Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in disease resistance in tobacco.
Journal: 2001/April - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 0027-8424
Abstract:
Hypersensitive response (HR), a form of programmed cell death, is frequently associated with plant disease resistance. It has been proposed that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades regulate HR cell death based on pharmacological studies by using kinase inhibitors. However, direct evidence is lacking. Here, we demonstrate that NtMEK2, a MAPK kinase, is upstream of salicylic acid-induced protein kinase (SIPK) and wounding-induced protein kinase (WIPK), two tobacco MAPKs that are activated by various pathogens or pathogen-derived elicitors. Expression of a constitutively active mutant of NtMEK2 induces HR-like cell death in tobacco, which is preceded by the activation of endogenous SIPK and WIPK. In addition, NtMEK2-SIPK/WIPK cascade appears to control the expression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMGR) and l-phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), two defense genes encoding key enzymes in the phytoalexin and salicylic acid biosynthesis pathways. These results demonstrate that a plant MAPK cascade controls multiple defense responses against pathogen invasion.
Relations:
Content
Citations
(125)
References
(36)
Drugs
(3)
Chemicals
(7)
Genes
(1)
Organisms
(5)
Processes
(10)
Anatomy
(2)
Affiliates
(1)
Similar articles
Articles by the same authors
Discussion board
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(2): 741-746

Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in disease resistance in tobacco

Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri–Columbia, 117 Schweitzer Hall, Columbia, MO 65211
Present address: Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: ude.iruossim@hsgnahz.
Edited by Noel T. Keen, University of California, Riverside, CA, and approved November 14, 2000
Edited by Noel T. Keen, University of California, Riverside, CA, and approved November 14, 2000
Received 2000 Sep 11

Abstract

Hypersensitive response (HR), a form of programmed cell death, is frequently associated with plant disease resistance. It has been proposed that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades regulate HR cell death based on pharmacological studies by using kinase inhibitors. However, direct evidence is lacking. Here, we demonstrate that NtMEK2, a MAPK kinase, is upstream of salicylic acid-induced protein kinase (SIPK) and wounding-induced protein kinase (WIPK), two tobacco MAPKs that are activated by various pathogens or pathogen-derived elicitors. Expression of a constitutively active mutant of NtMEK2 induces HR-like cell death in tobacco, which is preceded by the activation of endogenous SIPK and WIPK. In addition, NtMEK2-SIPK/WIPK cascade appears to control the expression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMGR) and l-phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), two defense genes encoding key enzymes in the phytoalexin and salicylic acid biosynthesis pathways. These results demonstrate that a plant MAPK cascade controls multiple defense responses against pathogen invasion.

Abstract

The active defense mechanisms of plants against invading pathogens often include rapid cell death, known as the hypersensitive response (HR), the activation of a complex array of defense genes, and the production of antimicrobial phytoalexins (1, 2). Several lines of evidence suggest HR cell death during plant disease resistance is a form of programmed cell death, as it requires active transcription and translation and is genetically defined (35). Although the details for the regulation and execution of HR remain poorly understood, production of reactive oxygen species, ion fluxes, protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and gene activation have been implicated in the process (5). In addition to these local responses, the uninfected portions of the plant usually develop systemic acquired resistance, which is manifested as enhanced resistance to a subsequent challenge by the initial or even unrelated pathogens (2).

Plant-defense responses are initiated by the recognition of pathogens, which is mediated either by a gene-for-gene interaction between a plant resistance (R) gene and a pathogen avirulence (Avr) gene or by the binding of nonrace-specific elicitors such as elicitins to a putative receptor (1, 69). Signals generated by such interactions are transduced into cellular responses via several interlinked pathways. Recent studies suggest that plant mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade is one of the converging points after the perception of different pathogens and pathogen-derived elicitors (1015).

MAPK cascades are major pathways by which extracellular stimuli are transduced into intracellular responses in yeast and mammalian cells (16, 17). The basic assembly of MAPK cascade is a three-kinase module conserved in all eukaryotes. MAPK, the last kinase in the three-kinase cascade, is activated by dual phosphorylation of Thr and Tyr residues in a TXY motif by MAPK kinase (MAPKK). MAPKK is, in turn, activated by MAPKK kinase. In mammals, three of the five subgroups of the MAPK family, the stress-activated protein kinase/Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK), the p38 kinase, and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 5, are activated in response to various stress signals, including UV and ionizing radiation, hyperosmolarity, oxidative stress, and cytokines (16, 17). The outcome of SAPK/JNK and/or p38 activation depends on the magnitude and duration of their activation. A transient activation of these MAPKs induces various defense responses and allows the cells to adapt to an adverse environment. By contrast, a persistent activation leads to apoptosis (16, 17).

The induction of MAPK-like activities has been associated with HR cell death in tobacco cells treated with xylanase, a fungal elicitor from Trichoderma viride and Arabidopsis cells treated with harpin, a bacterial elicitor from Pseudomonas syringae pv. Syringae (18, 19). Through the use of kinase inhibitors, we linked the activation of salicylic acid (SA)-induced protein kinase (SIPK) and wounding-induced protein kinase (WIPK), two tobacco MAPKs, to HR cell death induced by fungal elicitins (20). SIPK was first identified as SA-induced protein kinase (21). It is also activated by various biotic and abiotic stresses, much like mammalian JNK/SAPK (12, 16). WIPK, which was first cloned as a gene whose transcript is induced by wounding (22), is activated by pathogens and pathogen-derived elicitors as well (10, 11, 20). Its ortholog in parsley, ERMK, is also implicated in plant-defense response (13). However, the exact roles of these MAPKs remain unknown. Here, we report the identification of NtMEK2, a tobacco MAPKK. as the upstream kinase for both SIPK and WIPK based on in vitro and in vivo evidence. Expression of NtMEK2, a constitutively active mutant of NtMEK2, activates endogenous SIPK and WIPK and leads to HR-like cell death and the activation of a subset of defense genes, demonstrating that the NtMEK2-SIPK/WIPK cascade controls multiple defense responses during plant disease resistance.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. N.-H. Chua (Rockefeller Univ., New York) for pTA7002 vector; Drs. D. Klessig and A. Guo (Rutgers Univ., Piscataway, NJ) for tobacco cDNA library and HMGR and LOX cDNA clones; Drs. W. Folk and A. Kenzior (Univ. of Missouri, Columbia) for plasmid-carrying Ω-leader sequence and Flag epitope; and Drs. T. Guilfoyle, D. Randall, and J. Walker for critical reading of the manuscript. S.Z. is supported by National Science Foundation and University of Missouri–Monsanto grants. K.Y. was partially supported by a Korea Science and Engineering Foundation fellowship.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
MAPKKMAPK kinase
SAsalicylic acid
SIPKsalicylic acid-induced protein kinase
WIPKwounding-induced protein kinase
HRhypersensitive response
MBPmyelin basic protein
SAPKstress-activated protein kinase
JNKJun N-terminal kinase
DEXdexamethasone
Abbreviations

Footnotes

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF325168","term_id":"12484127","term_text":"AF325168"}}AF325168).

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Scheel D. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998;1:305–310.[PubMed]
  • 2. Yang Y, Shah J, Klessig D F. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1621–1639.[PubMed]
  • 3. Pennell R I, Lamb C. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1157–1168.
  • 4. Greenberg J T, Guo A, Klessig D F, Ausubel F M. Cell. 1994;77:551–563.[PubMed]
  • 5. Richberg M H, Aviv D H, Dangl J L. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998;1:480–485.[PubMed]
  • 6. Keen N T. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:447–463.[PubMed]
  • 7. Staskawicz B J, Ausubel F M, Baker B J, Ellis J G, Jones J D G. Science. 1995;268:661–667.[PubMed]
  • 8. Martin G B. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999;2:273–279.[PubMed]
  • 9. Ricci P In: Plant-Microbe Interaction. Stacey G, Keen N T, editors. Vol. 3. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1997. pp. 53–75. [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhang S, Klessig D F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7433–7438.
  • 11. Romeis T, Piedras P, Zhang S, Klessig D F, Hirt H, Jones J D G. Plant Cell. 1999;11:273–287.
  • 12. Zhang S, Klessig D F. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2000;27:65–84.[PubMed]
  • 13. Ligterink W, Kroj T, zur Nieden U, Hirt H, Scheel D. Science. 1997;276:2054–2057.[PubMed]
  • 14. Lebrun-Garcia A, Ouaked F, Chiltz A, Pugin A. Plant J. 1998;15:773–781.[PubMed]
  • 15. Stratmann J W, Ryan C A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:11085–11089.
  • 16. Kyriakis J M, Avruch J. BioEssays. 1996;18:567–577.[PubMed]
  • 17. Widmann C, Gibson S, Jarpe M B, Johnson G L. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:143–180.[PubMed]
  • 18. Suzuki K, Yano A, Shinshi H. Plant Physiol. 1999;119:1465–1472.
  • 19. Desikan R, Clarke A, Atherfold P, Hancock J T, Neill S J. Planta. 1999;210:97–103.[PubMed]
  • 20. Zhang S, Liu Y, Klessig D F. Plant J. 2000;23:339–347.[PubMed]
  • 21. Zhang S, Klessig D F. Plant Cell. 1997;9:809–824.
  • 22. Seo S, Okamoto M, Seto H, Ishizuka K, Sano H, Ohashi Y. Science. 1995;270:1988–1992.[PubMed]
  • 23. Zhang S, Du H, Klessig D F. Plant Cell. 1998;10:435–449.
  • 24. Aoyama T, Chua N-H. Plant J. 1997;11:605–612.[PubMed]
  • 25. Liu Y, Zhang S, Klessig D F. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact. 2000;13:118–124.[PubMed]
  • 26. Mansour S J, Matten W T, Hermann A S, Candia J M, Rong S, Fukasawa K, VandeWounde G F, Ahn N G. Science. 1994;265:966–970.[PubMed]
  • 27. Wurgler-Murphy S M, Maeda T, Witten E A, Saito H. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:1289–1297.
  • 28. Tang X, Frederick R D, Zhou J, Halterman D A, Jia Y, Martin G B. Science. 1996;274:2060–2063.[PubMed]
  • 29. Delaney T P, Uknes S, Vernooij B, Friedrich L, Weymann K, Negrotto D, Gaffney T, Gut-Rella M, Kessmann H, Ward E, Ryals J. Science. 1994;266:1247–1250.[PubMed]
  • 30. Hammerschmidt R. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1999;37:285–306.[PubMed]
  • 31. Dixon R A, Paiva N L. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1085–1097.
  • 32. Veronesi C, Rickauer M, Fournier J, Pouenat M L, Esquerre-Tugaye M T. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:997–1004.
  • 33. Zhang S, Klessig D F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7225–7230.
  • 34. Levine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R, Lamb C. Cell. 1994;79:583–595.[PubMed]
  • 35. He S Y, Bauer D W, Collmer A, Beer S V. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1994;7:289–292.[PubMed]
  • 36. Zhou J, Loh Y-T, Bressan R A, Martin G B. Cell. 1995;83:925–935.[PubMed]
  • 37. Kovtun Y, Chiu W-L, Tena G, Sheen J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2940–2945.
  • 38. Tournier C, Hess P, Yang D D, Xu J, Turner T K, Nimnual A, Bar-Sagi D, Jones S N, Flavell R A, Davis R J. Science. 2000;288:870–874.[PubMed]
Collaboration tool especially designed for Life Science professionals.Drag-and-drop any entity to your messages.