Fluorescence lifetime distributions in proteins.
Abstract
The fluorescence lifetime value of tryptophan residues varies by more than a factor of 100 in different proteins and is determined by several factors, which include solvent exposure and interactions with other elements of the protein matrix. Because of the variety of different elements that can alter the lifetime value and the sensitivity to the particular environment of the tryptophan residue, it is likely that non-unique lifetime values result in protein systems. The emission decay of most proteins can be satisfactorily described only using several exponential components. Here it is proposed that continuous lifetime distributions can better represent the observed decay. An approach based on protein dynamics is presented, which provides fluorescence lifetime distribution functions for single tryptophan residue proteins. First, lifetime distributions for proteins interconverting between two conformations, each characterized by a different lifetime value, are derived. The evolution of the lifetime values as a function of the interconversion rate is studied. In this case lifetime distributions can be obtained from a distribution of rates of interconversion between the two conformations. Second, the existence of a continuum of energy substates within a given conformation was considered. The occupation of a particular energy substate at a given temperature is proportional to the Boltzmann factor. The density of energy states of the potential well depends upon the width of the well, which determines the degree of freedom the residue can move in the conformational space. Lifetime distributions can be obtained by association of each energy substate with a different lifetime value and assuming that the average conformation can change as the energy of the substate is increased. Finally, lifetime distributions for proteins interconverting between two conformations, each characterized by a quasi-continuum of energy substates, are presented. The origin of negative components of the lifetime distribution is also discussed. In the companion paper that will follow (Alcala, J. R., E. Gratton, and F. J.Prendergast, 1987, Biophys. J., in press) lifetime distributions obtained here are used to fit experimental data.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beechem JM, Brand L. Time-resolved fluorescence of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:43–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ansari A, Berendzen J, Bowne SF, Frauenfelder H, Iben IE, Sauke TB, Shyamsunder E, Young RD. Protein states and proteinquakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Aug;82(15):5000–5004.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lakowicz JR, Cherek H. Dipolar relaxation in proteins on the nanosecond timescale observed by wavelength-resolved phase fluorometry of tryptophan fluorescence. J Biol Chem. 1980 Feb 10;255(3):831–834. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Austin RH, Beeson KW, Eisenstein L, Frauenfelder H, Gunsalus IC. Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. Biochemistry. 1975 Dec 2;14(24):5355–5373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alcala JR, Gratton E, Prendergast FG. Resolvability of fluorescence lifetime distributions using phase fluorometry. Biophys J. 1987 Apr;51(4):587–596.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karplus M, McCammon JA. Dynamics of proteins: elements and function. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52:263–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
