GRIN2A: an aptly named gene for speech dysfunction.
Journal: 2015/May - Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE
To delineate the specific speech deficits in individuals with epilepsy-aphasia syndromes associated with mutations in the glutamate receptor subunit gene GRIN2A.
METHODS
We analyzed the speech phenotype associated with GRIN2A mutations in 11 individuals, aged 16 to 64 years, from 3 families. Standardized clinical speech assessments and perceptual analyses of conversational samples were conducted.
RESULTS
Individuals showed a characteristic phenotype of dysarthria and dyspraxia with lifelong impact on speech intelligibility in some. Speech was typified by imprecise articulation (11/11, 100%), impaired pitch (monopitch 10/11, 91%) and prosody (stress errors 7/11, 64%), and hypernasality (7/11, 64%). Oral motor impairments and poor performance on maximum vowel duration (8/11, 73%) and repetition of monosyllables (10/11, 91%) and trisyllables (7/11, 64%) supported conversational speech findings. The speech phenotype was present in one individual who did not have seizures.
CONCLUSIONS
Distinctive features of dysarthria and dyspraxia are found in individuals with GRIN2A mutations, often in the setting of epilepsy-aphasia syndromes; dysarthria has not been previously recognized in these disorders. Of note, the speech phenotype may occur in the absence of a seizure disorder, reinforcing an important role for GRIN2A in motor speech function. Our findings highlight the need for precise clinical speech assessment and intervention in this group. By understanding the mechanisms involved in GRIN2A disorders, targeted therapy may be designed to improve chronic lifelong deficits in intelligibility.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(6)
References
(18)
Diseases
(1)
Conditions
(5)
Chemicals
(1)
Genes
(1)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(2)
Affiliates
(4)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Neurology 84(6): 586-593

GRIN2A

Objective:

To delineate the specific speech deficits in individuals with epilepsy-aphasia syndromes associated with mutations in the glutamate receptor subunit gene GRIN2A.

Methods:

We analyzed the speech phenotype associated with GRIN2A mutations in 11 individuals, aged 16 to 64 years, from 3 families. Standardized clinical speech assessments and perceptual analyses of conversational samples were conducted.

Results:

Individuals showed a characteristic phenotype of dysarthria and dyspraxia with lifelong impact on speech intelligibility in some. Speech was typified by imprecise articulation (11/11, 100%), impaired pitch (monopitch 10/11, 91%) and prosody (stress errors 7/11, 64%), and hypernasality (7/11, 64%). Oral motor impairments and poor performance on maximum vowel duration (8/11, 73%) and repetition of monosyllables (10/11, 91%) and trisyllables (7/11, 64%) supported conversational speech findings. The speech phenotype was present in one individual who did not have seizures.

Conclusions:

Distinctive features of dysarthria and dyspraxia are found in individuals with GRIN2A mutations, often in the setting of epilepsy-aphasia syndromes; dysarthria has not been previously recognized in these disorders. Of note, the speech phenotype may occur in the absence of a seizure disorder, reinforcing an important role for GRIN2A in motor speech function. Our findings highlight the need for precise clinical speech assessment and intervention in this group. By understanding the mechanisms involved in GRIN2A disorders, targeted therapy may be designed to improve chronic lifelong deficits in intelligibility.

Supplementary Material

Video:
From the Department of Paediatrics (S.J.T., S.A.M., A.T.M., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville; Language and Literacy Group (A.K.M., A.T.M.), Population Health Theme, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville; Speech Pathology Department (A.V.), The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville; Department of Radiology (S.A.M.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Epilepsy Research Centre (I.E.S.), Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne; and Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (S.A.M., I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia.
Corresponding author.
Correspondence to Prof. Scheffer: ua.ude.bleminu@reffehcs
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
From the Department of Paediatrics (S.J.T., S.A.M., A.T.M., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville; Language and Literacy Group (A.K.M., A.T.M.), Population Health Theme, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville; Speech Pathology Department (A.V.), The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville; Department of Radiology (S.A.M.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Epilepsy Research Centre (I.E.S.), Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne; and Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (S.A.M., I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia.
Correspondence to Prof. Scheffer: ua.ude.bleminu@reffehcsGo to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Received 2014 May 5; Accepted 2014 Oct 10.

Abstract

Objective:

To delineate the specific speech deficits in individuals with epilepsy-aphasia syndromes associated with mutations in the glutamate receptor subunit gene GRIN2A.

Methods:

We analyzed the speech phenotype associated with GRIN2A mutations in 11 individuals, aged 16 to 64 years, from 3 families. Standardized clinical speech assessments and perceptual analyses of conversational samples were conducted.

Results:

Individuals showed a characteristic phenotype of dysarthria and dyspraxia with lifelong impact on speech intelligibility in some. Speech was typified by imprecise articulation (11/11, 100%), impaired pitch (monopitch 10/11, 91%) and prosody (stress errors 7/11, 64%), and hypernasality (7/11, 64%). Oral motor impairments and poor performance on maximum vowel duration (8/11, 73%) and repetition of monosyllables (10/11, 91%) and trisyllables (7/11, 64%) supported conversational speech findings. The speech phenotype was present in one individual who did not have seizures.

Conclusions:

Distinctive features of dysarthria and dyspraxia are found in individuals with GRIN2A mutations, often in the setting of epilepsy-aphasia syndromes; dysarthria has not been previously recognized in these disorders. Of note, the speech phenotype may occur in the absence of a seizure disorder, reinforcing an important role for GRIN2A in motor speech function. Our findings highlight the need for precise clinical speech assessment and intervention in this group. By understanding the mechanisms involved in GRIN2A disorders, targeted therapy may be designed to improve chronic lifelong deficits in intelligibility.

Abstract

Language and speech impairment are integral to the epilepsy-aphasia syndromes (EAS). At the severe end of the epilepsy-aphasia spectrum lie two disorders associated with regression and continuous spike and wave during sleep, defined by bilaterally synchronous discharges occupying >85% of slow-wave sleep. Language regression, typically with verbal auditory agnosia, is characteristic of Landau-Kleffner syndrome, often associated with treatable focal seizures. Global regression is usual in epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and wave during sleep (ECSWS) associated with multiple seizure types. Next in the continuum is intermediate epilepsy-aphasia disorder (IEAD) with abnormal cognitive development or regression, with or without seizures, with epileptiform activity occupying <85% sleep.1 At the mild end, impaired language and literacy skills are described in benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.2 Ictal oromotor and speech impairment as well as interictal speech sound disorder have also been reported.3,4 Speech dyspraxia occurs in rare families with rolandic epilepsy and cognitive impairment.57 Impairment in language (understanding and use of words) is central to the EAS, yet speech (how speech sounds are produced or articulated) has not been carefully investigated.

Inherited and de novo mutations in GRIN2A, encoding the NR2A subunit of the glutamate NMDA receptor, are found in 9% to 20% of probands with EAS.810 We identified mutations in GRIN2A in 4 of 519 patients with epileptic encephalopathies of unknown cause and found all 4 patients had EAS disorders.8 This finding was replicated in French and German studies.9,10 Here, we studied the speech phenotype of 3 families with EAS associated with GRIN2A mutations.

Click here to view.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors sincerely thank the families for their participation in this study. The authors thank Associate Professor Lynette Sadleir for referring a family and Professor Susan Gathercole for use of the Nonword Memory Test. The authors are grateful to Professor Eliane Roulet-Perez for helpful advice regarding the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

GLOSSARY

ADRESDautosomal dominant rolandic epilepsy with speech dyspraxia
EASepilepsy-aphasia syndromes
ECSWSepileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and wave during sleep
GRIN2Aglutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl d-aspartate 2A
IEADintermediate epilepsy-aphasia disorder
GLOSSARY

Footnotes

Supplemental data at Neurology.org

Footnotes

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

References

  • 1. Tsai MH, Vears DF, Turner SJ, et al Clinical genetic study of the epilepsy-aphasia spectrum. Epilepsia 2013;54:280–287. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Overvliet GM, Besseling RM, Vles JS, et al Nocturnal epileptiform EEG discharges, nocturnal epileptic seizures, and language impairments in children: review of the literature. Epilepsy Behav 2010;19:550–558. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. Clarke T, Strug LJ, Murphy PL, et al High risk of reading disability and speech sound disorder in rolandic epilepsy families: case-control study. Epilepsia 2007;48:2258–2265. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lundberg S, Frylmark A, Eeg-Olofsson O. Children with rolandic epilepsy have abnormalities of oromotor and dichotic listening performance. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47:603–608. [[PubMed]
  • 5. Scheffer IE, Jones L, Pozzebon M, Howell RA, Saling MM, Berkovic SF. Autosomal dominant rolandic epilepsy and speech dyspraxia: a new syndrome with anticipation. Ann Neurol 1995;38:633–642. [[PubMed]
  • 6. Roll P, Rudolf G, Pereira S, et al SRPX2 mutations in disorders of language cortex and cognition. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15:1195–1207. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kugler SL, Bali B, Lieberman P, et al An autosomal dominant genetically heterogeneous variant of rolandic epilepsy and speech disorder. Epilepsia 2008;49:1086–1090. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Carvill GL, Regan BM, Yendle SC, et al GRIN2A mutations cause epilepsy-aphasia spectrum disorders. Nat Genet 2013;45:1073–1076. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lesca G, Rudolf G, Bruneau N, et al GRIN2A mutations in acquired epileptic aphasia and related childhood focal epilepsies and encephalopathies with speech and language dysfunction. Nat Genet 2013;45:1061–1066. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lemke JR, Lal D, Reinthaler EM, et al Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes. Nat Genet 2013;45:1067–1072. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Murdoch BE. Dysarthria: A Physiological Approach to Assessment and Treatment. Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes; 1998. [PubMed]
  • 12. Lewis BA, Freebairn L. Residual effects of preschool phonology disorders in grade school, adolescence, and adulthood. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:819–831. [[PubMed]
  • 13. Gathercole SE, Baddeley AD. Nonword Memory Test. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol; 1996. [PubMed]
  • 14. Dabul BL. Apraxia Battery for Adults, 2nd ed Austin: PRO-ED; 2000. [PubMed]
  • 15. Thoonen G, Maassen B, Wit J, Gabreels F, Schreuder R. The integrated use of maximum performance tasks in differential diagnostic evaluations among children with motor speech disorders. Clin Linguist Phon 1996;10:311–336. [PubMed]
  • 16. Duffy JR. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis and Management, 3rd ed St. Louis: Mosby; 2013. [PubMed]
  • 17. Enderby P, Palmer R. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment, 2nd ed Austin: PRO-ED; 2008. [PubMed]
  • 18. ASHA. Technical Report: Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Available at: . Accessed March 12, 2010. [PubMed]
  • 19. Semel E, Wiig E, Secord W. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Australian Standardised Edition, 4th ed Marrickville, Australia: Harcourt Assessment; 2006. [PubMed]
  • 20. Dunn LM, Dunn DM. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th ed Minneapolis: NCS Pearson Inc.; 2007. [PubMed]
  • 21. Williams KT. Expressive Vocabulary Test, 2nd ed London: Pearson Assessment; 2007. [PubMed]
  • 22. Bishop DJ. Test for Reception of Grammar, 2nd ed London: Pearson Assessment; 2003. [PubMed]
  • 23. Wechsler D. The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, 2nd ed London: Pearson Assessment; 2011. [PubMed]
  • 24. Liegeois FJ, Morgan AT. Neural bases of childhood speech disorders: lateralization and plasticity for speech functions during development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:439–458. [[PubMed]
  • 25. Monyer H, Sprengel R, Schoepfer R, et al Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science 1992;256:1217–1221. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Conti F, Barbaresi P, Melone M, Ducati A. Neuronal and glial localization of NR1 and NR2A/B subunits of the NMDA receptor in the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1999;9:110–120. [[PubMed]
  • 27. Kornau HC, Schenker LT, Kennedy MB, Seeburg PH. Domain interaction between NMDA receptor subunits and the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95. Science 1995;269:1737–1740. [[PubMed]
  • 28. Kendrick SJ, Lynch DR, Pritchett DB. Characterization of glutamate binding sites in receptors assembled from transfected NMDA receptor subunits. J Neurochem 1996;67:608–616. [[PubMed]
  • 29. Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, et al Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1091–1098. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sprengel R, Suchanek B, Amico C, et al Importance of the intracellular domain of NR2 subunits for NMDA receptor function in vivo. Cell 1998;92:279–289. [[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.