Adenosine Deaminase Levels in CSF of Tuberculous Meningitis Patients.
Journal: 2011/July - Journal of clinical medicine research
ISSN: 1918-3011
Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis kills five lakh patients in India every year, out of which 7-12 % are with meningeal involvement. Delay in its diagnosis and in initiation of treatment results in poor prognosis and sequlae in up to 25% of cases. The aim of the present study is to look for a simple, rapid, cost effective, non-invasive and fairly specific test in differentiating tubercular etiology from other causes.
METHODS
Forty patients between the age of 6 - 24 months attending hospital with symptoms and signs of meningitis were selected and divided into two groups: tubercular and non-tubercular, depending upon the accepted criteria. CSF was drawn and ADA estimated.
RESULTS
Out of 19 tubercular patients, 18 had CSF ADA at or above the cutoff value while one had below. Out of 21 non-tuberculous patients, two had ADA levels at or above the cutoff value while 19 had below this value. Results of our study indicate that ADA level estimation in CSF is not only of considerable value in the diagnosis of TBM, CSF ADA level 10 U/L as a cutoff value exhibited 94.73% sensitivity and 90.47% specificity in differentiating tuberculous from non-tuberculous meningitis; it also has 90.00% positive predictive value and 95.00% negative predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS
It can be concluded that ADA estimation in CSF is not only simple, inexpensive and rapid but also fairly specific method for making a diagnosis of tuberculous etiology in TBM, especially when there is a dilemma of differentiating the tuberculous etiology from non-tuberculous ones. For this reason ADA estimation in TBM may find a place as a routine investigation.
BACKGROUND
Cerebrospinal fluid; Adenosine deaminase; Tuberculous meningitis.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(8)
References
(20)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. Sep/30/2010; 2(5): 220-224
Published online Oct/10/2010

Adenosine Deaminase Levels in CSF of Tuberculous Meningitis Patients

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis kills five lakh patients in India every year, out of which 7-12 % are with meningeal involvement. Delay in its diagnosis and in initiation of treatment results in poor prognosis and sequlae in up to 25% of cases. The aim of the present study is to look for a simple, rapid, cost effective, non-invasive and fairly specific test in differentiating tubercular etiology from other causes.

Methods

Forty patients between the age of 6 - 24 months attending hospital with symptoms and signs of meningitis were selected and divided into two groups: tubercular and non-tubercular, depending upon the accepted criteria. CSF was drawn and ADA estimated.

Results

Out of 19 tubercular patients, 18 had CSF ADA at or above the cutoff value while one had below. Out of 21 non-tuberculous patients, two had ADA levels at or above the cutoff value while 19 had below this value. Results of our study indicate that ADA level estimation in CSF is not only of considerable value in the diagnosis of TBM, CSF ADA level 10 U/L as a cutoff value exhibited 94.73% sensitivity and 90.47% specificity in differentiating tuberculous from non-tuberculous meningitis; it also has 90.00% positive predictive value and 95.00% negative predictive value.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that ADA estimation in CSF is not only simple, inexpensive and rapid but also fairly specific method for making a diagnosis of tuberculous etiology in TBM, especially when there is a dilemma of differentiating the tuberculous etiology from non-tuberculous ones. For this reason ADA estimation in TBM may find a place as a routine investigation.

Keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; Adenosine deaminase; Tuberculous meningitis

Introduction

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is an endemic disease in developing countries [1], more so in low socio-economic status. Five lakh patients of tuberculosis die every year in India [2], 8.3 % of which is childhood tuberculosis. Multidrug resistance in tuberculosis and acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome (AIDS) further worsen the outcome of this disease [3]. Incidence of TBM in developing countries is 7-12%. Delay in diagnosis and so in the start of effective treatment results in poor prognosis and sequalae in up to 25% of cases [4]. Available methods of diagnosis of TBM were evaluated [5] and all of them were found to have low sensitivity and specificity.

The newer methods for diagnosing tubercular disease is based on pheno- and genotypic methods. For the detection of acid fast bacilli (AFB) in a smear, light microscopy is a common, rapid and specific method and is used the world over with a detection rate of 30-40% [6]. Sensitivity of culture on Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium is higher than microscopy but it needs several weeks of incubation. A number of genotypic assays based on nucleic acid amplification have been designed including GenProbe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test, Roche Amplicor MTB test, Cobas Amplicor test, Abbott LCx test, and the BD-Probe Tec (strand displacement amplification) test [7-11]. However, high cost involved in these tests prevents them to be widely used especially in developing countries.

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is an enzyme in the purine salvage pathway that catalyzes the conversion of adenosine and deoxyadenosine to inosine and deoxyinosine respectively with the release of ammonia. It plays important role in differentiating lymphoid cells and is present in abundance in active T-lymphocytes whose concentration is inversely proportional to the degree of differentiation [12]. Its levels are ten times higher in T-lymphocytes than in erythrocytes. The enzyme activity increases during mitogenic and antigenic responses of lymphocytes and T-lymphocyte blastogenesis can be inhibited by inhibitors of ADA. Likewise, a deficiency of adenosine deaminase is associated with severe defects in the cell mediated and the humoral arms of the immune system, predisposing the patient to opportunistic infections.

ADA is released by T cells during cell mediated immune response (CMI) to the tubercle bacilli. ADA is now being recognized as a marker of cell mediated immunity particularly as a marker of T lymphocyte activation. Adenosine deaminase levels (ADA) have also been considered by several researchers to differentiate tubercular disease from non-tubercular [13-17].

Different modalities to support the diagnosis in cases of TBM have to be considered because the cytological and biochemical analysis of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) have a considerable overlap. As few studies have been conducted to evaluate the role of CSF ADA levels for the diagnosis of TBM, we tried to estimate ADA levels in CSF in TBM and to find out its role as a sensitive, accurate, rapid, and affordable diagnostic tool that will work in resource-limited settings in confirming the tubercular etiology in cases of meningitis.

Patients and Methods

Routine procedures of history taking, examination and routine investigations were followed. Forty patients between the age of six months to two years having symptoms and signs of meningitis, admitted in the Pediatrics ward from July 2009 to June 2010 at the Subharti Medical College, Meerut, India were included in the present study.

Presence of first or more than one of the following criteria was adopted to label a case as tuberculous:

  • Bacteriological proof of presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
  • Biopsy showing caseating granulomas.
  • Clinico- radiological findings consistent with TB.
  • Definite clinical and radiological improvement in one month after specific anti-tubercular treatment.
  • History of contact with current disease and positive reaction (> 20 mm induration) to 5 tuberculin unit (TU) purified protein derivative (PPD).

Lumbar puncture was done in each case and at least 2 ml of CSF was collected in a sterile vial. Hemorrhagic CSF was excluded from the study. This CSF was subjected to biochemical and microscopic examination. ADA activity was estimated in all these patients by the method of Guisti [18] and was expressed as U/L. Cutoff reference range of 10 U/L CSF ADA was taken as positive.

Results

Out of 40 patients, 28 children were male and 12 patients were female (Table 1). Nineteen patients (47.5%) having fulfilled the criteria were labeled as tubercular, while the other 21 (52.5%) were labeled as non-tubercular (Table 2). Only two (10.52%) patients in 19 tubercular had evidence of presence of Mycobacterium.

Table 1
Distribution of the Cases According to Sex
SexNumber of cases
Male28
Female12
Total40
Table 2
Distribution of the Cases According to Accepted Criteria
GroupNumber of cases
Tuberculous19 (47.5%)
Non-tuberculous21 (52.5%)
Total40

Out of these 19 tuberculous patients, 18 patients were found to be having CSF ADA at or above the cutoff value while only one had below cutoff value. Of the 21 patients labeled non-tuberculous, two patients were found to be having CSF ADA at or above the cutoff value while 19 had values below the cutoff (Table 3).

Table 3
Distribution of the Cases According to Set Criteria and CSF ADA Levels
GroupNumber of casesADA levels in U/LMean SDt calP-value
Tuberculous19ADA ≥ 101827.1684
ADA < 100122.7660
Non-tuberculous21ADA ≥ 10026.06194.01730.0007
ADA < 10192.5714(p < .01)*
Total4040
*(p < 0.01) shows a highly significant difference between the tuberculous and non-tuberculous groups.

In tuberculous group ADA activity in CSF ranged between 9.2 to 110 U/L with a median of 22, mean SD as 27.1684 (ADA ≥ 10) and 22.7660 (ADA < 10). While in non-tuberculous group ADA activity ranged between 2 to 10.5 U/L with a median of 6, mean SD as 6.0619 (ADA ≥ 10) and 2.5714 (ADA < 10).

On comparison of the values of CSF ADA in the two groups, t cal is 4.0173 and the difference in these two values was found highly significant (p < 0.01) (Table 3).

Discussion

Demonstration of AFB in CSF, CSF culture, CSF cytology, and genomic amplification are the various means to confirm the etiology of TBM but visualization of AFB in direct smears or in cultures of CSF is usually difficult [19] and in most cases negative. Newer methods such as those involving bacterial genomic amplifications by PCR or other comparable methods, are not available for widespread use in the developing countries.

Routine CSF laboratory findings may not be helpful to differentiate tuberculous etiology in meningitis from other causes. The aim is to look for a simple and rapid test that can help in the diagnosis of TBM and differentiate it from other causes with fairly good accuracy.

ADA has been considered as a marker of cell-mediated immunity and its activity has been observed in various infections including TBM. Considering that both humoral and cell-mediated immunity play an important role in TBM infection, it has been suggested that ADA activity in CSF may help differentiate TBM from non-TBM infectious meningitis.

CSF - ADA estimation was reported to be useful in diagnosing TBM and to differentiate TBM from normal subject or patients with other neurological disorders [20]. CSF - ADA estimation is a useful method to differentiate TBM from aseptic meningitis [13]. Other researchers have also observed the usefulness of CSF-ADA activity in the diagnosis of TBM [21, 22].

In the present study CSF - ADA level 10 U/L as a cut-off value differentiate tuberculous from non-tuberculous meningitis. We have observed a highly statistically significant difference in the CSF - ADA levels of meningitis due to tuberculosis and non-tuberculous etiology (P < .01) (Table 3). Results of our study indicate that ADA levels in CSF are of considerable value in diagnosis of TBM and in differentiating this disease from others because a cut-off CSF - ADA level of 10 U/L exhibited fairly high accuracy with sensitivity of 94.73%, specificity of 90.47% for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. In addition to this, the positive predictive value of test is 90.00% with overall accuracy being 95.00% (Table 4). In cases where there is a dilemma in confirming the etiology, CSF ADA levels help in reaching out to a conclusion, and depending upon the values of ADA, patient may be diagnosed and treated.

Table 4
Distribution of the Cases According to True and False Positivity and Negativity and Statistical Accuracy
Cell EntriesNumber of CasesStatistical Indices of Diagnostic AccuracyPercentage
True Positive18Sensitivity94.73%
False Negative01Specificity90.47%
True Negative19Positive predictive valve90.00 %
False Positive02Negative predictive value95.00%

Levels of ADA in CSF of adult patients of TBM have been evaluated in earlier studies [12-14]. Raised levels of ADA in CSF are not specific to meningeal inflammatory disease but it can be a test for confirming its etiology with good predictive value. Raised ADA levels have also been noted in other conditions particularly in certain intracranial tumors [15].

Gupta et al [16] observed that adenosine deaminase levels in nontuberculous disease rarely exceeded the cut-off; set for tuberculous disease. They [17] have further observed that ADA estimation is not only a fairly sensitive and specific test (more than 90 %), helpful in differentiating tubercular from non-tubercular etiology; both in pulmonary and extra-pulmonary disease but is also simple, inexpensive and rapid. For this reason this test may help in early diagnosis, improve the prognosis and reduce spread of disease and sequlae.

The mean ADA levels in CSF of TBM cases of pediatric age groups have been reported to be ranging between 11.6-13.7 U/L in earlier study [12]. A level 15.7 - 21.3 U/L has been observed in adult TBM patients [13, 14]. These results show that levels of ADA vary in different age groups. In our study CSF ADA levels were found to be 9.2 to 110 U/L in tuberculous group with a median of 22, mean SD as 27.1684 (ADA ≥ 10) and 22.7660 (ADA < 10); while in non-tuberculous group ADA activity ranged between 2 to 10.5 U/L with a median of 6, mean SD as 6.0619 (ADA ≥ 10) and 2.5714 (ADA < 10). All the patients were between the age group of 6 to 24 months. This may be due to difference in immunological reactivity to tubercular antigen in children as compared to adults.

Kashyap et al take cutoff value of 11.39 U/L and has obtained sensitivity of 82% and specificity as 83% in TBM cases [15]. Rana et al take 10 U/L as cutoff value for diagnosis of TBM and found sensitivity 66.6% and specificity 90% [23]. Baheti et al found that CSF ADA may differentiate tuberculous from non-tuberculous meningitis even at a cut-off level of 6.5 U/L [24].

In the present study, median ADA levels in CSF were significantly high in TBM patients as compared to those with other etiologies. Ribera et al have also demonstrated similar finding but his study was in TBM patients of adult age group [25].

In conclusion, we found the sensitivity of the test to be 94.73%; specificity 90.47%, positive predictive value is 90.00 % and negative predictive value 95.00%, and so it can be concluded that ADA estimation in CSF is not only simple, inexpensive and rapid but also fairly specific method for making a diagnosis of tuberculous etiology in TBM, especially when there is a dilemma of differentiating the tuberculous etiology from non-tuberculous. For this reason CSF ADA estimation in TBM may find a place as a routine investigation.

References

  • 1. MastroianniCMPaolettiFLichtnerMD'AgostinoCVulloVDeliaSCerebrospinal fluid cytokines in patients with tuberculous meningitisClin Immunol Immunopathol1997842171176[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 2. TandonP.N.ChopraJ.S.SawhneyI.M.S.Neurotuberculosis: Clinical aspectsNeurology in Tripica1999Churchill Livingstone Ltd.358389[Google Scholar]
  • 3. ThwaitesGChauTTMaiNTDrobniewskiFMcAdamKFarrarJTuberculous meningitisJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2000683289299[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 4. Garcia-MoncoJ.C.MarraC.M.CNS TuberculosisNeurologic Clinics1741999737760[Google Scholar]
  • 5. BothamleyGHSerological diagnosis of tuberculosisEur Respir JSuppl199520676s-688s[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 6. SteingartKRHenryMNgVHopewellPCRamsayACunninghamJUrbanczikRet alFluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic reviewLancet Infect Dis200669570581[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 7. AbeCHiranoKWadaMKazumiYTakahashiMFukasawaYYoshimuraTet alDetection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct TestJ Clin Microbiol1993311232703274[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 8. BeavisKGLichtyMBJungkindDLGigerOEvaluation of Amplicor PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum specimensJ Clin Microbiol1995331025822586[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 9. DownJAO'ConnellMADeyMSWaltersAHHowardDRLittleMCKeatingWEet alDetection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens by strand displacement amplification of DNAJ Clin Microbiol1996344860865[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. LachnikJAckermannBBohrssenAMaassSDiephausCPunckenAStermannMet alRapid-cycle PCR and fluorimetry for detection of MycobacteriaJ Clin Microbiol200240933643373[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yeboah-ManuDYatesMDWilsonSMApplication of a simple multiplex PCR to aid in routine work of the Mycobacterium reference laboratoryJ Clin Microbiol2001391141664168[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 12. SharmaSKMohanAAdenosine deaminase in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusionIndian J Chest Dis Allied Sci19963826971[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 13. MalanCDonaldPRGoldenMTaljaardJJAdenosine deaminase levels in cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitisJ Trop Med Hyg19848713340[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 14. PirasM.A.GakisC.CFS.adenosine deaminase activity in tuberculous meningitisEnzyme1972-7314311317[Google Scholar]
  • 15. KashyapRSKainthlaRPMudaliarAVPurohitHJTaoriGMDaginawalaHFCerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase activity: a complimentary tool in the early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitisCerebrospinal Fluid Res200635[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 16. GuptaB KBharatVinayBandyopadhyayDebapriyaRole of Adenosine deaminase estimation in differentiation of tuberculous and non-tuberculous exudative pleural effusionsJ Clin Med Res42010227984[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 17. GuptaB KBharatVinayBandyopadhyayDebapriyaSensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of Adenosine deaminase in patients of Tubercular and Non-Tubercular Serosal Effusion in IndiaJ Clin Med Res6201023121126[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 18. GiustiGBergmeyerH.U.Adenosine deaminaseMethod of enzymatic analysisII1974FloridaVCH Weinheim1072[Google Scholar]
  • 19. MolaviALeFrockJLTuberculous meningitisMed Clin North Am1985692315331[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 20. BlakeJBermanPThe use of adenosine deaminase assays in the diagnosis of tuberculosisS Afr Med J19826211921[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 21. PrasadRKumarAKhannaBKCSF - ADA for diagnosis of TBMInd J Tub19913899102[Google Scholar]
  • 22. MishraOPLoiwalVAliZNathGChandraLDasBKCerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase activity and C-reactive protein in tuberculous and partially treated bacterial meningitisIndian Pediatr1995328886889[PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 23. SatyaVati RanaRajKumar SinghalKartarSinghLataKumarAdenosine Deaminase levels in Cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic test for Tuberculous Meningitis in childrenIndian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry200419259[Google Scholar]
  • 24. RajeshBahetiPurnimaLaddhaRSGehlotCSF - Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) Activity in Various Types of MeningitisJournal, Indian Academy of Clinical MedicineOct-Dec20012428587[Google Scholar]
  • 25. RiberaEMartinez-VazquezJMOcanaISeguraRMPascualCActivity of adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis and follow-up of tuberculous meningitis in adultsJ Infect Dis19871554603607[PubMed][Google Scholar]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.