Chemotherapy dose adjustment for obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a survey on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Journal: 2015/September - Oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with malignant diseases is a significant challenge because limiting chemotherapy doses in these patients may negatively influence outcome. There is a paucity of information addressing high-dose chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
METHODS
The Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) designed an electronic survey to assess current practice of dose adjustment of chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing HSCT.
RESULTS
A total of 56 EBMT centers from 27 countries responded to the online survey. Overall, 45 centers declared that they routinely adjust chemotherapy doses for obese patients (80.5%), and only 11 (19.5%) declared they do not adjust dose. Among the former group, most used body mass index as the parameter for defining obesity (28 centers, 62%). The method for determining the weight for chemotherapy calculation was actual body weight (ABW) in 16 centers, ideal body weight (IBW) in 10 centers, IBW plus 25% of the difference between IBW and ABW in 16 centers, and other methods for the rest. Among centers that used dose adjustment, 44% also capped the dose at 2 m(2) for a chemotherapy dose based on body surface area (BSA), whereas 56% did not cap. Interestingly, most of the centers (9 of 11) that did not adjust dose for weight also did not cap the BSA at 2 m(2).
CONCLUSIONS
This EBMT survey revealed large diversity among transplant centers regarding dose-adjustment practice for high-dose conditioning chemotherapy. Our next step is to analyze outcomes of transplantation according to dose-adjustment practice and, subsequently, to formulate a methodology for future prospective studies.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(1)
References
(29)
Diseases
(1)
Conditions
(1)
Organisms
(1)
Processes
(1)
Anatomy
(1)
Affiliates
(2)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Oncologist 20(1): 50-55

Chemotherapy Dose Adjustment for Obese Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Survey on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

+2 authors

Background.

Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with malignant diseases is a significant challenge because limiting chemotherapy doses in these patients may negatively influence outcome. There is a paucity of information addressing high-dose chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods.

The Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) designed an electronic survey to assess current practice of dose adjustment of chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing HSCT.

Results.

A total of 56 EBMT centers from 27 countries responded to the online survey. Overall, 45 centers declared that they routinely adjust chemotherapy doses for obese patients (80.5%), and only 11 (19.5%) declared they do not adjust dose. Among the former group, most used body mass index as the parameter for defining obesity (28 centers, 62%). The method for determining the weight for chemotherapy calculation was actual body weight (ABW) in 16 centers, ideal body weight (IBW) in 10 centers, IBW plus 25% of the difference between IBW and ABW in 16 centers, and other methods for the rest. Among centers that used dose adjustment, 44% also capped the dose at 2 m for a chemotherapy dose based on body surface area (BSA), whereas 56% did not cap. Interestingly, most of the centers (9 of 11) that did not adjust dose for weight also did not cap the BSA at 2 m.

Conclusion.

This EBMT survey revealed large diversity among transplant centers regarding dose-adjustment practice for high-dose conditioning chemotherapy. Our next step is to analyze outcomes of transplantation according to dose-adjustment practice and, subsequently, to formulate a methodology for future prospective studies.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:
Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party and Registry, Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris University, Paris, France; San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (TIGET), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Hematology Department, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Onco-Hematology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Augsburg, Ludwing-Maximilinas-Universitat Munich, Germany
Corresponding author.
Contributed equally.
Correspondence: Noga Shem-Tov, M.D., Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel. Telephone: 972-3-5305340; E-Mail: li.vog.htlaeh.abehs@votmehs.agon
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party and Registry, Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris University, Paris, France; San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (TIGET), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Hematology Department, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Onco-Hematology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Augsburg, Ludwing-Maximilinas-Universitat Munich, Germany
Received 2014 May 8; Accepted 2014 Oct 13.

Abstract

Background.

Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with malignant diseases is a significant challenge because limiting chemotherapy doses in these patients may negatively influence outcome. There is a paucity of information addressing high-dose chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods.

The Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) designed an electronic survey to assess current practice of dose adjustment of chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing HSCT.

Results.

A total of 56 EBMT centers from 27 countries responded to the online survey. Overall, 45 centers declared that they routinely adjust chemotherapy doses for obese patients (80.5%), and only 11 (19.5%) declared they do not adjust dose. Among the former group, most used body mass index as the parameter for defining obesity (28 centers, 62%). The method for determining the weight for chemotherapy calculation was actual body weight (ABW) in 16 centers, ideal body weight (IBW) in 10 centers, IBW plus 25% of the difference between IBW and ABW in 16 centers, and other methods for the rest. Among centers that used dose adjustment, 44% also capped the dose at 2 m for a chemotherapy dose based on body surface area (BSA), whereas 56% did not cap. Interestingly, most of the centers (9 of 11) that did not adjust dose for weight also did not cap the BSA at 2 m.

Conclusion.

This EBMT survey revealed large diversity among transplant centers regarding dose-adjustment practice for high-dose conditioning chemotherapy. Our next step is to analyze outcomes of transplantation according to dose-adjustment practice and, subsequently, to formulate a methodology for future prospective studies.

Keywords: Obesity, Dose adjustment, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Conditioning
Abstract
Click here to view.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the 56 participating centers, which are listed in the supplemental online data.

Acknowledgments

References

  • 1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–1727.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:563–570.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 3. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, et al Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA. 1999;282:1530–1538.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, et al. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1097–1105.[PubMed]
  • 5. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1625–1638.[PubMed]
  • 6. McTiernan AObesity and cancer: The risks, science, and potential management strategies. Oncology (Williston Park) 2005;19:871–881; discussion 881–882, 885–886.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. Blouin RA, Kolpek JH, Mann HJInfluence of obesity on drug disposition. Clin Pharm. 1987;6:706–714.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pinkel DThe use of body surface area as a criterion of drug dosage in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 1958;18:853–856.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. Griggs JJ, Mangu PB, Anderson H, et al Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1553–1561.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Navarro WHImpact of obesity in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;31:961–966.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Grigg A, Harun MH, Szer JVariability in determination of body weight used for dosing busulphan and cyclophosphamide in adult patients: Results of an international survey. Leuk Lymphoma. 1997;25:487–491.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gratwohl A, Brand R, McGrath E, et al Use of the quality management system “JACIE” and outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2014;99:908–915.[Google Scholar]
  • 13. Griggs JJ, Sorbero ME, Lyman GHUndertreatment of obese women receiving breast cancer chemotherapy. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1267–1273.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al Impact of body mass index and weight change after treatment on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: Findings from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 89803. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4109–4115.[Google Scholar]
  • 15. Georgiadis MS, Steinberg SM, Hankins LA, et al Obesity and therapy-related toxicity in patients treated for small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:361–366.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. Poikonen P, Blomqvist C, Joensuu HEffect of obesity on the leukocyte nadir in women treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dosed according to body surface area. Acta Oncol. 2001;40:67–71.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rosner GL, Hargis JB, Hollis DR, et al Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 8541. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:3000–3008.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schwartz J, Toste B, Dizon DSChemotherapy toxicity in gynecologic cancer patients with a body surface area (BSA)>2 m2. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:53–56.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 19. Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Haller DG, et al Influence of body mass index on outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with colon carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;98:484–495.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D, et al Impact of body mass index on outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer: Findings from Intergroup Trial 0114. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:648–657.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. Barrett SV, Paul J, Hay A, et al Does body mass index affect progression-free or overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer? Results from SCOTROC I trial. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:898–902.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fleming DR, Rayens MK, Garrison JImpact of obesity on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant cell transplant patients: A matched case-controlled study. Am J Med. 1997;102:265–268.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hansen JA, Gooley TA, Martin PJ, et al Bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:962–968.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 24. Meloni G, Proia A, Capria S, et al Obesity and autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28:365–367.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fuji S, Kim SW, Yoshimura K, et al Possible association between obesity and posttransplantation complications including infectious diseases and acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:73–82.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nikolousis E, Nagra S, Paneesha S, et al Allogeneic transplant outcomes are not affected by body mass index (BMI) in patients with haematological malignancies. Ann Hematol. 2010;89:1141–1145.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sriharsha L, Lipton JH, Pond G, et al Examining the safety and efficacy of a chemotherapy dosing method in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients of extreme body size. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009;15:201–210.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 28. Navarro WH, Agovi MA, Logan BR, et al Obesity does not preclude safe and effective myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in adults. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:1442–1450.[Google Scholar]
  • 29. Weiss BM, Vogl DT, Berger NA, et al Trimming the fat: Obesity and hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:1152–1160.[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.