Z1 microscope (Zeiss). Theslides were counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin to show cellularmorphology.

A mosaic acquisition with a magnification of 20×was performed covering entirely the tumors section using an AxioObserverZ1 microscope (Zeiss). The fusion of mosaic images was generated byAxioVision 4.6. A sequential acquisition of separate wavelength channelswas used to avoid fluorescence crosstalk. Exposure times were setso that pixel brightness was never saturated and kept constant duringthe entire image acquisition and between different experiments.

Animal Therapy Studies

Tumor bearing mice were injectedintraperitoneally with doxorubicin (Sigma, 2 mg/kg body weight; equivalentto a dose of 6.5 mg/m2 in patients). All mice were treatedonce per day for 6 days (4 days before the injection and 2 days followingthe radiotracer injection). Paclitaxel was suspended in HPMT solution(0.5% w/v hydroxypropylmethylcellulose dissolved in water plus0.2% v/v Tween 80). Tumor bearing mice were treated once daily viaoral gavage with paclitaxel (25 mg kg–1 d–1) for 6 days (4 days before the injection and 2 days following theradiotracer injection).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzedusing the unpaired,two-tailed Student’s t-test. Differences atthe 95% confidence level (P < 0.05) were consideredto be statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Youngho Seo and Sergio Wong ofthe Small Animal Imaging Core at UCSF for technical assistance. M.J.E.was supported by the 2013 David H. Koch Young Investigator Award fromthe Prostate Cancer Foundation, the National Institutes of Health(Grants R00CA172695, R01CA17661), a Department of Defense Idea DevelopmentAward (Grant PC140107), the UCSF Academic Senate, and GE Healthcare.C.T. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Departmentof Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (Grant PC151060). C.S.C.and N.S. were supported by the National Cancer Institute (Grant P41CA196276).T.G.B. was supported by the National Cancer Institute (Grants DP2CA174497,R01CA169338) and the Pew-Stewart Trust. A.J.C. and L.F. were supportedby a Prostate Cancer Foundation Challenge Award. Research from UCSFreported in this publication was supported in part by the NationalCancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under AwardP30CA082103. The content is solely the responsibility of the authorsand does not necessarily represent the official views of the NationalInstitutes of Health. Research from Singapore Immunology Network inthis publication was supported by the Category 3 Industrial AlignmentFund awarded by the Biomedical Research Council of A*STAR.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Informationis available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00631.

  • Additional experimental details; plotsof determinationof chelate number, immunoreactive fraction, biodistribution, saturationbinding data, PCR data, cell surface binding, and region of interestanalysis; ITLC traces; immunofluorescence results (PDF)

Supplementary Material

bc7b00631_si_001.pdfbc7b00631_si_001.pdf

Author Contributions

C.T. and H.L.J.O. made equal contributions.

The authors declare thefollowing competing financial interest(s): Michael J. Evans receivedconsulting fees and owns shares in ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MichaelJ. Evans received research support from GE Healthcare.

References

  • 1. LeachD. R.; KrummelM. F.; AllisonJ. P. (1996) Enhancement of antitumor immunityby CTLA-4 blockade. Science271, 17346.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. SchumacherT. N.; KesmirC.; van BuurenM. M. (2015) Biomarkersin cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell27, 124.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. CarbogninL.; PilottoS.; MilellaM.; VaccaroV.; BrunelliM.; CalioA.; CupponeF.; SperdutiI.; GiannarelliD.; Chilosi; et al. (2015) DifferentialActivity of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and MPDL3280A according to theTumor Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand-1 (PD-L1): SensitivityAnalysis of Trials in Melanoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers. PLoS One10, e0130142.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. PatelS. P.; KurzrockR. (2015) PD-L1 Expression as a Predictive Biomarker in CancerImmunotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther.14, 84756.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 5. HerbstR. S.; SoriaJ. C.; KowanetzM.; FineG. D.; HamidO.; GordonM. S.; SosmanJ. A.; McDermottD. F.; PowderlyJ. D.; GettingerS. N.; et al. (2014) Predictive correlatesof response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature515, 5637.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. HuangY.; ZhangS. D.; McCruddenC.; ChanK. W.; LinY.; KwokH. F. (2015) The prognostic significance of PD-L1 in bladder cancer. Oncol. Rep.33, 307584.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. GhebehH.; LeheC.; BarhoushE.; Al-RomaihK.; TulbahA.; Al-AlwanM.; HendrayaniS. F.; ManogaranP.; AlaiyaA.; Al-TweigeriT.; et al. (2010) Doxorubicin downregulates cell surface B7-H1 expression and upregulatesits nuclear expression in breast cancer cells: role of B7-H1 as ananti-apoptotic molecule. Breast Cancer Res.12, R48.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. ZhangP.; SuD. M.; LiangM.; FuJ. (2008) Chemopreventive agentsinduce programmed death-1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) surface expression in breastcancer cells and promote PD-L1-mediated T cell apoptosis. Mol. Immunol.45, 14706.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. PengJ.; HamanishiJ.; MatsumuraN.; AbikoK.; MuratK.; BabaT.; YamaguchiK.; HorikawaN.; HosoeY.; MurphyS. K.; et al. (2015) ChemotherapyInduces Programmed Cell Death-Ligand1 Overexpression via the Nuclear Factor-kappaB to Foster an ImmunosuppressiveTumor Microenvironment in Ovarian Cancer. CancerRes.75, 503445.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. EhlerdingE. B.; EnglandC. G.; McNeelD. G.; CaiW. (2016) Molecular Imaging ofImmunotherapy Targets in Cancer. J. Nucl. Med.57, 14871492.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. LesniakW. G.; ChatterjeeS.; GabrielsonM.; LisokA.; WharramB.; PomperM. G.; NimmagaddaS. (2016) PD-L1 Detection in Tumors Using [(64)Cu]Atezolizumabwith PET. Bioconjugate Chem.27, 210310.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. ChatterjeeS.; LesniakW. G.; GabrielsonM.; LisokA.; WharramB.; Sysa-ShahP.; AzadB. B.; PomperM. G.; NimmagaddaS. (2016) A humanizedantibody for imaging immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1 expression intumors. Oncotarget7, 1021527.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. GohA. X.; Bertin-MaghitS.; Ping YeoS.; HoA. W.; DerksH.; MortellaroA.; WangC. I. (2014) A novel human anti-interleukin-1betaneutralizing monoclonal antibody showing in vivo efficacy. mAbs6, 76473.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. VosjanM.J.; PerkL. R.; VisserG. W.; BuddeM.; JurekP.; KieferG. E.; van DongenG. A. (2010) Conjugation and radiolabeling ofmonoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using thebifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine. Nat. Protoc.5, 73943.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 15. BlakelyC. M.; PazarentzosE.; OlivasV.; AsthanaS.; YanJ. J.; TanI.; HrustanovicG.; ChanE.; LinL.; NeelD. S.; et al. (2015) NF-kappaB-activating complex engaged in response to EGFR oncogeneinhibition drives tumor cell survival and residual disease in lungcancer. Cell Rep.11, 98110.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. DengL.; LiangH.; BurnetteB.; BeckettM.; DargaT.; WeichselbaumR. R.; FuY. X. (2014) Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatmentsynergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J. Clin. Invest.124, 68795.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. DovediS. J.; AdlardA. L.; Lipowska-BhallaG.; McKennaC.; JonesS.; CheadleE. J.; StratfordI. J.; PoonE.; MorrowM.; StewartR.; et al. (2014) Acquired resistance to fractionated radiotherapy canbe overcome by concurrent PD-L1 blockade. CancerRes.74, 545868.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. HettichM.; BraunF.; BartholomaM. D.; SchirmbeckR.; NiedermannG. (2016) High-Resolution PET Imaging with Therapeutic Antibody-basedPD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Tracers. Theranostics6, 162940.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. HeskampS.; HoboW.; Molkenboer-KuenenJ.D.; OliveD.; OyenW. J.; DolstraH.; BoermanO. C. (2015) Noninvasive Imagingof Tumor PD-L1 Expression Using Radiolabeled Anti-PD-L1 Antibodies. Cancer Res.75, 292836.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. JosefssonA.; NedrowJ. R.; ParkS.; BanerjeeS. R.; RittenbachA.; JammesF.; TsuiB.; SgourosG. (2016) Imaging, Biodistribution,and Dosimetry of Radionuclide-Labeled PD-L1 Antibody in an ImmunocompetentMouse Model of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res.76, 4729.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. HeneweerC.; HollandJ. P.; DivilovV.; CarlinS.; LewisJ. S. (2011) Magnitudeof enhanced permeability and retention effect in tumors with differentphenotypes: 89Zr-albumin as a model system. J. Nucl. Med.52, 62533.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. deHaardH. J.; van NeerN.; ReursA.; HuftonS. E.; RooversR. C.; HenderikxP.; de BruineA. P.; ArendsJ. W.; HoogenboomH. R. (1999) A large non-immunized human Fab fragmentphage library that permits rapid isolation and kinetic analysis ofhigh affinity antibodies. J. Biol. Chem.274, 1821830.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. DurocherY.; PerretS.; KamenA. (2002) High-leveland high-throughput recombinantprotein production by transient transfection of suspension-growinghuman 293-EBNA1 cells. Nucleic Acids Res.30, E9.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.