DNA condensation in two dimensions.
Journal: 2001/February - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 0027-8424
Abstract:
We have found that divalent electrolyte counterions common in biological cells (Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Mn(2+) ) can condense anionic DNA molecules confined to two-dimensional cationic surfaces. DNA-condensing agents in vivo include cationic histones and polyamines spermidine and spermine with sufficiently high valence (Z) 3 or larger. In vitro studies show that electrostatic forces between DNA chains in bulk aqueous solution containing divalent counterions remain purely repulsive, and DNA condensation requires counterion valence Z>>/= 3. In striking contrast to bulk behavior, synchrotron x-ray diffraction and optical absorption experiments show that above a critical divalent counterion concentration the electrostatic forces between DNA chains adsorbed on surfaces of cationic membranes reverse from repulsive to attractive and lead to a chain collapse transition into a condensed phase of DNA tethered by divalent counterions. This demonstrates the importance of spatial dimensionality to intermolecular interactions where nonspecific counterion-induced electrostatic attractions between the like-charged polyelectrolytes overwhelm the electrostatic repulsions on a surface for Z = 2. This new phase, with a one-dimensional counterion liquid trapped between DNA chains at a density of 0.63 counterions per DNA bp, represents the most compact state of DNA on a surface in vitro and suggests applications in high-density storage of genetic information and organo-metallic materials processing.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(38)
References
(15)
Drugs
(1)
Chemicals
(11)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(1)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(26): 14046-14051

DNA condensation in two dimensions

Materials Department, Physics Department, and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Present address: Physikdepartment, Technische Universität München, Institut für Biophysik (E22), 85747 Garching, Germany.
To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: MRL, Room 2208, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106. E-mail: ude.bscu.lrm@aynifas.
Edited by David R. Nelson, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved September 22, 2000
Edited by David R. Nelson, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved September 22, 2000
Received 2000 Jun 23

Abstract

We have found that divalent electrolyte counterions common in biological cells (Ca, Mg, and Mn ) can condense anionic DNA molecules confined to two-dimensional cationic surfaces. DNA-condensing agents in vivo include cationic histones and polyamines spermidine and spermine with sufficiently high valence (Z) 3 or larger. In vitro studies show that electrostatic forces between DNA chains in bulk aqueous solution containing divalent counterions remain purely repulsive, and DNA condensation requires counterion valence Z ≥ 3. In striking contrast to bulk behavior, synchrotron x-ray diffraction and optical absorption experiments show that above a critical divalent counterion concentration the electrostatic forces between DNA chains adsorbed on surfaces of cationic membranes reverse from repulsive to attractive and lead to a chain collapse transition into a condensed phase of DNA tethered by divalent counterions. This demonstrates the importance of spatial dimensionality to intermolecular interactions where nonspecific counterion-induced electrostatic attractions between the like-charged polyelectrolytes overwhelm the electrostatic repulsions on a surface for Z = 2. This new phase, with a one-dimensional counterion liquid trapped between DNA chains at a density of 0.63 counterions per DNA bp, represents the most compact state of DNA on a surface in vitro and suggests applications in high-density storage of genetic information and organo-metallic materials processing.

Abstract

The existence of distinct states of DNA compaction is vital to the functions of viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotic cells (1). The more compact states lead to the efficient packing of colossal genomic DNA molecules within the small confines of the cell nucleus, the bacterial cytoplasm, and viral capsids. Equally important are the less compact states of DNA required during much of the cell life cycle to allow proteins access to the DNA template for a multitude of biological tasks (e.g., gene regulation, transcription, replication). The biologically relevant DNA-condensing agents in vivo include cationic proteins (e.g., histones) and polyamines such as spermidine and spermine with sufficiently high counterion valence (Z ≥ 3) (15). In bacteria, polyamine molecules such as spermine (4) and spermidine (3) are known to be critical for DNA compaction (1). Polyamines also are required in DNA catenation (interlocking) by topoisomerases, presumably for locally condensing neighboring DNA segments (1, 6).

There have been a number of theoretical (711) and experimental studies aimed at elucidating the fundamental physical mechanisms responsible for DNA condensation. Experimental studies done in vitro have found that DNA condensation from bulk solution critically depends on the valence of the counterions and that a valence of 3 or larger is required to overcome the inherently large electrostatic repulsive barrier between the like-charged polyelectrolytes (25). Furthermore, experiments show that counterions with Z = 2 simply provide screening of the electrostatic repulsions but do not lead to DNA collapse. It has been suggested that interactions between like-charged particles in electrolyte solutions may be affected in confined geometries near macroscopic surfaces. In particular, anionic colloidal spheres were found to attract each other in weak monovalent salt solutions near a surface (12, 13).

In this paper we show that the spatial dimension available to DNA plays a key role in the intermolecular interactions. Specifically, DNA chains adsorbed between cationic membranes within the lamellar (Lα) phase of cationic lipid (CL)-DNA complexes (1417) are found to undergo a collapse transition in the presence of simple divalent cationic biological salts, namely Ca, Mg, and Mn. Co also was used because its absorption peak in the visible at 512 nm allowed a direct measurement of binding to DNA in the collapsed phase. Synchrotron x-ray diffraction (XRD) and absorption measurements show that the collapsed phase consists of DNA chains electrostatically tethered by divalent counterions in two dimensions (2D). The trapped counterions form a novel one-dimensional (1D) liquid between the molecular chains at a density of 0.63 ions/DNA base pair. Thus, these simple divalent ions may play a critical role in controlling the compaction state of genomic nucleic acid, for example, in rod-shaped viruses where the genome is adsorbed onto a curved cationic protein surface. Furthermore, the observed enhanced counterion mediated attractive forces, leading to the DNA condensation for Z = 2 in 2D, may act between any like-charged polyelectrolyte macromolecules, such as cytoskeletal fibers or charged polypeptides adsorbed onto or near surfaces in vivo.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge discussions with R. Bruinsma, J. Israelachvili, P. Pincus, T. Lubensky, and G. Wong. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM59288, National Science Foundation Grant DMR-9972246, University of California Biotechnology Research and Education Program Training Grant 99–14, and Los Alamos-University of California Collaborative Grant CULAR STB-UC:99–216. The synchrotron x-ray experiments were carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Materials Research Laboratory at Santa Barbara is supported by National Science Foundation Grant NSF-DMR-0080034.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

2Dtwo-dimensional
CLcationic lipid
Zcounterion valence
XRDx-ray diffraction
1Done-dimensional
DOTAPdioleoyl trimethylammonium propane
DOPCdioleoyl phosphatidyl choline
SAXSsmall-angle x-ray-scattering
Abbreviations

Footnotes

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Lewin B Genes VII. London: Oxford Univ. Press; 1999. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bloomfield V A. Biopolymers. 1997;44:269–282.[PubMed]
  • 3. Wilson R W, Bloomfield V A. Biochemistry. 1979;18:2192–2196.[PubMed]
  • 4. Bloomfield V A. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6:334–343.[PubMed]
  • 5. Pelta J, Livolant F, Sikorav J-L. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:5656–5666.[PubMed]
  • 6. Krasnow M A, Cozzarelli N R. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:2687–2695.[PubMed]
  • 7. Oosawa F Polyelectrolytes. New York: Dekker; 1971. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gronbech-Jensen N, Mashl R J, Bruinsma R F, Gelbart W M. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78:2477–2480.[PubMed]
  • 9. Ha B-Y, Liu A J. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;79:1289–1292.[PubMed]
  • 10. Ha B-Y, Liu A J. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;81:1011–1013.[PubMed]
  • 11. Podgornik R, Parsegian V A. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;80:1560–1563.[PubMed]
  • 12. Larsen A E, Grier D G. Nature (London) 1997;385:230–233.[PubMed]
  • 13. Crocker J C, Grier D G. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77:1897–1900.[PubMed]
  • 14. Radler J O, Koltover I, Salditt T, Safinya C R. Science. 1997;275:810–814.[PubMed]
  • 15. Salditt T, Koltover I, Radler J O, Safinya C R. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;79:2582–2585.[PubMed]
  • 16. Salditt T, Koltover I, Raedler J O, Safinya C R. Phys Rev E. 1998;58:889–904.[PubMed]
  • 17. Koltover I, Salditt T, Radler J O, Safinya C R. Science. 1998;281:78–81.[PubMed]
  • 18. Wong G C L, Tang J X, Lin A, Li Y, Janmey P A, Safinya C R. Science. 2000;288:2035–2039.[PubMed]
  • 19. Friedmann T. Sci Am. 1997;276:96–101.[PubMed]
  • 20. Chesnoy S, Huang L. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000;29:27–47.[PubMed]
  • 21. Miller A D. Angew Chem Rev. 1998;37:1768–1785.[PubMed]
  • 22. Huang L, Hung M-C, Wagner E, editors. Nonviral Vectors for Gene Therapy. San Diego: Academic; 1999. [PubMed]
  • 23. Lasic D D, Strey H, Stuart M C A, Podgornik R, Frederik P M. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:832–833.[PubMed]
  • 24. Safinya C R, Koltover I In: Nonviral Vectors for Gene Therapy. Huang L, Hung M-C, Wagner E, editors. San Diego: Academic; 1999. pp. 91–117. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bruinsma R F. Eur Phys J B. 1998;4:75–88.[PubMed]
  • 26. Bruinsma R F, Mashl J. Europhys Lett. 1998;41:165–168.[PubMed]
  • 27. Harries D, May S, Gelbart W, Ben Shaul A. Biophys J. 1998;75:159–173.
  • 28. Dan N. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1369:34–41.[PubMed]
  • 29. O'Hern C S, Lubensky T C. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;80:4345–4348.[PubMed]
  • 30. Golubovic L, Golubovic M. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;80:4341–4344.[PubMed]
  • 31. Israelachvili J N Intermolecular and Surface Forces. London: Academic; 1985. p. 172. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 32. Roux D, Safinya C R. J Physiol (Paris) 1988;49:307–313.[PubMed]
  • 33. Alexander S, Chaikin P M, Grant P, Morales G J, Pincus P, Hone D. J Chem Phys. 1984;80:5776–5786.[PubMed]
  • 34. Ohnishi T, Imai N, Oosawa F. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1960;15:896–899.[PubMed]
  • 35. Israelachvili J N Intermolecular and Surface Forces. 2nd Ed. San Diego: Academic; 1992. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 36. Koltover I, Salditt T, Safinya C R. Biophys J. 1999;77:915–924.
  • 37. Fang Y, Yang J. Phys Chem B. 1997;101:3453–3456.[PubMed]
  • 38. Manning G S. J Chem Phys. 1969;51:924–939.[PubMed]
  • 39. Menes R, Pincus P, Pittman R, Dan N. Europhys Lett. 1998;44:393–396.[PubMed]
  • 40. Rau D C, Parsegian V A. Biophys J. 1992;61:246–254.
  • 41. Braun P V, Osenar P, Stupp S I. Nature (London) 1996;380:325–328.[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.