Evidence for rotation of V<sub>1</sub>-ATPase
Abstract
VoV1-ATPase is responsible for acidification of eukaryotic intracellular compartments and ATP synthesis of Archaea and some eubacteria. From the similarity to FoF1-ATP synthase, VoV1-ATPase has been assumed to be a rotary motor, but to date there are no experimental data to support this. Here we visualized the rotation of single molecules of V1-ATPase, a catalytic subcomplex of VoV1-ATPase. V1-ATPase from Thermus thermophilus was immobilized onto a glass surface, and a bead was attached to the D or F subunit through the biotin-streptavidin linkage. In both cases we observed ATP-dependent rotations of beads, the direction of which was always counterclockwise viewed from the membrane side. Given that three ATP molecules are hydrolyzed per one revolution, rates of rotation agree consistently with rates of ATP hydrolysis at saturating ATP concentrations. This study provides experimental evidence that VoV1-ATPase is a rotary motor and that both D and F subunits constitute a rotor shaft.
Two subclasses of the ATPase/ATP-synthase superfamily that catalyze the exchange of the energy of proton translocation across membranes and the energy of ATP hydrolysis/synthesis are VoV1-ATPase and FoF1-ATP synthase (1–3). Vo and Fo are the integral membrane proton channel portion. V1 and F1 are the soluble portion that contain catalytic sites for ATP hydrolysis/synthesis. VoV1-ATPases exist in membranes of various intracellular acidic compartments of eukaryotic cells (1, 4) and plasma membranes of Archaea and some eubacteria (5–7). FoF1-ATP synthases are responsible for ATP production in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and respiring bacteria (2). Several years ago, rotation of the centrally located γ subunit in the surrounding α3β3 hexamer cylinder in the isolated F1 was video-imaged (8), and the rotary catalysis mechanism of FoF1-ATP synthase was established (3, 9). Given the functional and structural similarity between VoV1-ATPase and FoF1-ATP synthase, it has been assumed that VoV1-ATPase would use a similar rotary mechanism to the FoF1-ATP synthase. However, without a precise knowledge of the atomic structure or even accurate subunit arrangement in VoV1-ATPase, the attempts to prove this assumption have been unsuccessful.
We previously identified VoV1-ATPase in an aerobic thermophilic eubacterium, Thermus thermophilus (5, 10, 11). The V1 portion of T. thermophilus, which is ATPase-active and hence called V1-ATPase, is made up of four subunits: A (63.6 kDa), B (53.1 kDa), D (24.7 kDa), and F (11.7 kDa) with a stoichiometry of A3B3D1F1 (5). The A subunit contains a catalytic site, and the A and B subunits are arranged alternately, forming a hexameric cylinder similar to the α3β3 of FoF1-ATPase. The D subunit most likely fills the central cavity of the A3B3 cylinder (11). Cross-linking studies have suggested that the D subunit forms part of the central stalk, and the F subunit is assumed to be associated with the D subunit (12–14). Here we report the visual demonstration of ATP-dependent rotation of V1-ATPase. The results also show that both D and F subunits constitute a rotor shaft with respect to the stator A3B3 cylinder.
Acknowledgments
We thank C. Ikeda for enzyme preparation and assays; T. Hisabori, K. Tabata, T. Ariga, K. Shimabukuro, and H. Ueno for critical discussions and technical advice; and B. Bernadette for critical assessment of the manuscript. This work was supported by Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan Grand-in-Aid for Scientific Research 12680629 (to K.Y.).
Abbreviation
| rps | revolutions per second |
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
The viscous frictional load of the rotating bead at 2.6 rps is calculated to be ≈15 pN⋅nm (18). The rotation is not impeded by the load of this magnitude, because the ATP hydrolysis rate of immobilized, bead-attached V1-ATPase estimated from the rate of bead rotation is nearly the same as the ATP hydrolysis rate of free V1-ATPase in the bulk medium, where the frictional load is negligible.
References
- 1. Nishi T, Forgac M. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:94–103.[PubMed]
- 2. Yoshida M, Muneyuki E, Hisabori T. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:669–677.[PubMed]
- 3. Boyer P D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1140:215–250.[PubMed]
- 4. Stevens T H, Forgac M. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:779–808.[PubMed]
- 5. Yokoyama K, Oshima T, Yoshida M. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:21946–21950.[PubMed]
- 6. Konishi J, Wakagi T, Oshima T, Yoshida M. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1987;102:1379–1387.[PubMed]
- 7. Wilms R, Freiberg C, Wegerle E, Meier I, Mayer F, Müller V. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:18843–18852.[PubMed]
- 8. Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K., Jr Nature. 1997;386:299–302.[PubMed]
- 9. Boyer P D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1458:252–262.[PubMed]
- 10. Yokoyama K, Akabane Y, Ishii N, Yoshida M. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12248–12253.[PubMed]
- 11. Yokoyama K, Ohkuma S, Taguchi H, Yasunaga T, Wakabayashi T, Yoshida M. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:13955–13961.[PubMed]
- 12. Xu T, Vasilyeva E, Forgac M. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:28909–28915.[PubMed]
- 13. Tomashek J J, Graham L A, Hutchins M U, Stevens T H, Klionsky D J. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:26787–26793.[PubMed]
- 14. Arata Y, Baleja J D, Forgac M. Biochemistry. 2002;41:11301–11307.[PubMed]
- 15. Yokoyama K, Muneyuki E, Amano T, Mizutani S, Yoshida M, Ishida M, Ohkuma S. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:20504–20510.[PubMed]
- 16. Hirono-Hara Y, Noji H, Nishiura M, Muneyuki E, Hara K Y, Yasuda R, Kinosita K, Jr, Yoshida M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:13649–13654.
- 17. Jault J M, Allison W S. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:319–325.[PubMed]
- 18. Yasuda R, Noji H, Yoshida M, Kinosita K, Jr, Itoh H. Nature. 2001;410:898–904.[PubMed]



