Heterogeneous Antibody Responses in Tuberculosis
Abstract
Antibody responses during tuberculosis were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with a panel of 10 protein antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It was shown that serum immunoglobulin G antibodies were produced against a variety of M. tuberculosis antigens and that the vast majority of sera from tuberculosis patients contained antibodies against one or more M. tuberculosis antigens. The number and the species of serologically reactive antigens varied greatly from individual to individual. In a given serum, the level of specific antibodies also varied with the antigen irrespective of the total number of antigens recognized by that particular serum. These findings indicate that person-to-person heterogeneity of antigen recognition, rather than recognition of particular antigens, is a key attribute of the antibody response in tuberculosis.
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. Worldwide, one third of the population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis; each year, 8 million cases of disease arise, and 3 million people die (4, 17). Immunological research on TB has focused largely on cell-mediated immunity because this part of the immune system mediates acquired resistance to TB (8). Much less effort has been placed on the characterization of the nonprotective, humoral immune response. It has often been suggested but never firmly established that different clinical outcomes are related to the fact that some patients show a stronger cell-mediated response and others show a stronger humoral response (12). It has also been conjectured that antibodies and immune complexes play an immunosuppressive role in TB (7, 23). Clearly, a full understanding of immune responses in TB and the use of such information to develop TB control measures require knowledge of humoral immunity in the infected host.
Most of our current knowledge on humoral immunity in TB derives from serodiagnostic studies. In the search for appropriate antigens, it has been repeatedly observed that single-antigen-based assays never achieve satisfactory serodiagnostic performance (reviewed in references 11 and 29), leading to the view that up to 30% of patients with TB are seronegative (15). However, complex antibody binding patterns are usually observed with immunoblot analyses of sera from TB patients (28). Thus, it has not been clear whether the poor performance of serodiagnostic assays reflects a lack of antibody responses in a large number of patients or a lack of appropriate reagents to measure the responses. An answer to this question requires the availability of a broad set of serologically active M. tuberculosis antigens.
We looked for antigens that elicit antibody responses in TB by focusing on the extracellular proteins of M. tuberculosis (operationally referred to as culture filtrate proteins), since these proteins are known to induce strong immune responses in TB (reviewed in references 1 and 10). Using a panel of 10 culture filtrate proteins purified from recombinant Escherichia coli, we found that person-to-person heterogeneity of antigen recognition, rather than recognition of particular antigens, is the signature of humoral immunity in TB.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Clemence Desputeau and Stephane Francoeur for excellent technical assistance. We also thank Tom Daniel, Karl Drlica, Sam Kayman, and Carol Lusty for comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by NIH grant AI-36896 (to M.L.G.). R.C. was the recipient of an AIDS training fellowship from the Istituto Superiore di Sanitá, Rome, Italy.
REFERENCES
References
- 1. Andersen Å B, Brennan P Proteins and antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In: Bloom B R, editor. Tuberculosis: pathogenesis, protection, and control. Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 1994. pp. 307–327. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 2. Andersen Å B, Hansen E BStructure and mapping of antigenic domains of protein antigen b, a 38,000-molecular-weight protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1989;57:2481–2488.[Google Scholar]
- 3. Ashbridge K R A, Booth R J, Watson J D, Lathigra R BNucleotide sequence of the 19kDa antigen gene from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:1249.[Google Scholar]
- 4. Bloom B R, Murray C J LTuberculosis: commentary on a reemergent killer. Science. 1992;257:1055–1064.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 5. Boom W H, Wallis R S, Chervenak K AHuman Mycobacterium tuberculosis-reactive CD4 T-cell clones: heterogeneity in antigen recognition, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity for mononuclear phagocytes. Infect Immun. 1991;59:2737–2743.[Google Scholar]
- 6. Bothamley G H, Beck J S, Schreuder G M T, D’Amaro J, de Vries R R P, Kardjito T, Ivanyi JAssociation of tuberculosis and M. tuberculosis-specific antibody levels with HLA. J Infect Dis. 1989;159:549–555.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 7. Campa M, Marelli P, Benedettini GB and T lymphocytes regulated by idiotype anti-idiotype interactions inhibit delayed-type hypersensitivity to BCG in mice. Cell Immunol. 1986;98:93–103.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 8. Chan J, Kaufmann S H E. Immune mechanisms of protection. In: Bloom B R, editor. Tuberculosis: pathogenesis, protection, and control. Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 1994. pp. 389–416. [PubMed]
- 9. Colangeli, R., A. Heijbel, A. Williams, C. Manca, J. Chan, K. Lyashchenko, and M. L. Gennaro. Three-step purification of lipopolysaccharide-free, polyhistidine-tagged recombinant antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Chromatogr., in press. [[PubMed]
- 10. Cooper A M, Flynn J LThe protective immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr Opin Immunol. 1995;7:512–516.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 11. Daniel T MAntibody and antigen detection for the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: why not? what more is needed? where do we stand today? J Infect Dis. 1988;158:678–680.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 12. Daniel T M, Oxtoby M J, Pinto E, Moreno EThe immune spectrum in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981;123:556–559.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 13. Heym B, Zhang Y, Pulet S, Young D, Cole S TCharacterization of the katG gene encoding a catalase-peroxidase required for the isoniazid susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:4255–4259.[Google Scholar]
- 14. Huygen K, Ljungqvist L, Berg R T, Vooren J-P VRepertoire of antibodies to culture filtrate antigens in different mouse strains infected with Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect Immun. 1990;58:2192–2197.[Google Scholar]
- 15. Ivanyi J, Bothamley G H, Jackett P SImmunodiagnostic assays for tuberculosis and leprosy. Br Med Bull. 1988;44:635–649.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 16. Jackett P S, Bothamley G H, Batra H V, Mistry A, Young D B, Ivanyi JSpecificity of antibodies to immunodominant mycobacterial antigens in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2313–2318.[Google Scholar]
- 17. Kochi AThe global tuberculosis situation and the new control strategy of the World Health Organization. Tubercle. 1991;72:1–6.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 18. Maddison S ESerodiagnosis of parasitic diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991;4:457–469.[Google Scholar]
- 19. Manca C, Lyashchenko K, Colangeli R, Gennaro M LMTC28, a novel 28-kilodalton proline-rich secreted antigen specific for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Infect Immun. 1997;65:4951–4957.[Google Scholar]
- 20. Manca C, Lyashchenko K, Wiker H G, Usai D, Colangeli R, Gennaro M LMolecular cloning, purification, and serological characterization of MPT63, a novel secreted antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1997;65:16–23.[Google Scholar]
- 21. Matsuo K, Yamaguchi R, Yamazaki A, Tasaka H, Yamada TCloning and expression of the Mycobacterium bovis BCG gene for extracellular α-antigen. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:3847–3854.[Google Scholar]
- 22. Ohara N, Kitaura H, Hotokezaka H, Nishiyama T, Wada N, Matsumoto S, Matsuo T, Naito M, Yamada TCharacterization of the gene encoding MPB51, one of the major secreted protein antigens of Mycobacterium bovis BCG, and identification of the secreted protein closely related to the fibronectin binding 85 complex. Scand J Immunol. 1995;41:433–442.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 23. Orme I M, McMurray D N. The immune response to tuberculosis in animal models. In: Rom W N, Garay S M, editors. Tuberculosis. New York, N.Y: Little, Brown & Co.; 1996. pp. 269–280. [PubMed]
- 24. Santos J I D, Morgado M G, Galvão-Castro BHuman visceral leishmaniasis: analysis of the specificity of humoral immune response to polypeptides of Leishmania donovani chagasi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;37:263–270.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 25. Schoel B, Gulle H, Kaufmann S H EHeterogeneity of the repertoire of T cells of tuberculosis patients and healthy contacts to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens separated by high-resolution techniques. Infect Immun. 1992;60:1717–1720.[Google Scholar]
- 26. Sørensen A L, Nagai S, Houen G, Andersen P, Andersen Å BPurification and characterization of a low-molecular-mass T-cell antigen secreted by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1710–1717.[Google Scholar]
- 27. Verbon A, Hartskeerl R A, Schuitema A, Kolk A H, Young D B, Lathigra RThe 14,000-molecular-weight antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is related to the alpha-crystallin family of low-molecular-weight heat shock proteins. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1352–1359.[Google Scholar]
- 28. Verbon A, Kuijper S, Jansen H M, Speelman P, Kolk A H JAntigens in culture supernatant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: epitopes defined by monoclonal and human antibodies. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:955–964.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
- 29. Wilkins E G L. The serodiagnosis of tuberculosis. In: Davies P D O, editor. Clinical tuberculosis. London, England: Chapman and Hall Medical; 1994. pp. 367–380. [PubMed]
- 30. Yamaguchi R, Matsuo K, Yamazaki A, Abe C, Nagai S, Teresaka K, Yamada TCloning and characterization of the gene for immunogenic protein MPB64 of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect Immun. 1989;57:283–288.[Google Scholar]

